Go Back   Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) > Project Camelot Forum > Project Camelot > Conspiracy Research

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2008, 10:49 PM   #76
Magamud
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 288
Default Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Ya Lear saids they are not the right engines with the planes. Anyone no more?
Magamud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 05:53 AM   #77
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magamud View Post
Ya Lear saids they are not the right engines with the planes. Anyone no more?

Magamud


Here's the link where Jon Carlson makes his case:


South Tower Flight UA175 Dropped
WRONG Engine In NYC Street


http://home.att.net/~south.tower/STengine1.htm



-feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2008, 05:15 AM   #78
warngen
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 92
Default Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Feeler,
About the photo of the woman's missing foot.
Lets think about this in a little more deeper sense...FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
The people in the photo are going about as usual; as if there weren't a cameraman, let alone the debris, infront of them. If I was there, I would be looking at it and AT LEAST paying attention to the camera man. IMHO, I believe that the image of the wreckage was copy and pasted into another image of people standing on the street corner.
Does anyone know WHEN these "photos" were taken? If this was right after the incident, wouldn't everything be covered in dust.
Actually now that I look at it more carefully, the ground is wet in the photo. 9-11 occured with no clouds in sight, meaning high pressure is dominating. NORMALLY, incoming rain is announced by upper level clouds, such as cirrus type clouds. As the rain gets closer, the clouds begin to form closer to the surface. And NOT 1 CLOUD WAS IN SIGHT!

P.S. Can someone find out the first time it rained in NY AFTER 9-11-01?
Thanks.
warngen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2008, 10:57 AM   #79
mattjb
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Default Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

i think the evidence points clearly to dummy planes. light weight shells (in particular wings) that were designed to disintergrate on impact.
mattjb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 08:57 AM   #80
feeler
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
Default Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattjb View Post
i think the evidence points clearly to dummy planes. light weight shells (in particular wings) that were designed to disintergrate on impact.
If your hypothesis is correct, some other means would be needed to create the wing-shape holes, such as ground-based particle beam weapons. -feeler
feeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2008, 06:08 PM   #81
samncheese
Avalon Senior Member
 
samncheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Puyallup, Washington state
Posts: 138
Default Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?

Ok, Feeler: I apolgize for being harsh with you, before, I did a lot of research on some of the pics you put up. The problem with it wasn't the lady but it was that the landing gear kept changing positions from on photo to the next. the engines were the wrong ones for the aircraft in question and little things like that.

Thank you for pointing me in a good direction.
samncheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Project Avalon