PDA

View Full Version : The "REAL" HITLER..!



jackovesk
9th February 2012, 15:22
Pictures show Adolf Hitler practising poses for his speeches - and relaxing in lederhosen

February 09, 2012

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/02/09/1226267/067801-hitler-pics.jpg
The pictures were never intended to be made public


Unseen photos emerge of Hitler in bizarre poses
Taken by his personal photographer in the 1920s
In pictures: Incredible images of the Fuhrer (http://www.news.com.au/pictures/gallery-e6frflv9-1226267065656?page=1)

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/02/09/1226267/073017-hitler.jpg
Hitler forbade any publication of this picture that he thought was "beneath his dignity".

NEVER before seen pictures that appear to show Adolf Hitler rehearsing for his hate-filled speeches have emerged.

The amazing pictures, taken in the 1920s, depict the Fuhrer in a series of poses, using a series of bizarre expressions and gestures, which he would practise and review before addressing the German public.

The photos, taken by his personal photographer Heinrich Hoffmann, were apparently intended to give Hitler an insight into how he came across to his people, The Daily Mail reported.

One he saw the pictures, he would decide whether to incorporate the various gestures and poses into his speeches and appearances.

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2012/02/09/1226267/068861-hitler-pics.jpg
Hitler would reportedly veto the pictures before deciding whether to use the poses during his appearances.

But he refused to let some of the pictures, including one of him leaning against a tree in a pair of tight lederhosen, be published, deeming them “beneath one's dignity”.

The vetoed pictures were reportedly stored in Hoffmann's studio until his arrest at the end of the war and disappeared into various archives.

They were later published in his little-known memoir, Hitler Was My Friend, in the 1950s. The book has now been released in English.

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2012/02/09/1226267/070983-hitler-pics.jpg
These set of images were taken of the Fuher during the 1920s.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/world/pictures-show-adolf-hitler-practising-poses-for-his-speeches-and-relaxing-in-lederhosen/story-e6freoox-1226267072924

PS - Nothing but a NANCY-BOY Puppet Actor..!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbF0JQgi7_U&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbF0JQgi7_U&feature=player_embedded

Geez, would'nt have PITLER have been the star attraction with the rest of his NANCY-BOY mates at Bohemian Grove...

http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1617962140104&id=829c1bff558684978b3fa1a715e94ca3&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.toxicagenda.com%2fimages%2fbo hemian%2520grove.jpg

Carmody
9th February 2012, 15:31
Regardless, he did pick up a nation and spin it about and have it do some quite potent things.

the same seems to be the trip desired for a few various nations in current times. as if those who aspire to power try to get up on a given horse that is constructed out of the low level group think (herd instinct through emotions and native psychic connections- which we can all involve ourselves in at any given time, rock concerts, for example) of the given nation.

Hitler, goebbels, et al..they managed to pimp their ride quite well. (US, Japan, etc, all on the same page of 'information control', but the Germans did it best, due to the level of 'prep' - ww1, werimar republic, etc)

Being informed is one of the major points that helps prevent that scenario from emerging again.

Control of communication is key to such scenarios, regarding potential or prevention of such, via disallowing communication control.

Thus, never allow any form of obvious, insidious or clandestine attempts to control information and it's flow.

For in that 'place' lies one of if not the key points of the construction of such machines of destruction that are based on driving entire populations.

nf857
9th February 2012, 15:37
Who has studied connections with Hitler and the occult, extra-terristial technology pacts etc, ive not had a chance to read any of this yet, id be interested who knows a lot more than me on the subject x

Cidersomerset
9th February 2012, 19:28
Here is part of the classic speech made by Hitler that changed the face of modern Polititions...
The film same as above, but with Goebbels explanation of its effect...

Joseph Goebbels Hitler's Minister of Propaganda

rHAGSXBYl1g

Sound familier...

Obama Civilian National Security Force Speech Parody Obamacare Healthcare Nazi

9RgkqD4djP4

Cidersomerset
9th February 2012, 19:40
As Goebbels said in the above clip , apart from the propoganda, the Nazi party had
plenty of funds to stifle opposition and win over the impoverished German people after
the recent recession suffered by all sections of society apart from the rich...
The US funded Hitlers rise....thru the 'Banksters'

The Federal Reserve Funded Hitler's Germany with US Tax Dollars

QtPBMZxNp4M


The people who run the world from the shadows for thousands of years
have a great system ,that although exposed is very hard to stop...

