NASSiM HARAMEiN with The NEW ENERGY MOVEMENT

[THE eXchanger]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDvZGKlxL1Q&feature=PlayList&p=AE40F5BF8FC 21C3F&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=35

YouTube - Nassim Haramein with New Energy Movement

NOW, here's a guy firing on all 12 dna strands !!!

[THE eXchanger]

here's is the first of 45

www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPgII_4ciFU

YouTube - Nassim Haramein 1/45

go to youtube, to find the rest of them

[cosmictexan]

Nassim is my favorite scientist. He has many great lectures online. To me this is his best (your link to 1 of 45) and covers eight hours, but it goes by quickly because he is so fascinating and has a different way of looking at everything. This man is definately working on all 12 strands.

[THE eXchanger]

Post Comparison- his blog
http://theresonanceproject.org/blog/

[THE eXchanger]

- http://theresonanceproject.org his website

[THE eXchanger]

Nassim Haramein on synchronicity

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VkuqDABTMo

YouTube - Nassim Haramein on synchronicity[/ame]
+ xxx

[Vidya Moksha]

The 8 hour presentation is available in 2 parts on google. The first part is here: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6151699791256390335&hl=en
For what its worth, I believe Nassim's understanding to be quite profound. He has joined so many dots in my own search and I am extremely pleased to have found his work.
The fractal nature of the universe seems so obvious now! :thumb_yello:
And to visualise the Earth's orbit as a spiral through space rather than describing the same circle is just...well, wonderful, and so simply obvious, zoroaster was on the mark all that time ago...
anyway, enough, do yourselves a favour if you havent seen this work yet...Enjoy!

[Unified Serenity]

I only found him a month or two ago and he is definitely well worth listening to. He shares some fantastic information on things he has been able to prove that most scientists said were impossible. I'd watch it again, and I have been looking for updates from that 8 hour film.

Share any videos you have come across after that date please :D

[Luminari]

..I have been looking for updates from that 8 hour film..

Share any videos you have come across after that date please :D


This video (1:43:27 duration)is 3 years more recent than the 8 hour one but is filmed at the same location.
http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=4907540922643918266&ei=Ha-ASuPQFIeUwgOy2ejADQ&q=crossing+the+event+horizon+nassim&hl=en&client=firefox-a


I have his full Crossing the Event horizon dvd set which is highly recommended, most of it is not available yet online though here is a small part of it:

YouTube - Crossing the Event Horizon: Another Cycle Begins - p. 1 of 3

YouTube - Crossing the Event Horizon: Another Cycle Begins - p. 2 of 3

YouTube - Crossing the Event Horizon: Another Cycle Begins - p. 3 of 3

[WinterWolf]

Ah yes. Nassim. I remember Sleepingnomore introducing his youtube vids to me before she left. I think she even posted some. I don't recall where though..


He's rather interesting.


Winter Wolf

[Luminari]

He's rather interesting.




Understatement of the year :mfr_lol:

Sounds like you better watch the 8 hour one WinterWolf :thumb_yello:

[Antonia]

I love Nassim Haramien's work so much that i've listened to his two eight hour lectures twice (I'm a bit slow the first time round computing) as well as every thing else he's got on the net...

Everything makes so much sense... the fractal nature of the universe fits in to what many of the channels say about what happens on Earth affecting the whole univesre... in the paridigm shift thats upon us... If this planet is a living genetic liberary of many life froms in this universe.. raising the vibration here will radiate out and affect all other life forms.. The hundred monkey effect... Hopefully the co-insiding lifeforms will be radiating higher vibrational energy back this way too, a symbiotic effect...

A universal dimentional leap...

[THE eXchanger]

Post Comparison- Nassim rocks !!!
+ xxx

[Vidya Moksha]

Just found out that Nassim appeared on coast to coast, i havent had time to listen yet..
its here: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2009/08/18
but i see its subscription only....not sure i have the cash right now, if anyone hears this and can recommend then please post here...

