After observing earthquake statistics from the
USGS website for a few months now, something has struck me as not quite right about some of these quakes. After learning about HAARP and the possibility of man-made quakes I started to take a closer and more educated look at the data.
Notice that there are a large amount of quakes occurring at the same EXACT depth throughout the entire world.
Now, this is just one example of many, so please go and have a look for yourself, and you will find that this is anything but uncommon, as there seems to be an earthquake at exactly 10.0 km at least once a day at various locations with very few exceptions.
Why could this be? These are the possibilities that come to my mind:
1) The data supplied is somehow inaccurate due to an error in the measuring devices.
2) These are naturally occurring quakes all at the same exact depth world-wide.
3) These quakes are being created by someone with some high-tech equipment.
Now, it is easily understood that there are giant plates stacked up, slowing grinding away at each other. It is also easily understood that less commonly there are bigger quakes which are a result of all of that slow grinding. If these plates themselves are so huge that it is possible to get quakes about as deep as 750 km, why is 10.0 km so common? If the nature of earthquakes are really so ambiguous and sporadic, shouldn't they ALL be appearing as in the image below?
Instead, we have a combination of both precision and varying quakes. So, once again, the question is "why?", and perhaps IF this is the work of some group of individuals, then who is behind this? (Is that a harp I hear playing?) Further, if you were them, wouldn't you at least target different depths to make it appear as if these are natural events?
It appears to me, as if there is indeed a group of individuals causing these anomalous quakes, and I can see why they would, as it would speed along the process of getting to the next "big one". But, just to make it clear, this is in no way righteous in my opinion.
Then again, I could be completely off here, but I havn't come up with an explanation for how supposedly ambiguous events appear with such rigidity.
Thank you taking the time to read. Thoughts/contributions/criticisms?