[Harper]

Well its a fair enough question, I think. If its difficult and going to ruffle feathers that isn't a real reason not to try to resolve. So here is where I fall on the subject. Maybe it will help you to again trust your instincts as there is never one truth, really not when humans are involved in any case. 2 people can have the same experience and have totally different truths around the same thing.

So for the whistleblowers I think its going to be pretty tough as most are so used to lying for whatever reasons its second nature and they may no longer be able to decifer a truth from an exaggeration or received lie from higher up the food chain anymore.

For example the gut reaction I had from Miriam Delcado (sp?, sorry) was this woman is lying, pit of my stomach feeling HOWEVER she was not lying about everything in my opinion. So was it worth listening to her -- In my opinion a resounding yes. She spoke of some things I am entirely certain of and others which we just self-satisified ego mania.

Let's see -- another, David Wilcock I think has part of the puzzle but I don't think he is lying, I just think he is mis-guided. Worth listening to ? Yes.

Now my tiny parts of my very small local puzzle are becoming clearer but then again I could discover somethig else which could negate the whole thing next week. Like I personally don't think large ships are going to make themselves a show in the sky anytime soon (no saying they are not there in a less obvious sense, but only the people who are seeking them I think, may see them) But then again if they turn up tomorrow won't I feel like an eegit.

So I think basically you can trust your own filter, whilst researching, verifying as possible and questioning everything that comes before you. Do not give up on your unique bs detector its really valuable.

g