View Full Version : New 9/11 Analysis Reveals Use of Hidden Technology
Studeo
5th August 2010, 08:16
This video shows how a oval shaped object was replaced by a CGI plane when it struck the WTC 2 building. Using in depth analysis and original video footage it makes interesting viewing.
http://blip.tv/play/AYHy7kIC
Nagual
5th August 2010, 12:52
already posted here http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1739-Another-9-11-Pentagon-Missile-Video-Could-This-Be-It/page4 ;)
Studeo
5th August 2010, 13:07
Oops sorry. Thanks Nagual.
sygh
5th August 2010, 16:37
I hadn't seen this analysis by Richard D. Hall, so, I'm sorry it's already posted but I'm glad for the mistake. The mathmatical analysis looks plausable; although I haven't sat down and done the numbers yet to check his work. After seeing how the twin towers fell, after the initial impacts and a very questionable time-frame, there was little double in my mind it was a demolition job.
However, I have a couple of questions about Richard Hall's asumptions as to what the ball was and where it came from. If it was a remote controled antigravity craft/bomb, why would anyone stoot it out of a helicopter at such close range? Wouldn't that run a greater risk of being found out? Also, with this orb's size, would it actually be shot out of a helicopter?
Is it possible that every film of the twin towers could be photoshoped or doped? Aren't there any amature films of the hit on the towers out there that came from a regular Joe or a reliable source?
TThinking
15th August 2010, 10:18
I saw a video where all the amateurs seem to work at art studio's or worked for the big 5 networks,which were also part of the fakery of every tv-shot.
iceni tribe
17th August 2010, 14:55
unseen footage and photos ,put a whole new spin on the subject for me.
theirs a few parts to the interview please bear with it ,it details concrete and steel turning to dust/rust and their a some fasinating photos that have to be viewed for the bigger picture.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_4NrRioRPU
tron
17th August 2010, 15:37
"If it was a remote controled antigravity craft/bomb, why would anyone stoot it out of a helicopter at such close range? Wouldn't that run a greater risk of being found out? Also, with this orb's size, would it actually be shot out of a helicopter?"
the film was "shot"(or recorded) from a helicopter...
:love:
heres the vid tribe posted: amazing looking stuff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_4NrRioRPU
iceni tribe
22nd August 2010, 16:10
thought provoking evidence....
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
pages of detailed analysis , photos and clips that point stuff out to you that you may have over looked.
ollie6986
22nd August 2010, 16:38
Very well presented, I remember hearing about the 'pod' on the bottom of the 2nd plane but this is first time I have seen a specific analysis of it. With the 3D computer modelling coupled with witness testimony, it is very convincing.
xbusymom
29th August 2010, 04:59
I was watching Warehouse 13, season 1 disc 1 episode 2 "Resonance" ...
where a scene showed the FBI HQ building at night and the lighted windows (if your awareness was switched on) showed 9/11 and the american flag...
so why are we still getting subliminals in a show filmed in 2009? could sound waves have had something to do with the original event?
iceni tribe
7th September 2010, 18:20
latest from press tv
http://www.presstv.ir/program/141561.html
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.