View Full Version : R.F.I.D Bracelet Once You Have Had the Swine Flu Vaccination?
Ancient Alien
09-13-2009, 06:19 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB7OwPk5Z78
Christo888
09-13-2009, 07:45 AM
Well that certainly is an entertaining piece of work!!!
That guy just scared the **** out of the audience and made no attempt to help them defy his rumors!!!:lightsabre:
This man is perpetrating the fear... certainly a typical church brain washing to scare people into submission and bond together as one under the rule of authority with the feeling of helplessness. Totally a scam... no evidence of self-empowerment, self-awareness, personal responsibility, or sovereignty of free will are mentioned.
May every single person who attends that church and watches that video rise up within themselves and defy the fear tactics!!!!!:original:
Who in that church will rise up in sovereignty and become free (not to be confused with martyrdom)?
mntruthseeker
09-13-2009, 01:06 PM
Christa The man speaking is an X Kansas City highway partrol officer
all of the cops know what is going on. This is a fact and people need to know.
Christo888
09-13-2009, 08:18 PM
Christa The man speaking is an X Kansas City highway partrol officer
all of the cops know what is going on. This is a fact and people need to know.
Are you serious?
Someone puts a video on youtube of a an x cop on a stage of a group of christians with a plant in the audience asking the question about forced vaccinations... and you say this is a fact people need to know???
Do you not understand psy-ops and fear tactics for submission?
Church people eat this stuff up like candy! They feed off of being corralled into the corner so they can worship their fake god out of martyrdom and victimhood... These are those headed for the slaughter.
They are being set up for the kill!!!!!!!!!!!
Obey Obey Obey Obey
The messenger is responsible for his words and leaves no option for the audience to exercise sovereignty, he is supporting the agenda!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And if you live in Oklahoma then welcome to the OK Corral!
Either repeal that legislation or move out of the state!
Freedom is won by quest and conquest.
Active participation or passive permission, to each their own choice but...
If there ever is a blockade then pull your car over to the side (ran out of gas) park your car and walk (ok maybe run) away from the road. Go find another car the next day and carry on.
High doses, 12,000mg to 15,000mg Vitamin C (evenly proportioned throughout day) a day (not the sissy ester C or time released), MMS, Colloidal Silver, and other, all destroy both the flu and the vaccine...
And do not allow anyone to be a messenger whom fails to remind an audience of their free will sovereign choices of life, especially on this forum!!!!!!
wtf... what kind of a planet is this???????????
And if you are a cop or military personnel and you go along with this agenda then what the hell is wrong with you???? Writing speeding tickets and helping out in domestic squabbles is one thing but participating in doing the dirty work of injecting your fellow humans or off to a camp they go against their will if they refuse is totally demonic... you will lose your soul for that!!!!!!
mntruthseeker
09-13-2009, 08:41 PM
Are you serious?
Someone puts a video on youtube of a an x cop on a stage of a group of christians with a plant in the audience asking the question about forced vaccinations... and you say this is a fact people need to know???
Do you not understand psy-ops and fear tactics for submission? {moderator shortened long quote - K}
Sorry to have upset you so much.
It was not put up with that in mind. It was to show people what is going on.
I want you to know that I have many people that work for the sheriffs,police and probational office in my immediate family. The things he is telling you is not just from the cops in Kansas City.
This was not a joke to me. !
I am turning the corner on this bus and instead of trying to have to figure out what to do if ...................I'm changing my reality to one without
pineal-pilot-in merkabah
09-13-2009, 09:01 PM
i heard that squalene is a troublesome substance and that once injected cant be treated. can anyone shed more light? would mms counteract it being alkaline v an acid.
Christo888
09-13-2009, 09:17 PM
i heard that squalene is a troublesome substance and that once injected cant be treated. can anyone shed more light? would mms counteract it being alkaline v an acid.
I'm not a doctor but perhaps taking some Shark Liver Oil now may get your immune system into gear in case something does get injected, thus balancing out a 'substance' that normally is good for you but is being used to trick the immune system into overdrive and body absorption.
But do not take my word for it, I don't know enough about squalene!!!!
gscraig
09-13-2009, 10:16 PM
This gentleman is not the only one speaking of the wrist band protocol, and since the first time I've heard of this, this draws concern. Many have wondered how could they enforce mass vaccinations, and the thoughts have ranged from inflating the number of sick and dead to create the fear for volunteers then and/or by force. The wrist band concept could be effective in itself, because it's putting people into submission mode. If you don't take the shot, well you can't hit the main highway for work, the hospital, you have limited mobility, etc. I don't know about getting placed on a bus if you don't take a shot, because you are then dealing with a lot of people leaving vacant cars, congestion and angry people growing in numbers at checkpoints.
This could be ugly indeed. Hopefully, an effort that I made privately via 40 State Health Depts, and a small few police and military, will have enough impact to where decision makers will refuse such policies. I will also contact a couple of my friends whom are police officers and see what they are hearing. My last conversation I had with one, they were sharing how bad things have become on the streets due to the economy that the local news is not reporting.
Continue to think positive. I do believe whatever is done, this era of humanity and US citizens will be hard to accomplish plans. That is the dark horse out of all of these rumors, plots, agendas, etc. We and They don't know how the public will react. Especially the US.
mntruthseeker
09-13-2009, 10:51 PM
I cant believe I apologized to Christa when it wasnt even me that started the thread. The whole thing is I had seen the video and heard similiar stories from family members. I posted it elsewhere on the forumn but only as to make a point.
Its no biggie if you listen and don't get bent out of shape in doing so. we know how to get around it
Swanny
09-13-2009, 10:57 PM
Maybe now would be a good time to stock up on food and supplies so that you dont have to leave home?
Kulapops
09-13-2009, 11:13 PM
Dang ! I wonder if the 5 tins of tomato soup I bought for the coming crisis in October 2007 are still in date ??
I know the dried 'country vegetable' has gone over. :original:
Look, are we going to have a crisis every October from now on?
lol, this time last year, I half filled a cupboard with tins - and I ain't used a single one since... I've changed my diet and I don't eat tinned food anymore !
So there is some progress going on at least.
Seriously, I like MNs point of view. Let's just imagine the scenario where it doesn't happen. That's a lot easier than figuring out how you are going to resist it if it does.
The WHO has signed treaties with 194 countries, and they're all adopting the same approach it seems from what I can gather. So there's no escape in a physical sense.
So perhaps the metaphysical is our best chance?
Peace n love
K
Swanny
09-13-2009, 11:20 PM
Hehe I bought tins this time last year :naughty:
Ammit
09-13-2009, 11:21 PM
Christo888 you need to lighten up, everyone on here has the right to give a comment without being hung for it. Anger is not the way to get your message across. Your message to me is the voice of one and not a proven fact to me.
MNTruthseeker, behave, just kiddin lol.
mntruthseeker
09-13-2009, 11:50 PM
Gosh, Do I have to. :naughty:
Karen
09-14-2009, 12:11 AM
Metal bracelets! That's a good one. I stopped wearing all metal and all jewelry years and years ago. Metal interferes with the electromagnetic flow in the body. I can't stand having anything on me. What a freakin fight that would be between me and the purveyors of the metal bracelets!
Yep I would bail out of the car and run the other way if I found myself able to escape such a trap. I'd probably be like Dr. Carley http://drcarley.com if trapped - just EF'N shoot me now, because I'm not taking your mark of the beast. The vaccines are so dangerous on so many levels, I don't think it can be undone. What if it's filled with with nano-beasty microchips?
I pretty much stay home anyway. Just shop around this small town or mail order. I do worry about my children though in Portland and Dallas. One believes some of the stuff I tell them and the other thinks I'm pretty much a fruitcake, so I don't share much. Well, that's their choice. Let it go.
Karen
09-14-2009, 12:19 AM
i heard that squalene is a troublesome substance and that once injected cant be treated. can anyone shed more light? would mms counteract it being alkaline v an acid.
I heard Dr. True Ott talk about this and I have a Medical Technologist (ASCP) degree, so understand the jargon better than those without the science/medical background.
True Ott said he had searched and searched, but found no antidote for the problem caused by the adjuvant squalene. Squalene caused Gulf War Syndrome. No it is not an acid/alkaline matter and would not be countered by MMS (chlorine dioxide).
Squalene is ingested in our foods. It is an oil that helps build the nerves and the nerve sheath that plays a role in the conduction of the electrical impulses in the nerves.
BUT when it is injected, your immune system attacks it like it is an invader and it makes antibodies to your own nervous system! You want your nervous system destroyed? Take the vaccine. They will be laughing with glee and sucking up the misery energy, loosh, as each one slowly and miserably dies.
Christo888
09-14-2009, 02:15 AM
:mfr_omg: Oh it's not anger... it is core fortitude straight up.
It is one thing to read about this, listen to an interview about it, and hear radio shows discuss it, but now a man has stood on stage, and told an audience what he has been privy to amongst his colleagues of authority. And he did not tell anyone how to remove themselves from the trap that he is apparently going to go along with!!!!
If you are a cop or military personnel good luck to you all!!!! :thumb_yello:
Some sleeping dogs should never be woken!
mntruthseeker
09-14-2009, 02:19 AM
When I think of cops/troopers/sheriffs, I dont just think of those in my family that are now being "closed lipped" on all of this but trust me, the stress is there..................I think of Sheriff Mack and the Oathkeepers. Those are my heroes and I know that Sheriff Mack has sent his letter and a copy of the constitutions that they plead to, to all the departments in the USA.
The Sheriffs do not have to follow any ruling that comes down from Obama.
