PDA

View Full Version : WAKE UP WORLD!!! Pushing Pedophilia In French Kids Clothing Ad Photo..!



jackovesk
7th January 2012, 02:28
Naked man appears in French children's fashion shoot

05 Jan 2012

One of France’s biggest mail-order fashion retailers has apologised for publishing a photo in which a naked man appears behind a group of children advertising beachwear.

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02100/La-Redoute_2100575b.jpg

The nudist can clearly be seen strolling knee-deep in the sea while in the foreground four children run towards the camera in bright clothing.

The mistake was compounded by the fact that La Redoute provided a magnifying glass to allow people to get a closer look at the beachwear and thus any outstanding items in the beach scene.

In a tweet La Redoute said that it “apologises for the photo published on its site and is doing what’s necessary to remove it”.

But the shot has gone viral on the internet and spawned a host of spoof montages.

These feature the unidentified nudist as part of the Moon landing, with the face of the disgraced former International Monetary Fund chief, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, or strolling behind President Nicolas Sarkozy as he goes for a summer dip in swimming trunks.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8994674/Naked-man-appears-in-French-childrens-fashion-shoot.html

PS - When is the World ever going to 'Wake Up' to the PTW Scumbags, who promote such in your face abhorent abuse, using innocent children as their messengers of pure (EVIL)..!

:mad2:

Sex in society: too much raunch, too young

The sexual freedoms gained in the Sixties have nothing in common with today's dismaying bombardment of explicit images at children.

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02102/RAUNCHY-LIFE_2102361c.jpg
Too much: a scene from the TV series Sherlock, left, and an explicit pose from Lady Gaga

06 Jan 2012

"Three million people saw your bottom!” So ran the shocked letter I received in the late 1960s after I had presented Late Night Line-Up wearing a daringly short skirt. Back then, minis were still news: Jean Shrimpton had recently caused an international storm by wearing one at the Melbourne races in Australia. Certainly, no women wore them to present BBC chat shows – no women presented chat shows in those days.

Looking at the pictures today, a miniskirt seems harmless. But some people took offence: they felt mine was too raunchy. They were alarmed, convinced that such clothing somehow put the morals of the nation at risk. It might enflame people’s lusts and prompt them to acts of sexual behaviour that, by the standards of the day, were to be deplored: sex before marriage, for example.

Sex makes one generation fearful for the next. It has always been so. And in each generation, there are always those who consider the more risqué edges of the entertainment industry to be going too far. In 1890s Paris, onlookers took against the frills and suspenders of can-can dancers. By the 1950s, its Crazy Horse cabaret was making witty mockery of such shows, while itself leaving little to the audience’s imagination. At the same time in Britain, nudes posing in tableaux at the Windmill Theatre were still not permitted to move.

Now I find myself caught up in concerns about the sexualisation of children today. This week, I was quoted as condemning outright Lady Gaga and other performers for seeming obsessed with appearing at their raunchiest in their pop videos and on prime-time television shows. So have I changed sides? Or has the world changed?

It could be that I have grown old. I am now in my late 70s; I no longer belong to the generation that rejoiced in outraging its elders and struggled against the strictures of Mary Whitehouse (I thought she was wrong then, and I still do).

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8998434/Sex-in-society-too-much-raunch-too-young.html

PS - Fu#K Off - Lady Gaga you sell out OWO effing evil WHORE..!

...and that goes to your all your co-opted braindead little 'Monsters' as well, who can't see through your controllers veil..!

Sierra
7th January 2012, 03:20
Well Jacko,

Somewhere on Avalon, someone published a link to the stupidest Christmas present ideas ever. And what blew my mind as I looked a the presents, was how many of them could be used as pedophilia training tools on young children.

I'll look around and see if I can find it or perhaps someone else knows where it is.

Sierra

Guest
7th January 2012, 04:21
Hi Jackovesk,

I don't appreciate lady gaga either....

Here in the States there is a show called, Toddlers in Tiaras, a beauty pageant television show for little girls it's suppose to give/teach them self confidence, self respect and sophistication; it totally sexualizes them at too young of an age and gives predators free ammunition and view. People are asleep and it is very sad.:sad:

Love

Nora

we are all related

music
9th January 2012, 10:15
I dare say the nudist was not noticed, or if he was, we are talking about French people, who are generally not that uptight about the human body. Nudist doesn't equal pedophile - the naked body is a natural and beautiful thing - , but I agree that sexually provocative imagery is inappropriate for children. I tend to think that most of our cases of sexual maladjustment and perversion stem from our turning away from natural sexuality, while fostering unnatural, air-brushed simulcra within a culture of repression.

Jenci
9th January 2012, 13:45
One of the techniques that the PTB use, is to bring "sex" into the mind of the viewer of an image whilst placing totally unrelated and innocent images of children alongside. Now the image itself may not be about sex, but it brings the idea of sex into the mind.

When seen, there is always an explanation - 'oh it is just perfectly innocent' but the real effect is happening subliminally.

For example it may be a picture of a sexy woman in a bikini (nothing wrong with that) and alongside children innocently posing. (nothing wrong with that either).

But if they can get the person viewing the image to think about sex, while the image of the child is seen they start to blur the lines. Most adults when thinking about sexual matters, do not ever bring the idea of children into the equation, because there is a line which is not crossed.

