PDA

View Full Version : Bill Gates



truthseekerdan
5th August 2010, 16:13
Well, Bill," said God, "I'm really confused on this one. I'm not sure whether to send you to Heaven or Hell! After all, you helped society enormously by putting a computer in almost every home in the world and yet you created that ghastly Windows. I'm going to do something I've never done before. I'm going to let you decide where you want to go!"

Mr. Gates replied, "Well, thanks, Lord. What's the difference between the two?" God said, "You can take a peek at both places briefly if it will help you decide. Shall we look at Hell first?" "Sure!" said Bill.

"Let's go!" Bill was amazed! He saw a clean, white sandy beach with clear waters. There were thousands of beautiful women running around,playing in the water, laughing and frolicking about. The sun was shining and the temperature was just perfect!

Bill said, "This is great! If this is Hell, I can't wait to see Heaven!" To which God replied, "Let's go!" and off they went. Bill saw puffy white clouds in a beautiful blue sky with angels drifting about playing harps and singing. It was nice, but surely not as enticing as Hell.

Mr. Gates thought for only a brief moment and rendered his decision. "God, I do believe I would like to go to Hell." As you desire," said God. Two weeks later, God decided to check up on the late billionaire to see how things were going. He found Bill shackled to a wall, screaming among the hot flames in a dark cave. He was being burned and tortured by demons.

"How ya doin', Bill?" asked God. Bill responded with anguish and despair. "This is awful! This is not what I expected at all! What happened to the beach and the beautiful women playing in the water?"

"Oh, THAT!" said God. "That was the screen saver".

http://mail4.joke-of-the-day-email.com/images/1038095737/173621419_ninja-cat.png

rosie
5th August 2010, 16:41
LOL! :rofl::clap2:

Beth
5th August 2010, 16:49
Good one, Dan! LOL

onawah
1st October 2010, 15:51
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723[/video]

"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!" (About 1 Billion People!)

From the article at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html
NaturalNews) In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change. He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per service
C = CO2 per energy unit

Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero, "probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number -- P (for People) -- might be reduced. He says:

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

You can watch this yourself at:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A...

Reducing the world population through vaccines
This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate, calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says "if we do a really great job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or 15 percent?"

Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction. So is "health care," which all NaturalNews readers already know to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it helps.

Perhaps that's the whole point of it. Given that vaccines technology help almost no one from a scientific point of view (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_v...), it raises the question: For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the first place?

Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions. Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A...

How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?
Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority of the people. Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't be very effective.

And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.

Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:

#1) They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking effect over perhaps 10 - 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

#2) They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates around the world, thereby reducing the world population over successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages (http://www.naturalnews.com/027512_v...).

#3) They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections.

This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way. A study documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028538_s...

Here's the study title and citation: Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010) Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1 Pandemic Virus? PLoS Med 7(4): e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259

The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased susceptibility to the H1N1 pandemic virus. In other words, seasonal flu vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15 percent, as Bill Gates suggested).

Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all in the name of health care!

The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the "hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting people all over the world. One such program is researching the development of "sweat-triggered vaccines" that could use specially-coated nano-materials to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.

More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration" solution. (http://www.naturalnews.com/028887_v...)

It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference speech: CO2 = P x S x E x C.

By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.

Who will be left alive? The smart people
The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously avoid vaccines. And those people, by and large, tend to be the more intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.

I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!" (Their words, not mine.)

In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to kill off as many of the gullible people as possible. Vaccines are, in effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population at large: If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious we are not alone in the universe.

If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or making them infertile) may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely what they are thinking.

In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates. More importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates you don't believe in the ability of your own immune system to protect you even from mild infections.

Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and institutions to betray them as well. In other words, if you don't even care enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any government care about protecting your health, either?

As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal health care reform guidelines. Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to reduce those health care costs? If you guessed, "unleash a hard-kill pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people" then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing monthly payouts. (Again, I am completely against such an approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)

As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what we've discussed here: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people increases the death rate of the population.

My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled through global vaccine programs. You will not only save your life, you'll also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral fragments in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.

Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question what they're being told to do by their own corrupt governments.

Articles Related to This Article:
• Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines

• Facebook crowdsourced investigation exposes vaccine denials of SIGA Technologies

• The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health

• Flu vaccines revealed as the greatest quackery ever pushed in the history of medicine

• Vaccines cause autism: Supporting evidence

• Are mandatory vaccinations acts of violence against children?

Related video from NaturalNews.TV


Your NaturalNews.TV video could be here.
Upload your own videos at NaturalNews.TV (FREE)



About the author: Mike Adams is a natural health researcher, author and award-winning journalist with a strong interest in personal health, the environment and the power of nature to help us all heal He is a prolific writer and has published thousands of articles, interviews, reports and consumer guides, reaching millions of readers with information that is saving lives and improving personal health around the world. Adams is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products. In 2010, Adams created NaturalNews.TV, a natural living video sharing site featuring thousands of user videos on foods, fitness, green living and more. He's also a successful software entrepreneur, having founded a well known email marketing software company whose technology currently powers the NaturalNews email newsletters. Adams is currently the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit, and enjoys outdoor activities, nature photography, Pilates and martial arts training. Known on the 'net as 'the Health Ranger,' Adams shares his ethics, mission statements and personal health statistics at www.HealthRanger.org

shadowstalker
1st October 2010, 16:05
It's funny how the PTB create the mass problem then try to make the people feel guilty about it.

They create GM food to destroy the farm lands and stave us, then they say there is not enough food.
They keep emissions up on factories and cars then then blame us for consumption.
They hold back Zero point energy for there gas guzzlers and blame us for lack of oil.
They create a depression and job loss and blame us for being lazy.

Sorry But really i don't feel much like making a huge list but I am sure most of us know the deal any way.
Beside I know I am preaching to the choir on this, UGG

This rant brought to you by..........
LOL:grouphug:

Celine
1st October 2010, 16:32
This is very valuable information..

So many "lay" people have never even seen Bill Gates, let alone hear him talk. Many people just ..hear about him...


His logic seems sound.. His intent, seems positive...

yet something still irqs me..

fifi
1st October 2010, 23:58
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/10/01/us.guatemala.apology/index.html?hpt=Sbin

US apologizes for infecting Guatemalans with STDs in the 1940s. When are they going to apologize to the world for AIDS, H1N1, vaccinations, etc.?

Ethereal Blue Being
2nd October 2010, 02:03
I've heard Bill Gates on talk shows before when they first set up their foundation where he says if third world countries had vaccinations then women would't feel the need to have 8 or 10 children just to get 2 or 3 to make it to adulthood (sometimes most of the 8 or 10 might make it to 13-14 yrs old and procreate) Is it possible that he and Melinda have their hearts in the right place but maybe they are uninformed ? I don't agree with vaccinations either but there seems to be alot of variables. It would be interesting to see if the "same" vaccines are used on everyone especially if that particular area of that particular country has a valuable resource to be harvested. Also haven't the vaccines in the US and elsewhere got stronger and stronger because of our parents and grand parents having them. If so will a first world country of "1st time vaccines" of the same strength be harmful to them?

Mandala
2nd October 2010, 04:14
Bill Gates seems to be on the inside track. He already has a place in the underground bunkers in case of a cataclysmic event. He knows he has no risk on the population reduction scheme, because his money and personal achievements guarantee that he will be saved and granted safe harbor. I hope his Karma is in balance.

Ki's
2nd October 2010, 06:04
Seems to me if we quit BOMBING stuff...we'd make a big dent in that CO2 thing.

Dale
3rd October 2010, 18:00
Is it possible that he and Melinda have their hearts in the right place but maybe they are uninformed ?

You know, I have a feeling that his intentions may very well be good, but that's not to say there aren't any "inside groups" supporting and influencing him in some way. This makes me think back to president Harding and his administration. Harding was a reasonable fellow with good intentions, but his administration went down in history as one of absolute corruption.

But who really knows? It just seems more logical to think that Bill Gates and his wife are trying to help the world, but don't fully understand the implications of the organizations they might be dealing with.

onawah
3rd October 2010, 18:46
[QUOTE=Ethereal Blue Being;56022]I've heard Bill Gates on talk shows before when they first set up their foundation where he says if third world countries had vaccinations then women would't feel the need to have 8 or 10 children just to get 2 or 3 to make it to adulthood (sometimes most of the 8 or 10 might make it to 13-14 yrs old and procreate) Is it possible that he and Melinda have their hearts in the right place but maybe they are uninformed ?

That does shed a different light on the question, and of course, one would rather think that the Gates intentions are good, but I still think that Gates is Illuminati. The whole "science" behind vaccines was wrong from the start, and there is plenty of evidence showing that, so this big push now for vaccines is highly suspicious. I think there is a very dark angenda behind it.

Ethereal Blue Being
7th October 2010, 03:28
You are all probably right about the Gates even if the motive is self preservation to vaccinate those countries to help prevent viral pandemics that have mutated from coming to the US, Europe etc.

East Sun
10th October 2010, 22:34
Reproductive health services? What are they? Abortions? Health care keeps people alive. We already have those.
I'm not sure he was saying what is being alluded to here. Why was the tape cut off there? I'd like hear what he said after that point.
Of course, this is the first time I heard him talk about these things...

norman
18th October 2010, 21:58
Oh!... my G** !

I've just been told tht Bill Gates was on British breakfast TV this morning talking up the cyber terror threat.

With so many people feeling the Oct/Nov big whammy is probably for real, here's a thought that just occured to me.

The US elections and the cyber false-flag event could be rolled into one big whammy by using the cyber 'attack' to clobber the voting machines and so allowing the incumbents to stay on as emergency managers during the 'crisis'.

The theory behind throwing them all out in November is that it takes a year or two to corrupt the congress members so a fresh batch would hold up the agend by that long too. That's a good enough reason to think that with time as tight as it is getting, they might well wish to kill the election in a couple of weeks from now.

Ba-ba-Ra
19th October 2010, 18:45
You know, I have a feeling that his intentions may very well be good, but that's not to say there aren't any "inside groups" supporting and influencing him in some way. This makes me think back to president Harding and his administration. Harding was a reasonable fellow with good intentions, but his administration went down in history as one of absolute corruption.

But who really knows? It just seems more logical to think that Bill Gates and his wife are trying to help the world, but don't fully understand the implications of the organizations they might be dealing with.

Gates might be 'trying' to help, but we have to understand that he is a product of an uninformed system. Or perhaps better said: a controlled system. Having spent some time around M.I.T., and Harvard grads, I find them to be in a very tight box of knowledge, which since they consider themselves highly educated in the best possible way, keeps them stuck. I'm not talking here about unkind, strong ego types. But of truly nice people who have bought completely into the system as they've been taught. Never recognizing, or even being able to get the smallest glimpse, that what they've been taught isn't the truth. They are exactly what the PTB wanted to produce and are their best soldiers.

shadowstalker
19th November 2010, 02:34
The World's Billionaires
#1 Carlos Slim Helu & family

Net Worth: $53.5 bil
Fortune: Self Made
Source: telecom
Age: 70
Country Of Citizenship: Mexico
Residence: Mexico City
Education: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Bachelor of Arts / Science
Marital Status: Widowed, 6 children

Telecom tycoon who pounced on privatization of Mexico's national telephone company in the 1990s becomes world's richest person for first time after coming in third place last year. Net worth up $18.5 billion in a year. Recently received regulatory approval to merge his fixed-line assets into American Movil, Latin America's biggest mobile phone company. His construction conglomerate, Impulsora del Desarrollo y el Empleo, builds roads and energy infrastructure. Son of a Lebanese immigrant also owns stakes in financial group Inbursa, Bronco Drilling, Independent News & Media, Saks and New York Times Co. Newspaper outfit's stock popped in early March on talk he might buy a controlling stake; he denies the rumor. Donating $65 million to fund a research project in genomic medicine with American billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad.

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/10/billionaires-2010_Carlos-Slim-Helu-family_WYDJ.html

I find the guys track record very disturbing.

*************************
Bill is second in line..lol
I wonder what Bill would do to get back on top again:tape:

Top 24 list of billionaires
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/10/billionaires-2010_The-Worlds-Billionaires_Rank.html

onawah
18th December 2010, 17:46
I just received the following information in an email from a local friend. There was no link showing the source, but it looks like it's worth investigating.
I did a search and found the article here:
http://english.pravda.ru/business/companies/14-10-2010/115363-machines_of_war_blackwater_monsanto_billgates-0/
(My virus detector gave me a warning about that page, but I was able to read it. )

"Machines of War: Blackwater, Monsanto, and Bill Gates

14.10.2010

Silvia Ribeiro
La Jornada

A report by Jeremy Scahill in The Nation (Blackwater's Black Ops, 9/15/2010) revealed that the largest mercenary army in the world, Blackwater (now called Xe Services) clandestine intelligence services was sold to the multinational Monsanto. Blackwater was renamed in 2009 after becoming famous in the world with numerous reports of abuses in Iraq, including massacres of civilians. It remains the largest private contractor of the U.S. Department of State "security services," that practices state terrorism by giving the government the opportunity to deny it.

Many military and former CIA officers work for Blackwater or related companies created to divert attention from their bad reputation and make more profit selling their nefarious services-ranging from information and intelligence to infiltration, political lobbying and paramilitary training - for other governments, banks and multinational corporations. According to Scahill, business with multinationals, like Monsanto, Chevron, and financial giants such as Barclays and Deutsche Bank, are channeled through two companies owned by Erik Prince, owner of Blackwater: Total Intelligence Solutions and Terrorism Research Center. These officers and directors share Blackwater.

One of them, Cofer Black, known for his brutality as one of the directors of the CIA, was the one who made contact with Monsanto in 2008 as director of Total Intelligence, entering into the contract with the company to spy on and infiltrate organizations of animal rights activists, anti-GM and other dirty activities of the biotech giant.

Contacted by Scahill, the Monsanto executive Kevin Wilson declined to comment, but later confirmed to The Nation that they had hired Total Intelligence in 2008 and 2009, according to Monsanto only
keep track of "public disclosure" of its opponents. He also said that Total Intelligence was a "totally separate entity from Blackwater."

However, Scahill has copies of emails from Cofer Black after the meeting with Wilson for Monsanto, where he explains to other former CIA agents, using their Blackwater e-mails, that the discussion with Wilson was that Total Intelligence had become "Monsanto's intelligence arm," spying on activists and other actions, including "our people to legally integrate these groups." Total Intelligence Monsanto paid $ 127,000 in 2008 and $ 105,000 in 2009.

No wonder that a company engaged in the "science of death" as Monsanto, which has been dedicated from the outset to produce toxic poisons spilling from Agent Orange to PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), pesticides, hormones and genetically modified seeds, is associated with another company of thugs.

Almost simultaneously with the publication of this article in The Nation, the Via Campesina reported the purchase of 500,000 shares of Monsanto, for more than $23 million by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which with this action completed the outing of the mask of "philanthropy." Another association that is not surprising.
It is a marriage between the two most brutal monopolies in the history of industrialism: Bill Gates controls more than 90 percent of the market share of proprietary computing and Monsanto about 90 percent of the global transgenic seed market and most global commercial seed. There does not exist in any other industrial sector monopolies so vast, whose very existence is a negation of the vaunted principle of "market competition" of capitalism. Both Gates and Monsanto are very aggressive in defending their ill-gotten monopolies.

Although Bill Gates might try to say that the Foundation is not linked to his business, all it proves is the opposite: most of their donations end up favoring the commercial investments of the tycoon, not really "donating" anything, but instead of paying taxes to the state coffers, he invests his profits in where it is favorable to him economically, including propaganda from their supposed good intentions. On the contrary, their "donations" finance projects as destructive as geoengineering or replacement of natural community medicines for high-tech patented medicines in the poorest areas of the world. What a coincidence, former Secretary of Health Julio Frenk and Ernesto Zedillo are advisers of the Foundation.

Like Monsanto, Gates is also engaged in trying to destroy rural farming worldwide, mainly through the "Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa" (AGRA). It works as a Trojan horse to deprive poor African farmers of their traditional seeds, replacing them with the seeds of their companies first, finally by genetically modified (GM). To this end, the Foundation hired Robert Horsch in 2006, the director of Monsanto. Now Gates, airing major profits, went straight to the source.

Blackwater, Monsanto and Gates are three sides of the same figure: the war machine on the planet and most people who inhabit it, are peasants, indigenous communities, people who want to share information and knowledge or any other who does not want to be in the aegis of profit and the destructiveness of capitalism.

* The author is a researcher at ETC Group


Translated from the Spanish version by:

Lisa Karpova

Pravda.Ru"

jiix
20th December 2010, 02:05
Does anyone remember the video of Bill Gates stating about wanting to bring the world population down to or as close as possable to zero, by means of new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, and other means. (RE: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?6079-Bill-Gates-on-video-cites-vaccines-as-population-control&highlight=Bill+Gates)

Anyone else getting... nervous, with this stuff?

onawah
20th December 2010, 02:38
In Bill Ryan's recent net radio interview, he said that his insider informer told him that TPTB intention now is to focus on controlling the availability of healthy food. They think they can create a superior human race by making it so difficult to provide ourselves with healthy food that only those will survive (other than themselves) who are smart and strong enough to form self-sustaining co-operative communities .
It follows that forcing deadly GMOs via Monsanto (enforced by Blackwater) onto the public would be considered an important part of that agenda.
Meanwhile, ommunity gardens are sprouting up everywhere, and people are finding ways to beat the agenda, even if they don't know the true purpose behind it.

Carmody
20th December 2010, 03:03
In a rude backhander to my friends, in order to present things differently so that maybe....just maybe... the message might get through, I phrase it differently, the odd time.

I say.."look at the fluoride, the fumes, the plastic chemicals, the toxic fertilizers, the toxic food ingredients, the radiation, the degradation of soils, the loss and pollution of the water table, the toxic air, the aspartame, the bisphenols, the vaccines, and the GM foods with toxins built in....think of it all as a silently delivered intelligence test."

"With pretty hard 'black and white' pass-fail conditions."

onawah
21st December 2010, 16:42
Although if TPTB actually want the strong to survive, why are they raiding food co-ops, confiscating raw milk, and trying their best to push through draconian legislature like S510?
Apparently they don't want that many of the strong to survive, just the very best of the strong.

Deega
30th December 2010, 15:08
Hi All Avalonians, Guests

Surfing on the Web, I came about Bill Gates (Microsoft) scholarship.

I was surprised to see that a "white student" is not eligible...!, there must be a great rational here, some of you know....?

http://www.gmsp.org/

All my blessings.

Deega

Arrowwind
22nd January 2011, 18:57
Bill Gates wants to register all new babies on the planet for vaccines
by David Gutierrez, staff writer

http://www.naturalnews.com/z031031_Bill … cines.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/z031031_Bill_Gates_vaccines.html)

(NaturalNews) Bill Gates is promoting a plan to use wireless technology to register every newborn on the planet in a vaccine database.