NONE...............we need to believe that this is the end results. I know I am
Ancient Alien
09-17-2009, 09:43 AM
Boston launches flu shot tracking
November 21, 2008
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/11/21/boston_launches_flu_shot_tracking/
Ancient Alien
09-17-2009, 09:55 AM
State rebuts talk of forced injections
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/09/17/in_public_health_bill_a_contagion_of_fear/
Kulapops
09-17-2009, 10:40 AM
Boston launches flu shot tracking
November 21, 2008
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/11/21/boston_launches_flu_shot_tracking/
Yes, I just read that article from the Icke website :
Quote :
Infectious disease specialists in Boston and elsewhere predicted that the registry approach could prove even more useful if something more sinister strikes: a bioterrorism attack or the long-feared arrival of a global flu epidemic. In such crises, the registry could be used to track who received a special vaccine or antidote to a deadly germ.
Interesting that the date is November 2008 then - six months before the arrival of Swine Flu.
Not sure why this story is being dragged out Icke's site now though, makes it sound as if it happened today.
Swanny
09-17-2009, 10:46 AM
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/11/21/boston_launches_flu_shot_tracking/
"Anything you can do to better pinpoint who's vaccinated and who's not, that's absolutely vital," said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy at the University of Minnesota.
If your a sheeple and you have the vaccine but someone else doesn't then there is nothing to worry about, your vaccine will protect you. But they will get everyone to gang up on those that don't have it saying they are a risk to all :thumbdown:
Stupid sheeple wake up :trumpet:
Kulapops
09-17-2009, 10:55 AM
I was thinking about this the other night...
Surely the only way out of this is some foolery ??
We need to find sympathetic doctors who are prepared to give us a shot in the sink :thumb_yello:
and then some paperwork , or a bracelet...
But how to broach the subject ?
could be a good idea though, for any avaloners who personally know doctors very well to broach the subject with them ... ?
Swanny
09-17-2009, 10:23 PM
I've been thinking the same thing. I know in Asia you can buy anything you like :thumb_yello:
dolphin
09-18-2009, 06:50 AM
christo, you're a moran.:tongue2:
enemyofNWO
09-18-2009, 10:16 AM
I was thinking about this the other night...
Surely the only way out of this is some foolery ??
We need to find sympathetic doctors who are prepared to give us a shot in the sink :thumb_yello:
and then some paperwork , or a bracelet...
But how to broach the subject ?
could be a good idea though, for any avaloners who personally know doctors very well to broach the subject with them ... ?
I am afraid thatwhat you are suggesting is not going to work .
The tagging and the compulsory vaccinations are declarations of war on the citizens .
The choice is very simple : comply to the dictates of the NWO and die becasue the vaccine will kill your immune system or go to the Fema camps and die .
It is estermination time folks .
Either the people esterminate the ruling class , the zionist scums , the banksters and the corrupt government or you the people will be esterminated ! Very simple really . I am glad I do not live in the US .
Swanny
09-18-2009, 05:13 PM
The doctors know the vaccine is bad, so if they can be paid to give it then they can be paid to pretend they gave it :original:
Christo888
09-18-2009, 05:35 PM
christo, you're a moran.:tongue2:
Well I hope its no reflection on you????:lol3:
That's it? ... nothing more to say?
Christo888
09-18-2009, 06:28 PM
I have another moronic question...
Why is there only one christian man that stood on a stage in church and said that semi trucks of bracelets were unloaded to a hospital, but no one else in the world has proof, not even a picture of this so called shackle that will be pegged through your wrist for ever and ever?????:lmfao:
And someone else took a picture of a light beacon, which for many years has been used for various purposes in law enforcement, but it is just a light beacon... so how is this light beacon associated with RFID and vaccines????
Does anybody in the world have something a little more specific that is relevant and not storytelling fearmongering christians regarding RFID bracelets?
Jnana
09-18-2009, 06:44 PM
Ear tags make more sense. Heck, a lot of the population already has the necessary hole in their body - less chance of lawsuits because of infections. The technology has a long history in the jewelry and livestock industries.
RFID Ear Tags for Cattle (http://fcw.com/articles/2008/04/21/usda-provides-rfid-ear-tags-for-cattle.aspx)
Buy yours here (http://www.bombayharbor.com/Product/10682/Rfid_Animal_Ear_Tag.html)
They might even figure out a way to make them reasonably attractive - a status symbol for good patriots.
Yes, I'm just making this up (the human aspect, anyway). You wouldn't want me on the dark side.
http://smartcardrfid.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/rfid_ear_tag_animals.jpg
Christo888
09-18-2009, 06:49 PM
Ear tags make more sense. Heck, a lot of the population already has the necessary hole in their body - less chance of lawsuits because of infections. The technology has a long history in the jewelry and livestock industries.
RFID Ear Tags for Cattle (http://fcw.com/articles/2008/04/21/usda-provides-rfid-ear-tags-for-cattle.aspx)
They might even figure out a way to make them reasonably attractive - a status symbol for good patriots.