It's not just images of children that are used to promote "their" agenda - they will also use images of animals, family members, death, blood into images designed to get the viewer thinking about sex. This is all to desensitise people to paedophilia, incest, bestiality, sacrifice, necrophilia.

After seeing a lot of these type of images, I would say Jack that photo in the OP is deliberate. Of course, it can be easily explained away as a mistake or innocent because nudity is not about sex.

And one of the things about desensitising people is that they get used to this stuff and then they can move onto the next phase. The kids in the photo above are behaving just as you would expect children to behave.

The last time I looked at images of children in swimwear, I was shocked to see so many of the kids posing with their bodies as you would expect an adult or the photos were taken from an angle which was suggestive.

People don't question it because it has been introduced slowly over time - deliberately.

Good topic to bring up, Jack, thanks.


Jeanette

Sierra
9th January 2012, 17:53
Here is the link I mentioned above:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/12/worst-christmas-gifts-for-kids_n_1143639.html#s525792&title=My_Cleaning_Trolley

Even the ones that are not sexually bent, are bent in other ways. Training tools. You too can go to McDonalds, go through security at the airport, become a cleaning maid.

Ugh.

Sierra

conk
9th January 2012, 17:57
I dare say the nudist was not noticed, or if he was, we are talking about French people, who are generally not that uptight about the human body. Nudist doesn't equal pedophile - the naked body is a natural and beautiful thing - , but I agree that sexually provocative imagery is inappropriate for children. I tend to think that most of our cases of sexual maladjustment and perversion stem from our turning away from natural sexuality, while fostering unnatural, air-brushed simulcra within a culture of repression.NOTHING is left unexamined in marketing and advertising photos. Every square inch is analyzed and considered, count on it. I'd bet my last dime that there are many explicit, but subliminal aspects as well. Nothing is left to chance.

Jenci
9th January 2012, 18:25
NOTHING is left unexamined in marketing and advertising photos. Every square inch is analyzed and considered, count on it. I'd bet my last dime that there are many explicit, but subliminal aspects as well. Nothing is left to chance.

Exactly!

Jeanette

conk
9th January 2012, 18:43
If anyone doubts that they go after young minds or try to implant thoughts, check out the subliminal messages on the covers of Harry Potter books. You'll find the word SEX all over the cover. All alcohol ads are saturated with pornography, especially the ice cubes and water splashes. Once you learn to see it, it jumps out from everywhere.

toad
9th January 2012, 19:35
I dare say the nudist was not noticed, or if he was, we are talking about French people, who are generally not that uptight about the human body. Nudist doesn't equal pedophile - the naked body is a natural and beautiful thing - , but I agree that sexually provocative imagery is inappropriate for children. I tend to think that most of our cases of sexual maladjustment and perversion stem from our turning away from natural sexuality, while fostering unnatural, air-brushed simulcra within a culture of repression.

Yeah we are talking about the french here, who regularly enjoy being naked and it doesn't really seem to bother them.





I dare say the nudist was not noticed, or if he was, we are talking about French people, who are generally not that uptight about the human body. Nudist doesn't equal pedophile - the naked body is a natural and beautiful thing - , but I agree that sexually provocative imagery is inappropriate for children. I tend to think that most of our cases of sexual maladjustment and perversion stem from our turning away from natural sexuality, while fostering unnatural, air-brushed simulcra within a culture of repression.NOTHING is left unexamined in marketing and advertising photos. Every square inch is analyzed and considered, count on it. I'd bet my last dime that there are many explicit, but subliminal aspects as well. Nothing is left to chance.

That is not necessarily true. You would be incredible surprised to see the stuff that doesn't get proofed and sent to press, and once it does theres no going back.

Jenci
9th January 2012, 19:56
I dare say the nudist was not noticed, or if he was, we are talking about French people, who are generally not that uptight about the human body. Nudist doesn't equal pedophile - the naked body is a natural and beautiful thing - , but I agree that sexually provocative imagery is inappropriate for children. I tend to think that most of our cases of sexual maladjustment and perversion stem from our turning away from natural sexuality, while fostering unnatural, air-brushed simulcra within a culture of repression.

Yeah we are talking about the french here, who regularly enjoy being naked and it doesn't really seem to bother them.





I dare say the nudist was not noticed, or if he was, we are talking about French people, who are generally not that uptight about the human body. Nudist doesn't equal pedophile - the naked body is a natural and beautiful thing - , but I agree that sexually provocative imagery is inappropriate for children. I tend to think that most of our cases of sexual maladjustment and perversion stem from our turning away from natural sexuality, while fostering unnatural, air-brushed simulcra within a culture of repression.NOTHING is left unexamined in marketing and advertising photos. Every square inch is analyzed and considered, count on it. I'd bet my last dime that there are many explicit, but subliminal aspects as well. Nothing is left to chance.

That is not necessarily true. You would be incredible surprised to see the stuff that doesn't get proofed and sent to press, and once it does theres no going back.


I only woke up to this issue when I stepped back and connected the dots, looking at the bigger picture.


This is one issue I would really love to be wrong on.

A recent thread here posted by W1ndmill on Missing Children http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?37821-Missing-Children-Missing-People

Jeanette