In a keynote address to the mHealth Summit, which focuses on using mobile technology to improve health care, Gates said that improving survival rates among children under the age of 5 would benefit not just individual families, but societies and the planet as a whole.

"The key thing, the most important fact that people should know and make sure other people know: As you save children under 5, that is the thing that reduces population growth," he said. "That sounds paradoxical. The fact is that within a decade of improving health outcomes, parents decide to have less children."

The number of children who die before their fifth birthday has already dropped from 20 million in 1960 to 8.5 million today, a statistic Gates attributes mostly to vaccination.

"About one-third [of that improvement] is by increasing income," Gates said. "The majority has been through vaccines. Vaccines will be the key. If you could register every birth on a cell phone -- get fingerprints, get a location -- then you could [set up] systems to make sure the immunizations happen."

Gates suggested using cell phones to record each birth and send the information, including biometric identifiers, to a central database. This database would then send reminders to parents' phones when it was time to come in for vaccines or other treatments. He said a prime location to implement such programs would be northern Nigeria or northern India, where vaccination rates are less than 50 percent.

Acknowledging that registering every single birth has never been done before, Gates called for "1,000 new ideas" to "blossom" in order to make it happen.

Such ideas could conceivably involve using the GPS devices inside phones to physically track parents who do not bring their children in for vaccines.

Gates also called for use of mobile technology to implement more continuous monitoring of vaccine supply chains.

Sources for this story include: http://www.smartplanet.com/people/b...

Gajanana
22nd January 2011, 19:07
It would be nice to invite bill gates on a fishing trip, a nice lake outing....

Nairnia
22nd January 2011, 21:14
Sources for this story include: http://www.smartplanet.com/people/b...

Well isnt that website a ray of joy! ;) From what I have read it seems very skewed, not surprisingly having its own agenda.

But how many of us would not be here had it not been for vaccines? In this modern world we have become ignorant to the cured diseases of the past and spared the great suffering of infant mortality.

Paul
22nd January 2011, 21:23
Vaccines will be the key.
This cow doesn't like Gates.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


But how many of us would not be here had it not been for vaccines?More of us would be here, and those here would be healthier, had it not been for vaccines.

Nairnia
22nd January 2011, 23:56
More of us would be here, and those here would be healthier, had it not been for vaccines.

Anthrax
Diptheria
Chickenpox
Hep A
Hep B
Hib
Measles
Meningococcus
Mumps
Pertussis
Pneumococcus
Polio
Rabies
Rotavirus
Rubella
Smallpox
Tetanus

Some of the diseases/illness which has been prevented or cured by vaccination. Unless you know different....?

Fred259
23rd January 2011, 00:06
This cow doesn't like Gates.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

More of us would be here, and those here would be healthier, had it not been for vaccines.

Clever you made me laugh, do you have Cow & Gate milk in Texas, we do here in the UK

Isthatso
23rd January 2011, 00:31
Anthrax
Diptheria
Chickenpox
Hep A
Hep B
Hib
Measles
Meningococcus
Mumps
Pertussis
Pneumococcus
Polio
Rabies
Rotavirus
Rubella
Smallpox
Tetanus

Some of the diseases/illness which has been prevented or cured by vaccination. Unless you know different....?

I can recommend the flwg articles if you are interested in further reading....

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#racket (Article from Wade Frazier - he's an avalon member)
http://www.whale.to/v/rapp.html (A Vaccine insider)

Warm wishes to all

East Sun
23rd January 2011, 03:07
Why in Hell would someone like Bill Gates, who has unlimited amounts of money want to promote something that would be harmful to the entire population of the world?
It does not compute. The only explanation I can think of is that he has been gotten at and is mind controlled. Extreme? Yeah. But what else could explain his behavior?

Paul
23rd January 2011, 07:07
Clever you made me laugh, do you have Cow & Gate milk in Texas, we do here in the UK

Thanks for letting me hear the laugh.

No, we don't have a Cow & Gate over here.

Paul
23rd January 2011, 07:10
The only explanation I can think of is that he has been gotten at and is mind controlled. Extreme? Yeah. But what else could explain his behavior?Yes, they've gotten to him. No one gets that much money, or gets to the highest offices of corporate or government power, unless those more powerful can control them.

Gajanana
23rd January 2011, 08:53
rubella. measles, mumps, chickenpox - had them all... you get sick, then you get well. If you dont get well, then perhaps it was meant to be. I would rather die or lose a child to illness, than to being part in pumping it full of **** chemicals and then seeing/feeling the suffering. I remember when my younger siblings had one of the above, mothers with young kids would come visit, so that thier kids could get the illness. it was in the 60's and very usual practice.

Nairnia
23rd January 2011, 09:43
I would rather die or lose a child to illness, than to being part in pumping it full of **** chemicals

To make that statement I would suggest you dont have children? No parent would sit back and let their child die when they could be saved, that is inhumane.

Ok, so here a scenario for you....

You get bitten by a rabbid dog, its teeth have punctured your arm and you are bleeding. Do you seek medical help and the vaccine or do you let yourself succomb to rabies and die a slow, painful death putting your family, friends and the public at risk from the same fate?

Metaphor
23rd January 2011, 10:03
To make that statement I would suggest you dont have children? No parent would sit back and let their child die when they could be saved, that is inhumane.

Ok, so here a scenario for you....

You get bitten by a rabbid dog, its teeth have punctured your arm and you are bleeding. Do you seek medical help and the vaccine or do you let yourself succomb to rabies and die a slow, painful death putting your family, friends and the public at risk from the same fate?

I have children, and do regret bitterly that I didn´t listen more carfully to the more informed people around me, that there are side-effects that your doctor will not inform you about. So please don´t talk about being a responsible parent here. Its hard as it is being a parent.
No parent would let their children die in a scenario as described above, but on the other hand they pump their kids full with unknown chemicals aka vaccines. Makes me wonder who is the more respnsible parent?

Nairnia
23rd January 2011, 14:34
I have children, and do regret bitterly that I didn´t listen more carfully to the more informed people around me, that there are side-effects that your doctor will not inform you about. So please don´t talk about being a responsible parent here. Its hard as it is being a parent.
No parent would let their children die in a scenario as described above, but on the other hand they pump their kids full with unknown chemicals aka vaccines. Makes me wonder who is the more respnsible parent?

You missed the point.


I would rather die or lose a child to illness, than to being part in pumping it full of **** chemicals

Are you saying as a parent you would you rather lose your child to illness? As a parent I believe I am qualified to talk about being a responsible parent and if my daughter contracted a terminal or severely debilitating illness, there is nothing I wouldnt do to prevent that. What would you do?

DawgBone
23rd January 2011, 14:48
Considering what we know about the intentions of the Elite, all global initiatives must be viewed suspiciously.

Vaccinations, GMO, pesticides and pollution are all obvious ways to weaken the population.

Anything that has a global effect is guilty until proven innocent.

Metaphor
23rd January 2011, 15:06
You missed the point.

And I guess you missed mine. Could be an issue with language, since i´m from another part of the world.
Bottom line is, that in most cases the medcine offered makes peoples condition even worse. Take cancer treatment for instance, its really the stoneage there. Vaccines is a trojan horse at worst. I reread your post, and understand it better now BTW.

maggie
24th January 2011, 10:13
Have children at home.. Affidavit of birth filed at county seat... Thats what I did. No birth certificate to be traded on the stock market, no social security number, and not responsible for imagined debt.
Tough way to go, I admit, but will be worth it.. If the child grows up wanting to "join the club" its not because I "commited" him into it..
Decide what vaccines if any needed. Choose only those the child could benefit from. I haven't needed to do any yet. No need for one size fits all.

witchy1
24th January 2011, 12:28
IMHO The man is a moron, and I would suggest that he sticks to plastic and not humans.......this is probably his initiation into tptw...... lets see how he succeeds as to what his next assignment is, either that or asked for something to do for humanity and actually believed this was a good thing.............
most aware docs and parents realize that mercury based vaccs are not good and they agree there is no point in vacc against a disease that no longer exists and that the facts show that even if you do have a vaccination it does not provide any guarantees that you wont get the disease anyway........... most people who get whooping cough have had jabs. the correlation between vacc and autism is astounding.
There is enough evidence here on Avalon - please do a search or plenty of info on the net.
I didnt know there was a vacc for Anthrax............when did that arrive!!!

jack
24th January 2011, 12:31
To make that statement I would suggest you dont have children? No parent would sit back and let their child die when they could be saved, that is inhumane.

Ok, so here a scenario for you....

You get bitten by a rabbid dog, its teeth have punctured your arm and you are bleeding. Do you seek medical help and the vaccine or do you let yourself succomb to rabies and die a slow, painful death putting your family, friends and the public at risk from the same fate?


Your mistaking our current healthcare system for one that is actually motivated to provide ultimate health and well being for all.

If a vaccine cures one disease, it gives you two more. If a medication cures one ailment, it attacks the immune system so that you can no longer defend yourself. Its your duty to know this rather then to play the role of defending the current system through your obvious ignorance of the truth.

The use of vaccines coincides with the massive rise in autism to the point of it being grossly apparent that there is a direct link. If robbing your child of the ability to feel love for another human being is what you would consider a noble act then by all means, vaccinate your child.


p.s To say that there are no alternative options just indicates that you have not looked for very long. If in the unfortunate event of me being bit by a rabid dog we have various options at our disposal, none of which neccesitate the need to go into a doctor for a potion that i would consider nothing less then poison. Its the same with any illness a child may have.

In case you were not already aware the third leading cause of death in the United States is - Medical Treatment. Not medical malpractise, Medical "treatment".

Enjoy your day, and your vaccine.

Infinitus
24th January 2011, 14:25
The way I see it, those that truly want to help mankind do it without this kind of publicity or recognition. He could just as easily help the world without anybody seeing the hidden hand at work. Gates has long since been hated for his financial success. Setting up the Gates Foundation and now pushing vaccines 'for the kids' feels to me like a PR campaign, whilst at the same time pushing this hidden agenda.

What intrigues me is why does he, all of a sudden, want to be liked? Is it a case of now he has our money, he also wants our hearts and minds? I don't think it's going to work.

Dale
24th January 2011, 14:47
I'll add to this thread a bit, in hoping we stay on course, here.

Yes, vaccines are a risk; and yes, many vaccines are clinically proven to have some immunity-building properties. With that said, a patient with an infected cut on their left hand can be treated by having the extremity amputated, or via antibiotic medications and/or herbal treatments. There are multiple ways of solving a problem, in most scenarios.

My personal philosophy, with regard to treatments, is to go from least invasive to most invasive. For example, if I wake up with a sore tooth, I will first try varying supplements and homeopathic options. In the case those trials fail, I will likely make an appointment with a professional to see if a root canal, or similar procedure, is necessary.

With vaccines, however, one must follow the money. It's a lucrative business, so things become less concise. In my experiences, the ambition for money attracts money; business attracts business, and health attracts health. More-so than what's in the needle, look who's behind it.

conk
24th January 2011, 17:22
Well isnt that website a ray of joy! ;) From what I have read it seems very skewed, not surprisingly having its own agenda.

But how many of us would not be here had it not been for vaccines? In this modern world we have become ignorant to the cured diseases of the past and spared the great suffering of infant mortality.
Vaccines are dangerous and largely ineffective. This is now irrefutable and incontrovertible.

Go F yourself Mr. Gates.

blufire
24th January 2011, 19:06
My daughters are 22 and 25. When my oldest had her first round of vaccines I was horrified at the reaction she had. I began to research vaccines and from that research my oldest did not receive any more vaccines and my youngest has had no scheduled vaccines. Also I have identical twin granddaughters who are 16 months old and they are clean.

The only exception is tetanus. We live on a farm and are in contact daily with soil, animal fluids and manure and therefore exposed to the tetanus bacteria. But, I have to special order the tetanus for us every seven years because the normal tetanus available has two other vaccines in combination.

Then there is the autism dilemma . . . . caused by vaccines or not? The curious thing is we are told that vaccines are not the culprit but never any solid information on what is the cause. I personally do not think vaccines are the source of autism but I do believe strongly that they are the “trigger”. So it is logical to me to decline vaccinations until we are given an answer and even then I would be suspect. Also, instead of flu and pneumonia vaccinations we use herbal medicines to boost our immune systems several times during the year. I cannot remember the last time any of us has had flu or even colds for that matter.

My research on vaccines and the resulting conclusions were one of the beginning points of not taking verbatim or following blindly what I am told to do by perceived authority.

Pragmatism, personal responsibility and common sense have almost vanished.

Transdimensional Bean Pod
24th January 2011, 19:41
I used to work as a teacher of autistic kids. My wife still does. This issue was a big one. Came up all the time. I try to stay up to date.

So far, I haven't seen anything linking the shots to autism. Except that is, the fraud perpetrated by Dr. Wakefield, who ought to be ashamed of himself. Ironic who the 'conspirators' wound up being, no?

I had a classmate in acupuncture school who was a pediatrician from Bolivia. Fantastic guy. Did all kinds of volunteer work in poor countries in South America and Africa. He would say, "If you want to see what life is like without vaccines, come with me on my next trip and see the kids dying in droves from preventable diseases". It's easy to skate by on herd immunity in the first world, but even there, things like pertussis are making a comeback in areas where people have started to decline vaccinations.

More on the autism angle. I have a relative who works at the NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health in the USA). Soon she says, we will be able to diagnose autism in utero. We can already pretty much do it at around 6 months now (in many cases). This also tends to argue against the shots, which come later down the line. The strongest correlating factor found to date is the age of the father (it also clearly tends to run in families). Men over 40 have a 6 fold increase in their chance of having a child with Autism. The risks climb steadily in the mid/late thirties. So if there IS some kind of environmental factor, looks to me like it's somehow related to the father's DNA. Given the toxic soup of chemicals we swim in every day, anything is possible here.

I agree that doctors should do more to inform patients of the risks that DO exist with vaccines. The medical establishment takes a 'greater good' approach here. Meaning, certain individuals will react badly. There IS such a thing as 'vaccine injury syndrome'. But if overall diseases are reduced, it’s considered worth it in the cost/benefit analysis.

My sister went through hell with her kids’ pediatrician just trying to space out the schedule. Her oldest two (of 3) have immune system deficiencies, and indeed, the oldest had a rough reaction to the first round of shots. All she wanted to do was space out the schedule, and they treated her like she was the worst mother on the planet. It was disgusting how she was treated. That said, she found herself a new doctor who was much more flexible, and it was fine.


I know that it’s possible for vaccines to be tainted or put to nefarious purposes. I’ve read some of the accounts linking shots to infertility in women in parts of the third world. I can’t tell the quality of the reports, but it is just like the snakes ‘they’ are in the elite circles to piggyback a ‘harm’ on a ‘help’. Creeps.

Arrowwind
24th January 2011, 19:52
Anthrax
Diptheria
Chickenpox
Hep A
Hep B
Hib
Measles
Meningococcus
Mumps
Pertussis
Pneumococcus
Polio
Rabies
Rotavirus
Rubella
Smallpox
Tetanus

Some of the diseases/illness which has been prevented or cured by vaccination. Unless you know different....?

Seems like some serious vaccination education is required here.
And I just don't know if I have the energy to present it on this forum
There are so many websites already that do an excellent job.

The polio vaccine is responsible for the huge increase in cancers we have been having over the last 30 years due to the SMV40 virus that is has contained, that is now actually sexually transmitted. When the government told the pharmaceutical companies not to distribute the contaminated vaccine they did so anyway. Research this further yourself. i have info on it on my blog www.HealthSalon.org (http://www.HealthSalon.org) Several books have been written on the topic buy leading researchers.

Now due to the MMR which does wear off, people should be getting them well into their old age for measles at an older age is very dangerous.

Clauson Labs, an independent research lab warned the pharmacuetical community persist in giving it anyway. We now have a childhood diabetes epidemic upon us.
This vaccine should not be given to children and only to those at very high risk when they are much older. even those who have recieved it at a later age have had some very serious side effects.
Smallpox vaccine did save countless lives. they don't give it any more. The vaccine also did not contain any weird crap like adjuvants, and other contaminations


rabies is a non issue. It is so dam rare and we do not give it routinely to people anyway, only after exposure.
Pertussis can cause seizure disorder and I have seen too many cases of it coming on just a day or two after the vaccine is admisistered. It should not be given unless there is a whooping cough that the hep B vaccine when given to infants and small children will cause diabetes in children. They epidemic in the neighbor hood

All cases of polio currently in the USA are caused by the vaccine. They should stop giving it.. IV vitamin c will cure polio anyway

Diptheria is not gone from the population due to vaccine but due to cleaner living conditions.
More people are suffering from chickenpox from the vaccine than before. A naturally axcquired cas of chicken pox will afford lifetime immunity.
Some people who get the vaccine now get very weird cases of chicken pox every year. Chicken pox in an adult can kill.. and if the vaccine wears off the previously vaccinated adult could then get chicken pox and die. This vaccine should only be given to children who risk death if they get the pox and there are dam few of them.

Anthrax is a non issue and should not and is not given routinely to children, only give during fear of chemical warfare and it is dubious that it works anyway. MMS willl take care of antrax, better chance with that than cipro.

Mumps is a benign disease and unvaccinated children who eat a healthy diet will sail through it.

Our parents were so unconcerned about children getting these diseases that when they came into a community in the old days it was pajama party time. They wanted it done and over with, and all the kids at once if possilbe.
The pharmaceutical industry has worked diligently to instill fear and to prevent us from developing natural immunity that is passed on from generation to generation.
This is why native americans died from mealses and europeans do not. No natural immunity.

A measles vaccine caused me to get arthritis. I had arthritis within minutes of receiving the vaccine. It ws the most stupid thing I ever did. I have had to fight off arthritis ever since. Fortuantely I have found a very effective natural way.

Because measles is no longer in the community children are not able to catch it and develop a natural immunity so if you do not vaccinate your children they will be at risk to get it as adults.. they should also get boosters as adults. If you choose to vaccineate do not give the trivalent mmr. Find a doctor that will give them independently over the course of a few years. This will reduce the possibility of the immune system being overwhelmed

It is not the mercury in vaccines that does so much damage. It is from the auto immune system being overwhelmed with pathogens and unknown virus and dna from animal sources, and of course the mercury is out of most of them now but there is still pleny of aluminum in them.

taizen
24th January 2011, 19:52
Here may lie Bill Gates hidden agenda to some extent http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/A_Robot_in_Every_Home.pdf . It's old but relevant to today. If you google bill gates robot in every home, you will come across some very interesting articles. The relevance? A controllable community. Like in I, Robot (to me, a little extreme-just an example). Imagine if there were to be a robot: the monitoring of vaccinations, health, wealth accumalation, personal activity monitoring such as personal frequency monitoring (anger vibrations differ from love vibrations), etc. Imagine how that would help other corporations complete their agenda?
Education is the beginning, feeling the 'vibe' will be my key. Bill Gates is on his own path, I feel I am not competent to judge his course of actions. I know what I must do and so do you.

non
24th January 2011, 20:02
How does the 'Registration' take place? Must the parents volunteer the lil one in? Really once you consider the free-will aspect of any registration, then you can not complain if you have become a member of a club that you applied to be a member of; had you not wanted the liabilities [due diligence or lack of, no excuse] then don't belong. Dead simple. And I know of what I speak, my two older children were vaccinated, and the latest, not. What is the difference? A more aware set of parents.

