[Jnana]

The following is from a recent addition to the Project Camelot blog:

Hot on the heals of last night's radio show in which we discussed - at some length - the philosophy behind Project Camelot's approach to video interviews, click here for a four minute audio extract of Dr Pete Peterson talking about friends - and enemies - "in high places".

In this intriguing clip (taken from the video, which we don't yet have permission to release) Dr Peterson, choosing his words with considerable care, affirms that we did not reach the moon without "help"; that ET visitors are both friendly and otherwise; that cattle mutilations are real, and are hostile acts; and that some abductee implant technology is definitely "not from anyone I know of here on this planet".

Enjoy. And someone please forward this to Dr Steven Greer. Regardless of anyone's opinion of Project Camelot's challenging interview style, the real issue is that the opinions expressed by Dr Peterson and many other researchers with great courage and integrity - and the strong statements issued by Dr Greer - cannot both be correct. Someone is right and someone is wrong, and it may be in all of our interests to ask who... and why.

This is a quick transcript I did of the clip. My apologies for any errors. A couple of phrases that I quote later are underlined.

Bill Ryan: What we’ve been told by our witness Henry Deacon is that some of our Apollo missions did actually go to the moon but not without help from our friends as it were. Can you make any comment on that?

Dr Peterson: Well it’s my feeling as a scientist that if we went to the moon then we had to have help from friends.

Bill Ryan: Okay.

Kerry Cassidy: And off-world friends you’re talking about.

Bill Ryan: We’re talking about friends in high places.

Dr Peterson: Friends in high places. From high places.

Bill Ryan: But we do have friends in high places do we?

Dr. Peterson: Far as I know.

Bill Ryan: Do we have any enemies?

Dr. Peterson: Uh, far as I know we do. I mean, there have been malevolent things happen all over the world that – you can’t deny cattle mutilation. And you can’t deny some personal, or human, mutilation. Or certainly, biomedical manipulation. I mean, it’s happened. Somebody did it, and it could have been done from here. But, when you examine that. You know, Linda Moulton Howe had written extensively and spoken extensively on these things and examined them extensively. I grew up with her in the same school system in the same town and know that she was exceedingly bright and got brighter and brighter as time went by. And I don’t doubt that a lot of her conclusions are correct conclusions. She’s someone that I would absolutely trust on that. And it appears to me, you know I say if something happens in one spot you don’t know. But when something happens time after time, year after year, in all different kinds of locations where people don’t know each other and don’t communicate and don’t read each other’s newspapers and it doesn’t make the press it seems highly likely that those things happened.

Bill Ryan: I understand. Now among many other things you are, let me use the word an electronics genius, if I may, and are you in possession of any information about the constitution of implants that have been recovered from abductees?

Dr. Peterson: Well I’ve talked to people who’ve removed what they felt were implants. I deal almost daily with nano-electronics and micro-electronics and the descriptions and pictures I’ve seen have nothing to do with any nano- and micro-electronics from that we have in this uh, you know, from anyone that I know of here on this planet. Many of them or most of them are biological in nature. I know that one doctor who has removed a number of what they felt were implants, uh, the implant acted like it was alive and moved through the body away from the surgeon trying to remove it. I know that some of them when they were taken out were minutely dissected and I’ve seen the pictures of that and they are devices that signals could be obtained from that were obviously intelligent signals. They were not random things. They were not biological things. And yet it was biological material that had obviously been engineered for a specific purpose. I’ve never seen anything in writing that would lead me to believe that we had that kind of technology on this planet.

Bill Ryan: And when we’re talking about friends or enemies in high places you’d feel that wasn’t a particularly friendly thing to do?

Dr. Peterson: I have no idea. It could well have been. And I wouldn’t doubt but what we’ve had that from both sides. Friends and enemies.

The thing I notice here is that Dr. Peterson speaks carefully when he does not have absolute proof of something. This is appropriate for someone with scientific training. Unfortunately, we do not have the rest of the interview to work with at this point in order to have a more complete view of Dr. Peterson and in what areas he has the most experience. On cattle mutilation, he seems to rely heavily on the research of Linda Moulton Howe. The problem here is that even though there is good evidence that the events are indeed occurring, there is rather limited evidence as to who is doing it. Dr. Peterson even admits that “it could have been done from here”.

In the area of implants, it would be necessary to know about all of the work occurring everywhere on the planet to be certain they were of non-earth origin. Because secret projects are highly compartmentalized, I think it is unwise to presume that Dr. Peterson has this complete knowledge, even though he may indeed have very wide knowledge of what is going on. Dr. Peterson initially states “I have no idea” in response to the question about whether the implants are a result of an unfriendly act. Since we don’t have a broader view of what Dr. Peterson knows about ET activities, it is difficult to evaluate whether his statement about not doubting that both sides are doing it carries a lot of weight. I'm also a bit unclear about what to make of his speech style and exactly what he means when he says he doesn't doubt something.

I’m looking forward to hearing the rest of the interview with Dr. Peterson. He seems to have had some interesting experiences. I’m not quite sure why Bill Ryan thinks the above short clip puts him in direct opposition with Dr. Greer when he is making qualified rather than definitive assertions as to what is going on, who is doing it, and why. He sounds like a fellow who is willing to let the evidence speak for itself. I hope he has much more evidence at his disposal to present to us.