Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Plejaren
I'm sitting here thinking about this and I've never considered this as a law. It seems to be a decision you make: To what degree will you leave things as they are and what degree will you respond to things and in what way. What will produce the most benefit.
If you think about it intensely. Angering someone by telling them about the lies in society. Doing anything! Who's weakness is it really? Are you harming them or are they harming themself, or are you harming you? Should you let their anger purify them or should you wait until they take the initiative to learn, or should you go ahead and see what happens when you say the truth anyway?
I think it makes no difference......No matter what you decide the laws of nature already got everything covered. It's impossible to not act perfectly. Any imperfection is a decision. You can decide it's imperfect action. This is yet more perfect action.
Nature wins and the law of allowance has become another aspect of nature.
|
By stepping "into" the way the law works, maybe that act alone assists whomever is involved including confirming or supporting the magnificence of the law of "allowance" itself. It is the "intent" of what you say, not necessarily how or what you say. ( my opinion )
Very good words Dean, thank you for the insight.
