View Full Version : Space Scientists WANT to NUKE Saturn?
Shechaiyah
10-01-2008, 03:59 PM
http://www.rinf.com/news/nov05/lucifer-project.html
This is a documentation and study of the feasibility of creating a sustainable fusion reaction from an initial fission reaction on Saturn caused by a significant quantity of Plutonium-238 being inserted deep into the atmosphere. A fusion-ignited Saturn-sun would be the key to creating a human-habitable area on Titan. This report is the result of my intensive research on this subject since late 2002. I could not be so confident in my assertions if it were not for the additional key research of Jacco van der Worp, a Netherlands physicist, and former NASA Consultant, Richard C. Hoagland. I am sure I will be accused of being an alarmist, but I believe the information presented here will convince any open mind that there is at least some suspicious activity regarding NASA's Galileo and Cassini missions.
********
COMMENTS:
I have asserted, there is some insanity in the way NASA MARS photosgraphs are manipulated to show desolation where there is clearly Life on the ground.
This article confirms what I feared: that our space scientists are totally over the edge, having no sense of cosmic responsibility for conserving anything.
They're off their rockers and they operate out of a playbook straight from the Orion Group -- Reptilian plunder, without assessing costs. The whole universe can be their trash heap, for all they care.
I'm sorry. I find this horrifying.
Shech--
kaedin32x
10-04-2008, 03:51 AM
hey i was checking this out a while back. they were supposed to hit saturn around july or something but as far as i can tell there has been nothing so far.
also i know that they already tried to use the same technique on jupiter. they hit it with around 14 lbs of plutonium whereas the saturn mission is supposed to have like 3 times as much, around like 73 lbs or something. the thing i hear people saying about this is the gravity in general most likely wouldnt be strong enough from a nuke for any fusion effect to happen. kinda like with jupiter, theres now a huge black dot on the atmosphere from that blast, yet nothing came of it.
ive been checking back every now and then since july about this and so far, nothing. so dont worry too much, i figure it either failed or was scrapped
conniec818
10-05-2008, 12:05 AM
greetings
this was all over the net earlier this year...look up project lucifer..if they havent taken it down ..on google or you tube..they were supposed to do it 7/7/08..but as far as i could tell they postponed it until 2010...dont know why though..
Sol Invictus
10-05-2008, 12:12 AM
Project Lucifer. Was a big thing last year for this summer, and has been 'set back', for reasons only they know of.
(well, they think we are dumb and will forget all of this - the net was set aflame and hundreds jammed nasa and its teams email systems with 'we know what your doing messages' which must of put a few noses out of joint to say the least).
However, Saturn is very heavily defended and will not be going stellar on us now, or ever, no matter how hard those in power try.
conniec818
10-05-2008, 12:20 AM
maybe they did not go ahead is because they were told no....
had they did ..it would have killed millions on earth..also it would have disrupted the entire solar system...
Sol Invictus
10-05-2008, 12:27 AM
maybe they did not go ahead is because they were told no....
had they did ..it would have killed millions on earth..also it would have disrupted the entire solar system...
Oh no one on earth had any qualms about making Saturn into a giant 'bomb', for thats what would of happend. Not a self sustaining reaction, but a super sized chain reaction and explosive release of material that would of 'shotgunned' through our solar system.
This didn't worry the PTb either.
zorgon
10-06-2008, 05:13 AM
they postponed it until 2010...dont know why though..
Elementary my Dear...
They reread the script :bleh:
Arthur C Clarke, who coined the name "Lucifer" for the new Sun said 2010, don't you recall the Movie?
Galileo carried 32 pounds of Plutonium 238 when is smashed into Jupiter and left a black spot twice the size of Earth
Cassini is carrying 72 pounds of Plutonium 238... :yikes:
To put that into perspective of how much KABOOM that is... the Nagasaki bomb carried a mere 12.5 pounds of Plutonium 238
Here is the best video on the Lucifer Project
http://www.youtube.com/v/lbmd7hWz2qI
No do not mistake "Lucufer" with "Satan" Lucifer is the "Bringer of Light" hence the reason ACC named it Lucifer...
