Obama signing into NWO ...?

Avid · 10-15-2009, 06:37 PM

This is a strange piece - especially as Monckton family were best friends with Diana POW...
http://fightinwordsusa.wordpress.com...-british-lord/

Quote:

Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord
October 15, 2009 at 6:17 am | In Political | Leave a Comment
The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.

A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.

much more on link!

I realise that we've been hoodwinked on 'global warming' as a fault of our own (seeing as countries are freezing already), but the wedge... it gets curiouser and curiouser

no caste · 10-15-2009, 07:26 PM

The two most important destabilizers right now are 'climate change' and Afghanistan, i.e. WHAT will Obama DO? Send more troops?? But he just won a Nobel Peace Prize??? Yada yada.

The Afghanistan decision is looming. The usual pattern is to sacrifice more US soldiers, pay private security companies more money, make a bit of dough (for the industrialists), kill a thwack of civilians, crush infrastructure, get the contracts to rebuild it. Hmmmm. I wonder what the electorate want, or, say, what foreign civilians want. Hmmmm.... Obama, you won't run again IMO, so fuggit. Damn the campaign contributors!! Pull out, go diplomacy.

Climate change. Hmmm. Pollution is a problem. Food degradation is a problem. Genetic integrity is a problem. Water issues are a problem. Weather weapons are a problem {to you boys upstairs in the echelon sh&thole}. Carbon capture (sequestration) is one little high-priced niche experiment on the go right now. Who knows, maybe it's a start, but it's cooked in the same oven as the other ideas. Military infrastructure and pollution (think aircraft alone, not to mention toxic dumping, nuke testing) is the biggest problem. Hmmm. But that's tied up with the economy and jobs (in deranged minds), and the *******s who always make money one way or another (killing each other). Hmmm.

no caste · 10-15-2009, 07:40 PM

Why wouldn't the old boy clique Skull and Bones and UK gun for him. It's in their vampire p$ss blood and weiners.

relax frankie goes to hollywood banned version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLrXFw76Qg

no caste · 10-16-2009, 01:19 AM

If I had to guess, I'd say the thinking is (apart from the pattern stuff) that send a bunch of troops, get the job done (whatever that is - pipelines?), finish the Taliban 9/11 story (fictional/cover-up), so it doesn't look like a loss with fraudulent elections etc.

Report: Obama Poised to Announce 45,000 Troop Escalation in Afghanistan
British Government's Troop Surge Came Amid Claims of US Assurances
by Jason Ditz, October 14, 2009

The Obama Administration has reportedly told the British government that it intends to announce an escalation of another 45,000 troops in Afghanistan, potentially as soon as next week.

The report comes despite claims that the Obama Administration is continuing to hold talks about the strategy, though this seems to be more based on the question of whether to emphasize the failed battle against the Taliban or focus what will soon be over 100,000 troops on fighting the roughly 100 al-Qaeda members reportedly in the nation.
http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/14/r...op-escalation/

--------------------------------------

From another post (me) on this thread:

Ron Paul 10/20/2008 "New Era of Slavery"
http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...?t=5753&page=4

Hmmm. The USSR started it (1979). Then:

The Afghan government was also supported by India, while the mujahideen found other support from a variety of sources including the United States, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and other Muslim nations through the context of the Cold War and the regional India-Pakistan conflict.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

It ended in a 9/11 conflagration. Now it's about gas pipelines and poppies. There was no drug trade in the Taliban years. There were schools, universities and hospitals before the Soviet invasion. It looks like a quagmire.

Following the money -

HR 1207 UPDATES "The Federal Reserve Transparency Act"
http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...andlove&page=6

10-15-2009, 07:26 PM	#2
no caste Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,375	Re: Obama signing into NWO ...? The two most important destabilizers right now are 'climate change' and Afghanistan, i.e. WHAT will Obama DO? Send more troops?? But he just won a Nobel Peace Prize??? Yada yada. The Afghanistan decision is looming. The usual pattern is to sacrifice more US soldiers, pay private security companies more money, make a bit of dough (for the industrialists), kill a thwack of civilians, crush infrastructure, get the contracts to rebuild it. Hmmmm. I wonder what the electorate want, or, say, what foreign civilians want. Hmmmm.... Obama, you won't run again IMO, so fuggit. Damn the campaign contributors!! Pull out, go diplomacy. Climate change. Hmmm. Pollution is a problem. Food degradation is a problem. Genetic integrity is a problem. Water issues are a problem. Weather weapons are a problem {to you boys upstairs in the echelon sh&thole}. Carbon capture (sequestration) is one little high-priced niche experiment on the go right now. Who knows, maybe it's a start, but it's cooked in the same oven as the other ideas. Military infrastructure and pollution (think aircraft alone, not to mention toxic dumping, nuke testing) is the biggest problem. Hmmm. But that's tied up with the economy and jobs (in deranged minds), and the *******s who always make money one way or another (killing each other). Hmmm.

10-15-2009, 07:40 PM	#3
no caste Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,375	Re: Obama signing into NWO ...? Why wouldn't the old boy clique Skull and Bones and UK gun for him. It's in their vampire p$ss blood and weiners. relax frankie goes to hollywood banned version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLrXFw76Qg

10-16-2009, 01:19 AM	#4
no caste Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,375	Re: Obama signing into NWO ...? If I had to guess, I'd say the thinking is (apart from the pattern stuff) that send a bunch of troops, get the job done (whatever that is - pipelines?), finish the Taliban 9/11 story (fictional/cover-up), so it doesn't look like a loss with fraudulent elections etc. Report: Obama Poised to Announce 45,000 Troop Escalation in Afghanistan British Government's Troop Surge Came Amid Claims of US Assurances by Jason Ditz, October 14, 2009 The Obama Administration has reportedly told the British government that it intends to announce an escalation of another 45,000 troops in Afghanistan, potentially as soon as next week. The report comes despite claims that the Obama Administration is continuing to hold talks about the strategy, though this seems to be more based on the question of whether to emphasize the failed battle against the Taliban or focus what will soon be over 100,000 troops on fighting the roughly 100 al-Qaeda members reportedly in the nation. http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/14/r...op-escalation/ -------------------------------------- From another post (me) on this thread: Ron Paul 10/20/2008 "New Era of Slavery" http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...?t=5753&page=4 Hmmm. The USSR started it (1979). Then: The Afghan government was also supported by India, while the mujahideen found other support from a variety of sources including the United States, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and other Muslim nations through the context of the Cold War and the regional India-Pakistan conflict. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan It ended in a 9/11 conflagration. Now it's about gas pipelines and poppies. There was no drug trade in the Taliban years. There were schools, universities and hospitals before the Soviet invasion. It looks like a quagmire. Following the money - HR 1207 UPDATES "The Federal Reserve Transparency Act" http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...andlove&page=6