Transdimensional Bean Pod
24th January 2011, 20:05
Great post arrowind. I have much to learn about the existent risks!

In my experience, there are a lot of doctors who would love to deliver more discriminating care, but if nothing else, time constraints and lack of awareness result is 'less than optimal' counsel.

This is true no matter WHAT I've tried to get help for. We get handled like packages in an assembly line. Stamped and shipped.

avid
24th January 2011, 20:15
I have found colloidal silver to be so wonderful enacting on all sorts of vile infections. I make it myself. The swine flu was neutralised fairly quickly even though the doctor said partner needed heavy-duty anti-biotics and potentially hospital care. We bought a proper nebuliser. It really worked! Since then - any inflamations are quickly dealt with either by drinking a small amount twice daily to overcome any current 'bugs', or you can gargle with the stuff to avoid flu etc. Of course you only use it when necessary, but the visits to doctors are almost zilch. Natural remedies are best!!!
Bill Gates wants to override nature??? Why can't he put his squillions into the life-saving knowledge of colloidal silver? After all - the astronauts couldn't have survived up there without it....
Sorry - but Bill Gates has subscribed to the 'depopulation' of the planet - he's been succoured into the 'riding-on-goat' scenario big-style. Evil is as evil does.

Rocketman
24th January 2011, 21:06
Here's a link to an interview with a "whistleblower" vaccination research scientist: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=743

Over the past decade, a disproportionate number of microbiologists have died under mysterious circumstances. Apparently, they are silenced if unwilling to play along with the genocidal schemes of their employers: http://911research.wtc7.net/post911/attacks/killings.html
http://www.rense.com/general18/five.htm

NancyV
24th January 2011, 21:36
You missed the point.
Are you saying as a parent you would you rather lose your child to illness? As a parent I believe I am qualified to talk about being a responsible parent and if my daughter contracted a terminal or severely debilitating illness, there is nothing I wouldnt do to prevent that. What would you do?
Both my children had the regular childhood diseases when growing up. I kept them home and gave them either herbal or homeopathic remedies. They never went to a doctor except in an emergency, neither one had a single vaccination or shot during their childhood, not even ONE. My son had the full barrage of vaccinations when he enlisted in the US Army at age 22. He didn't get as sick as some of the soldiers did, probably because his immune system was in top shape, but I would bet there may be some long term negative effects because of the vaccines, however there are methods of reversing those effects and strengthening the immune system which are available if one researches.

I did a LOT of research back in 1979 when I was pregnant with my first child and had to come to the logical conclusion that vaccines are highly toxic and dangerous in the extreme, especially for children.

As far as a severely debilitating illness I would do a lot of research to find an alternative and natural cure long before I would go to a doctor. I have found doctors to be useful when I absolutely needed them, such as for operations, but other than that I wouldn't even go to a doctor if I had cancer. Perhaps I might go to satisfy my curiosity and find out if that is a correct diagnosis, but even that wouldn't be essential.

Until one researches disease in great depth one may not realize that most mainstream doctors are sadly lacking in knowledge of what causes disease and how to reverse disease. They tend to focus on symptoms, pharmaceuticals and surgery. Of course it is each persons choice how they will approach their health and the health of their children. My method worked very well for my children and for me.

As far as Bill Gates, either he is extremely ignorant and brainwashed, as is everyone who has no clue how dangerous vaccines are, or he is knowingly a part of the pharmaceutical cartel and/or the agenda to reduce world population.

Nancy :)

Arrowwind
29th January 2011, 19:36
This came in a email to me today. Be alert folks. Be ever aware and work to protect yourselves.



1. Bill Gates Makes the Depulation "Usefulness" of Vaccines Explicit
Gates: Vaccines Vital in Developing World (what is depulation?)
By Erica Teichert

The vaccine industry publication, Fierce Vaccines, reported in its January 26, 2011 issue that Bill Gates explicitly laid out the importance of vaccination programs in reducing population. Read this article, especially the part which we have highlighted in red, and then ask yourself, again, why pregnant women and children, rationally the LAST groups who should receive any vaccines, let alone experimental ones, are the first targets of the incresaingly urgent and irrational MUST HAVE vaccine programs.
And then ask yourself why you, or anyone you have responsibility for, would allow vaccination for any purposed. Autism is only one of the consequences of poisoning the immune system. Vaccinations make us life-long customers of the pharmaceutical illness propagation system. Why would we allow them into our bodies when they do not work, have never been shown to be safe or effective and are based on a vast lie: that injected pathogenic material induces disease protection. Nothing, in fact, could be farther from the truth. Click here, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=3198 (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=s3N%2FeC1dfEBlMy5L7AT4%2FsSXPNpyBUoz), to read how the best way to predict pandemics is to track vaccination programs. And click here, http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=189 (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=EE%2FIWt0sXOR0CFycPBqvqMSXPNpyBUoz), to donate to make it possible for the Natural Solutions Foundation to take our Stop the Shot Case against influenza vaccines, all of which are dangerous, none of which protect us against flu and all of which are associated with long term serious problems like asthma, allergies, all-cause deaths and Alzheimer's disease. We have won on narrow grounds in our first two Federal Court rounds. This time we want to win big by getting a judgement to prohibit ALL influenza vaccines.
Click here, http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=3688 (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BOZZZRF9xacVsHKstbgefcSXPNpyBUoz), to tell legislators that you demand a Congressional investigation into the links between fetal death, autism, Alzheimers, asthma and a host of other serious conditions and vaccines.
And click here, http://www.youtube.com/naturalsolutions#p/f/1/_gWmVtn5JsA (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=8ONjoAGN5NuC9YnBiagLF8SXPNpyBUoz), to view Dr. Rima's video on the Globalist "Eudgenocidal" Agenda.
Here is the article which Fierce Vaccines published.
"In a move to continue supporting vaccination efforts abroad, Bill Gates donated $50 million to fund a myriad of vaccinations in the Middle East. And this time, he had matched support from Sheik Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, crown prince of Abu Dhabi. According to Gates, preventing disease through vaccinations is one of the most important actions a country can take towards ensuring stability.
"If governments look at the numbers--the impact of this--it compares favorably to almost anything else you can do to help a country," Gates said in an interview in Abu Dhabi, according to the Wall Street Journal. "If you don't, if you let the population growth stay high--like it is in countries with very poor health--whether it's stability or education, all of it is kind of out of reach."[Emphasis added - REL]
Of the total funds, two-thirds will be given to the GAVI Alliance for the purchase and delivery of the pentavalent vaccine and the introduction of the new pneumococcal vaccine in Afghanistan. These vaccines help protect the biggest killers of children younger than 5, including pneumonia, diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type B, which causes meningitis.
The remaining $34 million will be directed to the World Health Organization and UNICEF to deliver polio vaccines in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Polio is still in issue in the Middle East, as well as India and Nigeria. But thanks to the WHO, Unicef and other beneficiaries, polio cases have diminished by 99 percent in the past 20 years. Gates hopes that the efforts will push polio to join smallpox as the only diseases vanquished by vaccines.

2. Gardasil "Winner" in Fetal Death Sweepstakes, Beats Out H1N1 Vaccine!


H1N1 vaccine is implicated in a large number of fetal deaths (which is part of the reason that the Natural Solutions Foundation is suing the FDA to prevent the use of any flu vaccine in the United States) but it comes in second in fetal deaths: First Place Winner is Gardasil. Although only 1-4% of all vaccine-related adverse events are reported through the US government's VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System), the number of fetal deaths caused by Gardasil is even higher than those caused by the H1N1 vaccines.


"The H1N1 Flu vaccine appears in many of the abortion/stillbirth cases, but not the most. The “winner,” appearing in 297 of the VAERS records associated with miscarriage, is Gardasil (vaccine code HPV4)! Once again, this vaccine is a newcomer, having only existed for 4 years.


One More -- What? Infertile Woman? Dead Baby? Young Woman Ill for Life? Oh, Yes, One More Boy, Too! Stop the Madness. Say NO to Gardasil along with all other vaccines.


http://www.prlog.org/11223819-abortion-stillbirth-events-from-gardasil-far-exceed-all-other-vaccines.html (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=NqDRLwQougsUjzHg9s2IOMSXPNpyBUoz)
2. Andrew Wakefield Fights Back, Exposes British Medical Journal Fraud, Vaccine Funding!


Despite the fact that the link between colon inflammation and MMR vaccination had been published 14 years before Dr. Wakefield's BMJ study, Dr. Wakefield's paper, connecting the GI problems of autistic children and MMR vaccination caused a firestorm. First Dr. Wakefield's excellent paper was retracted by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and then Dr. Wakefield was deprived of his license to practice medicine in the UK.
Dr. Wakefield touched the nerve of the the vaccine industry, which is clearly willing to defly logic and defile anyone's career and reputation to bury the fact that the link between toxic materials in the bloodstreams and brains of children and their neurological collapse is a powerful and vitally important one.
To protect the vaccine industry (which is, in essence, protecting the entire pharmaceutical industry since once damaged, the immune and other systems require continuing medication for life) the powers that be are willing to lie, defame, and destroy truth tellers like Dr. Wakefield.
But Dr. Wakefield is fighting back. As Natural News reports, "The BMJ, in essence, has been caught pulling off what may be the largest scientific fraud ever perpetrated by any medical journal in the history of the world. It grossly misrepresented the facts in falsely accusing Dr Wakefield of fabricating the clinical trial data that led to his landmark study being published in The Lancet in 1998. The innocence of Dr Wakefield has now been established by these newly-released documents."
My take as a child and adult psychiatrist and physician? Those who, like Dr. Wakefield, draw a connection between vaccination and autism, leukemia, neurological dysfunction, diabetes and a host of other problems are totally correct. My advice? NEVER vaccinate a pregnant woman. NEVER vaccinate a baby. NEVER vaccinate a child. NEVER vacciante an adolescent. NEVER vaccinate an adult. NEVER vaccinate an older person. ALWAYS vaccinate public health officials and politicians who advocate vaccination.

http://www.naturalnews.com/031117_BMJ_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield.html (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=RTMlhFjCiN9nQ5O%2FFF%2BV18SXPNpyBUoz)

"Ministers of parliament and senior advisers in the UK government ruled against the flu vaccine for children under 5. This decision comes even though a flu epidemic is currently striking the UK. ... Possibly they took a look at what Dr. Hugh Fudenberg, one of the world's leading immunologists, has had to say on the flu vaccine. Fudenburg found that anyone who had more than two flu vaccines between 1970 and 1980 has a far higher chance of having Alzheimer's in old age. ... Physicians in America have been insisting that every child age 6 months to 18 years get an annual flu shot for several years now, but health officials have now ramped up those recommendations, telling EVERY person over the age of 6 months get a flu shot EVERY year, healthy or not, low risk or high.


What will receiving a flu shot every year every year of your life do to your immune system?


With all of those vaccinations, will you be more susceptible to influenza-related complications and death? Will children, who are already subjected to 48 doses of 14 vaccines from day of birth through age six, be at added risk for developing chronic health problems from being given a flu shot every year throughout elementary, junior high and high school? We really don't know."
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/01/17/uk-government-decides-against-giving-children-the-flu-vaccine.aspx (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=D8vGo4vj5qpEsCKpxoij38SXPNpyBUoz)

More articles on Vaccine Horrors:
http://www.naturalnews.com/031113_vaccines_science.html#ixzz1CAmiA95K (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=wCtKm4ytENVddiho0ycnjcSXPNpyBUoz)
http://www.naturalnews.com/031031_Bill_Gates_vaccines.html (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=KFzIAcA5vS9ra69%2B9XpsbcSXPNpyBUoz)
http://www.naturalnews.com/031075_vaccines_seizures.html (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Xxcc%2BFQUwgoMHONzZEfa1cSXPNpyBUoz)
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=VXMfe2GVagAraqrqEY4E88SXPNpyBUoz)

The One
10th March 2011, 11:29
Bill Gates is the chairman of the 30 person company TerraPower LLC. They recently completed a basic design for a reactor that theoretically could run untouched for decades on spent nuclear fuel. Now the company is seeking a partner to help build the experimental reactor, and a country willing to host it.A traveling-wave reactor would start with a little bit of uranium 235 but most of the fuel would be uranium-238.

This is what Bill said back in 2010


The deadline for the world to cut all of its carbon emissions is 2050. He suggested that researchers spend the next 20 years inventing and perfecting clean-energy technologies, and then the next 20 years implementing them. The world's energy portfolio should not include coal or natural gas, he said, and must include carbon capture and storage technology as well as nuclear, wind and both solar photovoltaics and solar thermal power.

Burning the enriched uranium would shoot neutrons into the depleted uranium making up roughly 90% of the fuel. That process would produce plutonium, which would create energy as it continued to get hit by even more neutrons. It's a slow, controlled reaction that could continue over many years without need of human intervention. And in TerraPower's design, the core of the reactor, where fission takes place, would be small: a cylinder about 10 feet wide and 13 feet long.

The idea for traveling-wave reactors has been around for decades but was mothballed amid waning U.S. interest in nuclear power. Then came a boost in the 1990s from a research paper by scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, including Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb and the brain behind Ronald Reagan's Star Wars missile-defense initiative; and an acolyte of Mr. Teller's named Lowell Wood.

Mr. Gates got the project rolling with seed money in the tens of millions of dollars. Venture-capital firms Charles River Ventures and Khosla Ventures invested $35 million last year. Nuclear-industry veteran John Gilleland is TerraPower's chief executive; a network of part-time researchers and scientists around the country offer input.

They have made pitches in France and Japan,and made the rounds in Russia, China and India. So far, there have been no takers. They are not looking at the US because itwould likely be a decade or more before the reactor could be tested on U.S. soil.

Whats he up to now spreading disinfo i think? http://www.terrapower.com/Home.aspx

king anthony
10th March 2011, 16:10
...Tesla...

conk
10th March 2011, 16:14
Gates+vaccine promotion=evil

DevilPigeon
10th March 2011, 16:21
.
.
He suggested that researchers spend the next 20 years inventing and perfecting clean-energy technologies, and then the next 20 years implementing them.
.
.


Let's hope he's not thinking of Microsoft employees, they've spent over 20 years fiddling with Windows & it still don't work...!

azure
10th March 2011, 16:51
Hopefully, he's thinking of how he can help the poverty stricken with some of his wealth. Yes I know, I am prolly dreamin' :twitch:

Flash
10th March 2011, 17:24
.
.
He suggested that researchers spend the next 20 years inventing and perfecting clean-energy technologies, and then the next 20 years implementing them.
.
.



Let's hope he's not thinking of Microsoft employees, they've spent over 20 years fiddling with Windows & it still don't work...!

Nuclear reactior Window versions, I had not tought of it!!:twitch:

Scary, please!:hail:

Arrowwind
15th April 2011, 01:31
How the Bill Gates Foundation is genetically manipulating nature and devastating our health
by Anthony Gucciardi, citizen journalist

http://www.naturalnews.com/z030940_Bill_Gates_Foundation_genetics.html

(NaturalNews) The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the largest private foundation in the world. With over $38 billion in assets, the Gates Foundation has the ability to impact the world in a very large way. The foundation claims to be doing just that, with the stated goal of the company being to "enhance healthcare and reduce extreme poverty." Despite this good-natured mission statement, the foundation's spending goes against its stated goals in almost every way. Foundation assets are being used for such things as funding the creation of genetically modified mosquitoes, purchasing 500,000 shares of Monsanto, experimental vaccine nanotechnology, and supporting Goldman Sachs.

Monsanto is the company responsible for the creation of Agent Orange, (with Dow Chemical - Arrow) which after being used in the Vietnam War led to over 150,000 being born with birth defects. Over 3 million Vietnamese adults were also negatively impacted. Monsanto also created Posilac, which is more commonly known as bovine growth hormone. This artificial growth hormone synthetically led to higher volumes of milk production in cows, in addition to destroying the animal's health. However, the damage done was not only limited to animals. In humans Posilac was found to lead to elevated risks of developing a tumor, due to increased levels of IGF (Insulin-like growth factor). Monsanto is now the largest biotechnology company in the world, responsible for genetically modifying a large portion of the world's food supply.

On August 30, 2010, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock. This company has driven thousands of Indian farmers to kill themselves after they were unable to pay mass amounts of debt back to the company. Additionally, the suicide was so prevalent among farmers in the area that it has been dubbed the "suicide belt" of India. Farmers who were promised increased revenue by the biotech giant were soon overcome with debt and regret. Some farmers drank the very insecticide they were given to use on their crops. If the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were truly attempting to "reduce extreme poverty," like their mission statement claimed, then why would they support an organization like Monsanto?

In addition to funding Monsanto, the Gates Foundation has also funded the development of genetically modified mosquitoes. The mosquitoes, developed by the University of Queensland, are modified to stop the spread of a virus carried by the insects. This technology also allows scientists to modify the insects in other ways, such as engineering the mosquito to produce a vaccine in their saliva. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in Bethesda is currently working on a transgenic mosquito that is essentially a mobile vaccination. If it is successfully implemented, unsuspecting targets will be injected with a vaccination, even if the person is opposed to the science behind most vaccinations.

The Gates Foundation is also focused on supporting large corporations. Goldman Sachs is a well-known global investment banking and securities firm. In addition to moving their profits offshore to avoid taxation of their $10 billion bailout, Sachs has also purchased pistols for all of its employees to defend themselves from any uprising. Why would a company be so afraid of its clients? The answer is pretty simple; the company is not looking out for them. For a foundation whose goal is reduce poverty, this does not seem like a very appropriate business partner. In fact, this organization is diametrically opposed to the views expressed in the Gates Foundation's stated goals.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is indeed changing the world. Unfortunately, it is in a negative way. The foundation funds the genetic modification of our planet, the siphoning of money from the working class to the rich, and many other organizations that are dismantling the United States economy. Those who donate to this organization, however, may not be aware of its actions. Just as with other organizations, most of the donations come from citizens with good intentions. It is a shame to see that the Gates Foundation is using the assets of charitable donors to fund the manipulation of the environment and the devastation of our health.