[JesterTerrestrial]

Nassim Haramein on Coast to Coast AM August 18th 2009

http://theresonanceproject.org http://www.coasttocoastam.com Nassim shared his Unified Theory about the structure of the universe, drawing from such fields as theoretical physics, cosmology, quantum mechanics, biology, chemistry, and anthropology. We could be part of a multiverse, he noted, in the sense that our universe is probably embedded into a larger universe, which itself is embedded in a larger universe, and so on, scaling into infinity. While the material world makes up less than 99.9% of our universe, the space around it is not empty-- rather it's a vacuum that's filled with energy and only appears empty because it's everywhere, he explained. Haramein suggested that all organized matter from black holes to atoms share basic properties and structures on different scales. Inside a single proton is the energy of the universe, and since all protons are connected (in what is called entanglement), everything that exists is part of a oneness, he stated. Access to infinity is within ourselves, through the very atoms of our being, he continued. Eliminating the strong and weak forces of the atomic world, Haramein's Unified Theory is based on the fundamental forces of gravity and the electromagnetic, which are in a feedback loop, and cause the universe to expand and contract at the same time. He has formed the Resonance Project to bring scientists and physicists together to further research unified theories and applications.


PLAYLIST
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=20BE35C3499A21DE

:)

[solitaryman]

Since Hubble telescope is sending cosmic pictures I was seeing similarities with histology.Hubble is using filters and histology is using coloring agents.I started thinking that the comos is a living entity and that we are just an organ or organels whitin this entity.

[lucrum]

That's sort of the world within world within world concept. :)

Say the cosmos is a living entity, with us and everything else we know inside it. This entity would probably live alongside with other entities like it. These again only a tiny part of another entity...and so it goes for all eternity... :)

Cool thought to play with though!

Edit: You said it Jester, I just didn't read it... *blush*

[THE eXchanger]

Thanks for posting his coast to coast :)

[waitinginthewings]

Nassim Haramein on Coast to Coast AM August 18th 2009

http://theresonanceproject.org http://www.coasttocoastam.com Nassim shared his Unified Theory about the structure of the universe, drawing from such fields as theoretical physics, cosmology, quantum mechanics, biology, chemistry, and anthropology. We could be part of a multiverse, he noted, in the sense that our universe is probably embedded into a larger universe, which itself is embedded in a larger universe, and so on, scaling into infinity. While the material world makes up less than 99.9% of our universe, the space around it is not empty-- rather it's a vacuum that's filled with energy and only appears empty because it's everywhere, he explained. Haramein suggested that all organized matter from black holes to atoms share basic properties and structures on different scales. Inside a single proton is the energy of the universe, and since all protons are connected (in what is called entanglement), everything that exists is part of a oneness, he stated. Access to infinity is within ourselves, through the very atoms of our being, he continued. Eliminating the strong and weak forces of the atomic world, Haramein's Unified Theory is based on the fundamental forces of gravity and the electromagnetic, which are in a feedback loop, and cause the universe to expand and contract at the same time. He has formed the Resonance Project to bring scientists and physicists together to further research unified theories and applications.


PLAYLIST
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=20BE35C3499A21DE

:)

I cliked on the youtube link to watch the vids & got this....can you believe this.....wtf


"This video has been removed due to terms of use violation."
can't watch any of Nassiems vids.....I am really sick of not being able to access vids in this ............country. It is happening so much now......sorry momentary rant of frustration. I love this mans work....so I'm p.....d off.

[Boober]

Ah yes Nassim Haramein , Mr. 64 tetrahedron himself. His stuff is amazing, its good to see a post on him, finally on avalon. Another guy to check out is Marko Rodin which im sure you guys have heard of. There are some cool videos of both of them together btw, on youtube. The only thing is I just saw a segment or newscast thing on Nassim Haramein and his wife and how she was able to have an orgasm when she gave birth. It kind of rubbed me the wrong way. It was a cool concept though.

[truth and integrity]

I watched Nassim Haramein several months ago. I thought that it was an interesting theory to explore. However, when I saw his video “Crossing the Event Horizon-Unlocking the Mystery” my BS detector was turn on. Is he using Grand Unified Theory to promote a specific spiritual agenda? Hmm.. he placed the tree of life on the ceiling and discovered mystery of life. Perhaps. But physics is quantitative and mathematical science. Since I do not have the physics background to review his theory, I was curious what people in this field have to say. They discussed specific elements of his theory showing inconsistencies and some absurdity. Hard to understand for somebody who is not a physicist. Others have brought very interesting points:


1. Nassim does not publish his papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals. All his papers are published on his website or in journal that are not accepted as legit science journals.