Yes, I'm just making this up - you wouldn't want me on the dark side.:lmao::lol3:
And they thought they thought of everything!:naughty:
Jnana
09-18-2009, 07:09 PM
Here you go, rfid wrist bands for people:
RFID wristbands help kids play safe in fun city (http://www.usingrfid.com/news/read.asp?lc=d4880dx258zt)
More here, including pictures of the wrist bands:
https://www.rfidtrakker.com/store/files/pdf/safetzone_case_study.pdf
Company web page here (inaccessible last time I looked - maybe the market for these things wasn't big enough to sustain them?):
http://www.safetzone.com
Notice the repetitive use of the word "safe".
Here's the technology that is more likely to be used if they really get serious about "chipping" the population:
Microsoft links up with human embedded RFID chips (http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=689)
Human chipping on its way with verichip (http://www.mobilemag.com/2003/11/27/human-chipping-on-its-way-with-verichip/)
Human chips more than skin deep (http://news.cnet.com/Human-chips-more-than-skin-deep/2009-1008_3-5318076.html)
California outlaws forced rfid tagging of humans (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/california-outlaws-forced-rfid-tagging-of-humans.ars)
http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/ChipImplant.png
I don't think this will involve a forced operation. TPTB are really cowards and don't want a revolution on their hands. Any good farmer knows better than to stampede the cattle. They will try to figure out a way for most people to want to have it through fear and/or safety/convenience arguments. A bait and switch. At some point, those who have refused so far will have no access to banking. That's just my guess when I put on my "evil overlord" thinking cap. Watch how they are doing things now: SLOWWWWLY, a very gradual loss of liberties.
Christo888
09-18-2009, 07:41 PM
OK, Jnana, thanks for your research, of course you already found out not really anything out there about actual or real shackles, bracelets, and RFID chips associated with vaccines, right!!!!!!
But, what you did provide is something awesome!!!
California does not allow the RFID chipping of humans
Can any lawyers verify this as complete (nevermind found one)?
http://www.mofo.com/news/updates/bulletins/13034.html
And damages can be sought of $1,000.00 a day against the violator until the chip, or even nanotech device is removed from the body!!!! Wow, so if anyone has an implant device of any kind in their body then you can recover damages ... I wonder if we can consider all of our bodies as the term 'body,' just in case someone has an ET implant or device somewhere within all of their bodies. :lmao::lol3::mfr_lol:
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_362_bill_20070627_amended_asm_v95.pdf
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 27, 2007
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 24, 2007
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 9, 2007
AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 26, 2007
SENATE BILL No. 362
Introduced by Senator Simitian
February 20, 2007
An act to add Section 52.7 to the Civil Code, relating to identification
devices.
legislative counsel’s digest
SB 362, as amended, Simitian. Identification devices: subcutaneous
implanting.
Existing law accords every person the right of protection from bodily
restraint or harm, from personal insult, from defamation, and from injury
to his or her personal relations, subject to the qualifications and
restrictions provided by law.
This bill would prohibit a person from requiring, coercing, or
compelling any other individual to undergo the subcutaneous implanting
of an identification device, as defined. The bill would provide for the
assessment of civil penalties for a violation thereof, as specified, and
would allow an aggrieved party to bring an action against a violator for
damages and injunctive relief, subject to a 3-year statute of limitation,
or as otherwise provided. The bill would also allow an interested party
to petition the court on behalf of an incompetent or minor upon specified
circumstances.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no.
State-mandated local program: no.
95
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 52.7 is added to the Civil Code, to read:
52.7. (a) A Except as provided in subdivision (g), a person
shall not require, coerce, or compel any other individual to undergo
the subcutaneous implanting of an identification device.
(b) (1) Any person who violates subdivision (a) may be assessed
an initial civil penalty of no more than ten thousand dollars
($10,000), and no more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for
each day the violation continues until the deficiency is corrected.
That civil penalty may be assessed and recovered in a civil action
brought in any court of competent jurisdiction. The court may also
grant a prevailing plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation
costs, including, but not limited to, expert witness fees and
expenses as part of the costs.
(2) A person who is implanted with a subcutaneous identification
device in violation of subdivision (a) may bring a civil action for
actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages,
injunctive relief, any combination of those, or any other appropriate
relief.
(3) Additionally, punitive damages may also be awarded upon
proof of the defendant’s malice, oppression, fraud, or duress in
requiring, coercing, or compelling the plaintiff to undergo the
subcutaneous implanting of an identification device.
(c) (1) An action brought pursuant to this section shall be
commenced within three years of the date upon which the
identification device was implanted.
(2) If the victim was an incompetent a dependent adult or minor
when the implantation occurred, actions brought pursuant to this
section shall be commenced within three years after the date the
plaintiff, or his or her guardian or parent, discovered or reasonably
should have discovered the implant, or within eight years after the
plaintiff attains the age of majority, whichever date occurs later.
(3) The statute of limitations shall not run against an incompetent
a dependent adult or minor plaintiff simply because a guardian ad
litem has been appointed. A guardian ad litem’s failure to bring a
plaintiff’s action within the applicable limitation period will not
prejudice the plaintiff’s right to do so.
