|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,201
|
![]()
I just realized that for years, I would use the term "iamtheone" often in my life (no real reason why either) and would even write prose using this term.
Well, when I did this exercise, I started to realize what I have been saying all along: iamtheone IAmTheOne IAmtheOne I Am One By doing this, I have started to realize that I have been one with the universe all along. As corny as it sounds, it makes sense to me and resonates well with my new-found ability to balance positivity and negativity in my life. I previously lacked such an ability and was unable to control my depression. Just thought I'd point this out. If it's in the wrong forum, move it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 229
|
![]()
I AM with you on this ONE
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Hi Humble Janitor,
Just a thought. Here's another angle: Theone is a name too. Maybe a past life? (It's feminine.) Or someone trying to speak to you? **The girl's name Theone \the(o)-ne\ is of Greek origin, and its meaning is "God's name". Costume designer Theoni V. Aldredge. Theone has 3 variant forms: Teone, Teoni and Theoni. **The meaning of the name Theone is Gift From God. The origin of the name Theone is Greek Hey, it was on another thread, but how was Christmas with your brother? The world's a tough oyster. Speaking of that, I see you caught some sh*t using the word 'Aryan' (as it's used most commonly in the USA). Don't jump ship! We all need each other. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
Balancing the positive and the negative is very important. The solution to chronic negative thinking is not chronic positive thinking. I like the concept of Positive Response Ability...where one battles with problems internally...pitting positive thoughts against negative thoughts...and eventually emerging with a positive response or solution. A surgeon must understand how dire a problem is before they can begin to formulate a solution. The agony and the ecstasy!
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
![]()
Someone else asked me this question a while back and this is the way i explained it. This may are may not be of assistance but anyway here it is.
"Everything is Dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature, but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half truths; all paradoxes may be reconciled" Evil can not be destroyed, it must be transmuted. Thesis and antithesis are identical in nature, but different in degree"; "opposites are the same, differing only in degree"; "the pairs of opposites may be reconciled"; "extremes meet"; "everything is and isn't, at the same time"; "all truths are but half-truths"; "every truth is half-false"; "there are two sides to everything," etc., etc., etc. Polarity explains that in everything there are two poles, or opposite aspects, and that "opposites" are really only the two extremes of the same thing, with many varying degrees between them. To illustrate: Heat and Cold, although "opposites," are really the same thing, the differences consisting merely of degrees of the same thing. Look at your thermometer and see if you can discover where "heat" terminates and "cold" begins! There is no such thing as "absolute heat" or "absolute cold"--the two terms "heat" and "cold" simply indicate varying degrees of the same thing, and that "same thing" which manifests as "heat" and "cold" is merely a form, variety, and rate of Vibration. So "heat" and "cold" are simply the "two poles" of that which we call "Heat"--and the phenomena attendant thereupon are manifestations of the Principle of Polarity. The same Principle manifests in the case of "Light and Darkness," which are the same thing, the difference consisting of varying degrees between the two poles of the phenomena. Where does "darkness" leave off, and "light" begin? What is the difference between "Large and Small"? Between "Hard and Soft"? Between "Black and White"? Between "Sharp and Dull"? Between "Noise and Quiet"? Between "High and Low"? Between "Positive and Negative"? The Principle of Polarity explains these paradoxes, and no other Principle can supersede it. The same Principle operates on the Mental Plane. Take a radical and extreme example--that of "Love and Hate," two mental states apparently totally different. And yet there are degrees of Hate and degrees of Love, and a middle point in which we use the terms "Like or Dislike," which shade into each other so gradually that sometimes we are at a loss to know whether we "like" or "dislike" or "neither." And all are simply degrees of the same thing, as you will see if you will but think a moment. And, more than this (and considered of more importance by the wise men of old, it is possible to change the vibrations of Hate to the vibrations of Love, in one's own mind, and in the minds of others. We've all had personal experiences of the involuntary rapid transition from Love to Hate, and the reverse, in your own case and that of others. And you will therefore realize the possibility of this being accomplished by the use of the Will, by means of the principle of polarity . "Good and Evil" are but the poles of the same thing, and the mind understands the art of transmuting Evil into Good, by means of an application of the Principle of Polarity. In short, the "Art of Polarization" becomes a phase of "Mental Alchemy" known and practiced by the ancient and modern Alchemical Masters. An understanding of the Principle will enable one to change his own Polarity, as well as that of others, if we will devote the time and study necessary to master the art and then finally rise above it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
![]()
Brilliant. Again I seem to be almost reacting with an 'of course', but I have tried to imagine this polarity as a circle instead of a line. That way, the extremes would again merge on the opposite of the neutral point.