2. Why would he try so hard to pretend to be peer-reviewed? He was reviewed by a private association with no credential at all. The paper he was awarded is not even published in real science journal.

3. As long he is not reviewed by an acknowledged panel his work is potentially rubbish/ potentially good science.

I will wait.

Best regards,

[Aztar]

1. Nassim does not publish his papers in peer-reviewed scientific journals. All his papers are published on his website or in journal that are not accepted as legit science journals.

2. Why would he try so hard to pretend to be peer-reviewed? He was reviewed by a private association with no credential at all. The paper he was awarded is not even published in real science journal.

3. As long he is not reviewed by an acknowledged panel his work is potentially rubbish/ potentially good science.

I will wait.

Best regards,

Wait no more :)

Peer reviewed scientific paper Award.

Chosen by a panel of 11 peer reviewers, Haramein's paper won the prestigious "Best Paper Award" in the field of “Physics, Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Field Theory, and Gravitation.” This significant paper marks a new paradigm in the world of quantum theory, as it describes the nuclei of an atom as a mini black hole, where protons are attracted to each other by gravitation rather than some mysterious undefined “strong force.” This radical new view of the quantum world produces a unification of the forces and appropriately predicts measured values for the nucleon of atoms.

The Award is for this paper, Enjoy!
http://theresonanceproject.org/pdf/schwarzschild_proton_a4.pdf


http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn179/Nazrudin/haramein_award4.jpg

Of course the whole "Climate-gate" reopened the whole peer reviewed "real" science journals validity.
What it boils down to is that you either work along with the status quo or seek another profession.

But hey I'm here to help so if you would like to contact someone in CHAOS and get the credentials of the actual peer reviewers or this "private association" http://www2.ulg.ac.be/mathgen/CHAOS/CASYS.html who do the reviews I think you may be surprised.

Here is come contact info for ya.


Prof. Daniel M. Dubois, HEC-ULg

HEC Management School - University of Liege
N1, Rue Louvrex 14, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
URL: http://www.sia.hec.ulg.ac.be
E-mail: Daniel.Dubois@ulg.ac.be
Tel. : + 32 (0)4 366 00 28


Director of ASBL CHAOS
CHAOS ASBL, Institut de Mathématique, B37, Université de Liège,
Grande Traverse 12, B-4000 LIEGE 1, Belgium
Fax: + 32 (0)4 366 94 89
URL: http://www.ulg.ac.be/mathgen/CHAOS

[truth and integrity]

Wait no more

Really. Do you always believe everything what you read without questioning? Have you checked those who sign it? Who is Daniel M. Dubois or Pere Julia? What is the area of thier expertise? Why his paper was not published in scientific journal and reviewed by physicists? Maybe it is a reason for it.

You can only find out when you do your homework.:original:

Best regards,

[Aztar]

You can only find out when you do your homework.:original:

Best regards,


I provided research links for you. The email is right there, one click away.
Have at it, do some homework ;p

[truth and integrity]

You did not read carefully what I wrote.Or mayby you are not familiar with scientific research. This discussion is pointless.:nono: Sorry.

Best regards,

[Aztar]

You did not read carefully what I wrote.Or mayby you are not familiar with scientific research. This discussion is pointless.:nono: Sorry.

Best regards,

I read it then provided links for your research endeavors, if you choose to just ignore it then that's ok as well.


Not only am I familiar with scientific research, so are the people who associate with Nassim.
Here is another person you can contact as part of your homework assignment.

PROFESSOR ELIZABETH A. RAUSCHER, Ph.D.
President
Tecnic Research Laboratory
3500 S. Tomahawk Rd., Bldg #188
Apache Junction, AZ 85219
http://elizabethrauscher.com/
Dr. Rauscher is author of over 250 scientific papers, 4 books, 3 US patents and held 1 European patent.

She may be able to answer your questions as to the scientific validity of the research at the resonance project.