Sources:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1082559/The-GM-genocide-Thousands-Indian-farmers-committing-suicide-using-genetically-modified-crops.html
http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/index.html?page=35109&pid=14910
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/03/researchers-turn-mosquitoes-into.html
http://www.gurufocus.com/news/104835/gates-foundation-buys-ecolab-inc-goldman-sachs-monsanto-company-exxon-mobil-corp-sells-mt-bank
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2009-12-03/arming-goldman-sachs-with-pistols-alice-schroeder-correct-.html
http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportID=90959
Offline

Arrowwind
15th April 2011, 03:50
There is a war going on. Bill and Melinda Gates are funding it.

Chicodoodoo
15th April 2011, 03:59
It sure makes you wonder how people can go so wrong.

fifi
15th April 2011, 04:04
Bill Gates used to be my icon - somebody I looked up to. Not anymore, since I've woken up. So sad to see such a genius now fallen into the fold of the PTB.

modwiz
15th April 2011, 04:24
With this couple we are given a great opportunity to see our MSM at its mind-farking finest. It has presented these two malevolent beings as wonders of the billionaire world. Benevolent and generous showing other billionaires how "classy" ones do it and make the world a better place. It is suggested/implanted into us that we are better off for having these sorts on our planet. Their wealth is our wealth and we are all enriched by their success.

The few, us, see it. The many see it just as presented above. Parasitic mosquitoes represented as lovely fairies for us to ooh and ah about.

No wonder they think we should die. They have no respect for us at all as we buy into such blatant bullfeathers because the TV/media told us.

All we can do is poke that entranced friend or family member and hope the spell breaks. We need some numbers to "see" WTF is going on.

Lord Sidious
15th April 2011, 04:49
It sure makes you wonder how people can go so wrong.

Wrong according to whom? You? Me? Us?
No.
They know exactly what they are doing and they are doing it for reasons important to us.
You know that of course, I am merely using your post as a foot in the door as it is.

Arrowwind
15th April 2011, 05:04
So Lord Sidious, are you saying that the Gates are intentionally screwing us?... that they arn't just dimwhit dumb rich people with pathetic do gooder goodiness?

ViralSpiral
15th April 2011, 05:59
How the Bill Gates Foundation is genetically manipulating nature and devastating our health
by Anthony Gucciardi, citizen journalist



Genetic manipulation is of the misinformed or ahem.... mind-controlled kind, which may include the Gates'?

They have a touchy/feely thing about them, which we are meant to "buy"

Lord Sidious
15th April 2011, 06:34
So Lord Sidious, are you saying that the Gates are intentionally screwing us?... that they arn't just dimwhit dumb rich people with pathetic do gooder goodiness?

Of course.

Wookie
15th April 2011, 06:46
To achieve the wealth and status the Gates have one must have full knowledge and understanding of how and what time/money is being spent on, also a willingness to stab people in the back to get ahead. Do not for a second think that any charity that is funded in any way by the Gates is anything more than a means to an end. (evil Wookies personal opinion) Hmmm get a huge tax break, if i in fact pay taxes, and sterilized the third world with one check, sounds like a good deal to me.

Peaceful Journeys Wookie

conk
15th April 2011, 15:47
They are also purveyors of poisons. VACCINES!

ktlight
11th May 2011, 10:52
At the heart of Gates' address lies the central Global Warming dogma, which dictates that Co2 emitted by human beings are the primary culprit for the unwanted heating of the globe. Since this artificial alleged human-induced heating effect allegedly stands to devastate the planet if left unabated, Global Warming dogma proponents therefore argue that human Co2 emissions must be drastically reduced. As Gates casually addresses the issue, he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

ERRATUM: To be completely fair and accurate, I should have stated that Gates seeks to reduce the anticipated growth of the human population rather than that he seeks to reduce the current population. I admit that the latter slogan, that is contained in the video, is a bit misleading and I do not want to insinuate that Gates seeks to kill off currently living people. He rather seeks to lower the projected population growth.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WQtRI7A064

Steven
11th May 2011, 12:04
ERRATUM: To be completely fair and accurate, I should have stated that Gates seeks to reduce the anticipated growth of the human population rather than that he seeks to reduce the current population. I admit that the latter slogan, that is contained in the video, is a bit misleading and I do not want to insinuate that Gates seeks to kill off currently living people. He rather seeks to lower the projected population growth.

Or coudl it be simply a 'lapsus linguae'. Often, especially in public, the subconsciousness mind reveal itself :)

Namaste, Steven

linz2d
11th May 2011, 12:29
You know, there's a man who makes billions from deceiving people into believing that Windows is the best OS(operating system) on the planet, and that every new release is somehow better than the last. With that fact it should be clear that he is the biggest BS'ter out there.

People want to reduce the CO2 emissions then all they have need to do is stop cutting down trees and plant more... those bugger's live off the stuff.

steve_a
11th May 2011, 12:30
Hi ktlight,

I'm with Gates on this one. I think the populationis becoming too dense and the food 'shortages' to come are mainly because of the increase of demand rather than the natural disasters that are occurring on the planet. I, like Bill Ryan (we disagree on some stuff but we're together on this), see a future where the population can be reduced in real terms, without harming born individuals simply by working a way where the world produces less people.

All balances and ups and downs (growing older populations, shift in global movement, dispersement of local populations etc.) will sort themselves out as these phases are temporary. The only other answer we have is to allow the population to grow uncontrollably, go hungry and deplete the Earth of it's resources. After that the situation will become permanent and that is not a pretty picture I can see painted on the wall.

Best regards,

Steve



At the heart of Gates' address lies the central Global Warming dogma, which dictates that Co2 emitted by human beings are the primary culprit for the unwanted heating of the globe. Since this artificial alleged human-induced heating effect allegedly stands to devastate the planet if left unabated, Global Warming dogma proponents therefore argue that human Co2 emissions must be drastically reduced. As Gates casually addresses the issue, he goes on to state that one way to accomplish this goal is to reduce the global human population.

ERRATUM: To be completely fair and accurate, I should have stated that Gates seeks to reduce the anticipated growth of the human population rather than that he seeks to reduce the current population. I admit that the latter slogan, that is contained in the video, is a bit misleading and I do not want to insinuate that Gates seeks to kill off currently living people. He rather seeks to lower the projected population growth.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WQtRI7A064

ktlight
11th May 2011, 16:02
Hi steve_a
If you look at it the other way round, that if the PTB were to stop marauding the planet, there would be enough to sustain everyone. There is no need, for instance, to have food mountains -that could be spread around. We all know that it's money/wealth=power that is the main motivator of the PTB and that they do anything to get it.
It has been illustrated that the entire world population could fit into Australia, each with enough space to grow food. There are vast areas of the world that have not been explored.
Also, we have a very close connection with our planet and it would naturally reduce the population if it could not bear it. For instance, there are and have been times when the male sperm count could not produce offspring, or females were naturally barren. I mean, we take so much from our earth and maybe the only way to replenish it is through us when we die and are buried, which might be an explanation for why there are so many of us living now.

I state this just for your consideration.

Some Bloke
11th May 2011, 16:55
Why is it always people like Gates & HRH Prince Jug Lugs saying these things, where do they get off , with their massive houses and private planes ?
The computer industry as a whole with it's planned obsolescence is about as bad as it gets.
Stange thing is, I'd just watched that vid (on YT) before logging on here

Lazlo
11th May 2011, 17:36
There is enough land to squeeze everyone in to Australia, but there is only enough arable land on the planet, at a population of 7 billion, for about 1 acre per person.

When you subtract oceans, deserts, mountains and other steep terrain, tundra, and ice caps...there is not a whole lot left where you can grow crops and have adequate supplies of fresh water.

Two possible futures await us:

One in which we take care of the environment and provide opportunities for people to choose smaller family sizes, preserve open spaces and biodiversity, and water quality: allowing humanity to reach a healthy and sustainable balance.


Another in which we continue on the path that we are on now, and end up in some future Malthusian nightmare.

Somedays I am rather optimistic, other days...not so much.

Edit to add: There is also the scenario in which TPTB succeed in killing most of us useless eaters off so that they can continue to amass wealth and power without regard for the environment.:mad2:

Thefrenzy1978
11th May 2011, 19:17
You know, there's a man who makes billions from deceiving people into believing that Windows is the best OS(operating system) on the planet, and that every new release is somehow better than the last. With that fact it should be clear that he is the biggest BS'ter out there.

People want to reduce the CO2 emissions then all they have need to do is stop cutting down trees and plant more... those bugger's live off the stuff.

Yeah know what you mean ive had my fare share of blue screen of death..

Darla Ken Pearce
11th May 2011, 19:50
Hey, and by their works you shall know them. Let's look a little closer at Bill Gates ~ he has been a "Gate or Barrier" to computing progress for decades. He is king of the genocide of spirit ~ who spends his hoard of loot for vaccines to kill people’s bodies as well as their spirits. He has worked hard to stunt our growth and creativity but he has failed ~ and this is his first real loss ~ ever. Okay, that's just what I think.

I love this thought as applied to Bill Gates, who is an example of a dictator who has taken more than his fair share with relish and greed overseeing his actions, and he's been so bold as to take over the shares of a billion other beings ~ yes, count them, who share the Earth with him. That he has a desire to kill or eliminate them should come as no surprise in this upside down 3D world before us.

To continue on my creaky soapbox, Bill Gates legacy trails into the dustbin of history with a residue of sparks highlighting darkness and a love for ignorance and the mundane of heart, mind, and spirit. I seem to have an allergy to Microsoft. Can you tell?

Hint: This is being written on a Mac. Sour Apples? You bet! Well, I wish to put this beneath me. In my opinion ~ his "Windows" lack vision and kindness and hinder creativity to the maximum amount allowed in 3D. If there's a hard way to do anything, Windows, has successfully found it and seized the day so-to-speak.

I have known his spirit and of him from his first days raiding, absorbing, and destroying other small brilliant companies and taking them over; sucking the life blood out of them ~ in order to spit out real seeds of creativity and hinder their brilliant programs null and void, in favor of his own version of "Windows: Winner takes all."

Some may call this the dog-eat-dog capitalist system and they'd be right. These old financial and limiting systems are going away now. Let's let them fall gracefully as they have proven to be of no value to us, now that our consciousness has risen.

For a time, Gates assisted in making us all losers but that day is over now that we have Windex and can go forth with new vision and clarity.

As we have witnessed, he has been very successful in these kinds of dark actions; genocide fits into his basic structure of thinking. The only masters of deceit reigning above him and who can do it better are Rockefellers and Rothchilds ~ they have all the political clout, but at least his efforts have earned Bill a seat near Royals by paying all the tolls required such as genocide. A small price for him, indeed.

A real marvel to me is that he has been so admired for his wealth and power ~ alone ~ and has been allowed to escape the consequences of his actions against others. Allowing him to reap harvests that do not belong to him, and use them to fund population control and other nasty programs. It a real wonder to behold and we are finally able to see this trend everywhere we look, and it's too crazy to believe. This hologram of disenchantment gone wrong needs an immediate transformation this moment!

On the other hand, it’s possible, he is greatly misunderstood but I have some serious questions; nobody else seems to ask or require of him. Meanwhile, start transforming in your mind.

How the world allows and embraces darkness of actions like this, well, I'll admit it will always rankle free spirits, such as mine, who are in favor of the free flow of information, creativity, and sharing, and who have no desire to stop anyone from being happy, creative, unlimited, and fulfilled in spirit, body, heart, mind, and soul. Why not share?

If you share all you have with everyone, each has what they need and hoarding and guarding become so not necessary, they go away in an instant. Want is a 3D construct and ugly.

It is this lack of faith in ourselves and others that causes us so much fear, we desire to take what belongs to others and is freely given by Earth to all beings. When we fall into this pit of illusion, it's just to make sure, we will never lack anything. This is what causes these lacks to be born and flourish.

Then, a huge enterprise arises to guard and militarize these efforts of hoarding for the few. No one seems to notice until they start stealing in your backyard and to your basic sustenance and finally they take your spirit, too. The Earth's bounty does not belong to just one individual or the few. It belong to all of us. Like a raccoon who reaches into the trap for things that glitter, our fists full of gems, keeps us imprisoned; if only we could release our grip, and surrender these fake treasures, we could easily escape the trap of our spirits and souls in this old worthless, enslaving 3D paradigm of want and poverty and move into the New Golden Age newly born to all those who ask and desire it. Imagine!

The Earth's bounty is to be shared freely and fairly and that's just how it is... The rest of this mess ~ this great illusion ~ will go away quickly ~ once this is grasped through remembrance of who we are and can become again. Masters. Even those with all the riches have impoverished themselves and their spirits, but they can't and won't let go. Spiritual happiness is love and it trumps everything else no matter how things may appear.

You know in retrospect, I was there at the Creation and watched Bill's modus operandi up close and personal. It was so sad to see these developments come forth.

This will give you an idea:

It is a fact, I witnessed his theft regarding Apple (Macs), as he attempted to steal their more enlightened operating system and make it his own, but Steve Jobs stopped and delayed him for about four years, and tied him up in the courts. It was a first.

This gave Apple and later, even without Steve Jobs ~ the time to surge ahead once again and add more creativity and design power before Gates was able to buy in again and slow it's progress through the world of the commerce by commonality used to hinder and slow computing long enough to once again, render it mediocre. This time affecting Apple as well.

Now, at long last, we all witness the day when creativity can begin to surge again, as it was intended. Our higher consciousness is the key that opens this fabulous door <sigh>.

Bill Gates could be called, the true king of the mundane, but that's a judgment and beneath me. Not! As all can see, he taken more than a lion's share for his small diminutive stature and a blind world applauds him. One where billions live in poverty and hunger because they have been left out and deemed to be useless eaters.

Whose judgment is this? Their power over us ~ ends now.

Please do not waste time defending or honoring Bill Gates on Avalon ~ at least not until he can see his way clear to funding something that uplifts us like Project Avalon instead of kills or hinders our progress.

Let his deeds speak for themselves, virtually everyone is required to change now and it's fairly important to know what changes need to come forth. So now you know where some of the real bodies lay and the darkness that surrounds Bill Gates and some of his actions.

One happy note is that the day has dawned when we will be able to discern everyone's aura and spirits ~ clearly for all to see ~ even as we achieve greater consciousness, we can see them more transparently each day. Soon, no one will be able to hide darkness again. Some will go away and they are the ones who refuse these necessary changes. We will all be blessed when that day fully arrives and we get out of 3D perspectives for once and for all. They are just too dark from my forest vista and I am not alone in this new vista.

Please note: I freely admit ~ I have some prejudice and bias against Bill's actions having witnessed him darkly arising into the public sphere from the swamps of Silicon Valley where I lived at the time. Needless to say again ~ but I will anyway ~ I use a Silver Mac Air as my trumpet and so can you. May no barriers lay between us. We all have these choices and there are no hard feelings about it.

Further note: One of my favorite bright nephews works for Bill Gates and I have never mentioned my opinion to him. He's too happy where he is ~ and with his new boat and new house and new vehicle, so it hasn't come up. Much love to all! xoxoxoxox ; )

Lazlo
11th May 2011, 20:27
Don't hold back now Darla, tell us how you really feel!!

But seriously...great post:hug::kiss:

Arrowwind
11th May 2011, 20:56
I do not believe that Gate's wants 1 billion people dead. He would prefer 1 billion never conceived.
It is his position, I think, that those populations with better health and improved economy will have less children, as so commonly seen in western industrialized society, where population grown has stabilitzed or is not even any longer repopulating, population rates decrease... go figure, its happening in Italy, even with the pope in residence.

That he sees vaccines as a means to this end is merely his blind spot. I doubt he sees it as an agenda to mass murder or death by chronic disease. He really believes in the vaccine myth.
Ultimately, some vaccines have helped to grow populations, as the small pox vaccine has done. Now that that disease is no longer present countless people live into longer lives, reproducing all the way.

Some Bloke
11th May 2011, 21:16
I've spent most of my life in the countryside, and I know a lot of farmers, what a lot of people don't realise is that cheap food and globalisation means that (certainly here in Europe) a lot of good land is given over to golf courses , ponies for spoilt girls or just abandoned. Remember in soviet Russia two thirds of all food was grown in small private gardens, not on the vast collectives . I'm saying that if food production was primerally local, and used the best low lying land instead of building on it etc there would be no problem . Remember its the hungry who are 'over' reproducing, if they didn't feel so threatened maybe the population would just level off ?

MargueriteBee
11th May 2011, 22:28
OP can we have a link, please.

Davidallany
11th May 2011, 22:47
It seems that Bill Gates wants a membership in the big boys club, all he has to do is convince us that vaccines and TV are good. Just how many slaves are working for him so he and his family can chill-out? There is no food shortage due to population but there is shortage due to manipulation and withholding.

noprophet
11th May 2011, 23:05
Ballllllllannnnnncccccce.

Not just expansion - not just contraction. Both of these are detrimental if used beyond their means.

There are higher dimensional laws in place to adjust this as necessary. I think we've even noted a few of them and hated them for it.

It is certainly not unreasonable to ask someone to have no more than 2 children. If we did this we would see a steady decline back into a reasonable state.

Ironically, capitalistic society argues with this a bit because you need slaves for the workforce just to support the cyclical economy. But that 'ish was outdated when it started - I'm still waiting for someone to pull the plug. Especially with us perfectly capable of creating a technocracy.

Seriously though - two kids per family; semantics aside - I don't think that's anything to complain about. Do you really need more than that? Do you really want more than that?

steve_a
12th May 2011, 00:33
Hi ktkight,

Things aren't as cut and dry as you might think. If the powers that be are marauding the planet it is because there is high demand in their country. There is ned to have food mountains, just as someone would save for a rainy day in a bank account. In the food mountain case, they are also there to control the price of food, not only to make it higher....... here in Brazil the government released beans on to the market to reduce the prices as the harvest was poor a couple of years ago. Beans make up part of the staple diet of Brazilians. And what about foreign aid? Where do you think foreign aid in the way of dried milk or other staples come from? So, as you can see if the world let go of their food mountains and something bad was to happen, everybody, but everybody would starve. As it is, food mountains are getting more and more difficult to manage.

I'm sure that the whole world population could fit into Australia if the whole world wanted to, but it doesn't. So what are we to do, force them to go to Aus? Of course not. Everybody should be free to go wherever they like, however, not everybody has that freedom and can't afford to travel to the town center never mind to Aus! All those people in Central Africa where the population is increasing in leaps and bounds and they're already in some countries they're already starving to death. So those that can leave and migrate to countries where they're not welcome to send money back home to buy food..... Would it not be more practicable to be able to manage the populations in their own countries?

Your last point we both agree, which is why Gates, Bill and I agree on the slowing down of the population, only those who are not conceived yet. The world is coming to breaking point and it could well be that we would all be extinct if Mother Nature wishes. We just have to exploit her too much, demand of her everything she has just to keep the current population stable. And in ten years time? Do you see where I'm getting at? It's far easier to control something that is adaptable (population) than a thing that is finite, because once it's gone, it's gone.