For those who believe Lucifer is Satan in the Bible... remember that Lucifer is only mentioned AFTER the Greek translation :bleh:
Now don't get me started on the Bozo's at NASA who love to smash into things... because it would take 4 Pages...
:yikes:
zorgon
10-06-2008, 05:18 AM
Oh no one on earth had any qualms about making Saturn into a giant 'bomb', for thats what would of happend. Not a self sustaining reaction, but a super sized chain reaction and explosive release of material that would of 'shotgunned' through our solar system.
No IF Saturn would have been ignited (or will be) it would become a small Sun and thus give life creating energy to Titan, a moon that looks a lot like Earth. This is what ACC envisioned only he used Jupiter... and Europa the Water World (moon)...
Problem is while Jupiter has the right proportions of Hydrogen to Helium as the Sun does... Saturn does not and it is doubtful that sustained fusion would occur
Here is the "Birth Sequence" as the planet ignites..
2010 - Peter Hyams - The Birth Scene
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhMYgq-0cGI
..
zorgon
10-06-2008, 05:28 AM
OH BTW... did you know that Carl Sagan had a plan to "Nuke the Moon"?
His idea was that if they dropped a nuke on the moon the resultant blast would throw matter into the air and they could look for organic material :mfr_omg:
Air Force Had Plans to Nuke Moon
The U.S. Air Force developed a top-secret Cold War plan to detonate a nuclear bomb on the moon in the 1950s.
In a letter to the journal Nature, physicist Leonard Reiffel, leader of the effort which was called Project A 119, wrote that the Air Force wanted to explore the effects of exploding a nuclear bomb on the moons face. The Air Force wanted the explosion to be clearly visible from Earth.
Part of the team researching the hypothetical explosion was a young Carl Sagan, who was recruited to study how the mushroom cloud would expand and collapse under the moons lighter gravity. Sagan proposed that a legitimate scientific purpose for the explosion could have been examining the cloud for possible organic material.
http://www.space.com/news/spacehistory/nuke_moon_000514.html
zorgon
10-06-2008, 05:29 AM
maybe they did not go ahead is because they were told no....
had they did ..it would have killed millions on earth..also it would have disrupted the entire solar system...
No it would have little effect on Earth, except we would see two suns :biggrin2:
Average Joe
10-06-2008, 02:58 PM
IF true, I find this plan outrageous.
Who are we to play God and decide to turn a planet into a sun?
What if there was creatures on Saturn? I doubt they'd be too happy!
Ceara
10-06-2008, 03:05 PM
They THINK they can turn a planet into a star but that's about as far as it goes. Wishful thinking...
They've already tried to crash a craft full of nuclear material on another planet and it pretty much fizzled.
kaedin32x
10-06-2008, 03:29 PM
its sad, alot of these people set out with good intentions at heart, up until the powers that be dig their claws in. then all meaning is lost and it seems to become another ego/macho thing. ya we rule we can make new suns, i think if we had people with true good intentions in power we can do great things not just for ourselves but the whole planet
Alexandra
10-06-2008, 03:42 PM
:original:
Antaletriangle
10-06-2008, 06:07 PM
I'm sure there'd be some effect /affect to Earth if either one of the two gas giants went stella.Cause and effect.Playing at Goddo again.We can't even feed our own people and the high degree masonics are experimenting with exotic sciences in space!?Why don't they get things in order and not meaning NWO!Fair enough they're after another place to inhabit but i hope they'd try and make a go of this beautiful sphere first.
Ali Quadir
10-06-2008, 06:33 PM
Read this...
Will Galileo Make Jupiter a Star? (http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/jupiter_galileo.html)
Phil Plait is an expert in astronomy. I have followed him for a long time. He worked with Nasa. You can verify his material in the scientific text books. I'm sure it will all hold.
He has some "bad qualities" like his total rejection of all things religious and what he calls pseudo science. But his science is usually top notch. And his writing skills are a joy to read and easy to access even to non scientists.
