Woman Sued After Saving Friend from Wrecked Car!?

[Antaletriangle]

I find this bizarre and infuriating...-such is the lack of spirituality here-it appears money is a god to some even when their life has been saved from a friend's compassion.
http://www.naturalnews.com/News_000628_injuries_California_Good_Samaritan.htm l
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, December 22, 2008
Key concepts: Injuries, California and Good Samaritan

The next time you see somebody needing to be rescued, you'd be better off to just ignore them and do nothing. At least that's the interpretation of a California Supreme Court decision that has allowed a lawsuit to move forward between a woman who was in a car wreck and her friend who pulled her out of the wreckage.

The woman claims her friend "carelessly" pulled her out of the wrecked car, contributing to her injuries. Inexplicably, the California Supreme Court agreed, saying that Good Samaritans have a legal responsibility to offer some sort of medical care, even if they have no training in emergency medicine.

Doing nothing, of course, lets you off the hook. And so by rendering this decision, the California Supreme Court has just doomed the lives of countless future crash victims and burn victims who will now be left to die as Good Samaritans watch from the sidelines, too afraid to save somebody's life if they know they can be sued for millions of dollars for doing so.

Dead people, after all, can't sue you in a California court. What the California Supreme Court has just taught everyone is that if you save someone from the burning wreckage of a car, make sure they're dead first.
Madness!

[alyscat]

agreed
alys

[stiros]

Thank you Antaletriangle for the thread.
This is “power elite mechanisms”, punish the helper, as I understand it.
In the gulags (old Soviet labour camps), they had the same principle, punish the helper.

Love, Freedom and Truth
stiros

[mulder]

The friend who was saved is totally selfish & ungrateful. This is not suprising as most TV shows just glorify every form of selfishness. Already, if you have a car crash the real person at fault will just lie & say it was the other drivers fault (even if it means the a car backed into them, instead of you hitting the back of their car!).:thumbdown:
This is what the illuminati want - no-one to help anyone so they can just put people in camps without anyone lifting a finger!! Shame this society is materialising faster than the illuminati believed it would.:mfr_omg:

[alyscat]

I'm guessing they weren't really friends... or that there was something conflicted in the relationship.
alys

[Zeddo]

Isn't this what the programmers want? Isn't this their aim, to disempower those who do have a spark of light in them?
All the answers here are true, but does it make us any less potent in our aim to be emissaries of light? Does it take away from us the knowledge that under ANY circumstance, we are who we are and at the given moment whatever that moment may be, hopefully, we will still do that which is right no matter the programmed outcome?
Part of the answer is not to allow this to taint you in what you know is true. We have only one truth, and that is infinite love. Lawsuits cannot rob us of that.

Z

[Antaletriangle]

Zeddo is right, this is what they want; to try and freak people out into not helping anyone around them with threats of sueing and other extreme measures-it's sick,absolute madness-people just turn the other cheek though even from reading about this occuring and comply willingly like some frightened little mouse!It doesn't speak well of humanity- there's no spine left just greed.I'm not saying everyone is like this but to see this behaviour stinks and there are people out there who will do exactly the same thing if the money carrot is dangled enforced by the judicial systems-they are aware of a huge weakness in humanity to enable a divide and conquer system- money-well,it's not my weakness.