View Full Version : Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours
The voice of One
12-01-2008, 11:06 AM
Please tell me what you make of this...
http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/arcticnukes18nov08.shtml
And the Seismic activity going on at the moment...
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/ (http://www.iris.edu/seismon/:mfr_omg:)
:mfr_omg:
elsinorelore
12-01-2008, 11:47 AM
Hey, I find this extremely interesting! If you find out any more, please post it!!!
Thanks!!!
historycircus
12-01-2008, 03:59 PM
Hey, I find this extremely interesting! If you find out any more, please post it!!!
Thanks!!!
I'll second that - and thanks for the link.
I wonder what the end game there is . . .
Dantheman62
12-01-2008, 04:08 PM
Nine H-bombs wouldn't be enough to shift the north magnetic pole, it would take alot more than that! If oil was involved than they surely wouldn't let all that money just float away. I would like to see more evidence of the explosions.
Great. More Radiation floating around. :sneaky2:
I don't know. Are they trying to circumvent the Magnetic Pole Shift? Whatever they're doing setting off a bunch of Nukes can't be good. :thumbdown:
GoingToFast
12-01-2008, 05:14 PM
This page is on my Favorit's list now.
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/
Antaletriangle
12-01-2008, 05:19 PM
Interesting info.Thanks for sharing.
oldpaganfreak
12-01-2008, 05:30 PM
i'm afraid that i just don't believe this. this report claims that the nukes were expolded on canadian territory. there are inuit settlements near there, as well as conventional oil exploration. just because something is 'claimed to be true' on the net does not make it so. this is certainly an example of that. i have many family and friends employed in oil exploration. blowing 9 nukes could hardly be hidden from us.
i would have to see a lot more compelling evidence before i would believe it.
canadians have very strong feelings about nuclear testing. the inuit would cewrtainly be raising sh*t about it and we have heard nothing in even the off beat news sources about this.
sorry....ain't true.
gatestar
12-01-2008, 05:39 PM
I find the timing interesting...we had two meteorites hit Canada around that time and they seem to come from north going south...also...there has been alot of buzz about major disasters on the west coast..could this be an attempt to trigger a major earthquake?
I remember on the 18th there was a large square at the north pole on the USGS map. I thought this was odd, I live on Vancouver Island so I watch USGS daily.
Antaletriangle
12-01-2008, 05:40 PM
Hey,don't be sorry if it's not true surely it's good news!
Connecting with Sauce
12-01-2008, 05:55 PM
Not sure what they are up to.
I have two possible reasons... the obvious oil one mentioned in the link
or...
If as a recent link here suggested (can't find it now) the planet is actually cooling slightly if red hot magma were to be released underneath the ice it would possibly melt it and keep the global warming / pole caps melting theme going well.
Either way I'm sure it isn't for a good cause... Also I would suggest with the nuclear boring / tunnelling machines they've had since 1995 would have made getting them placed would not take long, as the post above suggests otherwise.
Phil Schneider 1995:
http://educate-yourself.org/products/pslastlecturedescrip.shtml
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearch?q=Phil+Schneider+&hl=en&emb=0&aq=-1&oq=#
RubyTuesday
12-01-2008, 06:59 PM
HAARP looks VERY interesting on Nov 18th.
http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi
karelia
12-01-2008, 07:06 PM
There is still no second source confirming it, so I'm leaning towards believing it's not true. See here: http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/index.php
RubyTuesday
12-01-2008, 07:09 PM
There is still no second source confirming it, so I'm leaning towards believing it's not true. See here: http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/index.php
Nice site! :thumb_yello:
I can't see how it is true, either. Surely we'd see some immediate, major repercussions, no? I lean towards possibly something DID happen (check out HAARP) but not 9 nukes! I just can't imagine not knowing that?
EYES WIDE OPEN
12-01-2008, 08:13 PM
very pleased to see sceptism here. It was missing when this board first started. very healthy! :)
Christo888
12-01-2008, 08:20 PM
Please tell me what you make of this...
http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/arcticnukes18nov08.shtml
And the Seismic activity going on at the moment...
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/ (http://www.iris.edu/seismon/:mfr_omg:)
:mfr_omg:
Interesting article on 'educate yourself'... but I thought Magnetic North was in the South Geo Pole?
