PDA

View Full Version : Why Has Info of Fallen Satellite Gone Quite



The One
25th September 2011, 19:37
It's been said that government has satellites above the planet that are so powerful they can tell the color of your eyes if you look up from the ground ... and could zap a launched missile out of the skies

But reports are saying that they don't really know where the falling satellite has landed ...

Where are all the private reports

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/110921-coslog-breakup-330p.photoblog500.jpg

CALGARY - Officials in the U.S. and Canada are trying to determine where debris from an American satellite have landed, but the RCMP is shooting down reports that some pieces fell in an Alberta community.

RCMP calls reports of satellite debris falling in Alberta 'hoax'

here http://www.globalnews.ca/rcmp+calls+reports+of+satellite+debris+falling+in+alberta+39hoax39/6442488581/story.html The Canadian Press : Saturday, September 24, 2011 1:48 PM

More than 10 hours after the spacecraft plunged over the north Pacific Ocean, U.S. space officials didn't know just where it crashed.

Jonathan McDowell of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics says the spacecraft entered the atmosphere around 12:15 a.m. eastern time over the coast of Washington state.

He says much of the debris likely fell over the Pacific Ocean, with some making it to Canada over northern Alberta and perhaps as far as the Hudson Bay.

A YouTube video and comments on Twitter have triggered speculation that debris may have hit Okotoks, a town south of Calgary, but the RCMP says it has found no evidence support that.

RCMP Sgt. Patrick Webb says the video is likely a hoax, adding police have heard nothing about falling debris in the area.

"If that video is real, I will buy you a cup of coffee," Webb said in an interview.

On the video, the videographers talk throughout the footage and at one point, a person says -- "I am Oklahoma City, looking southeast and... the debris pieces keep on coming."

The video was titled "Okotoks, Canada - UARS Fiery Footage" and the Oklahoma City reference was not immediately clear.

McDowell said he'd be surprised if anyone was hurt by the debris because it appears to have fallen in such remote areas.

"I do think people saw lights in the sky and fireballs and may well be bits of UARS falling down," he said.

The bus-sized Upper Atmospheric Research Satellite was NASA's biggest spacecraft to tumble out of orbit, uncontrolled, in 32 years.

It was launched aboard space shuttle Discovery in 1991.

NASA decommissioned the satellite in 2005, after moving it into a lower orbit that cut its life short by two decades

mmmmm two decades

Dick
25th September 2011, 19:51
Maybe this is why:

However we should not be too worried about a chunk of satellite landing in our back yard. Nevertheless should that happen NASA are warning against taking pieces as a souvenir. Not because it is toxic, just that it is US government property and they want it back.But Leonid Ivashov, from the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, warns that keeping pieces of the satellite would be, first of all, hazardous: plutonium, which does not burn in the atmosphere, poses a direct danger to human health. “Experts call this type of satellite an orbital trolleybus. You need a lot of energy to keep such a satellite operational. And Americans have used radioactive plutonium for this. Metal and other parts of the satellite will burn in the atmosphere, but plutonium won't and it will end up on earth,” the expert told RT. “And it's a deadly danger to humans, for instance, exposure to plutonium leads to cancer.” 

Dick.

Maia Gabrial
25th September 2011, 20:02
Maybe this is why:

However we should not be too worried about a chunk of satellite landing in our back yard. Nevertheless should that happen NASA are warning against taking pieces as a souvenir. Not because it is toxic, just that it is US government property and they want it back.But Leonid Ivashov, from the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, warns that keeping pieces of the satellite would be, first of all, hazardous: plutonium, which does not burn in the atmosphere, poses a direct danger to human health. “Experts call this type of satellite an orbital trolleybus. You need a lot of energy to keep such a satellite operational. And Americans have used radioactive plutonium for this. Metal and other parts of the satellite will burn in the atmosphere, but plutonium won't and it will end up on earth,” the expert told RT. “And it's a deadly danger to humans, for instance, exposure to plutonium leads to cancer.”