To answer your last question I think I already did when I wrote about Africa. The highest population growth are in poorer under developed countries. Therefore I'm not too sure about being buried will be the reason for us being here now. I think it's because too many people are having sex. Does that make me seem to be a little jealous?

Right back at you. My thoughts are for you to reflect on.

Best regards,

Steve




Hi steve_a
If you look at it the other way round, that if the PTB were to stop marauding the planet, there would be enough to sustain everyone. There is no need, for instance, to have food mountains -that could be spread around. We all know that it's money/wealth=power that is the main motivator of the PTB and that they do anything to get it.
It has been illustrated that the entire world population could fit into Australia, each with enough space to grow food. There are vast areas of the world that have not been explored.
Also, we have a very close connection with our planet and it would naturally reduce the population if it could not bear it. For instance, there are and have been times when the male sperm count could not produce offspring, or females were naturally barren. I mean, we take so much from our earth and maybe the only way to replenish it is through us when we die and are buried, which might be an explanation for why there are so many of us living now.

I state this just for your consideration.

Bridey
12th May 2011, 02:37
Yes saw that vid regarding this topic a couple months ago......curious that The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in Norway.

Is he encouraging people on earth to have less children or does he agree with killing off a few billion people? Who knows but my gut says the former.
Why did he help fund a 45 million dollar seed vault? Because he knows something we don't regarding earth's future or is it a pro-active approach regarding Monsanto? Who knows?

Calz
12th May 2011, 04:13
Optimum level of global population is always an interesting topic.

If all the hidden technology was released such that the entire environment was purified ... and there was abundant free energy ... and with healthy food and the *real* advances in medicine eliminating disease ... then sure the planet could sustain current levels.

... but then what???

How to maintain a certain level of population? With all those improvements for society the population would soar without a means of leveling growth.

Agree or not with China's "one child policy" at least they are being honest and up front with their people. I find that dramatically better than what is currently being done with vaccines, food and environment.

Lack of honesty and integrity from TPTB/W (insert your own favorite description for the nitwits that fancy themselves "masters of the universe") is perhaps the most annoying and insulting thing of all. At least for me personally. If they would simply come out and say to the world ... "Okay folks listen up. We need to keep a handle on the population levels. Let us sit down and collectively come up with a solution to that problem".

I could deal with that. I am sure most would agree. And is certainly better than the current war,famine,disease paradigm.

As always ... IMHO.

ktlight
12th May 2011, 06:18
Hi ktkight,

Things aren't as cut and dry as you might think. If the powers that be are marauding the planet it is because there is high demand in their country. There is ned to have food mountains, just as someone would save for a rainy day in a bank account. In the food mountain case, they are also there to control the price of food, not only to make it higher....... here in Brazil the government released beans on to the market to reduce the prices as the harvest was poor a couple of years ago. Beans make up part of the staple diet of Brazilians. And what about foreign aid? Where do you think foreign aid in the way of dried milk or other staples come from? So, as you can see if the world let go of their food mountains and something bad was to happen, everybody, but everybody would starve. As it is, food mountains are getting more and more difficult to manage.

I'm sure that the whole world population could fit into Australia if the whole world wanted to, but it doesn't. So what are we to do, force them to go to Aus? Of course not. Everybody should be free to go wherever they like, however, not everybody has that freedom and can't afford to travel to the town center never mind to Aus! All those people in Central Africa where the population is increasing in leaps and bounds and they're already in some countries they're already starving to death. So those that can leave and migrate to countries where they're not welcome to send money back home to buy food..... Would it not be more practicable to be able to manage the populations in their own countries?


Most people, especially those who are starving, cannot afford to save/hoard. I do not think people choose to starve.

I wasn't suggesting that we should all move to Australia, rather, if we look at a world map, we will see the vast areas of land that are not Australia.

And I would rather trust nature than any PTB or Bill Gates. Who are/is they/he to suggest we should not have children? I agree only with self-imposed birth control. I do not accept force.

I was not suggesting that we are here to replenish the planet. I did say maybe. It is just an idea.

As for whether too many people are having sex, are you saying that this is not natural?

And, as for the highest growth, did you forget China?

Again, for your consideration.

Positive Vibe Merchant
12th May 2011, 07:03
Bill Gates might not openly say that he wants to start killing off people, but is a key holder for the seed vault. Now to me that speaks volumes.

What happens when all our natural seeds stop germinating sand we have to resoort to GM? How many believe that good ol' BG will open the door to the vault to help the world out?

Personally I don't think that he will do that for humanity

PVM

Darla Ken Pearce
12th May 2011, 07:09
National Geographic Magazine and TV has probably been one of the biggest conveyors of population control and overkill ever bombarded into the homes of the masses. This fallacy of overpopulation is a crock of BS being cubed and sold as sweet hay.

TPTB have deliberately kept populations crowded and deprived for centuries of the same old ruling class mentality of pure balloon juice. This idea stems from the physical manipulation of goods and resources while denying whole populations and huge groups of people access to their own lands and technology that could provide homes, shelter, food, and medical care without missing a beat. Instead ~ by manipulating minds and promoting ideas of poverty and deprivation they've created this illusion and locked the whole world into this terrible fear of want, need, and a great shortage of resources when there has never been such a thing prevailing on Earth. Ever.

Then when the least little progress is made, along comes another war to kill the young men and now, women, and destroy property that belongs to another. This is pure and unadulterated theft and has caused strife and hardship to all of those involved and it was with deliberate intent to wipe out property, savings, and fabulous resources that should and could have been used to progress and uplift but were instead simply destroyed. So many lives! Over and over again. You build it up and we will come and knock it down. Endless wars.

Can we not all reason and see just in reviewing our historic past. For instance, let's begin with China and its people, and the British coming there with opium and pushing this upon the Chinese. The opium wars, incapacitating huge masses of highly brilliant but now, addicted people. One of the most cruel travesties ever perpetrated on an entire civilization and one of the brightest, oldest, and most honorable ones at that. We do not know the half of it, but this is changing and we will know it soon. All is to be revealed for greater understanding.

So now some of you believe the one child rule, where women abort when they find out their baby is not a son and they only have the one chance and you think this is okay. It's acceptable to you in your high and might seat of judgment over others less fortunate than you are. Daughters have never been honored in China. Or how about the villagers seeing that you are pregnant and grabbing you bodily and forcing an abortion on you. Ripping out that baby from your womb.

This kind of world is acceptable, so Bill Gates can add on a few thousand acres to his land holdings. Well, I could illustrate an endless array of situations that have been created to keep you enslaved but it's too late for that now. There is a choice open for a brief window of time and space.

There are only two choices left. One is to ascend with Earth and the other is to not ascend but go to another 3D planet and continue your journey. Either alternative will work and it's your choice alone.

We will all meet again in an arena out of linear time, so it's not like another 13 million years in 3D will be noticed all that much. We end up together in the end of time, don't we?

If you can find time, read a new post in the spirituality forum called, Human 2.0 ~ Christed Edition ~ Lauren C. Gorgo, as I am running out of breath on this topic.

Yes, you can go out and find horrible conditions but these have been created on purpose and with the darkest intent. To keep people enslaved in a paradigm that states clearly and is continuously brainwashed into the masses that poverty is natural and it's the fault of the people reproducing! That they are sub-human and do not deserve to share the planet with their "betters" and it's ridiculous to any who are caring individuals who can look past their own noses.

Someone earlier mentioned that Australia could house all the world's population and it true but there is more. Texas has enough land to offer each person in underdeveloped countries a house large enough for a family requiring four bedroom houses and still have room to spare.

On a trip I made with my brother across Kansas, I could not believe the endless flat horizon, it stretches into infinity and there wasn't a hill in sight through the whole of that State. Instead fields and fields of corn grown by ConEd loomed forever in every direction and vista. This could well feed the entire world if necessary but it's not being used as food for humans. We have been lied to for so long and taught not to question or think for ourselves as to be handicapped like a returning veteran who comes home with limbs and sight damaged, brain injured and forgotten. Awakening is asked for now.

These injustices are a large part of the 3rd dimensional holographic illusion and we must release these total lies and get them out of our system ~ in order to leave them behind and ascend into something higher and better, where all people find welcome on Planet Earth and where she becomes a beacon to others and where she shines like the brightest of stars you can imagine in the Milky Way Galaxy. She has always offered up her bounty freely not just to all those who choose to incarnate here but those who can freely share in her bounty as a way station, an oasis of the greatest beauty for galactic travelers. Her bounty knows no limits and the prosperity of heaven returns and becomes one with her again. Now.

We came from the higher realms and we are meant to uplift and bring about the great changes in thought that will lead us out of this God Forsaken illusion created over aeons of time which have been fulfilled and we are seeing the end of this paradigm of horror and want now.

Not with more 3D created disasters and illusions but with absolute transformation and upliftment that is now possible, open, and which beckons us to come forth and create something wonderful; a New Golden Age, a Renaissance of Spirit, where our fondest dreams can be made into a new reality. There are so many wonders to explore within our own hearts and minds and upon the New Earth rising. Let us meet again, there or not. Much love! xoxoxox

goldmother
12th May 2011, 09:28
:behindsofa: The Human Depopulation issue is said to be a complected one. Speaking as a mother I would be willing to have only one child if I new that child would have a better quality of living, a longer healthier life, as would most people.

This is what gets to me, just give us the facts, educate the people about the consequences of overpopulation, most people can understand it, we don't need to be KILLED OFF. Just inform the people of the world, how bad things are, that we have to be responsible, if we want children, then we can choose to have them, but only one per couple. IMO as things are right now this idea is not unreasonable

I think the powers that Be should remember the average commoner can be reasonable when given the facts and would accept a Law on one child per couple given the state of the planet at this time. I know its harsh but its better than the inhumane ways of depopulating the planet they are using at present

ktlight
12th May 2011, 11:17
OP can we have a link, please.

The link is provided - youtube.

ktlight
12th May 2011, 11:22
Bill Gates might not openly say that he wants to start killing off people, but is a key holder for the seed vault. Now to me that speaks volumes.

What happens when all our natural seeds stop germinating sand we have to resoort to GM? How many believe that good ol' BG will open the door to the vault to help the world out?

Personally I don't think that he will do that for humanity

PVM

There does seem to be tight controls over the seeds. Hence, the harassment of growers in USA at the moment, no doubt likely to spread to UK pretty soon.

Davidallany
13th May 2011, 06:07
There does seem to be tight controls over the seeds.
Yeh, all the pure seeds are kept in Norway's vault.
5yhF38qQr4E

The One
14th June 2011, 07:50
David Cameron has pledged money that will go towards vaccinating more than 80million children (EPA)
.An extra £814million will be put aside by the government to vaccinate more than 80million children against diseases such as pneumonia and diarrhoea, the prime minister said.

Three children die every minute from pneumonia alone.

The money will help save up to 1.4million lives in the developing world over the next five years.

Speaking at a conference in London, Mr Cameron said: ‘That is one child vaccinated every two seconds for five years.

‘It is one child’s life saved every two minutes. That is what the money that the British taxpayer is putting in will give

Now you would think this is a good thing but The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation conference was attended by world leaders, charities, private companies and philanthropists including Microsoft’s Bill Gates. Mr Gates said his foundation was pledging an extra $1billion (£616million) over the next five years.

8072

Why is this idiot holding up the vacination

from being in control of one of the worlds most powerful companies to wanting to help vaccinate the world poorest nations I just don’t get it. I love a good conspiracy and maybe there is something more sinister about this. Maybe there is something in the vaccinations that will start something or maybe it’s my mind working overtime it won’t be the first time. I just don’t trust this man that’s all

Referee
14th June 2011, 08:05
Bilderberg member Bill Gates is complicit with NWO and TPTWTB . The most concerning thing he is up to is Internet 2 and cloud computing. Soon we will have to buy new computer devices that will only work on the cloud platform where your Hard drive will be on a remote server and to use the internet you will have to sign their user agreement. They are concerned that they can not stop alternative media and they want to shut it down. I hope enough people wake up to this and stop this.

PS I wonder what is really in the vaccines. Why not spend the money on hospitals and clean water?

dukes4monny
14th June 2011, 08:15
6M54QElUTT4

loveandgratitude
14th June 2011, 08:35
BILL GATES - SPOTTED AT THE ANNUAL EVIL GNOMES CONFERENCE
http://www.gardengnomefromhell.com/uploaded_images/evil-bill-gates-715834.jpg

The One
23rd June 2011, 12:07
8183

The new (GMO-DNA) vaccines contain SV40.

Wikipedia, in an article on DNA vaccination includes this reference to SV40:

"The SV40 promoter was conventionally used until research showed that vectors driven by the Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) promoter had much higher expression rates.[2] ... An example of DNA vaccine plasmid is pVAC, it uses SV40 promoter.


The SV40 Cancer Foundation, however, goes into more detail.

"SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or "Live" Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.

"In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.


Children being fed sugar cubes with the oral polio vaccine. Circa 1961.

"Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990's.

Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital said:

"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination."

Hillerman, chief of vaccines at Merck not only validated Bernice Eddy's discovery but he admitted that all Merck's vaccines contain cancer viruses and other viruses and that their Hepatitis vaccine caused the AIDS epidemic in the US.

Dr. Larry Palevsky, a NY board certified pediatrician, agrees as well that vaccines contain viruses and says that most of the viruses in vaccines can not be removed.

The new vaccines are GMO-DNA vaccines. The material that they wish to inject has been genetically engineered (thus GMO) using parts of viruses, cancers, animal poxes, and combined, and are then shot or inhaled or injected into the body, to be "taken up by the DNA" (thus DNA) . This material is meant to affect the body in the most fundamental way possible, by affecting the very coding of the body (the DNA) which controls functions for the existence of the person.

And doesn't SV40's potential uptake by the child or adult's DNA present a much graver danger than previously? Could this cancer virus now become part of the body's coding itself?

SV40 was removed by federal law. So, is against federal law to introduce it into vaccines again? And is it not an extreme threat to anyone taking the new vaccines, to have it taken up by their DNA?

Bill Gates wants every newborn on earth registered for vaccination, with cell phones to alert parents as well as locate people.

The Redmond, Wash.-based company's cofounder and chairman envisioned collecting biometric information on babies via handsets and transmitting the data to a central health registry, which could be used to remind parents about vaccinations. GPS data from the phone could also help guide medical personnel to remote locations to administer vaccines.

Gates imagined trialing the program in areas with low vaccination rates like Nigeria or northern India.

"If you could register every birth on a cell phone-get fingerprints, get a location-then you could systems to make sure the immunizations happen," said Gates. ....

Gate's plan didn't address the privacy implications of a birth database, which could be more or less substantial depending on how the information was structured.

Bill Gates is heavily invested in the new vaccines, that is the GMO-DNA vaccines. His plan would establish a global tracking system of everyone on earth which includes biometric identity information. While it clearly violates fundamental privacy rights as a prelude to violating human rights (i.e. giving governments power to inject things into anyone on earth in the name of "health"), Mr. Gates has come up with a unique marketing device for his own products. His plan arranges to track people down wherever they may be and force his products on them via government agencies

More here http://rense.com/general94/bill.htm

Humble Janitor
23rd June 2011, 13:08
Bill Gates must be stopped.

This is getting more and more ridiculous.

DianeKJ
23rd June 2011, 14:29
Bill Gates must be stopped.

This is getting more and more ridiculous.

Omg, yes he must be stopped. They really put pressure and use a lot of scare tactics on people already in regards to vax's. Can you imagine being tracked down and hounded on your cell phone as well? It was almost impossible to leave the hospital with my newborn daughter withouth the Hep B vax. I even wrote out a birth plan with very specific instructions of No Vax. Luckily my daughter had no issues at birth, and she was able to be with me constantly while there, so there were no "oops" vaccines, which happened to a friend of mine. It's just a nightmare.

TWINCANS
23rd June 2011, 15:02
8183

The new (GMO-DNA) vaccines contain SV40.

Wikipedia, in an article on DNA vaccination includes this reference to SV40:

...
Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital said:

"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination."

Hillerman, chief of vaccines at Merck not only validated Bernice Eddy's discovery but he admitted that all Merck's vaccines contain cancer viruses and other viruses and that their Hepatitis vaccine caused the AIDS epidemic in the US.

Dr. Larry Palevsky, a NY board certified pediatrician, agrees as well that vaccines contain viruses and says that most of the viruses in vaccines can not be removed.

Ho...y expletive! The whole vaccination industry needs to be stopped. This info is way too damning to be swept under the table. Make this go viral please, on behalf of the children.

I read many decades ago that AIDS came from a vaccine developed in a new research facility built in west Africa, using infected monkeys to make the carrier. Apparently the researcher was warned on many occations that the monkeys were infected but he continued on because the stakes were so high financially. He was competing for the contract for the US-wide polio vaccine. But clearly there were other labs using the same infected material.

Maia Gabrial
24th June 2011, 00:36
There he stands so tall and proud. Will he continue to do so when he's being prosecuted for crimes against humanity?

Autumn
24th June 2011, 08:29
Oh no! I'm speachless!

Maia Gabrial
8th October 2011, 21:48
Bill Gates seems to be another one involved with depopulation:

ijOEmtZyWTg

And this 11 year old exposes Monsanto. Cool kid!

nndEZBQ9bds

jackovesk
1st February 2012, 00:41
http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1596947497551&id=601af3133f6a7a568b94df639ddabe6c&url=http%3a%2f%2faftermathnews.files.wordpress.com %2f2011%2f05%2fgates-needle-2.jpg%3fw%3d500%26h%3d334

January 31, 2012

Bill Gates Quote:



"First we've got 'Population' - The world today has 6.8 Billion people, that's headed up to 9 Billion. Now if we do a really 'Great Job' on new 'Vaccines', 'Health Care', Re-Productive Health Services', we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%..!"

Covering Bill Gates’ media conflicts of interest and Andrew Wakefield’s lawsuit against the British Medical Journal for defamation after claiming Wakefield engaged in manipulation and falsification of data and diagnoses after he linked autism to the MMR vaccine.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVHkbhqxj7Q&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVHkbhqxj7Q&feature=player_embedded

PS - I mean C'Mon World, start seeing this 'Psychopathic SCUMBAG' for (What & Who) he really is..!

DeDukshyn
1st February 2012, 00:46
A bit of old news .. that quote was actually from a talk disguised as "climate change" he did for TED a while back. It is important that people realize that the "self proclaimed" elite look down on all you like your existence is a "problem" to be "solved".

modwiz
1st February 2012, 00:53
Bill Gates, he is such a buttnugget. Now, if we could just get him into the toilet and pull the handle. Bye bye Billy.

shadowbox
1st February 2012, 01:08
I honestly have never gotten a weird or bad vibe from Bill Gates.

I really don't think he is evil.

Why should I not feel this way? I trust my intuition very, very much & rarely, if ever, does it steer me wrong.

Can we look deeper into this perhaps?

DeDukshyn
1st February 2012, 01:11
I honestly have never gotten a weird or bad vibe from Bill Gates.

