|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: America
Posts: 427
|
![]()
What part of "is it true" do you want confirmation on?
That there was something recorded on seismographs? Or that they were nucleur bombs? The first part IS CONFIRMED. They are on the USGeological Survey maps here: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/ Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events. Exact same times, but the magnitude readings are just a wee different, which could be an aspect of coming from different seismographs I don't know how Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone would know they were nuclear bombs. I don't know how that can be verified. It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. Nor is that area in the Artic a fault line, to my knowledge. Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES. Helllloooo! Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory. Last edited by KathyT; 12-01-2008 at 09:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois USA
Posts: 652
|
![]()
just checked the usgs if there were nukes being blown up than it would show
on the rictor wait nm wrong gragh Last edited by joe2288; 12-01-2008 at 08:59 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OC, CA and next...
Posts: 1,289
|
![]() Quote:
Kathy T ... I like how you think, I have been looking for pics of the poles for 20 years and the only ones I ever found came from one of 'Norval's post! Someone surely doesn't like posting pics of the poles and when they do post are they 'smudged'? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So. Cal. U.S.
Posts: 4,205
|
![]()
Here's links to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE http://amazingbeauty.org/a-1-fortune...nature-08.html
Last edited by Dantheman62; 12-01-2008 at 09:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OC, CA and next...
Posts: 1,289
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So. Cal. U.S.
Posts: 4,205
|
![]()
oops, sorry, I'm trying!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OC, CA and next...
Posts: 1,289
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
![]()
This is the same hoax as the african pi rates
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Those daurn old nukes,i mean dukes causing hazzard again. ![]() Last edited by 777 The Great Work; 12-02-2008 at 12:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: America
Posts: 427
|
![]() Quote:
I looked really closely at their cryosphere maps of the dates in question, 11/17 and 11/18, and I can't detect any noticable change that you could attribute to "blasts". I've been monitoring the cryosphere maps for months, and keep screen copies of various days throughout the past 3 months. However, it is now winter season, with storms and ice building up. So if there was "something" to be seen from above, I suspect that the snow and ice could have covered it within hours. But have you laughed yet when you see the black dot on their cryosphere? Right where the north pole should be? Take a guess as to what they are covering up????? On their web page, click on the 30 day animation link... and it will show you images for the past 30 days. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 114
|
![]()
No confirmation on any controlled nuclear detentions? Not matter what, that many earthquakes of that size so concentrated in that particular spot is fairly peculiar...
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/zoom/eve...24&lat=79.6563 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
the simple fact is that there were NO NUKES exploded in the canadian arctic. the area in question is inhabited by canadians and has a lot of gas and oil exploration. don't you think that the folks in the neighbourhood woulda noticed??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 58
|
![]()
May be it was "the Mother Bomb "that Russia possess and it is not nuclear.They can be registered on sismographe.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 58
|
![]()
Correction:"The Mother of All Bomb"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
i think that is even less likely that the russians are detonating anything in the canadian arctic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|