PDA

View Full Version : New audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle on the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe



Bill Ryan
17th June 2010, 01:06
Hi, All:

(Project Avalon blog, 16 June):

Many of you will already have heard Richard Hoagland on Coast to Coast AM two days ago, vividly describing the risk of a collapse of part of the seabed of the Gulf of Mexico, with a resultant catastrophic tsunami. Click here (http://projectavalon.net/Richard_Hoagland_Coast_to_Coast_14_June_2010.mp3) for a continuous 20 minute MP3.

I've just now completed a 40 minute audio interview with Dr Bill Deagle in which he identifies precisely the same risk, informed by his own separate sources. Bill Deagle WAS UNAWARE OF RICHARD HOAGLAND'S SUMMARY WHEN HE SPOKE TO ME.

Please click here for this important interview (http://projectavalon.net/Bill_Deagle_Bill_Ryan_Project_Avalon_16_June_2010. mp3). It may be of interest to many that 'Dr Bill' seriously recommends the nuclear solution described in this recent Russian newspaper article (http://projectavalon.net/kp.ru_3_May_2010.html).

josie
17th June 2010, 01:09
good information, thanks bill, especially since there are bound to be others like me who were inclined to categorically dismiss anything nuclear. will go listen now.

Northern Boy
17th June 2010, 01:27
'Dr Bill' seriously recommends the nuclear solution described in this recent Russian newspaper article (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/../kp.ru_3_May_2010.html).:sarcastic:

Problem With this is its to unpredictable and they have no guarantee it will work and in fact it could make it worse and then what , the People in charge have been dragging their knuckles on this for to long any one who believes they have been on top of this is just to stupid to understand the magnitude of it or enjoy dining with the other sheep . You don`t want to compound the problem and then make it so that one can`t come in to fix the problem because of radiation And yes Russia has done this before but are the American Idiots in charge going to let Russia come in and solve this NO it doesn`t matter that they have the experience the brainless twits at pennsylvania Ave believe they can screw it up on thier own with out any ones help

Rocky_Shorz
17th June 2010, 02:03
Russia did not use a nuke on a well with 70K PSI behind it...

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CpPNQoTlacU&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CpPNQoTlacU&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

more underground nuclear blasts

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l5jfaXSFfGQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l5jfaXSFfGQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Rocky_Shorz
17th June 2010, 02:48
I just did a quick study on all 5 nukes Russia used to stop oil spills and only one is close to the same situation set off 2 Kilometers under the surface... Kharkov region in 1972 even though the set off the mini nuke down deep it had a mushroom cloud on the surface and didn't stop the oil flow...

imagine blowing a hole 1/10 of a mile across over this well, igniting the natural gas and then having the sea water pour down on the magma...

it isn't worth the gamble...

HORIZONS
17th June 2010, 03:22
Very good interview - everyone should listen and consider what is being shared.
Many thanks to you Bill for all your efforts.

Northern Boy
17th June 2010, 03:25
Very good interview - everyone should listen and consider what is being shared.
Many thanks to you Bill for all your efforts.

nope i`ll pass

tone3jaguar
17th June 2010, 03:30
Bill, I love you man. However, why do you find Dr. Deagle to still be credible? Last time he was talking about how planet x was going to cause all of the problems. Now he does not mention that at all and it is going to be caused by graviton waves on the galactic plane. Not to mention the call he made to you and Kerry a couple of years ago when he said that nuclear war was eminent. He believes that he is a prophet that was sent from god to tell us all the truth, and yet everything he tells us turns out to be made up B.S. I am tired of hearing him evangelize. He needs to give it a rest.

=[Post Update]=


I just did a quick study on all 5 nukes Russia used to stop oil spills and only one is close to the same situation set off 2 Kilometers under the surface... Kharkov region in 1972 even though the set off the mini nuke down deep it had a mushroom cloud on the surface and didn't stop the oil flow...

imagine blowing a hole 1/10 of a mile across over this well, igniting the natural gas and then having the sea water pour down on the magma...

it isn't worth the gamble...

Natural gas will not ignite unless you mix it with the proper air to fuel ratio of oxygen. The only oxygen down there is in the water and that does not count.

Northern Boy
17th June 2010, 03:34
Natural Gas is stored in lime stone up here and it doesn`t blow it apart so how could it there the fact it is a gas means it will find the path of least resistance ahead of any liquid so if anything it will make its way to the surface faster then the oil

unplugged
17th June 2010, 03:43
Don't we have a sufficient number of toxins to contend with in the Gulf right now -- benzene @ 3000+ PPB (acceptable levels = 5 PPB), Methylene Oxide @ 3400 PPB (acceptable levels = 5-10 PPB), Hydrogen sulfide @ 3000 PPB (acceptable levels = 61 PPB), without adding nuclear waste to the mix?

tone3jaguar
17th June 2010, 12:05
Don't we have a sufficient number of toxins to contend with in the Gulf right now -- benzene @ 3000+ PPB (acceptable levels = 5 PPB), Methylene Oxide @ 3400 PPB (acceptable levels = 5-10 PPB), Hydrogen sulfide @ 3000 PPB (acceptable levels = 61 PPB), without adding nuclear waste to the mix?