So please visit his page and then forget about all this.
Antaletriangle
10-06-2008, 07:01 PM
I understand and am aware alquadir about the propulsion system that was aboard Galileo-i was making a comment about how mad scientists could really be and if it ever did occur for some reason;a secondary sun in this system that it would have effects on Earth in one way or another.Seasons,Fauna and floral behaviour patterns,stresses on ozone and magnetic fields etc. etc.I've been on the bad science site before it's quite good,thanks.
BeaTnik-BandiT
10-06-2008, 07:07 PM
However, Saturn is very heavily defended and will not be going stellar on us now, or ever, no matter how hard those in power try.
That's a good thing to hear...
salute
Operator
10-06-2008, 07:12 PM
Well as always mankind wants to blow things up ... and thinks that way.
(I think Nassim Haramein said that).
What I have read is that they gave the orbiter 2 more years because it still was functioning very well. There was a big meeting
with a lot of scientist who could bring their wish list and they made a schedule around that. As far as I understood they
still have the plan to crash it. And it will be done in 2010 ...
First thing that crossed my mind is ... the must have a dark secondary reason to postpone to a better date ... :sad:
Cheers
Sol Invictus
10-06-2008, 08:02 PM
Read this...
Will Galileo Make Jupiter a Star? (http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/jupiter_galileo.html)
Phil Plait is an expert in astronomy. I have followed him for a long time. He worked with Nasa. You can verify his material in the scientific text books. I'm sure it will all hold.
He has some "bad qualities" like his total rejection of all things religious and what he calls pseudo science. But his science is usually top notch. And his writing skills are a joy to read and easy to access even to non scientists.
So please visit his page and then forget about all this.
HAHAHAHAHAHHA.....:lmfao:
Oh yes, thats right, listen to the man who's paycheck was signed by NASA and who pension is.... get my drift? he is no more going to stick his neck out than an NSA spook is going to write a history of their black operations and wet work.
As for Saturn, it has a very, very real chance of becoming one huge explosive reaction should a nuclear device detonate within it. Not maybe making a sun, but a collosal detonation and solar system wide effects.
Sol Invictus
10-06-2008, 08:03 PM
However, let me reinforce this message.
Nothing will get acces to the 'gate' deep within saturn. Nor are the streamers going to allow it to detonate or else wise be destroyed.
Some folks are in for a rude awakenign and hasty demise should they try.
Greg10036
10-06-2008, 08:45 PM
They better ask the people who live there first.
g.
Powerinourhandsl
10-06-2008, 08:53 PM
"Oh my God! Its full of Stars"
DapperDaze
10-06-2008, 09:05 PM
Or...the new model for stars is not completely explained with fusion and they had to go back to the drawing board. The new theoretical model is galactic electricity and superconductors (stars): Thunderbolt of the gods (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&ei=Kn3qSPejIIqCrQLlxtycCw&q=thunderbolt+of+the+gods&hl=en)
vlad the impaler
10-06-2008, 10:17 PM
Well, I feel I must respond to this. I do know a fair amount about fission-fusion weapon design.
I can tell you 100% that this assertion is total rubbish. For fission to occur, you can do it one of two ways.
You either a) fire two sub-critical masses together as in the 'Little Boy' design , or b) compress a non-critical mass into a critical one using some sort of force be it explosive, magnetic, laser whatever.
Now, Pu239 will fizzle if you try to use method a), so in order for 'Project Satan' to work, we will need some explosive packed around the RTGs on the spacecraft. Add to that, we also need an initiator (polonium works well), which is by design highly radioactive, and as such has a short half life. How long was that ship flying for?
