FCC is going to change the internet

[Praxis]

So I have not seen people discussing this issue on this site and it worries me.

Ajit Paii, former lawyer for Verizon and still toady for the TELECOM giants, is going to change the classification of the internet to make it NOT a public utility.

if you dont understand what having the internet be title 2 is.

Then watch wtt2aSV8wdw short video

They are pitching it as getting rid of "obama era regulations" as a scare tactic and that the heavy hand of government is making it hard for the poor poor telecoms to innovate.

This is BS. Straight and simple.

If you are in favor of the change, then you should rewatch the video again.

If you are in favor of the change, just wait until Avalon doesnt load because your ISP decides for you that Avalon data is not important(as I dont think that Avalon will pay the premium for their data being put in the fast lane.)

I understand that this crowd tends to lean more conservative and anti regulation. This isnt regulation it is making sure that EQUALITY is upheld.

All data on the internet should be treated EQUALLY.

You need to contact your Reps and Senators and ask that they fight this proposed changed.

[Michelle Marie]

Ajit Pai is chairman at the FCC.

https://www.fcc.gov/about/overview

I just posted earlier today regarding how we should hold the FCC accountable.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-A---Very-Bad-Day---Scenario-DoD-exercises-4-6-November&p=1192127&viewfull=1#post1192127

When I was looking around the FCC website, I kind of got the feeling that they are serving the U.N. Agenda more than the interests of the American people.

The control over the Internet goes along those lines. Here they talk about Internet Freedom:

https://www.fcc.gov/about-fcc/fcc-initiatives
Just like a lot of agendas, their words indicate the opposite of what they are up to.

Like I stated in my earlier post--it's time for accountability.

MM

(Looks like the ole revolving door strategy between the corporations and the government regulatory agencies.)

[Bruno]

This is something I am concerned about Praxis! You can not count on corporate interests to think for a moment about the plebs, it is all about greed. If we think fake news is a problem now it could get a whole lot worse. I know many people don't like government regulation but this is must in my mind.

[Fellow Aspirant]

Here's the incomparable John Oliver's latest piece on Net Neutrality. In 13 minutes, he explains what it is, and why and how the latest threat to it is pending in the U.S. government. Excellent piece ... clear, to the point and very disturbing ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vuuZt7wak

B.

[TargeT]

Here's the incomparable John Oliver's latest piece on Net Neutrality. In 13 minutes, he explains what it is, and why and how the latest threat to it is pending in the U.S. government. Excellent piece ... clear, to the point and very disturbing ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vuuZt7wak

B.

92vuuZt7wak


I almost hope this happens, I'd like to see "another" internet set up (competition); this would stop the NSA from only having to watch "one" internet... I'd be interested in setting up a small version myself; it's pretty simple with microwave transmitters.

[Michelle Marie]

That's the thing these changes inspire: alternatives.

An alternative to Google search engine is DuckDuckGo.

Some alternatives to YouTube are Vimeo and BitChute.

Make us our own free Internet, TargeT! 😊

Also, with our higher frequencies we will soon be using telepathy and other technologies that don't require AI.

Just I

I was just working on a presentation earlier today called: "We ARE the Technology"

🌀🌟🌀MM🌀🌟🌀

[Omni]

Ajit Pai gets my shill of the month award. I wish this corruption to be prosecuted.

[TargeT]

Make us our own free Internet, TargeT! 😊


Well, if by "free" you mean open and unfettered by ISP f**kery... sure.. but not "free" in a monetary sense unfortunately ;)




Ajit Pai gets my shill of the month award. I wish this corruption to be prosecuted.


Yeah, trump certainly seems to have filled the swamp a bit with this move (appointing Pai)...naivety or intentional malice...?

[bobme]

Wait a minute here. Was it not that long ago, that the fcc took control of the internet, calling it a national security threat?

Or am I wrong?

[Michelle Marie]

Wait a minute here. Was it not that long ago, that the fcc took control of the internet, calling it a national security threat?