Have at it :)

Here is radio show host William Alek speaking about Nassim's new paper "The Schwarzschild Proton": http://www.achieveradio.com/archplayer.php?showname=The%20%20Progressive%20Tec hnology%20Hour%20with%20William%20Alek&ShowURL=http://audio.achieveradio.com/vortex-net-tech/Oct-10-2009-at-10-00AM---Vortex-Net-Technology.mp3

If you are having difficulty with the technical papers of Nassim's work, I suggest you view this video: http://www.youtube.com/user/mumeo0#p/u/2/jvrXWbntQiI

I would also recommend this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isB2Wkn884w

Also it helps to be familiar with Classical Mechanics
Modern Physics: Classical Mechanics (Stanford)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyX8kQ-JzHI&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=189C0DCE90CB6D81

as well as Einstein's General Theory of Relativity (Stanford)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbmf0bB38h0&feature=related

Be well & happy researching

[Aztar]

I cliked on the youtube link to watch the vids & got this....can you believe this.....wtf


"This video has been removed due to terms of use violation."
can't watch any of Nassiems vids.....I am really sick of not being able to access vids in this ............country. It is happening so much now......sorry momentary rant of frustration. I love this mans work....so I'm p.....d off.

Here is another C2C, similar to the one JesterTerrestrial linked, it worked for me.
hXaLiGwaoic

[enemyofNWO]

You did not read carefully what I wrote.Or mayby you are not familiar with scientific research. This discussion is pointless.:nono: Sorry.

Best regards,

We are very familiar with scientific research , we learned a few things weeks ago about the Nobel prize for Mr. Banana . That took the cake !
Prizes awarded are a political act and so publishing on specialized science magazines . If an article strays too far form the accepted dogma , you can forget it . We learned about the rigged data for the global warming scam . We know that scientists are required to produce results and those results are very often biased , rigged or outright fraudulent . Over the years we learned about the big Pharma products withdrawn from the marked because they killed the patients . We know that science is rigged , history is rigged , our reality is rigged as a matter of fact the current reality is totally controlled by the PTB .The world could be different if so many scientists and inventors would not have been bumped off by the secret services and this is a fact .. In conclusion it boils down to the personal choice of the reader to accept or throw out some ideas . As always CAVEAT EMPTOR . But I enjoy listening to Nassim Haramein ,or reading what the Watcher and other whistleblowers have to say , that's why we are here .
Be well

[tintagelcave]

Thanks a lot, ExChanger! Nassim is such a lovable man and his sense of humor is excellent, I think. I found him on WWW last year and shared with friends a lot, he's someone I could arrange a group at home for, to enjoy him together. Such light energy and thoroughness in what he presents, yippie!
:trumpet:

[abraxasinas]

Hi All!

The Haramein-Rauscher Cosmology is rather close to the 'new science' after the transformation. Any of you interested and familiar with the scientific semantics can feel confident that this work will stand up to scrutiny.
The peer review process, as many of you know, is thorough but extremely biased towards the prevailing paradigms.

I have written a detailed critique on his paper on the Haramein-Rauscher metric, which is published in the first link below.
The Rotational Dynamics in Haramein-Rauscher Metrics and the Monopolic Current (http://tonyb.freeyellow.com/id124.html)

I have also examined his general cosmology (the one many of you have become familiar with) and since it converged nicely with my own research I did publish this in the second link.
The Newtonian-Einstein-de Sitter Universe in Cosmological Mirror-Supersymmetry (http://tonyb.freeyellow.com/id123.html)

This stuff is a bit technical, but I would answer questions on the science if anyone wishes to know more about it.

Abraxasinas


http://www.wbabin.net/science/bermanseder7.pdf
http://tonyb.freeyellow.com/id123.html

[aroundthetable]

thanks for the link :thumb_yello:

[truth and integrity]

I openly voiced my doubts, hoping that somebody in this forum shares the same doubts so that we can have a meaningful discussion. There are people here with an open and critical mind who helped me to get back on track. So, if you do not share my doubts, please do not waste your precious energy and time. It is not worth it.:original:

From my heart to yours,

[Aztar]

I openly voiced my doubts, hoping that somebody in this forum shares the same doubts so that we can have a meaningful discussion. There are people here with an open and critical mind who helped me to get back on track. So, if you do not share my doubts, please do not waste your precious energy and time. It is not worth it.:original:

From my heart to yours,

No wasted energy here, the links and information are for all eyes not just yours.

Take it, explore it or leave it.

From my Left brain to Everyone else's :wub2:

[truth and integrity]

Finally, we can agree. If you have posted those links for others, I am very happy about it because this is what this forum is all about. I thought that you wanted me to be engaged in an argument rather than accepting that we have a very different opinion on this topic. Sorry, if I misunderstood your intentions.

Best regards,

[carriblu]

Finally, we can agree. If you have posted those links for others, I am very happy about it because this is what this forum is all about. I thought that you wanted me to be engaged in an argument rather than accepting that we have a very different opinion on this topic. Sorry, if I misunderstood your intentions.

Best regards,

but...hes trying to show you, with great references, that your opinion might be wrong. why are you backing away from an opportunity to be "engaged in an argument" where you could back up your points? his links show that you are wrong that nassim isnt credible. you said some of it seems like BS, i would be interested if you could link some references that explain why Nassim isn't credible or if you yourself could somehow disprove some of Nassim's work?

[Aztar]

Finally, we can agree. If you have posted those links for others, I am very happy about it because this is what this forum is all about. I thought that you wanted me to be engaged in an argument rather than accepting that we have a very different opinion on this topic. Sorry, if I misunderstood your intentions.

Best regards,


Its all good :thumb_yello:

I'm a researcher, have been for 25 years, its what I do.
Any opportunity to provide research links to anyone I generally take it :original:

The great thing about science is not just provable repeatable science its also the theoretical aspect.
Another beautiful aspect is that of theories that break down and become proven wrong, this is a wonderful time to be a scientist because finding fault or false conclusions always leads to new exciting questions and a sense of wonder at the elusiveness of the universe we live in.

So is Nassim right in his Physics?, hell if I know but its a fun ride all the same.
Is Nassim credible? Well how about that funny looking guy who in 1895 who failed an examination that would have allowed him to study for a diploma as an electrical engineer in Zurich, then as a patent clerk between 1902-1909 he completed an astonishing range of theoretical physics publications, written in his spare time without the benefit of close contact with scientific literature or colleagues.
Strange fellow that Mr Einstein :)

[truth and integrity]

I can hear your fascination and your curiosity about new theories that may explain the universe we leave in. My expertise lies in psychology so I have approached this problem from a different angle. I have to depend on those who are physicists and their discussion gave me food for thoughts. I ask the same question as you are:” is he credible or is he right?” Maybe Nassim has a brain of a caliber that of Einstain and he will be 21 century genius. I believe that if his theory is a ground breaking, it will be recognized very quickly. Than I will say hooray. I just do not want to be disappointed.
But I seriously question that Nassim mixes physics with spirituality. If he is a physicist I want him to stay in the realm of physics. If he wants to be a spiritual Guru I want him to say so. I just want to hear the principle of his theory so that I can make my own connection, finding my understanding of spirituality. I was inspired by so many philosophers and spiritual teachers. They were important in my quest for truth but not any more.
As you said, life is a fun ride. :original:

Kind regards,

[carriblu]

I can hear your fascination and your curiosity about new theories that may explain the universe we leave in. My expertise lies in psychology so I have approached this problem from a different angle. I have to depend on those who are physicists and their discussion gave me food for thoughts. I ask the same question as you are:” is he credible or is he right?” Maybe Nassim has a brain of a caliber that of Einstain and he will be 21 century genius. I believe that if his theory is a ground breaking, it will be recognized very quickly. Than I will say hooray. I just do not want to be disappointed.
But I seriously question that Nassim mixes physics with spirituality. If he is a physicist I want him to stay in the realm of physics. If he wants to be a spiritual Guru I want him to say so. I just want to hear the principle of his theory so that I can make my own connection, finding my understanding of spirituality. I was inspired by so many philosophers and spiritual teachers. They were important in my quest for truth but not any more.
As you said, life is a fun ride. :original:

Kind regards,

maybe the closer science gets to explaining reality, the more it will resemble spirituality... nassim could be one of the first to bridge the gap. i mean, he's trying to prove the infinite nature of existence, that is pretty spiritual science

[SiriArc]

http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?pid=70577#p70577 #33

Submitted by Daniel Pinchbeck on Thu, 12/27/2007 - 22:56.