TPTB = Elites = Banksters =corporations = governments = professionals = You & me

Cidersomerset
9th February 2012, 20:12
Hitler was in fact an Austrian by birth and if it was not for the first world war who knows what would have happened...

Was it his destiny to become one of the most evil men in history........Or just a chain of unfortunate events !!!

Hitler was a Artist in his youth and obviously had a vision for classic architecture for the new third Reich...

He suffered the horrors of the trenches, and being gased and wounded in the great war....
as did many of his generation, he had nothing to do with creating that 'blood bath'..

What might have been....

B8ukMNijmgc


Hitlers dream new capitol..

http://meiadeleite.com/wp-content/uploads/hg2.png

GaelVictor
9th February 2012, 20:45
Hitler was of African descent, north-east african gene-pool. Through the male line (Y-chromosome)
That would have been an elaborate cover-up if the Third Reich had made it through to today.

GaelVictor
9th February 2012, 21:05
WWII started with 21 false flag attacks staged by Germany, the Gleiwitz incident being the main one;
The aim was to give the appearance that Poland and polish forces had used agression against the germans, so the declaration of war against Poland could be justified.

'On the night of 31 August 1939, a small group of German operatives, dressed in Polish uniforms, seized the Gleiwitz station and broadcast a short anti-German message in Polish. The Germans' goal was to make the attack and the broadcast look like the work of anti-German Polish saboteurs.

To make the attack seem more convincing, the Germans brought in Franciszek Honiok, a German Silesian known for sympathizing with the Poles, who had been arrested the previous day by the Gestapo. Honiok was dressed to look like a saboteur; then killed by lethal injection, given gunshot wounds, and left dead at the scene, so that he appeared to have been killed while attacking the station. His corpse was subsequently presented as proof of the attack to the police and press.

On the day following the Gleiwitz attack, 1 September 1939, Germany launched the Fall Weiss operation — the invasion of Poland — initiating World War II in Europe. On the same day, in a speech in the Reichstag, Adolf Hitler cited the 21 border incidents, with three of them called very serious, as justification for Germany's "defensive" action against Poland. Just a few days earlier, on 22 August, he had told his generals, "I will provide a propagandistic casus belli. Its credibility doesn't matter. The victor will not be asked whether he told the truth"

GaelVictor
9th February 2012, 21:25
Adolf Hitler & the banksters... this is what Adolf Hitler states as his most important mission ;

“THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-THE SPIRIT OF THE PROGRAM ABOLITION OF THE THRALLDOM OF INTEREST – THE CORE OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM.” “Once these two points are achieved, it means a victory of their approaching universalist ordering of society in the true state over the present-day separation of state, nation and economics under the corrupting influence of the individualist theory of society as now constructed. The sham state of today, oppressing the working classes and protecting the pirated gains of bankers and stock exchange speculators, is the area for reckless private enrichment and for the lowest political profiteering; it gives no thought to its people, and provides no high moral bond of union. The power of money, most ruthless of all powers, holds absolute control, and exercises corrupting, destroying influence on state, nation, society, morals, drama, literature and on all matters of morality, less easy to estimate.

“Break down the thralldom of interest” is our war cry. What do we mean by thralldom of interest? The landowner is under this thralldom, who has to raise loans to finance his farming operations, loans at such high interest as almost to eat up the results of his labor, or who is forced to make debts and to drag the mortgages after him like so much weight of lead.

So is the worker, producing in shops and factories for a pittance, whilst the shareholder draws dividends and bonuses which he has not worked for. So is the earning middle class, whose work goes almost entirely to pay the interest on bank overdrafts.

Thralldom of interest is the real expression for the antagonisms, capital versus labor, blood versus money, creative work versus exploitation. The necessity of breaking this thralldom is of such vast importance for our nation and our race, that on it alone depends our nation’s hope of rising up from its shame and slavery; in fact, the hope of recovering happiness, prosperity and civilization throughout the world. It is the pivot on which everything turns; it is far more than a mere necessity of financial policy. Whilst its principles and consequences bite deep into political and economic life, it is a leading question for economic study, and thus affects every single individual and demands a decision from each one: Service to the nation or unlimited private enrichment. It means a solution of the Social Question.