Or am I wrong?

In 2012 FBI Director Mueller said: "Down the road the cyber threat will be the number one threat to The country."

https://www.fcc.gov/general/cyber-security-and-network-reliability

They work through the CSRIC (Communications, Security, Reliability, Interoperabiliy Council) the advisory committee made up of industry leaders, academics, innovators in communications, Federal partners, public safety entities, state and local government officials, and Internet registries.

Members include Joel Molinoff from CBS tv, Francisco Sanchez from TX Homeland Security, Peter Fonash-Dept of Homeland Security..more at this link:

http://www.4-traders.com/news/FCC-Federal-Communications-Commission-CSRIC-V-Members-and-First-Meeting-Announced--20549259/

MM

[Fellow Aspirant]

Here's the incomparable John Oliver's latest piece on Net Neutrality. In 13 minutes, he explains what it is, and why and how the latest threat to it is pending in the U.S. government. Excellent piece ... clear, to the point and very disturbing ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vuuZt7wak

B.

92vuuZt7wak


I almost hope this happens, I'd like to see "another" internet set up (competition); this would stop the NSA from only having to watch "one" internet... I'd be interested in setting up a small version myself; it's pretty simple with microwave transmitters.

An alternate web would be hugely limited in what it would provide access to. Right now, the big players offer sites that are hugely useful to most people. YouTube, for example. There's nothing to stop anyone from "going rogue" right now. Who would use it, though?

No, better to keep free access for the web as we know it.

B.

B.

[Bruno]

That's the thing these changes inspire: alternatives.

An alternative to Google search engine is DuckDuckGo.

Some alternatives to YouTube are Vimeo and BitChute.

Make us our own free Internet, TargeT! 😊

Also, with our higher frequencies we will soon be using telepathy and other technologies that don't require AI.

Just I

I was just working on a presentation earlier today called: "We ARE the Technology"

🌀🌟🌀MM🌀🌟🌀

Yes alternative search engines are great, but this isn't about that, it's about service providers being able block or slow access to places on-line that don't provide them financial incentives. So if a government or corporation can pay they get better service or in a worst case scenario, they can pay to slow other sites like for example our little Motley Crue at Project Avalon.

[neutronstar]

Here's the incomparable John Oliver's latest piece on Net Neutrality. In 13 minutes, he explains what it is, and why and how the latest threat to it is pending in the U.S. government. Excellent piece ... clear, to the point and very disturbing ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92vuuZt7wak

B.

92vuuZt7wak


I almost hope this happens, I'd like to see "another" internet set up (competition); this would stop the NSA from only having to watch "one" internet... I'd be interested in setting up a small version myself; it's pretty simple with microwave transmitters.

An alternate web would be hugely limited in what it would provide access to. Right now, the big players offer sites that are hugely useful to most people. YouTube, for example. There's nothing to stop anyone from "going rogue" right now. Who would use it, though?

No, better to keep free access for the web as we know it.

B.

B.

Exactly, Setting up a new web would mean setting up a whole new infrastructure. That would be extremely expensive.

[Praxis]

Wait a minute here. Was it not that long ago, that the fcc took control of the internet, calling it a national security threat?

Or am I wrong?

I think this is a good question.

As far as I am aware,the FCC only has regulatory control over the internet and ISPs. They do this by issuing regulations into the Code of Federal Regulations(CFR).

So in this sense, they do "have control" over the internet.

The more interesting question inmy mind is what kind of hand Cybercomm has. For those who are not aware
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cyber_Command

Which as you can see in the wiki article was raised to a FULL command inthe Unified Combatant Command Structure of the DoD.

Which is interesting because this site http://www.stratcom.mil/Media/Factsheets/Factsheet-View/Article/960492/us-cyber-command-uscybercom/
Doesnt mention this and is over a year old in terms of being up to date.

If you are not aware of the Unified Combatant Command, you should be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_combatant_command

Understanding how the military is organized, is the first step to understanding the deep state and Secret Space program.