David Wilcock's latest Blog

[derpif]

Hi,

Bill and Kerry from Project Camelot, who were with me when we all heard this, both leaked the date -- whereas I maintained the secret until after it came and went. I was almost certain that giving away the secret date ensured it wouldn't -- nay, couldn't -- have happened on that particular day.

Is that true?
I thought it was David on C2C who gave away the alleged disclosure date first?

[TheChosen]

DW as always provides an excellent overview and piecing together of multiple sources of information.

Honestly , very very few people impress me nowadays and provide me information that I haven't heard or read before at least 10 times. DW is currently one of them.. And I could count on the numbers of my one hand the rest such people in the whole world.

[Majorion]

Originally Posted by TheChosen

DW as always provides an excellent overview and piecing together of multiple sources of information.

Honestly , very very few people impress me nowadays and provide me information that I haven't heard or read before at least 10 times. DW is currently one of them.. And I could count on the numbers of my one hand the rest such people in the whole world.

Agreed. I understand that many people don't like or particularly trust Wilcock. And of course its rather silly to suggest that a person like David or other researchers aren't in it for money reasons too.

In fact I'll go out on a limb and say theres nothing wrong with that, as long as that isn't one's main focus and their objectivity remains consistent.

So the question becomes, on most peoples' minds, is he deliberately disseminating careful disinformation? is he lying? is he a "disinfo agent"?

The most probable answer is No.

Clearly David is one of those researchers whose extra passionate about the things he talks about. He genuinely believes in his work, and it is reflected in his personality. Why else would he risk his reputation by saying disclosure is near and relaying specific dates?

Its because he is genuinely passionate and would actually risk letting that passion loose, even if it meant turning out wrong, obviously in a short period.

End rant.

[TheChosen]

If he is making any disinformation I surely haven't noticed it.. and I tend to believe my BS meter is calibrated quite sensitively after all those years.

I don't think he is in for the money more than he really needs to be. From what I've gathered from his interviews he is able to support himself comfortably in a rather average place and the rest of the money he gets goes back into further research / publishing so I believe that is completely fine. David Icke does the same thing and it has resulted into some high quality info.

The only thing I disagreed with him over the last year was Obama.. but after some very strong astral experiences with Obama I have changed my mind... and now the information is starting to come out for example in his latest blog that things behind the scenes are not as simple as painting anyone in government as an Illuminati puppet.

Now it also becomes very crystal clear how come the PTB could not agreed on what to do with Macedonia and its entrance into NATO. In that local conflict you can very clearly see France (through Greece) battling with the USA over this strategic outpost... (the very Rotschild vs Rockefeller battles) with Russia maintaining neutrality in the background.

[FIIISH]

I am reading this latest blog right now.

I think David's ego is a strength and a weakness for him.

I also think he puts things out there in the attempts of manifesting
outcomes and opportunities that he deems desirable.

Some of his motives are probably altruistic, some aren't.

That said, I pretty much rely on Avalon and Divinecosmos for my
alternative view on what is going on, and between the two
I feel I get what I can handle at any given time.

Discernment, of course, is a must.

[franciejones]

Any person talking for a long enough period of time might appear to have connected the dots...I cannot read this guy...he goes on forever and ever about how smart he is....its nauseating.

[Luminari]

Originally Posted by FIIISH

I think David's ego is a strength and a weakness for him.

I am going to say this again, and I'm going to keep saying it until everyone on the forum understands the concept;

The most EGOIC thing you can do is accuse another person of EGO

think about that.

[Humble Janitor]

Yet another enjoyable read that makes me ponder.

[371]

Originally Posted by Luminari

I am going to say this again, and I'm going to keep saying it until everyone on the forum understands the concept;

The most EGOIC thing you can do is accuse another person of EGO

think about that.

How do you figure??


example:
How do I think I'm awesome, because someone else thinks they are awesome and I point that out?

Please explain.

[Humble Janitor]

I don't see an ego with Wilcock.

No point in getting hung up on things that aren't there.

[FIIISH]

The most EGOIC thing you can do is accuse another person of EGO

Isn't that kind of like saying that it takes one to know one?

So here's a couple of opinions:

Among many other laudable qualitities, David is extremely
brilliant, lucid, and does much to awaken and inform others.

He also seems to think rather highly of himself.

Isn't it possible that both can be true?