PDA

View Full Version : Vaccines Didn’t Cure Polio After All..?



jackovesk
11th March 2012, 06:53
March 08, 2012


Smoke, Mirrors, and the “Disappearance” Of Polio … Unbeknownst to most doctors, the polio-vaccine history involves a massive public health service makeover during an era when a live, deadly strain of poliovirus infected the Salk polio vaccines, and paralyzed hundreds of children and their contacts. These were the vaccines that were supposedly responsible for the decline in polio from 1955 to 1961! But there is a more sinister reason for the “decline” in polio during those years; in 1955, a very creative re-definition of poliovirus infections was invented, to “cover” the fact that many cases of “polio” paralysis had no poliovirus in their systems at all. While this protected the reputation of the Salk vaccine, it muddied the waters of history in a big way. Even during the peak epidemics, unifactorial poliovirus infection, resulting in long-term paralysis, was a low-incidence disease that was falsely represented as a rampant and violent crippler by Basil O’Connor’s “March Of Dimes” advertising campaigns. – Vaccination Council.GreenMedInfo.com

This is a great article (excerpted above) about vaccines because it gets at issues that have always puzzled us. The main one is the claim the “naturopathy” community makes that vaccines did NOT (and do not) cause a downturn in various kinds of illnesses.

The video we’ve attached, which pertains to vaccines and autism (we’ve written about this a lot) is very interesting, too. There is no doubt that as the Internet (what we call the “Internet Reformation“) reveals more about what has really gone on to promote vaccines, people will get more and more skeptical – not just of vaccines as they relate to autism but about the medical industry itself.

The Western medical industry is increasingly being revealed as a conduit for pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines. In the meantime, homeopathy, acupuncture and naturopathy are making big comebacks. The idea that one can treat a disease by disguising or attacking the symptoms is increasingly questionable, in our humble view.

Surely, as this very public debate winds on it becomes clear that the vaccine-cures-all meme is an evident and obvious dominant social theme. We're used to discovering this sort of thing by now. Whenever we push hard at our belief system we discover another area where it seems promotions overwhelm science.

The power elite that evidently and obviously runs the world uses a number of fear-based promotions to frighten middle classes into giving up wealth and power to supra-national organizations. Vaccines are a great methodology for reinforcing the idea of authoritarian health care.

The idea is that only government science and government power can provide people with appropriate health care. But this is simply not true. Some vaccines, in fact, may be tolerable or perhaps necessary, but it is increasingly obvious that many of them have serious side effects for a percentage of the juvenile population. Here's some more from the article:

Unbeknownst to most doctors, the polio-vaccine history involves a massive public health service makeover during an era when a live, deadly strain of poliovirus infected the Salk polio vaccines, and paralyzed hundreds of children and their contacts. These were the vaccines that were supposedly responsible for the decline in polio from 1955 to 1961! But there is a more sinister reason for the "decline" in polio during those years; in 1955, a very creative re-definition of poliovirus infections was invented, to "cover" the fact that many cases of "polio" paralysis had no poliovirus in their systems at all. While this protected the reputation of the Salk vaccine, it muddied the waters of history in a big way.

Even during the peak epidemics, unifactorial poliovirus infection, resulting in long-term paralysis, was a low-incidence disease[2] that was falsely represented as a rampant and violent crippler by Basil O'Connor's "March Of Dimes" advertising campaigns. At the same time as Basil O'Connor was pulling in 45 million dollars a year to fund the Salk vaccine development, scientists started to realize that other viruses like Coxsackie, echo and enteroviruses, could also cause polio. They also discussed the fact that lead, arsenic, DDT, and other commonly-used neurotoxins, could identically mimic the lesions of polio. During the great epidemics in the United States, the pathology called polio was reversed by alternative medical doctors who attested to great success, using detoxification procedures available at the time – yet they were categorically ignored[3]. Now it is admitted in the medical literature that other viruses can cause polio, yet few people on the street have any idea.

Here's the video. Enjoy (if you can).

(Video from thedoctorstv's YouTube user channel.)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oEtF8FdqpA&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oEtF8FdqpA&feature=player_embedded

http://thedailybell.com/3687/VIDEO-Vaccines-Didnt-Cure-Polio-After-All

PS - How about that CoIntelPro 'NumSkull' in blue pajamas..?

Shouting out at the top of his voice slamming the bloke who was telling the 'Truth' and saying he wants to have a rationale calm debate. Gimme a Break :pound:

Czarek
13th March 2012, 01:38
In majority of cases, I find these doctors sincere; what they don’t realize is that they are sincerely wrong. If they do realize that, the anger outburst come out because he (doctors) knows that he was taken by the industry. This is what happens when you pretend to know stuff by reading abstracts.

Daozen
13th March 2012, 03:50
It has been public knowledge for about half a century that high dose Vitamin C can get rid of Polio. Check out Frederick Klenner's work.


“When I first came across Klenner’s work on polio patients,” writes Thomas Levy, “I was absolutely amazed and even a bit overwhelmed at what I read. . . To know that polio had been easily cured and so many babies, children, and some adults still continued to die or survive to be permanently crippled by this virus was extremely difficult to accept. . . Even more incredibly, Klenner briefly presented a summarization of his work on polio at the Annual Session of the American Medical Association on June 10, 1949 in Atlantic City, New Jersey:

‘It might be interesting to learn how poliomyelitis was treated in Reidsville, N.C., during the 1948 epidemic. In the past seven years, virus infections have been treated and cured in a period of seventy-two hours by the employment of massive frequent injections of ascorbic acid, or vitamin C. I believe that if vitamin C in these massive doses - 6,000 to 20,000 mg in a twenty-four hour period - is given to these patients with poliomyelitis none will be paralyzed and there will be no further maiming or epidemics of poliomyelitis.’ Levy concludes: “The four doctors who commented after Klenner did not have anything to say about his assertions.” (5)

“How then,” asks Landwehr, “could a Dr. Fred R. Klenner, a virtually unknown general practitioner specializing in diseases of the chest, from a town no one ever heard of, with no national credentials, no research grants and no experimental laboratory, have the nerve to make his sweeping claim in front of that prestigious body of polio authorities?” Indeed, Klenner was hardly a man to mince words. “When proper amounts are used, it will destroy all virus organisms,” he would say. “Don’t expect control of a virus with 100 to 400 mg of C.” (6)

It's a miracle nutrient.

http://www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html

wavydome
13th March 2012, 10:07
Jack,

I've been scanning this guy's scholarship for over a decade. By far, he is one of the most dynamic guys anywhere. Exposing the authoritarian lies -- His famous film "death by medicine" is inspiring others to use that same title, spread the concept around.

Recently a famous journalist, Bill Moyers did a piece supporting vaccines. (Hmm some kind of MIB job?) So Gary promptly updated his expertise on vaccines... 100s of pages? of non-schill science demonstrating lack of efficacy and bad side effects:

http://www.scribd.com/collections/3502355/Are-Vaccines-Really-Safe-and-Effective

This work provides great talking points for anyone and their doctor to come to intelligent choices. (I avoid doctoring like the plague). I think public sentiment is slightly aware of vaccine poisoning, but still overwhelmed by the totalitarianism. Histories like the "Spanish Influenza" are also turning up plenty of foul play evidence along. Besides the facts that refrigeration, sanitation and cheaper power generally brought most of the health improvements last century.

nearing
13th March 2012, 16:38
In the video, the boy in scrubs got all upset (because he had no science or data to respond with) and accused the man in the audience of attacking him personally. The man in the audience did not attack him personally and actually did the opposite which was to cite actual data.

How did that boy get through medical school?

conk
13th March 2012, 18:51
Some illness arrives and declines, sort of a bell curve if you picture it. Vaccines are introduced at the apex of the curve. The decline in illness is factually attributable to the natural decline (right side of the curve), while the vaccine gets the ill-deserved credit.