a few problems I have with the article:
1) it has no sources. No names from the UN, ect.
2) it's obviously bias.
3) it has no actual dates, time or any other information needed to confirm the report.
4) AP is no longer a good source of info over all. They have been compromised and have a long history of spreading Israeli and US propaganda.
5) the article also used a theoretical "fission" weapon as a back up to it's clams. Nuclear weapons are nuclear FUSION. Nuclear FISSION is much more difficult to obtain and also still very experimental.
6) The whole article stinks like a dead fish.