Our financial principle: Finance shall exist for the benefit of the state; the financial magnates shall not form a state within the state. Hence our aim to break the thralldom of interest.

Relief of the state, and hence of the nation, from its indebtedness to the great financial houses, which lend on interest.

Nationalization of the Reichsbank and the issuing houses, which lend on interest.

Provision of money for all great public objects (waterpower, railroads etc), not by means of loans, but by granting non-interest bearing state bonds or without using ready money.

Introduction of a fixed standard of currency on a secured basis.

Creation of a national bank of business development (currency reform) for granting non-interest bearing loans.

Fundamental remodeling of the system of taxation on social-economic principles. Relief of the consumer from the burden of indirect taxation, and of the producer from crippling taxation (fiscal reform and relief from taxation).

Wanton printing of bank notes, without creating new values, means inflation. We all lived through it. But the correct conclusion is that an issue of non-interest bearing bonds by the state cannot produce inflation if new values are at the same time created.

The fact that today great economic enterprises cannot be set on foot without recourse to loans is sheer lunacy. Here is where reasonable use of the state’s right to produce money which might produce most beneficial results.”

enfoldedblue
9th February 2012, 21:38
There is also speculation that Hitler's father was an illegitimate Rothschild child because his mother worked as a servant in a Rothschild home and was sent back to Germany when she became pregnant. More details here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?20996-Adolf-Hitler-Was-a-Rothschild--Proof- (don't know about the proof though)

Cidersomerset
9th February 2012, 21:41
Goring set up the initial framework for a EEC during the war with members
of occupied countries.....

Just as in Germany after Hitler got into power by the ballot, with financial backing
from the elites and prolific propoganda.....He was able to pervert his power..

This is being mirrored in the EEC today slowly by stealth,and now they are speeding up...

The NAZIS and FASCISTS who founded the THE EU and their influence today

7Nf5KeC4dAs

bearcow
9th February 2012, 21:45
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L47Ju1euHB0&list=UU9me65WdvrTaZTf91lWRWKA&index=21&feature=plcp


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UepcEYkw2lc&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE3Fc3ZQ0w&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-mU7I9NAEs&feature=related

Carmody
10th February 2012, 03:39
Hitler was a Artist in his youth and obviously had a vision for classic architecture for the new third Reich...

I know people whom have had their families wiped out by Hitler and crew (parts of my family are no less messy)..... but there is one thing they won't deny. That those SS and similar trenchcoats was BAD, I mean way way way cool. So bad they were the epitome of perfection of 'Bad'.

Which, of course, was part of the whole game. You see simialr being played out today. Both suble and obvious.

jcocks
10th February 2012, 05:46
Adolf Hitler & the banksters... this is what Adolf Hitler states as his most important mission ;

“THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-THE SPIRIT OF THE PROGRAM ABOLITION OF THE THRALLDOM OF INTEREST – THE CORE OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM.” “Once these two points are achieved, it means a victory of their approaching universalist ordering of society in the true state over the present-day separation of state, nation and economics under the corrupting influence of the individualist theory of society as now constructed. The sham state of today, oppressing the working classes and protecting the pirated gains of bankers and stock exchange speculators, is the area for reckless private enrichment and for the lowest political profiteering; it gives no thought to its people, and provides no high moral bond of union. The power of money, most ruthless of all powers, holds absolute control, and exercises corrupting, destroying influence on state, nation, society, morals, drama, literature and on all matters of morality, less easy to estimate.

“Break down the thralldom of interest” is our war cry. What do we mean by thralldom of interest? The landowner is under this thralldom, who has to raise loans to finance his farming operations, loans at such high interest as almost to eat up the results of his labor, or who is forced to make debts and to drag the mortgages after him like so much weight of lead.

So is the worker, producing in shops and factories for a pittance, whilst the shareholder draws dividends and bonuses which he has not worked for. So is the earning middle class, whose work goes almost entirely to pay the interest on bank overdrafts.