If you set off very small nuclear weapons under 1000+ feed of limestone, all you get is a bunch of heat to melt the rock shut. The radiation would stay underground.

Bill Ryan
17th June 2010, 12:07
If you set off very small nuclear weapons under 1000+ feed of limestone, all you get is a bunch of heat to melt the rock shut. The radiation would stay underground.

That's totally correct - unless the rock strata fractures, and it all goes wrong. (I don't have a position on the nuke option. by the way - I'm just trying to educate and inform as even-handedly as possible.)

norman
17th June 2010, 12:48
Surely!? If you melt the rock with a nuke, if the upwards pressure is extreemly high, won't the 'melt' only release more energy creating a bigger escape route for that energy?

Bill Ryan
17th June 2010, 13:18
Surely!? If you melt the rock with a nuke, if the upwards pressure is extreemly high, won't the 'melt' only release more energy creating a bigger escape route for that energy?

If the rock is solid, and therefore the energy has nowhere to go, the energy is contained and focused and ends up melting the rock (which then re-solidifies). Everything is 'welded' shut and solid.

If the rock is not solid (or solid enough), the energy will end up MOVING the rocks - maybe upwards and along fault/fracture lines, and more fissures are created. When the Russians did this (http://projectavalon.net/kp.ru_3_May_2010.html), this is what happened one time out of five.

theguardian
17th June 2010, 14:50
Hard time for the undersea life , so sad

MorningSong
17th June 2010, 17:26
Thanks Bill for this very, very, very interesting interview!

HORIZONS
17th June 2010, 18:01
This is not just the opinion of Dr Bill:
Simmons Says Nuclear Device Only Option to Stop Oil Flow
http://video.godlikeproductions.com/video/Simmons_Says_Nuclear_Device_Only_Option_to_Stop_Oi l_Flow

Rocky_Shorz
19th June 2010, 05:17
well everyone needs to be watching very closely, the relief well is cutting through at 5 times the rate it was...

This is a 5 mile pile of sediment they are drilling through, it is almost complete... less than 200 feet to go...

This isn't sand and stone on the surface....

when you watch the video on the Russian nuke blast, you see the burst come up to the surface...

so what if it doesn't go upwards, it seems softer as they get closer to the well...

setting off the nuke might open from the nuke downward just bringing the well closer and opening more leaks for it to pour through...

we are talking upwards of 70,000 PSI of pressure that is 35 TONS per square inch?

That is the type of pressure that turns coal into diamonds...

Now word is coming out that Thorium and Uranium are leaking from this well...

We would be building Thorium reactors around the world right now instead of Nukes if we didn't need enriched uranium for building bombs...

so what if like I said blowing a nuke blew downward into the well filled with Thorium and Uranium?

We have 2.5M gallons of oil leaking 4B cubic feet natural gas and 2B of methane leaking right now each day... along with volcanic gases and Thorium and Uranium...

at the present rate of leak, it will take over 30 years before it runs dry...

they drilled 5 miles down into a underwater mountain, what happens if setting off the nuke blows out the side of the mountain...

68 Trillion Gallons of Oil/Natural Gas/Methane released instantly...


I'm not an expert, but anyone that is pushing to set off a nuke to stop this oil flow is a gambler willing to take a shot at instantly destroying this planet...

as terrible as it sounds, if they are only able to capture 95% of what is leaking...

It won't be pretty, but at least we'll survive and have time to try and come up with a better solution

Rocky_Shorz
19th June 2010, 05:24
http://ccom.unh.edu/images/lots/mexico/5_keathley_cyn.jpg

lindabaker
19th June 2010, 22:18
I keep getting a "404 Not Found" message on the Deagle links, both on this forum and on the Project Avalon Blog page.

HORIZONS
19th June 2010, 23:05
I keep getting a "404 Not Found" message on the Deagle links, both on this forum and on the Project Avalon Blog page.

It looks like the link was severed to the file with the latest server issues that have taken place as of late. Send Bill a PM and see if he can get it restored.

=[Post Update]=

Friday's show: very interesting... http://podcast.gcnlive.com/podcast/nutri_med/0618103.mp3

Eligos
19th June 2010, 23:54
Any updates on Bill's interview with Dr Deagle? A working link to the mp3 would be appreciated.
TIA

Tuza
20th June 2010, 00:05
For a few years everyone has talked about the shtf scenario. We are in that scenario, it is blowing out from the fan. I know nothing about technical stuff but I get a bad feeling about any nukes being blown up in the leak. Of course I want the leak to stop because it is killing everything but for everyone's sake why arent these so called experts calling in experts from all around the world to find a safer solution or is that too late. I just keep getting it is going to cause even more problems with an explosion of a nuke.