This is the contemporary "Holy Grail" it seems.

I was told that Nassim said this about the free energy devices, that they may only work if you think they will work. Is it possible that this next level of technology is dependent on the consciousness "set and setting" of the user? This would make sense with other aspects of psychic experience, such as psychedelic states.

We are learning more about how consciousness creates waves, energy fields, etcetera. Perhaps it is at that subtler level that these devices would be accessible and activated?

This make any sense?

If it was the case, then a training in intensified states of consciousness would be a prerequisite for using these technologies - like the training a jet pilot goes through, but on another level. It would be necessary to deeply explore the polarity of the psychic/physical - technically, aesthetically, phenomenologically to access "free energy," teleportation, etc.

Will The Transformation

~Rilke~

http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b321/siriarc/LightninginaBottle2.jpg

[Odiwan]

But I seriously question that Nassim mixes physics with spirituality. If he is a physicist I want him to stay in the realm of physics. If he wants to be a spiritual Guru I want him to say so. I just want to hear the principle of his theory so that I can make my own connection, finding my understanding of spirituality. I was inspired by so many philosophers and spiritual teachers. They were important in my quest for truth but not any more.
As you said, life is a fun ride. :original:

Kind regards,

I do not feel that being one thing (say a physicist) precludes anyone from making statements or presenting ideas that appear to be in a different realm. I would be far more suspicious if someone was actually proclaiming themselves to be a spiritual guru. I feel that the realm we are moving into, is one that perhaps could see the eradication of specialists working in isolation.

I will admit to only having discovered Nassim recently, but the little that I have seen of him sits true with me. I certainly agree that we always need to use our blessed sense of judgement and discretion, but as my intuition tells me that we live in a field of consciousness, I would expect that more and more physicists (actually all scientists from all fields) to be discovering truths that until recently fell in the realm of spirituality, magic and superstition.

My 5 cents...

[DOMINIC 777]

Thank you Susan for all the great info you put up
lol
dominic

www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDvZGKlxL1Q&feature=PlayList&p=AE40F5BF8FC 21C3F&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=35

YouTube - Nassim Haramein with New Energy Movement

NOW, here's a guy firing on all 12 dna strands !!!

[truth and integrity]

Dear Aztar,

I would like to share something with you so that we can laugh together. Our discussion helped me to clarify feelings that were to strong to ignore. I was able not only to clarify my feelings but also analyze my beliefs on specific spiritual issues. Then I could ask myself a few questions:
1. Is Nassim theory going to change my life? Yes to the same extent as relativity theory did.
2. Is his theory going to make me happier, more creative, fulfilled, and loving? Absolutely not. I wish it were so simple.
3. Am I fascinated with his mind enough to go again through pain of reading physicists discussion and analysis of his theory? Definitely not.

Finally, when I heard him saying that he was the first one (he emphasized that no scholar ever did) to discover that the Ark was a new technology that helped Moses to cross the Red See, my response was: Thank you Mr. Haramein. Next please.

Well, beliefs are just beliefs. Any theory is just educated guesswork. So I can laugh today, tomorrow I may change my beliefs.

PS. I appreciate your willingness to help others to do research. You may regret that you said it aloud because I will ask you for help.:original:

Kind regards,

[Aztar]

It's all good :original:

We don't have to eat everything on the plate, we don't even have to eat anything on the plate. Eat what you like and leave the rest or push the plate aside and order something else.

The author David Eddings who IMO wrote really good fantasy wrote a fiction story so I figured "well it's David Eddings, so of course it will be a great story"
Boy was I in for a surprise, I think i made it through 50 pages and just could not get any further, It was horrid.
Does that diminish my enjoyment of his Fantasy writing?
Not in the least.

