|
11-08-2008, 10:49 PM | #76 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 288
|
Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
Ya Lear saids they are not the right engines with the planes. Anyone no more?
|
11-10-2008, 05:53 AM | #77 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
|
Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
Quote:
Magamud Here's the link where Jon Carlson makes his case: South Tower Flight UA175 Dropped WRONG Engine In NYC Street http://home.att.net/~south.tower/STengine1.htm -feeler |
|
11-11-2008, 05:15 AM | #78 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 92
|
Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
Feeler,
About the photo of the woman's missing foot. Lets think about this in a little more deeper sense...FOOD FOR THOUGHT: The people in the photo are going about as usual; as if there weren't a cameraman, let alone the debris, infront of them. If I was there, I would be looking at it and AT LEAST paying attention to the camera man. IMHO, I believe that the image of the wreckage was copy and pasted into another image of people standing on the street corner. Does anyone know WHEN these "photos" were taken? If this was right after the incident, wouldn't everything be covered in dust. Actually now that I look at it more carefully, the ground is wet in the photo. 9-11 occured with no clouds in sight, meaning high pressure is dominating. NORMALLY, incoming rain is announced by upper level clouds, such as cirrus type clouds. As the rain gets closer, the clouds begin to form closer to the surface. And NOT 1 CLOUD WAS IN SIGHT! P.S. Can someone find out the first time it rained in NY AFTER 9-11-01? Thanks. |
11-11-2008, 10:57 AM | #79 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
|
Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
i think the evidence points clearly to dummy planes. light weight shells (in particular wings) that were designed to disintergrate on impact.
|
11-13-2008, 08:57 AM | #80 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 360
|
Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
If your hypothesis is correct, some other means would be needed to create the wing-shape holes, such as ground-based particle beam weapons. -feeler
|
11-14-2008, 06:08 PM | #81 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Puyallup, Washington state
Posts: 138
|
Re: Holographic planes vs the real thing?
Ok, Feeler: I apolgize for being harsh with you, before, I did a lot of research on some of the pics you put up. The problem with it wasn't the lady but it was that the landing gear kept changing positions from on photo to the next. the engines were the wrong ones for the aircraft in question and little things like that.
Thank you for pointing me in a good direction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|