Atmosphere on the Moon - A Study

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Redacted

[spacevisitor]

Hello again zorgon, this is the second absolute magnificent thread I see you started here and I will study this one also of course.
But accept for the time being my compliments for this thread also and for your excellent research.:up:

One of John's favorite subjects

Well the first thing we need to do before we start is to clear up a couple of old myths. Because as long as you believe these two, you will live forever in denial of reality... and as such there will be no help for you...:bleh:

Myth Number One
There is no Atmosphere on the Moon

So, this must be very sad news indeed for those who always said that John was wrong about this .:naughty:

EXHIBIT #7
Yes you CAN see stars in the 'sky', the large orb is Venus... funny that Apollo shots NEVER show any... but thats for later

Very interesting what you show and say here, I am really looking forward to your explanation about that.

[HallieBallie]

I found it also very weird that we couldn't see any stars in the pics of NASA.

Some said it's the focussing of the camera to the surface of the moon and the reflection of the light blinds the effect to see the stars.

Now i see the pics of the DoD/NAVY project with stars, very nice, thank you.

BTW :welcomeani: zorgon, nice thread.

[luis9343]

wow, thanks a lot for this zorgon, will def go over it soon.

[Bigfatfurrytexan]

In my mind, i cannot fathom how a body could have mass, but not attact an atmosphere. Is it breathable? Well...likely not on the near side. However, John has asserted that on the farside there exists enough atmosphere to make it breathable. Now...i am unsure if it would have enough O2 to keep the blood saturation high enough, or if the sodium levels (or other mineral) would not be somewhat toxic or uncomfortable to our respiratory system.

Now, i would tend to agree that if there is atmosphere, it would likely be on the farside, and it would tend to settle more into low lying areas and caves (gravity and all). I believe that the Earths magnetosphere is largely overlooked as causation for any of the anomolous findings, as well.

That being said, excellent info, Zorgon. Nice to have a place to stretch the old legs, huh?

[johnlear]

In my mind, i cannot fathom how a body could have mass, but not attact an atmosphere. Is it breathable? Well...likely not on the near side. However, John has asserted that on the farside there exists enough atmosphere to make it breathable. Now...i am unsure if it would have enough O2 to keep the blood saturation high enough, or if the sodium levels (or other mineral) would not be somewhat toxic or uncomfortable to our respiratory system.

Now, i would tend to agree that if there is atmosphere, it would likely be on the farside, and it would tend to settle more into low lying areas and caves (gravity and all). I believe that the Earths magnetosphere is largely overlooked as causation for any of the anomolous findings, as well.

That being said, excellent info, Zorgon. Nice to have a place to stretch the old legs, huh?


The breathable atmosphere is on both the nearside and the farside and equal to about 18,000 feet here on Earth.

Since Pari Spolter, in her book, "Gravitational Force of the Sun" has both mathematically and scientifically debunked Newtons Law of Universal Gravitation, the gravitational constant, and Einsteins mathematical hoaxes: the Theories of Relativity both General and Special, we don't need to be arguing about the breathable atmosphere on the moon anymore. :)

[Bigfatfurrytexan]

The breathable atmosphere is on both the nearside and the farside and equal to about 18,000 feet here on Earth.

Since Pari Spolter, in her book, "Gravitational Force of the Sun" has both mathematically and scientifically debunked Newtons Law of Universal Gravitation, the gravitational constant, and Einsteins mathematical hoaxes: the Theories of Relativity both General and Special, we don't need to be arguing about the breathable atmosphere on the moon anymore. :)

:) and there we have it. I have read through some of the Spolter stuff on the pegasus site. Very interesting, to say the least.

[zorgon]

Redacted

[zorgon]

Test Complete

[Orion11]

excellent zorgon!! everything ive ever seen from you is great though!! Thanks soo much man. Much respect.

[Colin]

bump

[Tuza]

I know this must be a dumb question Zorgon considering your research, but I am right in thinking that the moon was supposed to have been brought and anchored here by some ETs, how does that hypothesis equate!:original:

[Tuza]

bump:original:

[day]

The breathable atmosphere is on both the nearside and the farside and equal to about 18,000 feet here on Earth.

Since Pari Spolter, in her book, "Gravitational Force of the Sun" has both mathematically and scientifically debunked Newtons Law of Universal Gravitation, the gravitational constant, and Einsteins mathematical hoaxes: the Theories of Relativity both General and Special, we don't need to be arguing about the breathable atmosphere on the moon anymore. :)

I am looking forward to reading her book!! Einstein dispelled Euclidian geomtry and now it time for us to look at things moving faster than the speed of light and going beyone the sciences held in this time matrix for masses.

I can just imagine classical physicists arguing over this as being 'dysfunctional physics!!!'

thanks for the post!

[day]

Beautifly laid out Zorgon --- a delight to read!

[Tuza]

Zorgon you must think I am dippy with the question that the moon was hypothesized to be towed and anchored here by ET's, but I would like your take via that and the moon atmosphere. Thanks.:original:

[Norval]

Lots of good information for ones to read and look at in their search for what is realy true. :thumb_yello:

[ISIS]

Once again awesome thread Zorgon!!

I look forward to your threads...

If you keep them posting

You can be sure, we'll keep on looking

Thank you:wink2:

ISIS

:thumb_yello::thumb_yello:

[bill7907]

Good one zorgon.

But I wonder what the NASA has been doing secretly since Appollo 17, which was the last mission that landed men on the moon. And that was in 1972.

Were they restricted to land on the Moon by a particular Extraterrestrial race?

Why in 1972 they would land men on the moon, and now in 2008(almost 2009) with all that leap in technology, they are not doing it anymore?

[Swanny]

I don't believe they have made it to the moon yet

[smat]

Wonderful thread Zorgon.

I watched Nasa's Greatest missions on DiscoverHD a couple of days ago.
What I found strange was that all through out the mission we had wonderful good quality colour film, but the second we reached the moon we had the poorest bluriest black and white images ever.

It went back go good quality colour again showing Niel Armstrong plating the flag..... but the sequence wasn't played like a video it was a set of time lapsed still pictures.

I have never seen good quality colour video footage of when they were on the moon, was the lunar landing faked or is good quality un doctored video or photos of the moon classified.

Surely in all them trips we did to the moon we must have some good pics.

also when the flew over the dark side of the moon the camera was zoomed so you could only see a thin strip, are there and good quality pictures of the far side of the moon?

[zorgon]

Yippee Back in business :thumb_yello:

Now I need to review the stuff and add more :up: