Re: colin powell: crisis on 21, 22 january
california: thanks...
andy: i missed that! good catch!
graybeard: youre right, and a difference of opinion is always welcome when sifting and winnowing for the truth. theres a very good chance i could be reading into this. it strikes me as very suspicious that he would give those two dates.
supposedly, part of the illuminati religion means having to announce or at least give a nonverbal signal to the public of what will transpire so that they can reap their 'fear' energies (sending them to whatever deities from whatever dimension theyre in contact with) from the tragedy/catastrophe within the boundaries of their luciferian laws.
despite powells involvement in this, i dont think he himself is a luciferian. hes obviously a CFR guy, but my intuition says that his own gut believes that what he is doing is for the best of the country. he quietly resigned from the bush administration because he knew the iraq war was wrong and that he had been fed CIA misinformation when he presented the case for war before the UN. richard clarke left, flailing his arms about what had transpired. powell was quiet about it. i wonder why. graybeard, i can hear you saying, "youre reading into it again!" but,
- he was either threatened to keep quiet
- hes got a chip in the big game now and will use it as leverage to bail his own ass out one day
- he genuinely wants to enter politics again and doesnt want to burn any bridges.
its the last option, in my view... or all 3.
i suppose we will have to wait and see what happens on those days to see who was right. nothing really fazes me anymore-- disseminating politics today amuses me as it should everyone, mainly because we should know this all ends with us winning because weve read the last page. its like watching a daily soap opera version of patriot games. oh, the drama is nice!
|