(4) A defendant is stopped estopped to assert a defense of the
statute of limitations when the expiration of the statute is due to
conduct by the defendant inducing the plaintiff to delay the filing
of the action, or due to threats made by the defendant causing
duress upon the plaintiff.
(d) (1) For purposes of implantation only, any interested person
may file a petition for an order or judgment declaring an
incompetent or minor free from the control of a parent or guardian
who is requiring or preventing implantation of an identification
device.
(2) The court shall consider that petition in light of applicable
law with respect to the best interests of the incompetent or minor.
(e)
(d) Any restitution paid by the defendant to the victim shall be
credited against any judgment, award, or settlement obtained
pursuant to this section. Any judgment, award, or settlement
obtained pursuant to an action under this section shall be subject
to the provisions of Section 13963 of the Government Code.
(f)
(e) The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed
so as to protect privacy and bodily integrity.
(g)
(f) Actions brought pursuant to this section are independent of
any other actions, remedies, or procedures that may be available
to an aggrieved party pursuant to any other law.
(g) This section shall not in any way modify existing statutory
or case law regarding the rights of parents or guardians, the rights
of children or minors, or the rights of dependent adults.
(h) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Identification device” means any item, application, or
product that is passively or actively capable of transmitting
personal information, including, but not limited to, devices using
radio frequency technology.
(2) “Person” means an individual, business association,
partnership, limited partnership, corporation, limited liability
company, trust, estate, cooperative association, or other entity.
(3) “Personal information” includes any of the following data
elements to the extent they are used alone or in conjunction with
any other information used to identify an individual:
(A) First or last name.
(B) Address.
(C) Telephone number.
(D) E-mail, Internet Protocol, or Web site address.
(E) Date of birth.
(F) Driver’s license number or California identification card
number.
(G) Any unique personal identifier number contained or encoded
on a driver’s license or identification card issued pursuant to
Section 13000 of the Vehicle Code.
(H) Bank, credit card, or other financial institution account
number.
(I) Any unique personal identifier contained or encoded on a
health insurance, health benefit, or benefit card or record issued
in conjunction with any government-supported aid program.
(J) Religion.
(K) Ethnicity or nationality.
(L) Photograph.
(M) Fingerprint or other biometric identifier.
(N) Social security number.
(O) Any unique personal identifier.
(4) “Require, coerce, or compel” includes physical violence,
threat, intimidation, retaliation, the conditioning of any private or
public benefit or care on consent to implantation, including
employment, promotion, or other employment benefit, or by any
means that causes a reasonable person of ordinary susceptibilities
to acquiesce to implantation when he or she otherwise would not,
but does not include legitimate medical uses for which the patient
or his or her guardian or parent has consented..
(5) “Subcutaneous” means existing, performed, or introduced
under or on the skin.
And here is another verifying article!!!!!!
http://www.govtech.com/gt/139441?topic=117671
Calif. State Senate Passes Bill Banning Forced Human RFID Tagging
Bookmark and Share
Comment
You May Also Like
* European Data Protection Supervisor Issues Opinion on RFID
* California Bans Forced RFID Tagging of Humans
Related Links
Improve global collaboration with our inter/intra-agency communication solutions : Polycom
Tools Sponsored By
Aug 31, 2007, News Report
Found in: Security
California Senate Bill 362, which would prohibit any person from forcing any other person to undergo an implant in their body of a radio frequency identification (RFID) device, passed the Senate Floor on a 28-9 vote Thursday, and will now go to Governor Schwarzenegger.
RFID "tags" are tiny chips with miniature antennae that can be embedded in almost anything. Using radio waves, RFID can help identify and track people, animals, or objects. Devices known as "readers" access the information on the tags.
"RFID technology is not in and of itself the issue. RFID is a minor miracle, with all sorts of good uses," said the bill sponsor Senator Joe Simitian. "But we shouldn't condone forced 'tagging' of humans. It's the ultimate invasion of privacy."
Despite wide-ranging support, the RFID industry has declined to support SB 362. In response, Simitian said, "I think it's unfortunate and regrettable that the industry hasn't come out in support of SB 362. I understand why we're having a robust debate about the privacy concerns related to RFID, but at the very least, we should be able to agree that the forced implanting of under-the-skin technology into human beings is just plain wrong. I'm deeply concerned that this isn't a given for the industry."
"Passage of SB 362 ensures that no Californian is compelled to have electronic identifiers of any type embedded in their body. This provides Californians with the personal agency to make such decisions should they have a reason to, as well as another means of protecting their personal information," said Jennifer King, Research Specialist at the Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic at U.C. Berkeley School of Law.
If the governor signs SB 362, California would join Wisconsin and North Dakota, which have already banned forced RFID implantation.
In 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an RFID tag for human implantation called VeriChip, which would allow medical professionals to access a person's medical history in the event that the person couldn't communicate. The chip's parent company, VeriChip Corporation, reports that 2,000 people have already had tags implanted. The company also has clients around the world that want to use human implantation as a source of identity. For example, the attorney general of Mexico and 18 of his staff members were implanted with chips to allow them to get into high-security areas.