Dick.

That's one way to keep people from taking it. Scare them with the plutonium. Why are they using plutonium in satelites...?

MorningSong
25th September 2011, 21:01
They don't want anyone to know! These "agencies" are so run amuck in their lies and deceit, they are pathological!

Why would the Italian news keep repeating warnings all day on Friday that it was headed for Italy?

Why would the Italian Civil Protection put out a pdf on their site and send it to all news outlets showing the sat's path over Northern Italy if it was, according to the now published NASA estimates, coming up from "down under" and coming over Africa....nowhere near Europe?

Too many questions..... I'm going outside for a smoke.....

Adi
26th September 2011, 07:52
Maybe this is why:

However we should not be too worried about a chunk of satellite landing in our back yard. Nevertheless should that happen NASA are warning against taking pieces as a souvenir. Not because it is toxic, just that it is US government property and they want it back.But Leonid Ivashov, from the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, warns that keeping pieces of the satellite would be, first of all, hazardous: plutonium, which does not burn in the atmosphere, poses a direct danger to human health. “Experts call this type of satellite an orbital trolleybus. You need a lot of energy to keep such a satellite operational. And Americans have used radioactive plutonium for this. Metal and other parts of the satellite will burn in the atmosphere, but plutonium won't and it will end up on earth,” the expert told RT. “And it's a deadly danger to humans, for instance, exposure to plutonium leads to cancer.” 

Dick.

Wasn't Alexander Litvinenko, the ex KGB spy killed with plutonium. The images that I seen of him on his death bed where pretty scary indeed.

Source:

http://www.iom3.org/material-matters/polonium-plutonium-poisoning-alexander-litvinenko?c=574

The One
26th September 2011, 08:18
Latest on this Satellite vanished

NASA never a straight answer last night said it has no idea where a six tonne satellite that fell to earth had finally landed.The uppper atmosphere reseasrch satellite plunging through the atmosphere between 3.23am and 5.09am on Saturday.

Nasa believes parts may be scattered over the pacific.But chief Nicholas Johnson said as we dont know where the re-entry point was,we dont know where the debris field might be

Calz
26th September 2011, 12:48
Well let me yell ya why ...

fgTyiaDmytw

ulli
26th September 2011, 13:00
Wow, I have something to fwd now. Hahaha....Even use FB again. Hahaha....Calz, you are the best!!

Maia Gabrial
26th September 2011, 13:31
Latest on this Satellite vanished

NASA never a straight answer last night said it has no idea where a six tonne satellite that fell to earth had finally landed.The uppper atmosphere reseasrch satellite plunging through the atmosphere between 3.23am and 5.09am on Saturday.

Nasa believes parts may be scattered over the pacific.But chief Nicholas Johnson said as we dont know where the re-entry point was,we dont know where the debris field might be

And I don't believe for a second that they DON'T know where it's at or where it's going to come down. If that were the case, could they be trusted with the lives of astronauts and billions of dollars worth of technologies?
Believe me, they KNOW....

Calz
28th September 2011, 06:26
Update from Never A Straight Answer ...


NASA: Satellite fell in south Pacific, not Canada

WASHINGTON (AP) — The dead NASA satellite fell into what might be the ideal spot — part of the southern Pacific Ocean about as far from large land masses as you can get, U.S. space officials said Tuesday.

New U.S. Air Force calculations put the 6-ton (5.4-metric ton) satellite's death plunge early Saturday thousands of miles (kilometers) from northwestern North America, where there were reports of sightings. Instead, it plunged into areas where remote islands dot a vast ocean.

NASA says those new calculations show the 20-year-old satellite entered Earth's atmosphere generally above American Samoa. But falling debris as it broke apart did not start hitting the water for another 300 miles (480 kilometers) to the northeast, southwest of Christmas Island, just after midnight EDT Saturday.

Rest of story:

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-satellite-fell-south-pacific-not-canada-201709293.html