Thralldom of interest is the real expression for the antagonisms, capital versus labor, blood versus money, creative work versus exploitation. The necessity of breaking this thralldom is of such vast importance for our nation and our race, that on it alone depends our nation’s hope of rising up from its shame and slavery; in fact, the hope of recovering happiness, prosperity and civilization throughout the world. It is the pivot on which everything turns; it is far more than a mere necessity of financial policy. Whilst its principles and consequences bite deep into political and economic life, it is a leading question for economic study, and thus affects every single individual and demands a decision from each one: Service to the nation or unlimited private enrichment. It means a solution of the Social Question.

Our financial principle: Finance shall exist for the benefit of the state; the financial magnates shall not form a state within the state. Hence our aim to break the thralldom of interest.

Relief of the state, and hence of the nation, from its indebtedness to the great financial houses, which lend on interest.

Nationalization of the Reichsbank and the issuing houses, which lend on interest.

Provision of money for all great public objects (waterpower, railroads etc), not by means of loans, but by granting non-interest bearing state bonds or without using ready money.

Introduction of a fixed standard of currency on a secured basis.

Creation of a national bank of business development (currency reform) for granting non-interest bearing loans.

Fundamental remodeling of the system of taxation on social-economic principles. Relief of the consumer from the burden of indirect taxation, and of the producer from crippling taxation (fiscal reform and relief from taxation).

Wanton printing of bank notes, without creating new values, means inflation. We all lived through it. But the correct conclusion is that an issue of non-interest bearing bonds by the state cannot produce inflation if new values are at the same time created.

The fact that today great economic enterprises cannot be set on foot without recourse to loans is sheer lunacy. Here is where reasonable use of the state’s right to produce money which might produce most beneficial results.”

Sounds like a noble cause to me. I mean, how different is the situation in the western world today to the situation as it was before ww2....

We seem to have many of the exact same problems now as Hitler sought to rectify back then.....

It makes you wonder why the bankers helped finance him back then when we seeked to remove their power over his people? Maybe it was more of a case of infiltration to derail the movement to turn him into a sort of "ultimate enemy"?

I mean, there's talk of how Stalin was actually responsible for many of the evils attributed to the Nazis, there's talk that Hitler proposed a peace treaty before the war even got going that would have "turned the world upside-down"....

Hitler is still today depicted as the "epitomy of evil" - but what of Russia's Stalin, or China's "chairman Mao"? They have been guilty of sins whichat least equal those of Hitler.
Was Hitler really the "epitomy of evil" he's been made out to be?

I know it's not a popular view, but it bears looking into, doesn't it?

Mulder
10th February 2012, 06:57
Adolph Hitler is the product of inbreeding and a fine example of what happens when cousins marry cousins. Although he was a notorious hypochondriac and drug abuser maybe some of his physical ailments stemmed from the inbreeding issue.

Read more: Were Adolf Hitler's parents related before their marriage? (http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/447015#ixzz1lxYi8yDc) |

GaelVictor
10th February 2012, 10:14
Hitler's father married his half-niece. If you then get a son, which they did; Adolf, there can be no inbreeding as the Y chromosome from the father mixes with the X chromosome of the mother. A daughter however could be an inbred as she could receive indentical X chromosomes.


Adolph Hitler is the product of inbreeding and a fine example of what happens when cousins marry cousins. Although he was a notorious hypochondriac and drug abuser maybe some of his physical ailments stemmed from the inbreeding issue.

Read more: Were Adolf Hitler's parents related before their marriage? (http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/447015#ixzz1lxYi8yDc) |

Mulder
10th February 2012, 10:51
Hitler's father married his half-niece. If you then get a son, which they did; Adolf, there can be no inbreeding as the Y chromosome from the father mixes with the X chromosome of the mother. A daughter however could be an inbred as she could receive indentical X chromosomes.


Adolph Hitler is the product of inbreeding and a fine example of what happens when cousins marry cousins. Although he was a notorious hypochondriac and drug abuser maybe some of his physical ailments stemmed from the inbreeding issue.

Read more: Were Adolf Hitler's parents related before their marriage? (http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/447015#ixzz1lxYi8yDc) |

Thanks for your reply - I have to disagree, as it is still technically "in-breeding" as Hitler's Mom & Dad were related on both sides of their family tree: One branch of the tree was a second degree relation (Johann Nepomuk Hiedler is generally accepted to be Alois' biological father) and the other branch was a third degree relation (Johann Nepomuk Hiedler is Klara's grandfather). So Klara's husband Johann Nepomuk Hiedler is also Klara's uncle!