The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA), which develops ethics policies for the American Medical Association, recently issued a report raising concerns about the human implantation of RFID tags. The report stresses that RFID devices may compromise a person's privacy and security because it is not yet clear if the information contained in the tags can be properly protected. Further, CEJA finds that RFID tagging may present physical risks because the tags may migrate under the skin, making them hard to remove at a later time.
And this link is to the actual bill being signed by the Governor.
"California Law Bans Forced Human RFID Tagging"
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/homeland_security_patriot_act_fema/news.php?q=1241205284
Ancient Alien
09-18-2009, 09:46 PM
Why RFID wristbands when they can just put the RFID chips in the vaccines?
http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/18/hitachi-develops-rfid-powder/
“They need a chip that will self-perpetuate, that will spread like a virus, that people can pass to each other, to everyone … “
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt2hk3CgXE
Christo888
09-18-2009, 09:54 PM
Why RFID wristbands when they can just put the RFID chips in the vaccines?
http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/18/hitachi-develops-rfid-powder/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt2hk3CgXE
Right ... that makes much more sense because it isn't really traceable by us but not a whole lot of fear factor in that, like wearing a bracelet... the mark. :lol3:
And if they do then in California you can sue civilly and recover $1,000.00 a day in damages until the chip or nano's are removed. :mfr_lol:
Jnana
09-18-2009, 11:00 PM
Why RFID wristbands when they can just put the RFID chips in the vaccines? http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/18/hitachi-develops-rfid-powder/
I would think that a grain of sand is still too big for a small hypodermic needle. Also, please note the following line from another story about the same chip:
It is attached to a separately-provided external antenna when used, and communicates with the RFID tag reader via the 2.45 GHz band. Maximum communication range is 300 mm.
Hitach Achieves 0.05-mm Sq RFID (http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20070220/127959/)
A weakness of RFID is the RF (radio frequency) bit. To communicate at radio frequencies efficiently, you need an antenna of a certain size. No matter how small the chip is, you will still need the antenna. Also note that this tiny chip has a very small range - not much more than an inch. Embedded in the body it would likely not be able to communicate with the receiver at all.
“They need a chip that will self-perpetuate, that will spread like a virus, that people can pass to each other, to everyone … “ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwt2hk3CgXE
If the chip is meant to identify an individual, then your records must be tied to a number built into the chip. I don't see how a chip that spreads like a virus will achieve that. Am I missing something?
Ancient Alien
09-18-2009, 11:29 PM
Hey Christo,
I wouldn't put too much faith in the legal system. In 2008 mercury was made illegal here in Norway. One of the main reasons: Mercury exposure in young children can have severe neurological consequences. Now all of a sudden it's ok to add a little thimerosal in the vaccines, and they've even made pregnant women one of the primary targets for the swine flu campaign.
Christo888
09-19-2009, 12:09 AM
Hey Christo,
I wouldn't put too much faith in the legal system. In 2008 mercury was made illegal here in Norway. One of the main reasons: Mercury exposure in young children can have severe neurological consequences. Now all of a sudden it's ok to add a little thimerosal in the vaccines, and they've even made pregnant women one of the primary targets for the swine flu campaign.
Ya, I know what you mean, the wheels of justice are slow aren't they. However, the legal wrangling has many advantages... and you don't have to wait for a final result, the legal system has several purposes!!!!:lol3: There are battle hardened proponents out there waking up!:thumb_yello:
Kulapops
09-19-2009, 12:23 AM
Way to go California !
So are we saying that Ah-nuld saves the day again ? :original:
As he utters the immortal words...
"To be or not to be : Not to be"
K
Ancient Alien
09-19-2009, 12:37 AM
The Chip is at the Tip of the Needle
By Dr Ryke Geerd Hamer (New GermanMedicine)
Yesterday, 27 August 2009, I was giving an introductory talk about German New Medicine (GNM) near Vienna, Austria. My wife was with me and about 40 listeners. At the end as part of the discussion the swine flu was mentioned and a lady got up and declared the following:
A friend of hers works for a pharmaceutical company in Vienna and told her that the swine flu injection needles indeed contain nano particles in their very tip, which cannot be detected with the naked eye but are clearly visible with as little as a 12 times magnifying microscope like children’s toy microscopes. The staff of the pharmaceutical company was advised that these nano particles work in the human body like a motherboard in the computer and lots of data can be stored on it, which will make cash cards obsolete. This measure was also intended to do an accurate census and to protect babies, as many mothers would simply “discard” their newborn, without knowledge of the authorities.
This lady further disclosed that she was working in the medical field. She had asked a lawyer who came to her as a patient, how it was possible to avoid being chipped. He told her that he was aware of the planned chipping of the population; in fact most upper class members of society were aware of this plan. For this year no forced vaccinations were planned but to rather encourage people through the media to volunteer for the jab.
In case too few would come forward, forced vaccination was planned for next year. Exempt from those were certain professional groups like the
police, medical personal, politicians etc. Being a lawyer, he knew ways for himself to avoid the jab, but for the majority of the population there was no escape.
http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/6854
Christo888
09-19-2009, 04:11 AM
http://www.mofo.com/news/updates/bulletins/13034.html
Just as a reminder, absolutely no RFID or any "Identification device" can be tagged on or into a human in the state of California... nothing, zilch, nadda... not even nano-technology at the tip of a needle!
Check with the law firm below for more information, begin taking steps to pass similar laws and legislation in your own state or country ASAP!!!!!
From the Law firm of Morrison & Foerster:
California Bans Mandatory Implanting of Identification Devices
November 2007
by Christine E. Lyon
Privacy Bulletin
Effective January 1, 2008, a new California law will regulate the implantation of RFIDs and other identification devices in humans. California Senate Bill 362 (“SB 362”) prohibits any person from requiring, coercing, or compelling another individual to undergo the implanting of an “identification device” on or under the skin.[1] It specifically prohibits conditioning employment, promotion, or other employment benefits on an individual’s consent to the implantation of an identification device.[2]
Under SB 362, an “identification device” is any item, application or product that is passively or actively capable of transmitting personal information, including but not limited to devices using radio frequency technology.[3] An implantation of an identification device is considered to be “subcutaneous” if the device is “existing, performed, or introduced under or onthe skin.”[4] SB 362 provides that it “shall be liberally construed so as to protect privacy and bodily integrity.”[5]
SB 362 creates a private right of action for an individual who is implanted with a subcutaneous identification device in violation of this new law.[6] Such an individual may bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, and any other appropriate relief.[7] Actions brought under SB 362 are independent of any other actions, remedies, or procedures that may be available to the plaintiff.[8] In addition, a person who violates SB 362 may be assessed an initial civil penalty of up to $10,000, and up to $1,000 for each day the violation continues until it is corrected.[9] This civil penalty may be recovered in a civil action, and the court may also grant reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation costs to a prevailing plaintiff.[10] Any restitution paid by the defendant is credited against its liability under SB 362.[11] Claims under SB 362 generally must be filed within three years after the identification device is implanted.[12]
California is not the first state to prohibit the mandatory implantation of an RFID or other identification device in a human. Wisconsin and North Dakota have already implemented similar laws.
[1] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(a). The “persons” covered by SB 362 include individuals, business associations, partnerships, limited partnerships, corporations, limited liability companies, trusts, estates, cooperative associations, or other entities. SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(h)(2).
[2] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(h)(4). SB 362 also defines “require, coerce, or compel” to include physical violence, threat, intimidation, retaliation, the conditioning of any private or public benefit or care on consent to implantation, or “other means that causes a reasonable person of ordinary susceptibilities to acquiesce to implementation when he or she otherwise would not.” Id.
[3] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(h)(1). For purposes of SB 362, “personal information” includes an individual’s first or last name; address; telephone number; email, internet protocol or web site address; date of birth; driver’s license number or California identification number; any unique personal identification number contained or encoded on a driver’s license or identification card issued pursuant to Section 13000 of the Vehicle Code; bank, credit card, or other financial institution account number; any unique personal identifier contained or encoded on a health insurance, health benefit, or benefit card or record issued in conjunction with any government-supported aid program; religion; ethnicity or nationality; photograph; fingerprint or other biometric identifier; Social Security number; or any unique personal identifier. SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(h)(3).
[4] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(h)(5).
[5] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(e).
[6] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(b)(2).
[7] Id.
[8] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(e).
[9] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(b)(1). The recoverable litigation costs include expert witness fees and expenses. Id.
[10] Id.
[11] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(d).
[12] SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(c)(1). If the individual was a dependent adult or minor when the implantation occurred, the action may be brought within three years after the date the plaintiff or his or her guardian or parent discovered or reasonably should have discovered the implant, or within eight years after the plaintiff reaches the age of majority, whichever is later. SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code 52.7(c)(2). SB 362 provides that it does not “in any way modify existing statutory or case law regarding the rights of parents or guardians, the rights of children or minors, or the rights of dependent adults.” SB 362, Cal. Civ. Code Section 52.7(g).
dolphin
09-19-2009, 07:23 AM
christo fyo, california statutes are null and void when the federal govt declares "a national emergency" ... that will supercede any state legislation. executive orders are already in place. they've already thought of that.
exchanger's already posted the actual rfid bracelet from a guy in the military on youtube and there are plenty of other videos. no point in going into this. if you don't believe it, your choice. why am i waisting my energy
hahaha, btw.... your posts speak for themselves!
Kulapops
09-19-2009, 11:38 AM
The Chip is at the Tip of the Needle
The staff of the pharmaceutical company was advised that these nano particles work in the human body like a motherboard in the computer and lots of data can be stored on it, which will make cash cards obsolete.
Maybe I'm splitting hairs here, or this speaker is mixing two themes in one sentence, but the job of a motherboard is not to store data. That would be the internal memory and the hard drive...
I'm always wary of stories where the grasp of the technological terms used to describe it sounds futuristic to the speaker (lots of big words to them) but don't make sense to people familiar with those words.
Yes, the technology exists (apparently, but what can I know, I'm just sat in front of this screen...?) to place chips into syringes, albeit with larger than normal bore. Yes, nanotechnology will be the next wave in computer science (but when will that become reality is anyone's guess)
But take a moment to grab a handrail again. Most of these stories rely on paranoia as their backdrop. So if it is a story that describes a 'hopeless' situation, I am now more skeptical. (Don't forget last October, peeps). I like the idea that it will go away, some will have vaccines alright, and it will come back next year... and probably the year after.
In the real world, as far as I can see, the removal of our freedoms seems to be gradual, not apocalyptic.
K
Northern Boy
09-19-2009, 07:26 PM
christo fyo, california statutes are null and void when the federal govt declares "a national emergency" ... that will supercede any state legislation. executive orders are already in place. they've already thought of that.
exchanger's already posted the actual rfid bracelet from a guy in the military on youtube and there are plenty of other videos. no point in going into this. if you don't believe it, your choice. why am i waisting my energy
hahaha, btw.... your posts speak for themselves!
What makes FEDERAL STATUTES ANY DIFFERENT THAN STATE ONES? NEITHER APPLY TO YOU UNLESS YOU CONSENT TO THEM
Christo888
09-19-2009, 10:27 PM
christo fyo, california statutes are null and void when the federal govt declares "a national emergency" ... that will supercede any state legislation. executive orders are already in place. they've already thought of that.
exchanger's already posted the actual rfid bracelet from a guy in the military on youtube and there are plenty of other videos. no point in going into this. if you don't believe it, your choice. why am i waisting my energy
hahaha, btw.... your posts speak for themselves!
Dolphin, you seem to be stuck in a net. The topic of executive orders has been covered for years, and the reach of WHO on top of that also has been covered.
The videos you speak of that Exchanger is continuing to spread are psyops videos, the two videos are showing up on as many NWO websites and fearmongering christian sites as far as searches will take you... they went viral as planned.
The disinfo of the video posted here in the beginning is of a christian x trooper fearmongering attention to his own website and storytelling to a church crowd about rumors he claims to have been privy too. And enjoyed telling the crowd that the State of Oklahoma, of which is not under executive orders, martial law, the UN, or the WHO, but can enact its own laws for the people that live in that state independently of the federal government... blah blah blah, has passed its own state law that every state resident is to be forced vaccinated. This has since been recanted by Greg Evenson on his own website http://www.theheartlandusa.com/ as Oklahoma has no such law. Greg Evenson sells products, dvd's, and other material for a living... if he does not get you rallied up and to his site he will not make any money and go out of buisness... clear enough!
Each state dictates the will of the people (yes that is arguable but not right now) of that state not the federal government. If you want to live in a state that passes a law to force vaccinate its people than go ahead, executive orders are not needed. if all 50 states pass legislation that forces vaccinations from swine flu then you certainly do not need executive orders and the WHO to take over right.
So over the course of time the more states that pass legislation such as California has then tptw will have to create an event in order to activate the executive orders etc. If such an event cannot be pulled off then there are no executive orders and there is no FEMA and there is no WHO to exercise power.
In order to pull off such an event (like 911) you have to have psyops programs in operation throughout the country (America) in order to create a catalyst for reaction to upset the apple cart so that executive orders, UN charters, and the WHO can have the opportunity to take over.
Christians are the current psyops target in America in order to tip the balance towards unrest so that the jurisdiction of the states can be taken away, and martial law, or pandemic, or whatever can take its place in power.
But one more time... if there is no event and no group to blame it on then the state you live in is the law of the land.
Does that make sense dolphin?
Today we do not have an event that activates executive orders, and the like, but we do have a law that prevents forced vaccination and chipping the population of California.
It would be great if all 50 states and every country on the planet pass such similar legislation then we have some more time to wake more people up, the more people that wake up the harder it is for tptw to create an event with a group to blame it on because they don't want to get caught!!!
There are not enough vaccines produced to put in place a mass vaccination program nationwide... you cannot have a mass vaccination program unless you have a vaccine... therefore state law dictates what you are subjected to in the meantime whether you voluntarily get a vaccine or wait until it possibly is forced upon you by unfolding events that we as a population are responsible in... our reactions and choices of what we continue to spread or discuss either helps their agenda to further the NWO or we can change the momentum from escalating out of our hands!!!
Go back and read the thread again dolphin especially about the light beacon thought to be an RFID device!!!
You can call me as many names as you want, because you really are only wasting your time, but we are not under martial law, we are currently under state law and we may or may not ever be in that position of martial law because it totally depends on the awareness and empowerment of all of us to create the understanding of the group mind as opportunity arises in order to have an input in order to do a part.
It is either Active Participation or passive permission.
So dolphin what is it you are selling???
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.