I really don't think he is evil.

Why should I not feel this way? I trust my intuition very, very much & rarely, if ever, does it steer me wrong.

Can we look deeper into this perhaps?

He's not "evil" ... he is owned.

modwiz
1st February 2012, 01:13
I honestly have never gotten a weird or bad vibe from Bill Gates.

I really don't think he is evil.

Why should I not feel this way? I trust my intuition very, very much & rarely, if ever, does it steer me wrong.

Can we look deeper into this perhaps?

Not me. It's the old walking and talking like a duck thing, except buttnugget works better for him. I trust my intuition very much, as well.

BTW, I never said he was evil or am I implying it. Ticks are not evil, they just live off of the blood of others.

astrid
1st February 2012, 01:22
not owned but cloned,
taken over, etc.

modwiz
1st February 2012, 01:42
not owned but cloned,
taken over, etc.

Maybe got microchipped during a vaccination. :pound:

Flash
1st February 2012, 01:50
I honestly have never gotten a weird or bad vibe from Bill Gates.

I really don't think he is evil.

Why should I not feel this way? I trust my intuition very, very much & rarely, if ever, does it steer me wrong.

Can we look deeper into this perhaps?

Not me. It's the old walking and talking like a duck thing, except buttnugget works better for him. I trust my intuition very much, as well.

BTW, I never said he was evil or am I implying it. Ticks are not evil, they just live off of the blood of others.

Modwiz, your picture makes me dizzy (bottom, top, sideways...) lol

modwiz
1st February 2012, 01:59
I honestly have never gotten a weird or bad vibe from Bill Gates.

I really don't think he is evil.

Why should I not feel this way? I trust my intuition very, very much & rarely, if ever, does it steer me wrong.

Can we look deeper into this perhaps?

Not me. It's the old walking and talking like a duck thing, except buttnugget works better for him. I trust my intuition very much, as well.

BTW, I never said he was evil or am I implying it. Ticks are not evil, they just live off of the blood of others.

Modwiz, your picture makes me dizzy (bottom, top, sideways...) lol

I am still reeling from my avatar being abused on you tube by an emotionally disturbed thing. As soon as my world stops spinning, so will my avatar.
My appreciation to all who interceded and mitigated the abuse. As a non celebrity public use of my image, by malicious third parties, is not something I am accustomed to. :bad:

shadowbox
1st February 2012, 01:59
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

modwiz
1st February 2012, 02:18
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

I am aware of a resource problem because of elites, like Gates, wanting to keep making fake money from the control of resources, including software. Various, already developed, energy technologies make resource scarcity a thing of the past. Living anywhere, without despoiling land, will be possible. Overpopulation is directly related to resource allocation, so is therefore a false problem, in an unhidden reality.

Overpopulation of psychopaths is a problem that we might want to address though. I don't think vaccinations is the answer there.

jaybee
1st February 2012, 02:18
PS - I mean C'Mon World, start seeing this 'Psychopathic SCUMBAG' for (What & Who) he really is..!

What a ridiculous thing to say....

and the guy on the video was a jerk

sorry :ohwell:

another...'ooooo aint the world a terrible place' thread from you.

modwiz
1st February 2012, 02:23
[/COLOR]
http://ts4.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1596947497551&id=601af3133f6a7a568b94df639ddabe6c&url=http%3a%2f%2faftermathnews.files.wordpress.com %2f2011%2f05%2fgates-needle-2.jpg%3fw%3d500%26h%3d334

January 31, 2012

Bill Gates Quote:



"First we've got 'Population' - The world today has 6.8 Billion people, that's headed up to 9 Billion. Now if we do a really 'Great Job' on new 'Vaccines', 'Health Care', Re-Productive Health Services', we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%..!"

Covering Bill Gates’ media conflicts of interest and Andrew Wakefield’s lawsuit against the British Medical Journal for defamation after claiming Wakefield engaged in manipulation and falsification of data and diagnoses after he linked autism to the MMR vaccine.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVHkbhqxj7Q&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVHkbhqxj7Q&feature=player_embedded

PS - I mean C'Mon World, start seeing this 'Psychopathic SCUMBAG' for (What & Who) he really is..!

Whoever thought 'revenge of the nerds' would be this bad, eh? :der:

CdnSirian
1st February 2012, 02:23
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

I am going to answer this as a Canadian. There is no over-population. That planet is at present, completely mismanaged.

Eg:. Canada. Most of the population lives within 200 miles south/north of the Trans Canada Highway. Leaving a lot of the country empty. Canada is the second largest country in the world, Russia is #1.

There is a lot of space to occupy, a lot of land to be made arable, with FE making it easy, and as yet is UNDER-populated. I believe this planet can support many more billions. If organized well.

Anyone who got through Gr 6 can do it. That's if we can start over.

jaybee
1st February 2012, 02:25
I honestly have never gotten a weird or bad vibe from Bill Gates.

I really don't think he is evil.

Why should I not feel this way? I trust my intuition very, very much & rarely, if ever, does it steer me wrong.



I agree....I believe that he and his wife are doing their best to help people.

And spending vast ammounts of money to do that.


http://www.gatesfoundation.org/annual-letter/2012/Pages/home-en.aspx

throughout my careers in software and philanthropy—and in each of my annual letters—a recurring theme has been that innovation is the key to improving the world. When innovators work on urgent problems and deliver solutions to people in need, the results can be magical.

Right now, just over 1 billion people—about 15 percent of the people in the world—live in extreme poverty. On most days, they worry about whether their family will have enough food to eat. There is irony in this, since most of them live and work on farms. The problem is that their farms, which tend to be just a couple acres in size, don’t produce enough food for a family to live on.

Fifteen percent of the world in extreme poverty actually represents a big improvement. Fifty years ago, about 40 percent of the global population was poor. Then, in the 1960s and 1970s, in what is called the “Green Revolution,” Norman Borlaug and other researchers created new seed varieties for rice, wheat, and maize (corn) that helped many farmers vastly improve their yields. In some places, like East Asia, food intake went up by as much as 50 percent. Globally, the price of wheat dropped by two-thirds. These changes saved countless lives and helped nations develop.


that's just the first bit....more on link

s3nru
1st February 2012, 02:26
the computation field has a rich history of eugenics based application. google 'IBM and Nazis' for a fun read.

TigaHawk
1st February 2012, 04:38
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

Put "rules" or, a form of coarse you have to go thru, and pass, before you're allowed to have kids.

IE:

the parents relationship is stable and isnt a short thing - a child is a big committment, if a couple cant committ to themselves why have a child?

The parents are given a series of tests, no offense, but our gene pool realy is contaminated with inbreeding (re: USA prefers inbreeding((1st cousin marriage)) over gay marriage) Ensure the parents arnt prime candidates for a Darwin award, and are mentaly fit, patient and understanding enough to look after a child well.

Income and living conditions - alot of people jump blindly into having kids, ie, when they have no income, living with their parents, etc. Parents must have a stable, clean, safe home and enviroment for their kids. The parents should be able to support the child 100% without govt or outside assistance.

1 Parent should be forced to "stay at home" from just before the child is born, untill the child is 10-15 or something. The excuse of parents not raising their children then playing the blame game is appauling, parents need to parent their children, and accept responsibility for their, and their childs actions.

All relationships may not work out 100%, in the case of ones where it just doesnt work out, nomatter what was tried - something needs to be done about how "child payments" are made. Currently they just slap this on the person with the biggest income, regardless if the person works 10hours overtime a week just to get the bigger paycheque. The child should be supported 50/50 by both parents, every of the "child payment" to be audited. This is also abused to hell, with the parents that have custody of the child spending the money on booze or drugs or unrelated stuff, and again the child suffers. this has to stop.


Remove all benefits from having kids. IE you have a baby the govt pay's you $7000. There are SO MANY PEOPLE that have kids just for the money, its not funny. Its not what kids are meant to be about and the child suffers because of it.


This one is probably not going to make me popular... but... Screen.. in a safe.. no invasive way if possible - the embryo/sperm to determin if the child has any
"defects' - ie Downs Syndrome, Cerebal Palsy, Chrons Disease, etc. This also ties in to my comment about our gene pool being messed up as well. If its known a child will be born with downs syndrome or other defects which will screw up their life considerably... "stop/fix" it. It's a hard one for me even, i know people with disabilities and they're wonderfull loving people, but given the option to forsee stuff like that and be able to change it - i'd change it. Trying to dance around the fine line here and hope it can be done just by analyzing a single egg and sperm and deducing what will pair with what which will result in "something" - so there is no abortion or loss of life - just in a way knowing that 1+ 1 = 2 ?





Impliment all of the above and i can guarentee our population count will go down, but not in a bad way. It just prevents/stops all the people whom should not have kids because they are not fit/compitent/mentaly capable/caring, but choose to have them anyway.

Should also improve quality of life greatly for the kids that do come into this world.


^ thats how you address overpopulation. Remove the "breeding like rabbid rabbits" - put a sensible, set of steps/tests that the parents must go thru if they want kids, for the child and parents sake. I have a gut feelign ALOT of people wont qualify to have kids... so....

humanalien
1st February 2012, 07:02
I've know about that, almost from the start but what
i didn't know is the bill bought up a lot of news networks.

Alex Jones way just talking about it yesterday.

ktlight
1st February 2012, 09:02
"Bill Gates' media conflicts of interest and Andrew Wakefield's lawsuit against the British Medical Journal for defamation after claiming Wakefield engaged in manipulation and falsification of data and diagnoses after he linked autism to the MMR vaccine. "

aVHkbhqxj7Q

"'Reports commonly say Bill Gates– through his philanthropic foundation work– is ‘saving lives’ and ‘feeding the world’s poor.’ In fact, the billionaire is made out to be almost a saint.

But there’s no mistaking the genocidal undertones. Hundreds of millions if not billions are living on the edge of starvation at the start of the 21st Century, while a new era of GMO-proliferation and Big Agra domination pose other grave threats– both economic and vital. Thus, it is extremely important that we collectively decide on the best solutions for the future– or at least avoid the worst outcomes; it could prove far too costly in hindsight to pander to the wrong development.'"

jackovesk
1st February 2012, 21:45
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

Get Rid of the Banksters, Govts, Corporations, Big Oil & Open up the Free Energy Patents...

Problem solved...

Come to think of it Overpopulation is a Myth...

astrid
1st February 2012, 22:16
This just crossed my path.
http://www.naturalnews.com/034834_Bill_Gates_sperm_infertility.html

"Mass vaccination is apparently not the only depopulation strategy being employed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, as new research funded by the organization has developed a way to deliberately destroy sperm using ultrasound technology. BBC News reports that the Gates Foundation awarded a grant to researchers from the University of North Carolina (UNC) to develop this new method of contraception.

For their study, the UNC team tested ultrasound on lab rats and found that two 15-minute doses "significantly reduced" both sperm counts and sperm integrity. When administered two days apart through warm salt water, ultrasound caused the rats' sperm counts to drop below ten million sperm per milliliter, which is five million less than the "sub-fertile" range, and stay that way for up to six months.

The report claims the technology is for contraceptive purposes only and not for causing sterility. However, Dr. James Tsuruta, who led the research, told reporters that it is unclear whether or not the technology can cause long-term damage, and that more research is needed to determine whether or not repeated ultrasounds cause permanent damage."

Hmmmmmm

More in above linked article.

DeDukshyn
2nd February 2012, 00:20
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

I am going to answer this as a Canadian. There is no over-population. That planet is at present, completely mismanaged.

Eg:. Canada. Most of the population lives within 200 miles south/north of the Trans Canada Highway. Leaving a lot of the country empty. Canada is the second largest country in the world, Russia is #1.

There is a lot of space to occupy, a lot of land to be made arable, with FE making it easy, and as yet is UNDER-populated. I believe this planet can support many more billions. If organized well.

Anyone who got through Gr 6 can do it. That's if we can start over.

Waaay back in college I did much study into non linear equations. I came across a formula that calculated max population of a few variables. I don't recall really how it worked or what all the input variables were even but when I did it for humans on earth it worked out to ~11 billion (addition: it stabilized at 11 after a peak of 13). I didn't ever really seem to understand the formula - the fact that it made a reasonably likely number gave me faith - take it with a grain of salt.
Our population isn't yet a problem, our ability to be controlled and the link of that to our population is the problem. I can't recall who said this (paraphrased): "500 years ago it was infinitely easier to control a million people than to kill them, today it is infinitely easier to kill a million than to control them."

The oceans have krill - billions of tonnes of krill. A valid food source. Monsanto can keep their lame GMO seeds and "super bees" -- let's go eat something else ... ;)

Maia Gabrial
2nd February 2012, 01:43
Bill Gates has been very blessed and his way of saying thanks is to murder people. Didn't I hear that Microsoft is having financial difficulties? There is a God....

EnergyGardener
2nd February 2012, 01:58
Would be easy enough to do at TSA airport x-ray machines. Now let's see, line up the gonads / ovaries and "zap".....

Now, we know their real purpose?

WhiteFeather
2nd February 2012, 03:47
What a crock pot! I really used to like this guy, now he gives me the creeps. Watch the first few minutes of this imbeciles perspective on giving children vaccines to save lives. Sorry we aren't buying it Bill. You JackAss.!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Gi6cf-jiI&feature=related

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Lying POShyte.

Cjay
2nd February 2012, 04:03
Would be easy enough to do at TSA airport x-ray machines. Now let's see, line up the gonads and ovaries and "zap".....

Now, we know their real purpose?

Ovaries are gonads... but we know what you meant.

WhiteFeather
2nd February 2012, 04:07
Who made this Ass Clown Ambassador of Vaccines? It had to be Boy George Bush, Or Don Osmond Rumsfeld perhaps.

WhiteFeather
2nd February 2012, 04:20
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???
Why ruin a good thing here. Bill Gates and The Us Government have it under control. Depopulation control that is.

DreamsInDigital
2nd February 2012, 04:39
He's probably a Robitoid or Synthetic now...it happens when you see figures like this turn 180's unexpectedly.

etm567
2nd February 2012, 05:01
What a crock pot! I really used to like this guy, now he gives me the creeps. Watch the first few minutes of this imbeciles perspective on giving children vaccines to save lives. Sorry we aren't buying it Bill. You JackAss.!

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Lying POShyte.

It really is tragic, because I think vaccines can do a great deal of good, if they're not contaminated with bull****. I for one believe that the HIV virus was in the hepatitis B vaccine. And the vets of the first Gulf War that got so sick got sick with some mycoplasma, Mycoplasma fermentans incognitus, created by friends of the Bush/Baker clan in Texas.

I'm not entirely sure, but I think vaccines do not have to be bad. But yes, I believe today in the hands of Baxter Labs and their ilk, they are entirely evil.

jcocks
2nd February 2012, 06:37
So, how DO we address overpopulation then???

Put "rules" or, a form of coarse you have to go thru, and pass, before you're allowed to have kids.
etc...
.

Do you realise just how slippery that slope you've decided to traverse there is??? Before you knew it, the only people able to have kids would be the ones TPTB wanted to have kids (ie themselves) and all other childbearing would be forbidden or artificiallly halted.

I know you had the best of intentions in coming up with that idea, but surely you realised that it would be misused against us?

Mulder
2nd February 2012, 06:59
The first thing we can do is STOP buying anything from Microsoft, Skype, & Gates' other companies. Then we can target other companies like Coca Cola & bankrupt them all!

WhiteFeather
2nd February 2012, 15:15
He seems like a modern day Hitler, IMO.

Nerge
6th February 2012, 12:41
Link to full article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering


"A small group of leading climate scientists, financially supported by billionaires including Bill Gates, are lobbying governments and international bodies to back experiments into manipulating the climate on a global scale to avoid catastrophic climate change.

The scientists, who advocate geoengineering methods such as spraying millions of tonnes of reflective particles of sulphur dioxide 30 miles above earth, argue that a "plan B" for climate change will be needed if the UN and politicians cannot agree to making the necessary cuts in greenhouse gases, and say the US government and others should pay for a major programme of international research."

It's very nice of them to 'propose' these geo-engineering methods are used, don't you think? Awefully considerate of them to ask!

*pay no attention to those chemtrails that have been above our heads for years* :)

solosthere
6th February 2012, 13:10
we all know that they have been doing this for years. The thing that scares me is they do these experiments and there are unseen efects that they did not and could not predict. This is scary to me. Maybe we should just statr treating our mother the right way and then we wont have to worry about it!!!!!!!!!!

Maia Gabrial
6th February 2012, 19:33
I say leave nature and the Earth alone. They've been around alot longer than Bill Gates and all the morons that follow him. Nature has always been able to take care of itself.
To Gates and the murderous ones like him I'd say, "Stop interfering with the Earth and her inhabitants, morons!"

pugwash84
6th February 2012, 21:20
maybe if he concentrated on his job and not giving vaccines vista wouldn't have flopped hahahahaha

MMA_Fan
6th February 2012, 21:35
He asked hundreds of scientists for their ideas on how to reduce deaths from diseases in the third world and vaccines were part of the solution.
Bill Gates has helped save thousands of lives and given billions from his own pocket to help.

TargeT
6th February 2012, 22:49
He seems like a modern day Hitler, IMO.

Bill gates was handed the microsoft empire (stolen from various sources)

Mark Z. was handed the Face book empire (stolen from variou ssources)

I feel that both of these actions happened by trend watching.. a trend was spoted (personal computing) and an empire set up with the "right guy" in charge... social media was the same way...

you see this is how easy it is to control a population, you simply find out what is popular and ALREADY HAPPENING, then take advantage & pre-position "your guy" at the top so you can continue to steer society with the right "mind sets" at the top.

this is all my opinion of course.... but its based in facts (research the start of both those companies... very shady stuff)

Vaccines are the same way, a trend is noticed that polio is on its way out, vaccines are produced and hailed as the "cure" (even though the "cure" was just improved hygine & indoor plumbing...)


its not quite the problem/reaction/solution format, it's even more insidious IMO...... its taking credit for what was already happening, or guiding credit into a maliable Figure head (such as B. Gates & Mark Z.)

gooty64
7th February 2012, 00:38
tgVvkayVBi0

Marin
7th February 2012, 01:27
As many of us already know, the FDA, the CDC, Big Pharma, AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics) and the public health authorities are all VERY powerful entities promoting their own agenda. Researchers like Dr. Wakefield suffer the consequences when their studies run counter to the interests of vaccine makers. Ask yourself, Is Dr. Wakefield really in a position to make money or are the pharmaceutical companies to the tune of billions of dollars?

Having worked as a molecular biologist/geneticist, including time spent on a non-profit Autism Gene Bank, I have a pretty good barometer for what's good science and what's not. The campaign waged against Dr. Wakefield, in my opinion, is simply a smear campaign.