RubyTuesday
12-01-2008, 08:27 PM
Okay, a friend just passed this on to me:
http://lantis.tv/amp/releases/seismic.html
So maybe it isn't totally impossible. I still can't believe NINE but who knows? :shocked:
KathyT
12-01-2008, 08:52 PM
What part of "is it true" do you want confirmation on?
That there was something recorded on seismographs? Or that they were nucleur bombs?
The first part IS CONFIRMED.
They are on the USGeological Survey maps here: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/
Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events. Exact same times, but the magnitude readings are just a wee different, which could be an aspect of coming from different seismographs
I don't know how Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone would know they were nuclear bombs. I don't know how that can be verified.
It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. Nor is that area in the Artic a fault line, to my knowledge.
Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES. Helllloooo!
Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory.
joe2288
12-01-2008, 08:56 PM
just checked the usgs if there were nukes being blown up than it would show
on the rictor wait nm wrong gragh
Christo888
12-01-2008, 08:59 PM
What part of "is it true" do you want confirmation on?
That there was something recorded on seismographs? Or that they were nucleur bombs?
The first part IS CONFIRMED.
They are on the USGeological Survey maps here: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/
Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events. Exact same times, but the magnitude readings are just a wee different, which could be an aspect of coming from different seismographs
I don't know how Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone would know they were nuclear bombs. I don't know how that can be verified.
It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. Nor is that area in the Artic a fault line, to my knowledge.
Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES.
Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory.
Kathy T ... I like how you think, I have been looking for pics of the poles for 20 years and the only ones I ever found came from one of 'Norval's post! Someone surely doesn't like posting pics of the poles and when they do post are they 'smudged'?
Dantheman62
12-01-2008, 09:13 PM
Here's links to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE http://amazingbeauty.org/a-1-fortunecity/nature/nature-08.html
Christo888
12-01-2008, 09:15 PM
Here's a link to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE
Excuse me... I guess I should have been more specific. I mean real pics of the poles un touched.
Dantheman62
12-01-2008, 09:19 PM
oops, sorry, I'm trying!
Christo888
12-01-2008, 09:25 PM
oops, sorry, I'm trying!
No worries... it':thumb_yello:s all good.
KathyT
12-01-2008, 09:47 PM
Here's links to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE http://amazingbeauty.org/a-1-fortunecity/nature/nature-08.html
The closest I've found to "real" pictures of the northern Artic, are the Cryosphere maps at the University of Illinois: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/
I looked really closely at their cryosphere maps of the dates in question, 11/17 and 11/18, and I can't detect any noticable change that you could attribute to "blasts". I've been monitoring the cryosphere maps for months, and keep screen copies of various days throughout the past 3 months. However, it is now winter season, with storms and ice building up. So if there was "something" to be seen from above, I suspect that the snow and ice could have covered it within hours.
But have you laughed yet when you see the black dot on their cryosphere? Right where the north pole should be? Take a guess as to what they are covering up?????
On their web page, click on the 30 day animation link... and it will show you images for the past 30 days.
777 The Great Work
12-01-2008, 09:59 PM
This is the same hoax as the african pi rates :lmao:.(9 in 18 hours is 666. what the hell is an Artic Nuke?:wall:but if we articulate nuke, we get 666 again. Mirrors :naughty: The nuke info was released on nov 17 the day of the full moon when human emotions are high and kundalini can be raised. They really hate Lucy.
http://freshimagehosting.com/images/dim9qcookbxg5ehx4le7.jpg (http://freshimagehosting.com/)
Those daurn old nukes,i mean dukes causing hazzard again.:mad3:
Shakesbeer
12-01-2008, 10:02 PM
No confirmation on any controlled nuclear detentions? Not matter what, that many earthquakes of that size so concentrated in that particular spot is fairly peculiar...
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/zoom/events/?lon=-116.0724&lat=79.6563
oldpaganfreak
12-02-2008, 12:59 AM
the simple fact is that there were NO NUKES exploded in the canadian arctic. the area in question is inhabited by canadians and has a lot of gas and oil exploration. don't you think that the folks in the neighbourhood woulda noticed??
solitaryman
12-02-2008, 01:25 AM
May be it was "the Mother Bomb "that Russia possess and it is not nuclear.They can be registered on sismographe.
solitaryman
12-02-2008, 01:28 AM
Correction:"The Mother of All Bomb"
oldpaganfreak
12-02-2008, 02:23 AM
i think that is even less likely that the russians are detonating anything in the canadian arctic.
