Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - AI - Dan Burisch/Jake Simpson/Philip Corso Jnr/William Herman/Kurt Kurzweil/Val Valer

Czymra · 01-30-2009, 02:44 PM

I think I'm with you. I wouldn't be surprised if I had already had a connection there as I know exactly what this 'energyish' feeling is you describe and I usually have that with dreams connected to bombastic architecture of the ultra-modern kind. Sadly I hadn't had such a dream in quite a while. In fact all my attempts to raise my resonance even higher at the moment is a drag. It seems that finally I have come to a barrier of needing real military style discipline to pull something through rather than channelling the motivation to return again and again.
What I wonder however is this: Are there ways of engaging with it without having it consciously work against the process? What exactly does the AI have on it's radar? Intention or mental focus? Is it possible to thing of yoghurt and still engage with the machine without it so knowing?

"Think of nothing think of nothing!"
...
"Oh no what's that?"
"Sorry but I couldn't help thinking about marshmallows."

01-30-2009, 02:44 PM	#23
Czymra Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Germany Posts: 1,151	Re: AI - Dan Burisch/Jake Simpson/Philip Corso Jnr/William Herman/Kurt Kurzweil/Val V I think I'm with you. I wouldn't be surprised if I had already had a connection there as I know exactly what this 'energyish' feeling is you describe and I usually have that with dreams connected to bombastic architecture of the ultra-modern kind. Sadly I hadn't had such a dream in quite a while. In fact all my attempts to raise my resonance even higher at the moment is a drag. It seems that finally I have come to a barrier of needing real military style discipline to pull something through rather than channelling the motivation to return again and again. What I wonder however is this: Are there ways of engaging with it without having it consciously work against the process? What exactly does the AI have on it's radar? Intention or mental focus? Is it possible to thing of yoghurt and still engage with the machine without it so knowing? "Think of nothing think of nothing!" ... "Oh no what's that?" "Sorry but I couldn't help thinking about marshmallows."