However, I always missed that they are all sitting on the same entity anyway! No necessity to bend anything. ![]() In fact, it seems almost too simple. But I shall keep it on my mind. I am aware of wanting to master the last paragraph, but it only works half of the time. I suppose the problem is that I am too used to rejecting, and I would have to accept the emotion to work with it. Anyway, thanks for that response. Quite helpful I believe. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,201
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know about jumping ship or usage of that word. What thread/post are you referring to? I believe I did condemn the white man in one thread but I don't care if others are offended. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
love & light |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
![]() Quote:
Right, but I still am convinced that I might be able to 'think' better without all those words, then I might not even have had the concept of 'problem'. Nevertheless, thanks again. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 992
|
![]()
Great explanation 777, another example is male and female. Without female there is no male and without male there is no female. We are one, the God split at the light. The coming together as one produces new life. The realization of the male aspect of a female produces a balanced person and vice versa. The denial of the feminine in humanity has produced agressive unbalanced societies and abuse of mother earth. The denial of a womans male aspect can result in wimpy weak women totally dependant on a man to validate their life. Balance, the centre pole is the key, neither one nor other, but both
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lunar Base II
Posts: 3,093
|
![]()
The following is a bit off-topic and preachy, but it includes elements of my previous comment in a different context, which may help in understanding my overall philosophical bias:
What about positive thinking and self esteem? Are they in harmony with the teachings of Jesus? Are they a new religion which is out of harmony with the teachings of Jesus? What is the underlying principle in the teachings of Jesus? Is it positive thinking and self esteem, or something else? Without going into a proof text rant, I must say that I find positive thinking much more biblical than self esteem! Faith is closely related to positive thinking, and is well thought of in scripture in general, and the teachings of Jesus in particular! On the other hand, self esteem is closely related to pride, and is decidedly not well thought of in scripture in general, and the teachings of Jesus in particular! An extreme rendition of the joining of positive thinking and self esteem is 'I Am God' which is not something that the Bible encourages its readers to go around proclaiming! The problem is self delusion and self centeredness! Not facing reality is a form of lying! To yourself! Self exaltation is self centered! Self degradation is also self centered! The religion contained in the teachings of Jesus is a religion of responsibility! To be responsible is to face reality, and see it clearly, and then formulate a responsible course of action, and then to implement this plan! It is duty centered! The focus is external, not internal! When someone lives responsibly, the byproduct is appropriate positive AND negative thinking (which includes both faith and doubt), and an appropriate self image! They are the fruit, not the root! In other words, positive delusion is not the solution to negative delusion, and self exaltation is not the solution to self degradation! Responsibility trumps both positive thinking and self esteem! The religion of positive thinking and self esteem is not the religion of the teachings of Jesus! The religion of responsibility is the religion of the teachings of Jesus! Please don't misunderstand my seemingly harsh stance on positive thinking and self esteem! A negative thinking and self degrading Christianity opened the door wide open to these teachings! They have come as a breath of fresh air to millions of people around the world! But some have found Peale appalling and Paul appealing! These twin concepts have been corrective, but they should not be normative! A religion of responsibility, as found in the teachings of Jesus is, in my view, the normative standard! Last edited by orthodoxymoron; 01-07-2009 at 02:15 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,151
|
![]()
I see what you mean and gladly I'm not in positive naïvety mode. I am in fact rather allergic to it and try to learn through humility.
I am trying to work the actual feelings of positivity not the thoughts but have the notion that there are ways to trigger this process and I've surely just uncovered a few of them. Sadly religion often is a way of self delusion but it's understandable to buy into this need. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|