Long story short, the
Revelation of John can be explained only by someone who has
personally received both the Vision of the "Son of man" and the Revelation of the "resurrection" (including the Revelation of the Memory of Creation--
Genesis 2:7; and the revelation of the memories of previous lives--
Luke 20:34-36).
Having no Knowledge whatsoever of Revealed Truth, the Christian theologians have concocted any number of utterly
bizarre interpretations of the
Revelation of John; in the process making probably tens of millions of dollars (theft by deception) with the sale of books, magazine articles, video and audio tapes, classes, etc. etc. etc.
What they do not understand is that the terms "dragon", "beast of the sea" and "beast of the earth" are to be understood as representing different aspects of the 'fallen' consciousness: the "dragon" symbolizing the 'movement' of self-reflection; the "beast of the sea" symbolizing the "self"; and the "beast of the earth" symbolizing the 'thinker'.
In the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy5QeBRu3JI
Agent Smith represents the 'movement' of self-reflection or the "dragon", whereas Neo represents the "observing consciousness" or "Michael" (see chapter 12 of the
Revelation of John).
The origin of the 3-dimensional 'curved' space within which the "self" exists occurs at time segment 5:29-5:33; after which "the Fall" is symbolized by time segment 5:45-6:08.
Then, in the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GALu0...eature=related
Agent Smith, as the “beast of the sea”/consciousness of the “self”, is graphically represented at time segment 2:15-2:23; whereas Agent Smith, as the “beast of the earth”/consciousness of the‘thinker’, emerges at time segment 3:01-3:05; references to the "beast of the sea" and the "beast of the earth" being found in Chapter 13 of the
Revelation of John(The "beast of the earth" is also referred to in Sura 27:82 of the
Koran.)
And, were these Truths about the
Revelation of John to be more widely publicized--rather than the bizarre interpretations of the Christian theologians--there would be more of a chance for Peace in the Middle East than there is at present.
But the media is, of course, under the complete control of either the secularists or those whose economic survival depends upon the preservation of the bizarre doctrines of Christianity, Inc.