Pros&Cons Of Disturbing The Moon With 2T Bomb Oct8/09

[BROOK]

There ya go...I forgot about that....that Dan...making sense of things
.
You're right....it probably will not have much of an effect

[Wormhole]

Thanks Dan, makes a lot of sense, but I still don't like PTB messing with my moon!!! I like the way she looks just the way she is. Her wrinkles are el natural...

It's just the mentality... "let's go and shoot something at it and see what happens" Blah Blah Blah.

You know what I mean. How much is this costing? And I wonder, really, why?

Peace of Mind,
(and don't worry anchor, we all love each other)
Wormhole

[Dantheman62]

Originally Posted by Wormhole

Thanks Dan, makes a lot of sense, but I still don't like PTB messing with my moon!!! I like the way she looks just the way she is. Her wrinkles are el natural...

It's just the mentality... "let's go and shoot something at it and see what happens" Blah Blah Blah.

You know what I mean. How much is this costing? And I wonder, really, why?

Peace of Mind,
(and don't worry anchor, we all love each other)
Wormhole

Yeah I hear ya there!

[Dantheman62]

I read somewhere that the real mystery was why those craters are so shallow.
To be hit that hard by huge, extremely fast meteors or comets, those craters should be at least twice as deep, if not three times or more!
So that's the real mystery, why didn't they penetrate deeper?

[Wormhole]

Now that IS VERY interesting. One would think that that would mean a denser mass, or at least a very pliant one. But everything I've read concludes that the calculated mass of the moon is lighter then what one would think... That's very odd info indeed!

[BROOK]

It's supposed to be...to find frozen water

he purpose of the mission is to discover whether there’s frozen water in the craters near the moon’s south pole. If water is indeed found, it could have very important implications for further human missions on the moon, as a potential source for oxygen (you know why we need that) and hydrogen (for rocket fuel).


http://mashable.com/2009/06/18/nasa-...tter-facebook/

[Wormhole]

[QUOTE=BROOK;149614][COLOR=Cyan][I][B]It's supposed to be...to find frozen water

Yeah, I heard that but do not believe it. I think we are more likely to find a half-used bottle of Tang.

Love ya Brook, glad you're here. Keep smiling!
Worm

[Dantheman62]

Well I wonder if there's some kind of metal shell under that outer crust. Let's say the crust is 43 miles thick like they say, and under that is some kind of hollow metal ball which would be the inner moon, hence making it ring like a bell when it's hit by something. That would prove that it's artificial.
Maybe that's what they're really looking for, after hitting it with that impactor. hmmm

[Wormhole]

I was thinking the same thing.

[BROOK]

Originally Posted by Dantheman62

Well I wonder if there's some kind of metal shell under that outer crust. Let's say the crust is 43 miles thick like they say, and under that is some kind of hollow metal ball which would be the inner moon, hence making it ring like a bell when it's hit by something. That would prove that it's artificial.
Maybe that's what they're really looking for, after hitting it with that impactor. hmmm

I'm in agreement there too...the more I hear about that idea..the more sense it makes...even though it's hard to believe

[BROOK]

[quote=Wormhole;149615]

Originally Posted by BROOK

[color=Cyan][i][b]It's supposed to be...to find frozen water

Yeah, I heard that but do not believe it. I think we are more likely to find a half-used bottle of Tang.

Love ya Brook, glad you're here. Keep smiling!

Worm

I'm with you sister...I'm sure there is more to it...just what it the question