Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Camelot Forum > Project Camelot > Off-Topic

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2009, 12:42 AM   #1
Antaletriangle
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3,380
Default A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...



http://www.time.com/time/world/artic...886661,00.html

By Dan Fletcher Friday, Mar. 20, 2009Stonehenge.
For a set of craggy rocks in an English field, Stonehenge's ability to capture the imagination is impressive. The ancient monument — composed of massive stones arranged into concentric circles by unknown builders — is referenced almost as far back the Norman Conquest, when an English historian remarked in 1130 A.D. that "no one can conceive how such great stones have been so raised aloft, or why they were built here." That certainly hasn't kept many from trying. It seems like everyone has a theory for why the ruins were constructed. Some are more plausible than others.


The Not-So-Silent Stones
Alas, Still No Sign of Aliens-i dunno!!lol.With March 20 marking the vernal equinox (one of two days during the year where day and night are the same length) attention turns again to one of the more persistent theories for Stonehenge's origin. In a 1965 book, "Stonehenge Decoded," astronomer Gerald Hawkins offered the then-most comprehensive hypothesis to date of Stonehenge's purpose. Hawkins saw the cluster of stones, constructed in phases from around 3100 B.C. through 1600 B.C., as an ancient astronomical calendar. (See pictures of the seven wonders of the world.)

In his analysis, he identified 165 separate points on the monument, and linked them to astrological phenomenon like the two solstices and equinoxes and lunar and solar eclipses. It's a difficult theory to disprove completely and some evidence is persuasive — at dawn on the summer solstice, for example, the center of the Stonehenge ring, two nearby stones (The Slaughter and Heel Stones) and the sun all seem to align. Still, critics of Hawkins' theory say he gives the ancient builders too much credit, arguing they wouldn't have had the sophistication or precision necessary to predict all the astrological events Hawkins' ascribes to his Stonehenge calendar. And plus this is England after all — wet, overcast England. The climate may have prevented the ancient people of Stonehenge from even seeing the sky with regularity.

Still, Hawkins' theory is one of the more legitimate attempts at a Stonehenge explanation. In the 12th Century, the legend of King Arthur wasn't completely regarded as fiction. In his account of Stonehenge, historian Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote that troops tried to move the stones from Ireland to England in order to provide a monument for their war dead. When they couldn't, they enlisted the help of the wizard Merlin to transport the massive stones — some weighing as much as 50 tons — back to Britain before arranging them in the current configuration.

In a modern twist on Geoffrey's account, some argue that space aliens, rather than Merlin, constructed Stonehenge. These theories feed off the fact that no one's exactly sure how the rocks got to their present location — the origin of some were traced as far as a Welsh mountain range 137 miles away from the Stonehenge. Although modern tests employing only technology from the era have moved similar stones, there's still no full explanation for how ancient people managed such a feat. Hence, aliens.

Some theories are even more inventive. In the 1920s, a Brit named Alfred Watkins attempted to connect Stonehenge with other sites in England, arguing that when taken together, they served as landmarks to navigate through the island once dense, now vanished, ancient forest. He called these routes "ley lines" and the theory developed a sizable following, though trained archaeologists were dubious about this amateur's theory. Another hypothesis is that the configuration is meant to resemble a giant vulva, as a means of tribute to an ancient fertility god. Others argue that Stonehenge was a place of ancient healing, and archaeologists have discovered skeletons at the site riddled with crude wounds, perhaps indications of rudimentary surgery.

The current consensus (if such a thing even exists) is that Stonehenge was used as a burial site. Archaeologists have found skeletal remains at the site dated to a 500-year period beginning in 3000 B.C. One dubbed the site a "domain of the dead" and say the bodies found likely belong to a select group of elite ancient people. It's the most solid evidence yet, but it doesn't preclude Stonehenge having a dual purpose as an astrological calendar or as a religious site. The only thing certain is that as the sun rises and sets to mark another equinox, another day will pass with the complete answer of the site's origins still firmly lodged in the past. Perhaps that's how it's meant to be.
Antaletriangle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 01:34 AM   #2
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...

Hay Dan...you been getting any outta this world visitors ?

Love that picture
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 01:35 AM   #3
Antaletriangle
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3,380
Default Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...

Yeah brook just winding big dan malone up a bit-as you do!!lol.
Antaletriangle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 01:52 AM   #4
BROOK
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,117
Default Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...

Hay Dan remember this encounter



We love you Dan

Last edited by BROOK; 03-21-2009 at 01:57 AM.
BROOK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 05:30 AM   #5
Dantheman62
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: So. Cal. U.S.
Posts: 4,205
Default Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...




How did you do that A?
Dantheman62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 05:47 AM   #6
no caste
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...



oops, the ancestors won't like that....
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 06:15 AM   #7
Seth Haniel
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hartlepool England But Moving Shortly to Fauldhouse Scotland
Posts: 172
Cool Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...

Got a power burn on my right hand from touching one of the Stones during a meditation in the STONEHENGE way back 1994 - can still see it today

Strange
Seth Haniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2009, 07:28 PM   #8
Antaletriangle
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 3,380
Default Re: A Brief History Of Stonehenge theories...

Wild stuff Seth yer can get power surges and all sorts depending on receptivity etc. I did that design Dan on friday just thought i'd post it here and have a bit of fun with you Dan for the craic!lol.
Antaletriangle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon