PDA

View Full Version : The Fabian Society + Eugenics



Merlinus
8th March 2018, 22:01
How socialism and eugenics were jointly started by the UK elite - the Fabian Society, the Royal Society, the X Club, and more

https://steemit.com/life/@newsandviews/how-socialism-and-eugenics-are-closely-related-the-fabian-society-the-royal-society-darwinism-the-x-club-and-more

The Fabian Society was founded by a bunch of these elitist pigs in 1884 in London. Some of the elitist pigs involved included George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Annie Besant, Margaret Sanger, H. G. Wells, Bertrand Russell, and even George Orwell (Eric Blair). George Orwell appears to have had a falling out with the Fabians when he exposed their real intentions in his books 1984 and Animal Farm (with 1984 indicating a 100 year vision from the founding of the Fabian Society in 1884.)

The symbolism of the Fabian society is extremely telling. It is a picture of a wolf in sheep's clothing to make clear their incredibly subversive approach. The society was named after the Roman general Fabius whose tactic was an extremely slow breakdown of the opposition until finally the right opportunity exists to strike hard, fast, and destructively. This is also the reason for the use of the turtle as another symbol of the Fabians as seen above.

Multiple links are provided with additional info on the fabians

Merlinus
8th March 2018, 22:05
Quotes from some of their members

“I believe that now and always the conscious selection of the best for reproduction will be impossible; that to propose it is to display a fundamental misunderstanding of what individuality implies. The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failure, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies.”

-H.G. Wells in American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 10 (1904), p. 11

“We may perhaps assume that, if people grow less superstitious, government will acquire the right to sterilize those who are not considered desirable as parents. This power will be used, at first, to diminish imbecility, a most desirable object. But probably, in time, opposition to the government will be taken to prove imbecility, so that rebels of all kinds will be sterilized. Epileptics, consumptives, dipsomaniacs and so on will gradually be included; in the end, there will be a tendency to include all who fail to pass the usual school examinations. The result will be to increase the average intelligence; in the long run, it may be greatly increased. But probably the effect upon really exceptional intelligence will be bad.

Eugenics has, of course, more ambitious possibilities in a more distant future. It may aim not only at eliminating undesired types, but at increasing desired types. Moral standards may alter so as to make it possible for one man to be the sire of a vast progeny by many different mothers. … If eugenics reached the point where it could increase desired types, it would not be the types desired by present-day Eugenists that would be increased, but rather the type desired by the average official. Prime Ministers, Bishops, and others whom the State considers desirable might become the fathers of half the next generation…

If we knew enough about heredity to determine, within limits, what sort of population we would have, the matter would of course be in the hands of State officials, presumably elderly medical men. Whether they would really be preferable to Nature I do not feel sure. I suspect that they would breed a subservient population, convenient to rulers but incapable of initiative.”

–Bertrand Russell, “ICARUS or the Future of Science” (1924)

Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

-Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. 1946

Foxie Loxie
8th March 2018, 22:54
:welcome: So glad you joined, Merlinus!!!

Satori
9th March 2018, 01:07
G. Edward Griffin and many others have written and spoken of the Fabianist and other esoteric organizations bent upon "forging the world nearer to the hearts desire" for decades. This is not the least bit new. But it's good that more and more people are becoming aware of things such as this.

Cardillac
9th March 2018, 16:15
"Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. 1946"

if my read sources are correct Julian Huxley was the brother of Aldous Huxley, author of "Brave New World" and mentor/teacher of Eric Blair (alias George Orwell)-

wife of Julian Huxley was Margaret Sanger, the founder of the very dubious organization known as "Planned Parenthood"; Sanger was THE high-priestess of eugenics (the 1st sterilizations of "undesireables" began in the early 20th century (not in N**i Germany but in the US) and stated "black people are like weeds and need to be rooted out"- nice lady, right?-

a great fan of Margaret Sanger has been...

Hilary Clinton who has admired Sanger's "tenacity"-

nice lady, right?

be well all-

Larry