A faucet of human thinking falls into the category of "truth givers" or in Eddings case "entertainment giver", the tendency to discover someone we respect on a certain subject or area and think perhaps that their views/skills apply in other or in some cases ALL area's, lets look at religion as an example here, if for example religion becomes someones "truth giver" it may be looked to not just for moral and spiritual guidance but since they become the iconic symbol for truth they can then be looked to for answers to questions perhaps outside their professed area of expertise this can lead to problems if say you are a scientist gathering empirical data on the earth being round in an era when the icons of truth have categorically stated that it is indeed flat.

On the other hand we can develop within ourselves the ability to adapt our thinking continually to available information and experience to add to our knowledge base, this may help with "old dog, new trick" syndrome.

Of course the pendulum may well swing to far the other way, best described in a joke.
"We have more an more specialists learning more and more about less and less, eventually their will be specialists who know absolutely everything about nothing.”

Nassim questioned everything since his youth, ofttimes getting chastised or thrown out of school.
It's because of this questioning, IMO, that played a part in the evolution of his theories in physics.
If my car breaks down, there is a extremely good chance I will seek advise from someone other than Nassim, unless he writes a book on car maintenance then we shall see :)

[truth and integrity]

On the other hand we can develop within ourselves the ability to adapt our thinking continually to available information and experience to add to our knowledge base, this may help with "old dog, new trick" syndrome.

Well said. I couldn’t agree more. Especially, as we get older and our minds are not as flexible as before. :naughty:


Nassim questioned everything since his youth,

We also should question everything. We give our power away too easily by trusting authority. A decade ago, psychologists did a quite interesting research. According to this research, only every 3 adult has the ability of critical thinking. So 2/3 of Americans do not have this ability. It is scary isn’t it? How convenient it is for PTB.

Kind regards,

[Aztar]

Well said. I couldn’t agree more. Especially, as we get older and our minds are not as flexible as before. :naughty:

It is easier to carry an empty cup than one that is filled to the brim.
Tao Teh Ching

Descartes' dropped everything he knew and started fresh to discover what it was he could prove, eventually he discovered something he knew and could prove without the slightest possibility of doubt and that was that he existed, "I think therefore I am"

BHihkRwisbE


A decade ago, psychologists did a quite interesting research. According to this research, only every 3 adult has the ability of critical thinking. So 2/3 of Americans do not have this ability. It is scary isn’t it? How convenient it is for PTB.

Kind regards,

Yes quite interesting isn't it. On that subject I would point to this article:

AN INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING

Science in the United States is often poorly taught as a fact-based discipline rather than as a way of knowing or method of discovery. As incredible as it may seem, studies reveal that 3% of the U.S. population is scientifically literate, down from 5% about twenty years ago. Thus, it does not appear that science alone will teach critical thinking to the masses. In fact, critical thinking programs are almost always designed by social scientists and directed toward improving thinking in the humanities and social studies, but the same can be accomplished with math and science courses. Properly taught university courses should teach a student critical thinking in addition to the disciplinary content of the course.
http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html

But what happens when the part of our brain responsible for critical thinking is damaged?

Neuroanatomist Jill Bolte Taylor had an opportunity few brain scientists would wish for: One morning, she realized she was having a massive stroke. As it happened -- as she felt her brain functions slip away one by one, speech, movement, understanding -- she studied and remembered every moment. This is a powerful story about how our brains define us and connect us to the world and to one another.

UyyjU8fzEYU

Of course we could just as easily lay out the historical instances when the field of psychology was used in order for the PTB to maintain & increase control over the mass's but this would be better as a subject of another thread:zip:

[Aztar]

Not sure if this is posted anywhere else but it is a relatively newly posted Nassim Video.

Enjoy!

Nassim gives an absolutely stunning display of the Phi Ratio and relates it to Marko Rodkin's Mathematics.

Nassim Haramein - Phi Ratio Meets Vortex-Based Mathematics With Marko Rodkin [1/2]

gycQ3HblJkc

Nassim Haramein - Phi Ratio Meets Vortex-Based Mathematics With Marko Rodkin [2/2]

_2kxRaDYBnw

I'm pretty sure thats Brian Leary in the background.

