jackovesk
7th January 2012, 02:28
Naked man appears in French children's fashion shoot
05 Jan 2012
One of France’s biggest mail-order fashion retailers has apologised for publishing a photo in which a naked man appears behind a group of children advertising beachwear.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02100/La-Redoute_2100575b.jpg
The nudist can clearly be seen strolling knee-deep in the sea while in the foreground four children run towards the camera in bright clothing.
The mistake was compounded by the fact that La Redoute provided a magnifying glass to allow people to get a closer look at the beachwear and thus any outstanding items in the beach scene.
In a tweet La Redoute said that it “apologises for the photo published on its site and is doing what’s necessary to remove it”.
But the shot has gone viral on the internet and spawned a host of spoof montages.
These feature the unidentified nudist as part of the Moon landing, with the face of the disgraced former International Monetary Fund chief, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, or strolling behind President Nicolas Sarkozy as he goes for a summer dip in swimming trunks.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8994674/Naked-man-appears-in-French-childrens-fashion-shoot.html
PS - When is the World ever going to 'Wake Up' to the PTW Scumbags, who promote such in your face abhorent abuse, using innocent children as their messengers of pure (EVIL)..!
:mad2:
Sex in society: too much raunch, too young
The sexual freedoms gained in the Sixties have nothing in common with today's dismaying bombardment of explicit images at children.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02102/RAUNCHY-LIFE_2102361c.jpg
Too much: a scene from the TV series Sherlock, left, and an explicit pose from Lady Gaga
06 Jan 2012
"Three million people saw your bottom!” So ran the shocked letter I received in the late 1960s after I had presented Late Night Line-Up wearing a daringly short skirt. Back then, minis were still news: Jean Shrimpton had recently caused an international storm by wearing one at the Melbourne races in Australia. Certainly, no women wore them to present BBC chat shows – no women presented chat shows in those days.
Looking at the pictures today, a miniskirt seems harmless. But some people took offence: they felt mine was too raunchy. They were alarmed, convinced that such clothing somehow put the morals of the nation at risk. It might enflame people’s lusts and prompt them to acts of sexual behaviour that, by the standards of the day, were to be deplored: sex before marriage, for example.
Sex makes one generation fearful for the next. It has always been so. And in each generation, there are always those who consider the more risqué edges of the entertainment industry to be going too far. In 1890s Paris, onlookers took against the frills and suspenders of can-can dancers. By the 1950s, its Crazy Horse cabaret was making witty mockery of such shows, while itself leaving little to the audience’s imagination. At the same time in Britain, nudes posing in tableaux at the Windmill Theatre were still not permitted to move.
Now I find myself caught up in concerns about the sexualisation of children today. This week, I was quoted as condemning outright Lady Gaga and other performers for seeming obsessed with appearing at their raunchiest in their pop videos and on prime-time television shows. So have I changed sides? Or has the world changed?
It could be that I have grown old. I am now in my late 70s; I no longer belong to the generation that rejoiced in outraging its elders and struggled against the strictures of Mary Whitehouse (I thought she was wrong then, and I still do).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8998434/Sex-in-society-too-much-raunch-too-young.html
PS - Fu#K Off - Lady Gaga you sell out OWO effing evil WHORE..!
...and that goes to your all your co-opted braindead little 'Monsters' as well, who can't see through your controllers veil..!
05 Jan 2012
One of France’s biggest mail-order fashion retailers has apologised for publishing a photo in which a naked man appears behind a group of children advertising beachwear.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02100/La-Redoute_2100575b.jpg
The nudist can clearly be seen strolling knee-deep in the sea while in the foreground four children run towards the camera in bright clothing.
The mistake was compounded by the fact that La Redoute provided a magnifying glass to allow people to get a closer look at the beachwear and thus any outstanding items in the beach scene.
In a tweet La Redoute said that it “apologises for the photo published on its site and is doing what’s necessary to remove it”.
But the shot has gone viral on the internet and spawned a host of spoof montages.
These feature the unidentified nudist as part of the Moon landing, with the face of the disgraced former International Monetary Fund chief, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, or strolling behind President Nicolas Sarkozy as he goes for a summer dip in swimming trunks.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8994674/Naked-man-appears-in-French-childrens-fashion-shoot.html
PS - When is the World ever going to 'Wake Up' to the PTW Scumbags, who promote such in your face abhorent abuse, using innocent children as their messengers of pure (EVIL)..!
:mad2:
Sex in society: too much raunch, too young
The sexual freedoms gained in the Sixties have nothing in common with today's dismaying bombardment of explicit images at children.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02102/RAUNCHY-LIFE_2102361c.jpg
Too much: a scene from the TV series Sherlock, left, and an explicit pose from Lady Gaga
06 Jan 2012
"Three million people saw your bottom!” So ran the shocked letter I received in the late 1960s after I had presented Late Night Line-Up wearing a daringly short skirt. Back then, minis were still news: Jean Shrimpton had recently caused an international storm by wearing one at the Melbourne races in Australia. Certainly, no women wore them to present BBC chat shows – no women presented chat shows in those days.
Looking at the pictures today, a miniskirt seems harmless. But some people took offence: they felt mine was too raunchy. They were alarmed, convinced that such clothing somehow put the morals of the nation at risk. It might enflame people’s lusts and prompt them to acts of sexual behaviour that, by the standards of the day, were to be deplored: sex before marriage, for example.
Sex makes one generation fearful for the next. It has always been so. And in each generation, there are always those who consider the more risqué edges of the entertainment industry to be going too far. In 1890s Paris, onlookers took against the frills and suspenders of can-can dancers. By the 1950s, its Crazy Horse cabaret was making witty mockery of such shows, while itself leaving little to the audience’s imagination. At the same time in Britain, nudes posing in tableaux at the Windmill Theatre were still not permitted to move.
Now I find myself caught up in concerns about the sexualisation of children today. This week, I was quoted as condemning outright Lady Gaga and other performers for seeming obsessed with appearing at their raunchiest in their pop videos and on prime-time television shows. So have I changed sides? Or has the world changed?
It could be that I have grown old. I am now in my late 70s; I no longer belong to the generation that rejoiced in outraging its elders and struggled against the strictures of Mary Whitehouse (I thought she was wrong then, and I still do).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8998434/Sex-in-society-too-much-raunch-too-young.html
PS - Fu#K Off - Lady Gaga you sell out OWO effing evil WHORE..!
...and that goes to your all your co-opted braindead little 'Monsters' as well, who can't see through your controllers veil..!