jackovesk
21st January 2012, 17:24
Friday, January 20, 2012
Scientists are now recommending that mothers delay vital breastfeeding in order to ‘improve’ the effects of vaccinations, stating that consuming breast milk could hamper the potency of vaccinations such as the rotavirus injection.
http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/images16.jpeg
The authors state that the immune-boosting effects of breast milk could negatively affect the vaccine potency.
Of course the authors make no mention of the relationship between vaccination and over 189 diseases as observed by peer-reviewed research.
In a study published in the Journal of Pediatric Infections & Diseases that anyone can freely read, scientists say that breastfeeding should be halted to improve vaccine effects (which include negative effects).
The advisory is specifically targeted toward developing and poor nations, as is the norm with massive vaccination campaigns funded by the likes of the Bill Gates Foundation and the United Nations.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-evrDDo7Y--0/TxobAkHp2PI/AAAAAAAAOEc/xvsIBMRmdSg/s1600/babyeating1-210x131.jpg
Perhaps most startling is the fact that children in these nations oftentimes rely on breast milk as the only source of quality nutrition, yet the recommendation states that this is a desirable effect. In fact, a weakened immune system is just what the scientists are looking for to increase the potency and ‘effectiveness’ of the vaccine.
An excerpt from the study reads:
INTERPRETATION: The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be evaluated.
Scientists: Stop Breastfeeding, Make Way for Negative Effects
What’s more is the fact that the researchers seem to indicate mothers should instead choose to give their children synthetic formula. This is telling, as it shows that synthetic formula has nowhere near the immune-boosting capabilities of real breast milk. In fact, it can be quite damaging to the health of babies. In addition to containing toxic ingredients similar to processed foods, infant formula has been linked to a greater risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and many more illnesses.
What does this ultimately mean? It means the enhanced ‘potency’ of these vaccinations given to children who are starved of breast milk also includes the negative reactions. The same negative reactions that are well documented by published research, tying vaccinations to autoimmune disorders and to infant mortality.
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/scientists-say-delay-breastfeeding-to.html
Scientists are now recommending that mothers delay vital breastfeeding in order to ‘improve’ the effects of vaccinations, stating that consuming breast milk could hamper the potency of vaccinations such as the rotavirus injection.
http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/images16.jpeg
The authors state that the immune-boosting effects of breast milk could negatively affect the vaccine potency.
Of course the authors make no mention of the relationship between vaccination and over 189 diseases as observed by peer-reviewed research.
In a study published in the Journal of Pediatric Infections & Diseases that anyone can freely read, scientists say that breastfeeding should be halted to improve vaccine effects (which include negative effects).
The advisory is specifically targeted toward developing and poor nations, as is the norm with massive vaccination campaigns funded by the likes of the Bill Gates Foundation and the United Nations.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-evrDDo7Y--0/TxobAkHp2PI/AAAAAAAAOEc/xvsIBMRmdSg/s1600/babyeating1-210x131.jpg
Perhaps most startling is the fact that children in these nations oftentimes rely on breast milk as the only source of quality nutrition, yet the recommendation states that this is a desirable effect. In fact, a weakened immune system is just what the scientists are looking for to increase the potency and ‘effectiveness’ of the vaccine.
An excerpt from the study reads:
INTERPRETATION: The lower immunogenicity and efficacy of rotavirus vaccines in poor developing countries could be explained, in part, by higher titers of IgA and neutralizing activity in breast milk consumed by their infants at the time of immunization that could effectively reduce the potency of the vaccine. Strategies to overcome this negative effect, such as delaying breast-feeding at the time of immunization, should be evaluated.
Scientists: Stop Breastfeeding, Make Way for Negative Effects
What’s more is the fact that the researchers seem to indicate mothers should instead choose to give their children synthetic formula. This is telling, as it shows that synthetic formula has nowhere near the immune-boosting capabilities of real breast milk. In fact, it can be quite damaging to the health of babies. In addition to containing toxic ingredients similar to processed foods, infant formula has been linked to a greater risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and many more illnesses.
What does this ultimately mean? It means the enhanced ‘potency’ of these vaccinations given to children who are starved of breast milk also includes the negative reactions. The same negative reactions that are well documented by published research, tying vaccinations to autoimmune disorders and to infant mortality.
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/01/scientists-say-delay-breastfeeding-to.html