Here's a link to a thread where I've highlighted some of the vaccination issues:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?22237-Vaccines-What-happened-behind-closed-doors.-The-story-you-haven-t-heard.&p=237265&viewfull=1#post237265


Micheal Murphy, director of the film, "What in the World are they Spraying" has highlighted evidence of Bill Gates's investment in geoengineering:

• Aluminum resistant gene patent # 7582809

• Patent granted on September 1, 2009

• Patent developed at the Robert W. Holley Center for Agricultural Health at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY.

• Leon Kochian and Jurandir Vieira de Magallhaes are the primary inventors/ researchers

• Patent assigned to US Department of Agriculture and Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research

• According to Cornell University Chronicle Online, the research project was supported in part by the McKnight Foundation Collaborative Crop Research Program, the Generation Challenge Program, the National Science Foundation and the USDA.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a contributor to both the McKnight Foundation and the Generation Challenge Program.

Why is the the Aluminum resistant gene patent # 7582809 important?
"In 2008, samples around California’s Lake Shasta and the Pit River Arm tributary were tested in a State Certified Lab following weeks of fly-overs and chemtrails. The results of the water samples showed 4,610,000 parts per million of aluminum ― 4610 times the maximum contaminant level. At another pond, filled with filtered water and confirmed to contain “0″ aluminum, test revealed 375,000 parts per million of aluminum (375 times the maximum contaminant level) after only 18 months exposure to the aerial spraying. The usually pristine snow pack from the Ski Bowl area of Mt. Shasta showed 61,000 parts per million of aluminum."

Our water, soil and air are becoming increasingly more toxic and organic seeds can no longer grow under these conditions. As a result, more farmers are asking for GM seeds. Coincidentally, a research group, funded by Monsanto, has a patent for growing aluminum resistant GM seeds: patent #7582809.


Community Alliance for Global Justice
http://www.infowars.com/gates-foundation-invests-in-monsanto/[/b]
August 27, 2010

"Farmers and civil society organizations around the world are outraged by the recent discovery of further connections between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and agribusiness titan Monsanto. Last week, a financial website published the Gates Foundation’s investment portfolio, including 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock with an estimated worth of $23.1 million purchased in the second quarter of 2010 (see the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission). This marks a substantial increase from its previous holdings, valued at just over $360,000 (see the Foundation’s 2008 990 Form).

The Foundation’s direct investment in Monsanto is problematic on two primary levels,” said Dr. Phil Bereano, University of Washington Professor Emeritus and recognized expert on genetic engineering. “First, Monsanto has a history of blatant disregard for the interests and well-being of small farmers around the world, as well as an appalling environmental track record. The strong connections to Monsanto cast serious doubt on the Foundation’s heavy funding of agricultural development in Africa and purported goal of alleviating poverty and hunger among small-scale farmers. Second, this investment represents an enormous conflict of interests.”

Monsanto has already negatively impacted agriculture in African countries. For example, in South Africa in 2009, Monsanto’s genetically modified maize failed to produce kernels and hundreds of farmers were devastated. According to Mariam Mayet, environmental attorney and director of the Africa Centre for Biosafety in Johannesburg, some farmers suffered up to an 80% crop failure. While Monsanto compensated the large-scale farmers to whom it directly sold the faulty product, it gave nothing to the small-scale farmers to whom it had handed out free sachets of seeds. “When the economic power of Gates is coupled with the irresponsibility ofMonsanto, the outlook for African smallholders is not very promising,” said Mayet. Monsanto’s aggressive patenting practices have also monopolized control over seed in ways that deny farmers control over their own harvest, going so far as to sue—and bankrupt—farmers for “patent infringement.”

Transnational corporations like Monsanto have been key collaborators with the Foundation and AGRA’s grantees in promoting the spread of industrial agriculture on the continent. This model of production relies on expensive inputs such as chemical fertilizers, genetically modified seeds, and herbicides. Though this package represents enticing market development opportunities for the private sector, many civil society organizations contend it will lead to further displacement of farmers from the land, an actual increase in hunger, and migration to already swollen cities unable to provide employment opportunities. In the words of a representative from the Kenya Biodiversity Coalition, “AGRA is poison for our farming systems and livelihoods. Under the philanthropic banner of greening agriculture, AGRA will eventually eat away what little is left of sustainable small-scale farming in Africa.”

Referee
7th February 2012, 11:47
Gates is funding this maddness. I have heard they are nanoparticles that self-replicate

T9kBOrvhqfw

centreoflight
7th February 2012, 12:21
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzW5Kb8u0Og&feature=g-all-f&context=G2f62589FAAAAAAAACAA

Before I opened the Avalon site I watched the above video. Sofia Smallstorm introduces primary and scientific findings hidden in the muffles of mainstream media. Eugenics is a term from the 50s and is now called TransHumanism.

Aetheric Traveler
7th February 2012, 13:32
It is not hard to see the Evil desired outcome of this human experiment.

Piezo electric effects from these crystals formed in the human body can/will be created when people in the environment are subjected to Electromagnetic Fields and Radiated Wavelengths/energies.

Since the desire of of the PTB is to chip everyone, creating a population of chipped humans with nanocrystalline piezoelectric sensitivities, then, people will be subjected to the will of the Inner Circle of the Powers That Be electronically with incredibly insidious potential results.

Imagine.......... you have been chipped with a Hybrid Radio Frequency Identification chip that does not just make it possilbe for you to be tagged, number and indentified.

You will also have nanotechnological electrically active and receptive fibers throughout the entire hemoglobin blood network of every cell of your body that can be made to respond or react to the frequencies you are subjected to by the artificially transmitted external environment as well as the chip implanted within you.

You will become a controllable/ programmable flesh robot with no ability to express you own will since the red blood cells in your body will be vibrated in a manner which serves someone else, not you.

The ability to destroy/kill a person with a select frequency of EMR will also exist.

Cell phone towers are already subjecting you to EMR of an unhealthy kind, but what about the reactive fibers in people's bodies?

People are talking about wanting to be physically and mentally transformed by technology, but who is going to control that technology? Certainly not the same people who have screwed up the gov'ts, banking systems and social order!!!

This is Borg Engineering to control population, free will and most importantly to eliminate the ability of people to revolt against the PTB.

Now, I'm pissed!!!
AT

Maia Gabrial
8th February 2012, 00:59
So, let me ask the big question: Why is Depopulation and Geoengineering, chemtrailing, GMO's not considered PREMEDITATED MURDER? It definitely is that. They plan out how they're going to do away with people and do it. Normal people would go to prison for this. I say Bill Gates and all of these like-minded creeps should be locked up in prisons or in psycho wards.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/06

Enough already! :wizard:

jackovesk
8th February 2012, 17:41
http://rense.com/1.imagesH/gates(R).jpg

pugwash84
8th February 2012, 18:40
that picture is so funny lmao!

conk
9th February 2012, 19:32
At a bare minimum it's reckless endangerment, but I tend to agree with your assessment Maia. Whatever its label, its a criminal act.

Calz
27th February 2012, 02:18
Bill Gates is the Sperminator (cartoon)

Friday, February 24, 2012
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com


(NaturalNews) What do you call a guy who is obsessed with destroying human sperm and depopulating the planet? The Sperminator, of course.

Much like the Terminator played by Arnold Schwarzenegger in the movies, the Sperminator is a highly-intelligent death machine that seeks to use high technology to destroy humanity's future.

See the full-size "Sperminator" cartoon at CounterThink.com:
http://www.counterthink.com/Bill_Gates_is_the_Sperminator.asp

When it comes to Bill Gates and his dehumanization agenda, it's hard to even know where to begin: GMOs? Vaccines? Chemtrails? Genetically engineered mosquitoes?

Bill Gates has even funded a technology that can sterilize a human man by blasting his scrotum with a high-frequency ultrasound device. Bing! (http://www.naturalnews.com/028853_ultrasound_fetus.html)

That's where the idea for this cartoon came from, by the way. Word!

Microsoft has also teamed up with Merck, becoming a global "drug development partner" with the world's larger vaccine manufacturer. (http://www.naturalnews.com/034848_Microsoft_Merck_eugenics.html) As if we didn't already have enough blue screen of death in our lives, just wait until we start getting psychiatric drugs patented by Microsoft. Can you imagine the psychotic side effects of something like MS-Prozac? "Don't worry, you brain will reboot after it downloads and applies 47 update patches at the most inconvenient time imaginable. Do not disconnect power during this process..."


The Sperminator says: Kill the humans!

You read it right: Microsoft is now in the pharmaceutical business. And their focus is gene-targeting technology that could theoretically be used to develop race-specific bioweapons that, for example, kill only people of a certain color.

Then again, Bill Gates' depopulation agenda doesn't seem to be race specific... it's more like "Kill all humans" much like the Terminator in the first film. Hey, maybe Bill Gates will use his billions of dollars to build a time machine that transports him back into humanity's early origins where he can destroy the entire future of the race by vaccinating a young male child named John Conner.

None of this is a joke, by the way. The cartoon may be satire, but Bill Gates' depopulation agenda is 100% true. This is a guy who openly admitted on stage in front of a live audience that if society does a "really great job" with vaccines and health care, we can "lower the population by perhaps 10 to 15 percent." Watch that video yourself right here:
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723

Or read our report on this at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html


The Great Culling is upon us

The global depopulation agenda, you see, is hiding in plain sight. The monsters who are pushing to depopulate the planet are telling you right out in the open how they're planning on killing you. VACCINES, get it? HEALTH care, okay? These are the words Bill Gates uses right in plain sight.

It's all a big IQ test to see if you're paying attention enough to save your own life and avoid being part of the "great culling."

Check out that new documentary, by the way, at: www.TheGreatCulling.org

And above all, remember that if you are reading this, you ARE the resistance.

Spread the word. Stay alive. Avoid being "depopulated" by vaccines, GMOs, chemical food additives and pharmaceuticals. And most of all, avoid being "sperminated" by Bill Gates.


14184

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/035059_Bill_Gates_depopulation_Sperminator.html#ix zz1nXoQ6XBd

DNA
27th February 2012, 02:29
I have a question.

What do we do about the fact that the population of the planet is currently reaching a tipping point of disasterous proportions?

What if through the lack of a population awareness program the oceans become toxic waste, the forests become a distant memory and the wildlife of the earth is confined to a zoo?

If there was a choice between depopulation through covert derfertitility programs or the mass genocide of the masses through introduced diseases, war and starvation,,,I think I'll take the covert action to curb the birth rate.

If one takes the long view, one might look at Bill Gates as the ultimate humanitarian.

Lost Soul
27th February 2012, 02:34
Man's chemicals cesspools combined with radioactive waste will create a disease that can kill mankind better than Bill Gates' funded projects. Unless we raise our vibration and take care of our eart mother, the worse is yet to come

WhiteFeather
27th February 2012, 02:41
I have a question.

What do we do about the fact that the population of the planet is currently reaching a tipping point of disasterous proportions?

What if through the lack of a population awareness program the oceans become toxic waste, the forests become a distant memory and the wildlife of the earth is confined to a zoo?

If there was a choice between depopulation through covert derfertitility programs or the mass genocide of the masses through introduced diseases, war and starvation,,,I think I'll take the covert action to curb the birth rate.

If one takes the long view, one might look at Bill Gates as the ultimate humanitarian.

Maybe we can get some answers on how to clean up this gem from our star friends, I'm sure they encountered this before in a nearby galaxy perhaps.

Calz
27th February 2012, 02:46
I have a question.

What do we do about the fact that the population of the planet is currently reaching a tipping point of disasterous proportions?

What if through the lack of a population awareness program the oceans become toxic waste, the forests become a distant memory and the wildlife of the earth is confined to a zoo?

If there was a choice between depopulation through covert derfertitility programs or the mass genocide of the masses through introduced diseases, war and starvation,,,I think I'll take the covert action to curb the birth rate.

If one takes the long view, one might look at Bill Gates as the ultimate humanitarian.

The "elite" ... lest we not forget ... have plans to hit their DUMBs and let whatever earthchanges (natural or otherwise) reduce us useless eaters topside.

If the "long view" was expected to be "business as usual" then there could be such a case made (although it could certainly be done in a more honest, humane and loving manner). Yes, birth control done with integrity would be far preferable to murder and ecological insanity.

jorr lundstrom
27th February 2012, 02:52
I have a question.

What do we do about the fact that the population of the planet is currently reaching a tipping point of disasterous proportions?

What if through the lack of a population awareness program the oceans become toxic waste, the forests become a distant memory and the wildlife of the earth is confined to a zoo?

If there was a choice between depopulation through covert derfertitility programs or the mass genocide of the masses through introduced diseases, war and starvation,,,I think I'll take the covert action to curb the birth rate.

If one takes the long view, one might look at Bill Gates as the ultimate humanitarian.

Maybe we can get some answers on how to clean up this gem from our star friends, I'm sure they encountered this before in a nearby galaxy perhaps.


Well WF, in Alien mind by Bouno there are a lot about how this problems
are handled in other places. Not an uncommon problem. Link below.

http://exopoliticshongkong.com/uploads/Alien_Mind_a_Primer_book.pdf

A lot of other interesting stuff in there too. LOL


http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/tt81/sakasvattaja/Winged_craft_similar_to_Anunnaki.jpg


Jorr

Omni connexae!
27th February 2012, 02:54
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

WhiteFeather
27th February 2012, 02:56
Thanks Jorr, just downloaded it. Looks like a good read.

DNA
27th February 2012, 06:28
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

Dude,,,,really?

Bottom line, there are too many people in the world. China isn't a devoloping nation, India has been around for thousands of years. These countries may be extreme examples, but as far the world is concerned, there is a carrying capacity with any eco-system, and the carrying capacity of the earth is as of yet unknown. But, it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

gripreaper
27th February 2012, 06:52
Enlil and Enki are sitting around the fire and Enlil says: I'm sick and tired of having to clone these workers so let's give them the ability to reproduce by themselves. Enki says, hey bro, that's a bad idea. One day were going to have to deal with that if you do. Enlil wins the argument. Fast forward a couple million years and here we are. The same bloodline elites which are descendant from these extraterrestrial geneticists are now faced with their manipulation of the indigenous species of this planet, and they have their genocidal plans in place. The indigenous species of this planet were in perfect harmony with nature. You see any other aspects of nature which are not in harmony?

The only way to overcome this manipulation of the genome is to ascend into the higher vibrations and reignite the DNA strands which were turned off. From that vantage point we would hopefully be able to come up with solutions which are humane and in balance with nature.

Simonm
27th February 2012, 08:10
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

Dude,,,,really?

Bottom line, there are too many people in the world. China isn't a devoloping nation, India has been around for thousands of years. These countries may be extreme examples, but as far the world is concerned, there is a carrying capacity with any eco-system, and the carrying capacity of the earth is as of yet unknown. But, it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

To be fair, it's not an issue. There was a cracking article pointing out that every man, woman and child alive today could ALL live in an area the size of Australia within about an acre of land each and STILL have enough space left for newcommers. I'm trying hard to find it again, but can't at the moment. Problem is, majority of people want to live in or around cities and thats the issue.

Calz
27th February 2012, 08:14
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

Dude,,,,really?

Bottom line, there are too many people in the world. China isn't a devoloping nation, India has been around for thousands of years. These countries may be extreme examples, but as far the world is concerned, there is a carrying capacity with any eco-system, and the carrying capacity of the earth is as of yet unknown. But, it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

To be fair, it's not an issue. There was a cracking article pointing out that every man, woman and child alive today could ALL live in an area the size of Australia within about an acre of land each and STILL have enough space left for newcommers. I'm trying hard to find it again, but can't at the moment. Problem is, majority of people want to live in or around cities and thats the issue.

I expect Gaia could support this many people ***IF*** we as the human race were being good stewards and using our many resources to maintain a healthy environment rather than the current nonsense.

IMHO

Simonm
27th February 2012, 08:21
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

Dude,,,,really?

Bottom line, there are too many people in the world. China isn't a devoloping nation, India has been around for thousands of years. These countries may be extreme examples, but as far the world is concerned, there is a carrying capacity with any eco-system, and the carrying capacity of the earth is as of yet unknown. But, it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

To be fair, it's not an issue. There was a cracking article pointing out that every man, woman and child alive today could ALL live in an area the size of Australia within about an acre of land each and STILL have enough space left for newcommers. I'm trying hard to find it again, but can't at the moment. Problem is, majority of people want to live in or around cities and thats the issue.

I expect Gaia could support this many people ***IF*** we as the human race were being good stewards and using our many resources to maintain a healthy environment rather than the current nonsense.

IMHO

Thats the problem isn't it. Not space or even resources, but bad management by us.

Omni connexae!
27th February 2012, 08:27
...the planet is currently reaching a tipping point of disasterous proportions...


Bottom line, there are too many people in the world.


it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

On what basis are you making these judgements?

Global Fertility rates (the average number of children a woman has over her childbearing years) have been falling pretty significantly in the last couple of decades. Since 1965, fertility rates have dropped by about half to 2.47. Since the current global replacement rate (the number of children the average woman who lives through her childbearing years must have to maintain an even population) is currently at 2.33, it only needs to decline a relatively small percentage before a drop in population becomes inevitable. It won't happen immediately because of how fertility rate is calculated, but as long as fertility rate is below the replacement rate for a significant length of time, the drop will happen.

This decline in fertility rates is strongly collated with falling infant mortality rates and higher education rates for women.

Here is a chart showing a ratio between fertility rates and infant mortality. Each circle represents a country where accurate records are kept.

In 1960:
http://i41.tinypic.com/lxme0.png

In 2009:
http://i43.tinypic.com/p25hv.png

Source. (http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&ctype=b&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=s&met_y=sp_dyn_tfrt_in&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&met_x=sp_dyn_imrt_in&scale_x=lin&ind_x=false&ccm=uni&ifdim=country&tunit=Y&pit=1260421200000&hl=en&dl=en&uniSize=0.03500000000000001&iconSize=0.5&icfg)

So what does all this mean? It means that the overpopulation crises will likely be very short lived, if there is one at all. Most projections I've seen show world population peaking around the 2050's, and then falling.

Still, we could have a population peak of up to 9 billion, which is a considerable number of people to feed/cloth/take care of. Not insurmountable, but it could be a rough few decades before the problem self-corrects. You must also consider that the exponential technology development we are witnessing, the "Carrying Capacity" of our earth continues to grow. Examples: we're continuously improving the efficiency and quantity of the food we produce. The same can be said with energy....different methods of harnessing energy and resources for our use. Either way, the "overpopulation apocalypse" mantras are getting stale.

MSM loves telling us there's an huge global overpopulation crisis, alternative media loves playing on this too, coming up with stuff like "TPTB are trying to depopulate us!!!!1" and such nonsense, surely we learned something from Malthus? He couldn't have dreamed of the technologies we have today. In a similar vein, we can barely dream of the technologies that will be around in 20 years, and what will be possible in food production/energy.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpEWwIb0Xxg

DNA
27th February 2012, 08:50
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

Dude,,,,really?