Even if the Lizards, or whoever did manage to do all of the above, a fission bomb going off surrounded by hydrogen will not cause a fusion reaction! For fusion, you need very very high temperatures, and very very high pressure! In effect the Deuterium needs to be imploded from all sides. The Teller-Ulam two stage hydrogen bomb design used styrofoam as a plasma generator to create the hard X-rays required for the radiation implosion of the secondary fusion stage. Whist inside the tank of Deuterium, a fissile 'spark plug' was placed to provide imploding force in the opposite direction. The whole lot was levitated (spaced) to increase the 'hammer on anvil' blow of the fission shock on the Deuterium. Basically, it was very carefully designed to make it work. (Not all Hydrogen bombs have worked. The first British one for example was a failure).
Not much chance of implosion in the atmosphere of the planet is there? There is nothing to squeeze from the other side of the explosion!
So, you can all rest easy. Physics in on our side on this one....
pineal-pilot-in merkabah
10-06-2008, 10:48 PM
Or...the new model for stars is not completely explained with fusion and they had to go back to the drawing board. The new theoretical model is galactic electricity and superconductors (stars): Thunderbolt of the gods (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&ei=Kn3qSPejIIqCrQLlxtycCw&q=thunderbolt+of+the+gods&hl=en)
is that where they found out the sun was just a big electromagnetic ball and not a hot nuclear reactor? or did they know before this??
Ali Quadir
10-06-2008, 11:16 PM
Oh yes, thats right, listen to the man who's paycheck was signed by NASA and who pension is.... get my drift? he is no more going to stick his neck out than an NSA spook is going to write a history of their black operations and wet work.
He's not payed by Nasa... He used to work for them but is not working for them now. I was clear about this. Please get the facts straight. :)
There is an alternative to trusting this man......
Get an education and verify his words for yourself.
:tongue2:
Seriously... You are absolutely 100% entitled to your opinions... You are absolutely not entitled to your own facts... If you want to vent opinions... Go right ahead. If you want to misrepresent reality, or make it seem like something else.. You are essentially lying about the facts. And while you're doing it, you're accusing good people of being bad people...
And what does that make you?
Now the person who suggested all this had no insight in the underlying science. He has put forward his warnings. That dropping the spaceship into Saturn WOULD cause Saturn to ignite... Nasa decided to do it anyway because one of the moons. Titan I believe has potential to contain live. And they did not want to take any chances in contaminating that moon. Saturn clearly did not ignite, the spacecraft just vanished into Saturn. This all was in the past. There is very little to discuss really...
Thank you Vlad.
DapperDaze
10-06-2008, 11:17 PM
The electromagnetic part yes, except it is a new "theory". The movie (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&ei=OZvqSKLEBJCQqQKVysGYAQ&q=thunerbolt+of+the+gods&hl=en) goes into evidence that explains some of the inconsistencies associated with the fusion model, such as comets, neutrinos, black sunspots and I thought the computer electric-galaxy model was very cool. If you are into astronomy it is worth watching, all doom and gloom aside. :shocked:
is that where they found out the sun was just a big electromagnetic ball and not a hot nuclear reactor? or did they know before this??
zorgon
10-08-2008, 06:33 AM
So please visit his page and then forget about all this.
No thanks Phil makes a living debunking others. If it wasn't for CT'ers he wouldn't have an income. :bleh:
Funny how no one bugs him about the books and lecture tours he make money on, but if a whistle blower wants to sell a book the debunkers are all over him
Phil Plait and his buddy Jim Oberg... Send them on the next mission to Mercury :biggrin2:
zorgon
10-08-2008, 06:40 AM
That dropping the spaceship into Saturn WOULD cause Saturn to ignite... Nasa decided to do it anyway because one of the moons. Titan I believe has potential to contain live. And they did not want to take any chances in contaminating that moon. Saturn clearly did not ignite, the spacecraft just vanished into Saturn. This all was in the past. There is very little to discuss really...
WOW what a load of RUBBISH... Saturn 'clearly' did not ignite because Cassini has not yet crashed into it. The mission has been extended to 2010... Galileo crashed into Jupiter and created a huge black spot larger than Earth. They were planning to drop Galileo onto Europa... the water moon... but decided not to contaminate that pristine world and flew it into Jupiter instead...
You really ought to try to get your facts straight before you taunt us with that 'expert' Phil Plait
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.