[orthodoxymoron]

If I were an insider(which I am not...I don't even know someone who knows someone) I wouldn't publicly reveal 'secret' information unless my superiors had cleared me to do so. I might, however, reveal information 'Deep Throat' style. This information might then emerge in fraudulent documents or in the testimony of someone with questionable credentials...or someone who knows someone. The 'good-stuff' would probably be buried in disinformation and half-truths. I suspect that this is the way a lot of 'good information' gets released. If someone is an insider...the naysayers say they are being protected because they are disinfo agents. If someone is an outsider...the naysayers say they have no credibility. The insiders don't exactly go out of their way to document 'the real story' for the general public.

There are people who say they have been on alien spacecraft...and have been instructed by aliens. I tend to doubt this...but I listen very closely to what they say. They may have been fed information from insiders. They may be very intuitive and perceptive. They may be excellent researchers. They may have psychically derived information(which I tend to distrust).

I just try to listen to everything...and assume that 90% is bs. I try to identify the 10% which is not bs. I suspect that if I really correctly identified the 10%...and knew it...I would know way too much! I tend to speculate a lot...in the hope that people who know a lot more than I do may get an insight which will lead them to a clearer understanding of the alien/spiritual/ufo phenomenon. Frankly, speculation is a very necessary part of seeking truth in very obscure and suppressed areas of research. But one should be honest when they are speculating...to make it clear that they are, in fact, speculating.