[truth and integrity]

Originally posted byAztar
Of course we could just as easily lay out the historical instances when the field of psychology was used in order for the PTB to maintain & increase control over the mass's

Yes. I discovered this after I graduated. I thought that was an irony of my life. First, I got a degree in business. It was so boring and I decided to move into another field. After I graduated, I began to question many theories. However, after a very intense period of questioning, I came up stronger than ever. My lesson was like of Jill Bolte to balance my left and right brain. I have stayed for to long in my left. But all my insights and creativity comes from my right brain and I enjoy more to be there. I think that Goethe found a pearl when he said “If you trust yourself, you will be happy”.

It would be better as a subject of another thread

Definitely. It would be interesting to open this discussion. However, I have not learned yet how to open a new thread. :sweatdrop:

Kind regards,

[truth and integrity]

enemyofNWO, carriblu and Odiwan.

I apologize that I did not respond to your posts earlier. Nassim’s video opened a Pandora box with many questions with quite intense feelings. It took me 2 months of literally “a dark night of the soul” to answer those questions and clarify all the feelings. If I did respond, I would prolong my process. :mfr_omg: No, thanks, no:lmfao:

Originally posted byenemyofNWO
We are very familiar with scientific research , we learned a few things weeks ago about the Nobel prize for Mr. Banana . That took the cake !
Prizes awarded are a political act and so publishing on specialized science magazines . If an article strays too far form the accepted dogma , you can forget it . We learned about the rigged data for the global warming scam . We know that scientists are required to produce results and those results are very often biased , rigged or outright fraudulent . Over the years we learned about the big Pharma products withdrawn from the marked because they killed the patients . We know that science is rigged , history is rigged , our reality is rigged as a matter of fact the current reality is totally controlled by the PTB .The world could be different if so many scientists and inventors would not have been bumped off by the secret services and this is a fact .. In conclusion it boils down to the personal choice of the reader to accept or throw out some ideas . As always CAVEAT EMPTOR . But I enjoy listening to Nassim Haramein ,or reading what the Watcher and other whistleblowers have to say , that's why we are here .



I agree with you 100% and I question everything. So, Nassim is not an exception.

Originally posted carriblu
maybe the closer science gets to explaining reality, the more it will resemble spirituality... nassim could be one of the first to bridge the gap. i mean, he's trying to prove the infinite nature of existence, that is pretty spiritual science [/QUOTE]

Why do I need science to explain reality? PTB can only control us through our left brain and they were extremely successful for more that 5000 years. They can not do this through our right brain were all the answers and guidance are.


Originally posted by Odiwan
I do not feel that being one thing (say a physicist) precludes anyone from making statements or presenting ideas that appear to be in a different realm. I would be far more suspicious if someone was actually proclaiming themselves to be a spiritual guru. I feel that the realm we are moving into, is one that perhaps could see the eradication of specialists working in isolation.

I will admit to only having discovered Nassim recently, but the little that I have seen of him sits true with me. I certainly agree that we always need to use our blessed sense of judgement and discretion, but as my intuition tells me that we live in a field of consciousness, I would expect that more and more physicists (actually all scientists from all fields) to be discovering truths that until recently fell in the realm of spirituality, magic and superstition.

In this process of seeking for truth and questioning Nassim and other quantum physicists, I have learned that PTB are planning using science to program us to a new view of reality.

Love to you all

[justpeter]

I watched the 8-hour presentation just a few days ago and I was very happy with it. I suppose everyone has a different opinion on it depending on their life's experiences.

However, a couple of points are bothering me. Nassim said he'd developed special meditation techniques and when he was asked if he would publish them he said he would, but this was in 2003. Did he ever do that? Also he said he was developing "technology" based on his principles but I haven't seen any of that either.

It does seem to me that he understands the basic nature of this universe but I can't understand why he hasn't made some practical use of his knowledge in the last 7 years.

This isn't a criticism, just a genuine desire to know. Can anyone shed any light on this?

Peter

[I_Am]

Very interesting.

Hmmm...What do Volkswagen know, that we don't???


http://www.cadblogg.se/nassim_volkswagen.jpg

http://www.arabamoto.com/var/resizes/VOLKSWAGEN/vw-gti/volkswagen.jpg

:shocked: