View Full Version : Are they announcing the discovery of Nibiru?
I saw an article that says that they the astronomers found a star much bigger that saturn and that it appeared from nowhere!!!!
are they announcing Nibiru?
you can find the link at www.disclose.tv
09-17-2008, 01:47 AM
they maybe....but notice the distance away from us.....
we should have no concern!
09-17-2008, 02:25 AM
Heres the wiki link for the star, i'm not sure as to call the planet around it Nibiru just yet tho.
This is a handy program I found for exploring stars and planets in 3D. It doesn't come with 1RXS J160929.1-210524 pre-installed but i'm sure someone has made a plugin for it. :biggrin2:
This is pretty interesting as well:
09-17-2008, 02:39 AM
I saw a video on Youtube,
where someone claimed to be an astronomer (kept his identity secret) in a base at the Antarctica.
And he showed some pictures of Niberiu, of which he claimed is kept secret by all his colleges and all goverments.
At the end he said that he would report again.
I don't know if this was genuine, and I'm curious if there is a new report of him.
09-17-2008, 02:44 AM
Nice find, isorec. Thanks.
09-17-2008, 02:50 AM
The article is on Sky& telescope
09-17-2008, 02:59 AM
Let me post that story in full here:
Is This an Alien Planet?
Discovering a planet around another star is no big deal these days — dozens of them have been reported in 2008 alone, and the total count now stands at more than 300.
Of course, the burgeoning exoplanet population hasn't stopped astronomers from looking for more of them. Big gaps remain in the sampling statistics, because the most successful techniques (radial-velocity monitoring, microlensing events, and periodic transits) favor finding large bodies close to their parent stars. Far-out planets are rarely discovered this way because they have long orbital periods and even longer odds of crossing directly in front of their stars.
But it should be possible to spot alien worlds directly by imaging very young nearby stars. This game plan assumes that any outlying gas-giant planets are still glowing warmly from having formed so recently, making them relatively easy pickings at infrared wavelengths. One of these came to light in 2004, though it orbits a feebly glowing brown dwarf rather than a proper star.
Now a trio of astronomers from the University of Toronto has found a "planetary-mass candidate" next to a young star that has roughly the Sun's mass. To see it, last April they utilized an adaptive-optics-aided infrared imager attached to the Gemini North telescope atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii.
The press release announcing the discovery touts the "First Picture of Likely Planet," but astronomers David Lafrenière, Ray Jayawardhana, and Marten van Kerkwijk are stopping short of calling it that.
For one thing, there's no information yet on the characteristics of its orbit — or, indeed, whether it's even bound to the star at all. They do know that it's not a star, because it's not very hot (about 1,800 kelvins, or 2,700°F) and its infrared spectrum reveals the presence of water and carbon monoxide. Most likely it's about 8 times the mass of Jupiter.
The parent star, which has the snappy designation 1RXS J160929.1-210524, lies about 500 light-years from Earth. So the putative planet's apparent separation of 2.2 arcseconds corresponds to about 330 astronomical units. That's already raised eyebrows among solar-system modelers, because it's highly unlikely that so massive a planet could have formed so far from its star.
The observing team has looked at more than 80 other stars in a 5-million-year-old grouping called the Upper Scorpius Association, and this is the only candidate planet they've turned up to date.
Jayawardhana admits that calling it a "planet" is a stretch; more likely, it's a "failed" binary star with a seriously stunted secondary. However, he notes that a massive planet might conceivably have formed closer in and then been tossed outward by a chance encounter with another large planet soon after the young star formed.
The true nature of 1RXS J160929.1-210524's companion probably won't become clear anytime soon. Its orbital period is likely thousands of years. At best, the team hopes to confirm that the star and its companion are moving together in space. "If we confirm that this object is indeed gravitationally tied to the star, it will be a major step forward," says Lafrenière. Those observations will have to wait until next spring, when the pair emerges from behind the Sun.
09-20-2008, 11:26 PM
Maybe they are lying about the distance it is away from us.
09-21-2008, 07:02 AM
This particular planet at this star
has absolutely nothing to do with Planet X
neither does Nancy Leider
and her nutcake Zeta "Ridiculans"
The aspect of alien interventions within this solar system run the spinning wheel
of species that emerge from common fascist military governments [like our planet]
to beings that farm designer solar systems
in sacred geometries,
to interdimensional beings we cannot even comprehend or possibly even experience.
so for a head start:
as per possible "alien intervention"
something removed from the typical conspiracist
slant and presented by scientifically peer reviewed
from SPSR, and UTSI
University Tennessee Space Institute top physicist
The Mars Pentad Mounds
form a perfect tetrahedral grid
THE MOUNDS OF CYDONIA
- A CASE STUDY FOR PLANETARY SETI
members and peer reviewed articles
09-21-2008, 10:39 PM
I asked Cha Cha (that new mobile search engine, text 242242 with a question and they answer it within a few minutes) and they said that Nibiru was actually a comet. Anyone knows anything about this? Im a little confused, is it a star, a planet, or a comet?
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.