Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) (http://projectavalon.net/forum/index.php)

- Conspiracy Research (http://projectavalon.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=56)

- - Holographic planes vs the real thing? (http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=6756)

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Ya Lear saids they are not the right engines with the planes. Anyone no more?

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magamud (Post 75010)

Ya Lear saids they are not the right engines with the planes. Anyone no more?

Magamud

Here's the link where Jon Carlson makes his case:

South Tower Flight UA175 Dropped
WRONG Engine In NYC Street

http://home.att.net/~south.tower/STengine1.htm

-feeler

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Feeler,
About the photo of the woman's missing foot.
Lets think about this in a little more deeper sense...FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
The people in the photo are going about as usual; as if there weren't a cameraman, let alone the debris, infront of them. If I was there, I would be looking at it and AT LEAST paying attention to the camera man. IMHO, I believe that the image of the wreckage was copy and pasted into another image of people standing on the street corner.
Does anyone know WHEN these "photos" were taken? If this was right after the incident, wouldn't everything be covered in dust.
Actually now that I look at it more carefully, the ground is wet in the photo. 9-11 occured with no clouds in sight, meaning high pressure is dominating. NORMALLY, incoming rain is announced by upper level clouds, such as cirrus type clouds. As the rain gets closer, the clouds begin to form closer to the surface. And NOT 1 CLOUD WAS IN SIGHT!

P.S. Can someone find out the first time it rained in NY AFTER 9-11-01?
Thanks.

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

i think the evidence points clearly to dummy planes. light weight shells (in particular wings) that were designed to disintergrate on impact.

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattjb (Post 77097)

i think the evidence points clearly to dummy planes. light weight shells (in particular wings) that were designed to disintergrate on impact.

If your hypothesis is correct, some other means would be needed to create the wing-shape holes, such as ground-based particle beam weapons. -feeler

Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Ok, Feeler: I apolgize for being harsh with you, before, I did a lot of research on some of the pics you put up. The problem with it wasn't the lady but it was that the landing gear kept changing positions from on photo to the next. the engines were the wrong ones for the aircraft in question and little things like that.

Thank you for pointing me in a good direction.