Humble Janitor
12-02-2008, 07:27 AM
Please tell me what you make of this...
http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/arcticnukes18nov08.shtml
And the Seismic activity going on at the moment...
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/ (http://www.iris.edu/seismon/:mfr_omg:)
:mfr_omg:
Just to clarify for those who believe that the bombs were not exploded, did you catch this part of the link above:
On November 17 and 18, 2008 nine H-Bombs were exploded below the Arctic Ocean near the North Magnetic Pole
See the bold part? We apparently wouldn't have to see them to know that they exploded. :thumb_yello:
Average Joe
12-02-2008, 11:12 AM
Funny how these openings to the hollow earth are at the poles where nobody goes. Keeps the "mystery" alive I suppose. Very convenient.
As for exploding 9 nukes to seal the entrance to hollow earth, probably a good idea, because if you seal it, it will stop 100 billion trillion gallons of Arctic Ocean from pouring down the hole.
MacGyverCanada
12-02-2008, 11:45 AM
OK, well firstly, Canada is a non-nuclear nation; it isn't legal for anyone including our own government to possess nukes... not that that's stopping 'em.
I think that people have some misconceptions about where the Inuit people live... certainly there are settlements above the Arctic Circle, but nobody lives at the North Pole per se. The Quikiqtaaluk region extends northward from Baffin Island, and the landmass reaches about 83 degrees N. However, the northernmost Inuit community is Grise Fiord at about 75 degrees N, population: approximately 100 people. There aren't too many people at or near the north pole to confirm or deny any sort of activity, nuclear or otherwise.
oldpaganfreak
12-02-2008, 04:55 PM
if you read the article, you would see that the explosions were sup[posedly near banks island. there is a settlement on banks island. the article is just plain stupid. it makes the canadian government look stupider than they really are. the nukes were supposedly exploded in holes ten kilometers deep (6 miles). i'm not sure where some othese people get this sh*t. obviously, the writer is making it up as he goes along. canada is becoming increasingly protective of arctic sovereignty. this simply could not happen.
ekimdrachir
12-03-2008, 09:57 PM
I joined this forum so that I could post a link to another site where we are following this topic, it would be great to get more information about what exactly happened, but the blasts HAVE been confirmed from more than one source.
http://ipower.ning.com/forum/topics/did-they-nuke-the-arctic-bush
oldpaganfreak
12-04-2008, 12:08 AM
i have checked out your link, however, it's just a re-hash of the link in the original post in this thread. it just isn't believable or well sourced or reliable. nine drilled underwater holes, miles deep; nine nukes on canadian territory; a settlement on banks island, near the site...and no one heard or saw anything?? the net is overflowing with bogus alarming stories. this is one of them.
davefla73
12-04-2008, 01:14 AM
i'm afraid that i just don't believe this. this report claims that the nukes were expolded on canadian territory. there are inuit settlements near there, as well as conventional oil exploration. just because something is 'claimed to be true' on the net does not make it so. this is certainly an example of that. i have many family and friends employed in oil exploration. blowing 9 nukes could hardly be hidden from us.
i would have to see a lot more compelling evidence before i would believe it.
canadians have very strong feelings about nuclear testing. the inuit would cewrtainly be raising sh*t about it and we have heard nothing in even the off beat news sources about this.
sorry....ain't true.
They have blown up hundreds of nukes all around the world that YOU would never have known about there is a good movie called the nuke cafe about all the testing they did in space and out in the oceans not to mention the ones in russia you never hear of them.
oldpaganfreak
12-04-2008, 04:50 AM
whether or not i am aware of all nuclear tests is not the issue. the area in question is in canada. canada is a non-nuclear country. our laws prohibit nukes on canadian soil. that is the issue. we are not talking about the u.s. ot russia and their nuclear programs. we are discussing canada.
the ecidence that supports these nuclear detonations is flimsy at best. there is far more reason to believe that they DID NOT occur that that they did. nine nuke blast in eighteen hours would not go undetected by ALL canadian monitors. this is an area where there is canadian oil exploration. if they DID occur, there would be some canadian confirmation, and hell to pay in parliment.
nukes are illegal on canadian soil. there has never been a nuclear blast in canada. full stop.
from you position in florida, you are hardly in a position to dispute that.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.