Bottom line, there are too many people in the world. China isn't a devoloping nation, India has been around for thousands of years. These countries may be extreme examples, but as far the world is concerned, there is a carrying capacity with any eco-system, and the carrying capacity of the earth is as of yet unknown. But, it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

To be fair, it's not an issue. There was a cracking article pointing out that every man, woman and child alive today could ALL live in an area the size of Australia within about an acre of land each and STILL have enough space left for newcommers. I'm trying hard to find it again, but can't at the moment. Problem is, majority of people want to live in or around cities and thats the issue.

All that addresses is space. How about the room for landfills on that acre. Where is the tire landfill going to be? Do you know how quick that acre would fill up with garbage, sewage and toxic by-products?
Each human generates an incredible amount of trash and pollutants.


The topic of this thread is Bill Gates funding seruptitious methods for decreasing fertility, to decrease the over all birth rate and the population of the planet.

This has been going on for years really. Inoculation cocktails decreasing fertility are nothing new. Additives and preservitives in food are doing this as well.

The evidence is there everytime you hear a report about a new animal going extinct, the plastic island floating in the pacific, the fact it is unsafe to eat the food from the oceans, monsanto engineering seeds so they won't need pesticide because bugs won't eat them and some how we don't understand how the bees are disapearing. The disapearing rainforests. The disapearing ozone




Mankind is just getting warmed up baby. We have only had technology distinguishing us from our ancestors for a hundred years or so.

Cjay
27th February 2012, 09:15
If we cleaned up our act, eliminated pollution and environmental destruction and found ways to use the resources of the Earth 10 times more efficiently, then theoretically (simplistically), the Earth could support 10 times the current population. Of course there is a limit to the number of people Earth can support, sustainably, because the Earth is finite. Some say the Earth is growing. If so, does that mean the carrying capacity of the planet is also growing?

Factoring in quality of life, not only for humans but for all creatures, the concept and the calculation becomes a lot more complicated.

Even if we find a new planet like Earth and then another and another, there would still be an upper limit to the population that could be supported on four (or more) Earths.

I think we are capable of finding a balanced solution without genocidal population reduction, without murdering our daughters (such as in India and China) and without NWO Sperminator type nonsense. I hope we grow up soon and learn to co-operate for our common good.

Simonm
27th February 2012, 09:22
Global overpopulation is not an issue. The issue of overpopulation is with developing nations. The solution to overpopulation in these nations is development of education/infrastructure/communication and such.

Dude,,,,really?

Bottom line, there are too many people in the world. China isn't a devoloping nation, India has been around for thousands of years. These countries may be extreme examples, but as far the world is concerned, there is a carrying capacity with any eco-system, and the carrying capacity of the earth is as of yet unknown. But, it is my guess that if the current population leveled off and did not grow by one person, it would be sufficient to end nature on this planet as we know it within 20 years.

To be fair, it's not an issue. There was a cracking article pointing out that every man, woman and child alive today could ALL live in an area the size of Australia within about an acre of land each and STILL have enough space left for newcommers. I'm trying hard to find it again, but can't at the moment. Problem is, majority of people want to live in or around cities and thats the issue.

All that addresses is space. How about the room for landfills on that acre. Where is the tire landfill going to be? Do you know how quick that acre would fill up with garbage, sewage and toxic by-products?
Each human generates an incredible amount of trash and pollutants.

.

Hence the comments by OC and myself. Bad management IS the issue.

Bryn ap Gwilym
27th February 2012, 11:35
Everyone has an answer to reduce the alleged over population problem, but I don't hear one of them stepping forward to volunteer that their life should be extinguished along with every member of their family & all of their future generations.

Oh no. These people are standing well clear of the line as they make damned sure that they push & keep all others in front of them as they protect their own self superior pompous butts...

All those who think the world is over populated & the population needs to be reduced. Please man up & step forward as you volunteer to help reduce the population with your sacrifice.

jcocks
27th February 2012, 13:48
What riles me about issues such as this are that the very technologies that can fix this mess are being witheld from us by the same people who tell us there is a problem in the first place...

IMHO, the task of cleaning this mess up is an impossible task for as long as we continue to use polluting technologies such as internal combustion engines to move us around and coal / gas / nuclear powered power stations to generate our electricity. And let's not forget the huge megaships that belch out diesel fumes like no tomorrow.....

Unless we addreess these issues, our efforts to clean up the pollution will be inneffectual. That's not to say that we can't all do our bit to help, but just that that's not **ALL** we should be doing.

CdnSirian
27th February 2012, 15:58
"Thats the problem isn't it. Not space or even resources, but bad management by us. " The management simply is not organized for the benefit of the planet. I'll bet a Grade 8 class could come up with a plan to support the planet and everyone on it. No, make that Gr 5.

The resources are here, the money is here, but it is not in the hands of "ordinary people" who will work for the benefit of all.

gripreaper
27th February 2012, 16:28
What riles me about issues such as this are that the very technologies that can fix this mess are being witheld from us by the same people who tell us there is a problem in the first place...

IMHO, the task of cleaning this mess up is an impossible task for as long as we continue to use polluting technologies such as internal combustion engines to move us around and coal / gas / nuclear powered power stations to generate our electricity. And let's not forget the huge megaships that belch out diesel fumes like no tomorrow.....

Unless we addreess these issues, our efforts to clean up the pollution will be inneffectual. That's not to say that we can't all do our bit to help, but just that that's not **ALL** we should be doing.

Bingo. Get rid of the resource scarcity paradigm of control by the globalist elite banksters, which under the fiat monetary debt system requires us to cannibalize our environment to survive, and a whole new paradigm opens up where population begins to stabilize. Work on the primary issue and the secondary issues are not so daunting.

That means control by the oil and electric cartels be broken and the free energy released to the masses. Heck, that technology has been around for at least 100 years, it just doesn't fit into the existing paradigm of control of the masses by the few who see themselves as God's, descendant from the very genetic manipulators of us.

Maia Gabrial
27th February 2012, 18:13
Then again, Bill Gates' depopulation agenda doesn't seem to be race specific... it's more like "Kill all humans" much like the Terminator in the first film. Hey, maybe Bill Gates will use his billions of dollars to build a time machine that transports him back into humanity's early origins where he can destroy the entire future of the race by vaccinating a young male child named John Conner.


Please Calz_Avaretard, don't give them any ideas like that! Billy boy is evil enough as it is! Let's see if he and the rest of his ilk will hang themselves with their own ropes....
I affirm that THEY will be the ones who will be culled from our population! And I stand by this!

percival tyro
27th February 2012, 19:27
Ouch!... Hope I make the grade.

rgray222
15th May 2012, 23:01
SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. — Melinda Gates recently announced a “new crusade” for her $32 billion Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. A recent Newsweek interview with Michelle Goldberg says it’s a “decision that is likely to change lives all over the planet.”

Gates has “decided to make family planning her signature issue,” by investing “billions to revolutionize contraception worldwide,” with substantial economic consequences.

The Gates decision will “be hugely significant for American women.” She’s “pouring money into the long-neglected field of contraceptive research, seeking entirely new methods of birth control,” a “whole new class of drugs,” some that could even work without hormones, and others, might be implantable devises that never need to be removed, can even be turned on and off by the woman.

The good news: Gates is already in high gear “teaming up with the British government to co-sponsor a summit of world leaders in July in London, to start raising the $4 billion the foundation says it will cost to get 120 million more women access to contraceptives by 2020.”

And that’s huge: Last year the entire pharmaceutical industry made a total of $67.4 billion in all their research, including cancer and heart, plus the cost of developing a single new drug can exceed $1 billion. So Gates $4 billion in new research for women’s health care makes Melinda Gates perhaps the biggest player in the future of pharmaceuticals worldwide.

Commercial opportunities: Drug sales of $15 billion to $36 billion annually

Moreover, we know investing in R&D can have huge payoffs, creating major new marketing and sales opportunities for the commercial drug world. $4 billion of new research is certain to leverage up several times with new business opportunities not only for the pharmaceutical industry, but for clinics, hospitals and medical professionals.

For example, Newsweek says that Pfizer’s Depo-Provera is already the most “popular in many poor countries because women need to take it only four times a year.” So you do the numbers: If 120 million new women users chose Depo-Provera, at an estimated average cost between $120-$300 per woman annually, that works out to $15 billion to $36 billion in new sales annually, a nice payoff from leveraging $4 billion in research money.

Gates’s research commitment may be one of the most significant health-care decisions of the new century. As Gates put it, when she realized “what needed to get done in family planning, I finally said, OK, I’m the person that’s going to do that.” Now she hopes to lead the charge and “galvanize a global movement.”

With this commitment, if Gates succeeds in these plans the global economic, social, cultural and political landscape will be dramatically altered, with women gaining more power over their own health care.

Economic ripples: 120 million potential new women entrepreneurs

We’ve all heard about how all across the globe, especially in developing, emerging and poor countries, new banking institutions are making microloans (small loans to poor people with no credit or collateral). This new industry stepped into the global spotlight back in 2006 when Muhammud Yunus, an Indian economics professor turned banker, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, along with his Grameen Bank, for their groundbreaking efforts with microloans, creating a new class of micro-entrepreneurs worldwide.

So we expect the Gates $4 billion research investment will add more stimulus to this microloan phenomenon and increase membership in this new class of entrepreneurs.

In a well-documented feature on women’s health, population growth, birth control and family planning back in 2010, the editors of Mother Jones magazine, Monika Bauerlein and Clara Jeffery, wrote:

“Every tiny improvement in the status of women, every bit of education for girls, translates into women having more control over their fertility, which translates into family sizes that match parents’ means and wishes, which in turn means more opportunity for the next generation — a virtuous cycle of enormous potential” and economic prosperity.

WhiteFeather
15th May 2012, 23:11
LMFAO. Bill the Bull Shyte Artist.

tenacity1
15th May 2012, 23:48
eugenics it doesn't come in a smallpox blankets anymore, it comes smiling at you thru these darn boxes of evil that transmit thoughts. Gates and his ilk are shills for the NWO

jackovesk
17th May 2012, 09:05
When the SHTF Bill & Melinda Gates will be on an unexpected Early Retirement...:yes4:

GoodETxSG
17th May 2012, 10:04
Ya know, they are some really weird and evil people... I am ashamed I ever worked at Microsoft... How did he go from being a garage PC geek, to stealing other people’s ideas to being a Luciferian Mass Murdering billion air in such a short period of time? Talk about a transformer, he must have popped out of his momma and had his horns shaved off and his tail nipped ASAP, they just forgot the FANGS!

:flame:

¤=[Post Update]=¤


eugenics it doesn't come in a smallpox blankets anymore, it comes smiling at you thru these darn boxes of evil that transmit thoughts. Gates and his ilk are shills for the NWO

I do not doubt it, when working there the CIA back doors and oddly placed code depicting the devil was puzzling back then, not so much now...

Maia Gabrial
17th May 2012, 18:17
Some people just don't know what to do with all their money.... Some people use it for drugs and eventually kill themselves with it. But the Gateses will use their wealth to kill others.... How UN-NOBLE of them.... Give the Gateses' money to people who WILL solve this nonexistent overpopulation problem without harming a hair on anyone's head. WE can show them how to use the money wisely.... IMO!

bluestflame
17th May 2012, 21:11
anticipating an "accidental" side effect of the planned contraception drugs to be either long term sterility or "second generational" sterility , where it skips a generation and our children are unable to have children :(

that would be the sneaky way to achieve thier agenda

remember bill gates was investing heaps into robotics and nanotechnology

toad
17th May 2012, 22:14
I dont get the problem? Whats so wrong with new contraception research?

Positive Vibe Merchant
18th May 2012, 00:02
I think the problem that in all likelihood there will be 'side effects' that will cause sterilization, preventing children being born.

it isn't as far fetched as one might seem. Gates has been into Eugenics for some time.

PVM

Ellisa
18th May 2012, 00:48
I agree with Toad. What on earth is wrong with extending the use of safe, affordable contraception to the women (and possibly men) of the Third World and elsewhere who are desperate to limit their family size?

Positive Vibe Merchant
18th May 2012, 00:55
is not the condom with 99.9% effiecieny, combined with some other form of contraception not good enough?

are we so lazy that we need a pill or a jab that last a year so we can just forget about it?

Ellisa
18th May 2012, 03:38
Condoms do not give women the assurance that they need. So the answer to your question is ---Yes- we do need a pill or jab so that the other half of the couple can use your suggested "some other form of contraception" to ensure complete protection from accidental pregnancy, which is something only one half of the participants is going to have to deal with.

bluestflame
18th May 2012, 23:20
the gates's have also been advocates of the utilisation of vaccinations to help reduce the population , which adds a different slant to thier interest in contraception marketed cleverly as "empowering women"

Hervé
19th May 2012, 00:15
"Empowering" women is the Lizzies' newspeak for total control of the human species

According to Alex Collier, that is the way the Grays had been had: the Lizzies genetically modified the female of their species to the point they couldn't reproduce anymore and from then on were at the mercy of the Lizzies' cloning technology in order to "survive" as a species.

Debra
19th May 2012, 00:31
I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.

Just like the financial system - keeps millions in debt.

Get off the platform! It is true what they say about the Mac .. when you get one, you never look back.

*post update*

So, instead of investing even more money into protective measures to curb the rate of child birth, when there are plenty around already, why are they not giving money to protect children already here ??? And in peril !

Seriously, what do Americans really say about this?

Arrowwind
19th May 2012, 00:50
[B]“Every tiny improvement in the status of women, every bit of education for girls, translates into women having more control over their fertility, which translates into family sizes that match parents’ means and wishes, which in turn means more opportunity for the next generation — a virtuous cycle of enormous potential” and economic prosperity.

There's lots I could say about this article but I decided to just attack this one point.
Here in the USA women have had access to fairly reliable birth control for at least 2 generations now.
What I am seeing is that our children, who were more chosen than anytime previously in history,
are not receiving more economic opportunity and clearly studies show that the current youth of today, under 35
should anticipate a quality of life that is much less than their parents.

We worked harder, with two parents working, spent less time together as a family and our children in general are not doing better for our sacrifices.

So I call Bull ****.

toad
19th May 2012, 04:33
I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.


Oh come on now, as if Steve Jobs didnt steal ideas? OSX is also prone to virii, and is becoming more and more so, OSX just wasnt nearly popular enough for anyone to really care enough to design malware for it, but that is quickly changing.

The Truth Is In There
19th May 2012, 09:08
Condoms do not give women the assurance that they need. So the answer to your question is ---Yes- we do need a pill or jab so that the other half of the couple can use your suggested "some other form of contraception" to ensure complete protection from accidental pregnancy, which is something only one half of the participants is going to have to deal with.

pregnancy is supposed to happen when people have sex, otherwise mother nature would have made sure it won't. people who develop chemicals for population control, be it vaccines or contraceptives, should be fed their own stuff first, just like any doctor should first test a medicine on him/herself before prescribing it to patients. that would be a beneficial form of depopulation.

for people who need sex but don't want to bother with kids there are various natural means to prevent pregnancy, no one needs chemicals. people are just being told they do and then wonder why they get "unwanted" (from their pov) side-effects.

Maia Gabrial
19th May 2012, 15:50
There are so many worthy causes they could be focused on, like cleaning up the air, food and water. Like making life better for ALL people, not just the frigging elites and their chosen butt kissers..... Eugenics is not right. I think that most people don't understand life to begin with, let alone the Divine Plan....

Food is being INTENTIONALLY destroyed for this nonexistent overpopulation problem. Naturally, destroy the food and water, create a "shortage" and people will die. Quite a few people have already been deceived into believing this STAGED problem is the only reason why people have died of starvation....This is PREMEDITATED MURDER in my opinion.

If these two "concerned" really want to help anyone, then they should use their money and influence to prevent the destruction of and the tampering of the food supply. Maybe they could use some of their superior education in finding solutions to housing "problems", too. Instead they want to be the ones to find ways to control the population. Sounds NWO to me....

I don't have much confidence in people like the Gateses....

Debra
19th May 2012, 16:44
LOL, you are probably right about Steve Jobbs, toad.
But I speak from experience of the last wonderful 4 years of continuous mac usage - I AM CLEAN. All macs, including my original and my more recent puchases, are purring away. And no protection.
After the nightmares I had with a PC and microsoft prior to turning over, I wonder why I put myself through it all ;)




I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.


Oh come on now, as if Steve Jobs didnt steal ideas? OSX is also prone to virii, and is becoming more and more so, OSX just wasnt nearly popular enough for anyone to really care enough to design malware for it, but that is quickly changing.

toad
19th May 2012, 16:59
LOL, you are probably right about Steve Jobbs, toad.
But I speak from experience of the last wonderful 4 years of continuous mac usage - I AM CLEAN. All macs, including my original and my more recent puchases, are purring away. And no protection.
After the nightmares I had with a PC and microsoft prior to turning over, I wonder why I put myself through it all ;)




I am a proud Mac user. Gates in my view has been a sneaky little stealer from way back. So, I am not surprised.

The virus has always been with Microsoft. They have created systems that need it, and through down the line interests in companies that make virus protection software, they keep users in an endless cycle of paying for protection.


Oh come on now, as if Steve Jobs didnt steal ideas? OSX is also prone to virii, and is becoming more and more so, OSX just wasnt nearly popular enough for anyone to really care enough to design malware for it, but that is quickly changing.


O right don't get me wrong, there is no comparison between the ability to infect and compromise security, but as more and more people use osx it is changing. Just look at the new flashback malware that infected over 600,000 mac computers in the month of may alone. I used to use osx all the time I loved it, but once I went full nerd back in the day I'll never use anything but linux. :D

GCS1103
19th May 2012, 17:01
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. They are a recognized "partner", along with the Rockefeller Foundation, to the World Health Organization (WHO), which is an agency of the United Nations and these foundations donate an enormous amount of money to it. Through the WHO, these foundations now have a large voice in the agriculture industry and big Pharma, all in the name of "humanitarian purposes".

An interesting article, backed by facts, can be found at: www.naturalnews.com (in a piece dated February 29, 2012 entitled "Bill Gates, Monsanto and Eugenics: How one of the world's wealthiest men is actively promoting a corporate takeover of global agriculture") for a better picture of The Gates Foundation and what they are attempting to accomplish. NWO, population and food control; it's right here.

Hervé
19th May 2012, 19:44
For some history to be found under a few carpets...


The American Eugenics Movement Predated the Nazi One

Eugenics or Democracy
by Katherine S. O'Keefe
Full book free online at http://www.eugenics-watch.com/eugbook/euod_ch1.html (http://www.eugenics-watch.com/eugbook/euod_ch1.html)

“In 1930 John D. Rockefeller and John D. Rockefeller Jr. were members of the American Eugenics Society. Furthermore, in the Twenties Raymond Fosdick, an important official of the Rockefeller Foundation, was a member of the American Eugenics Society Advisory council. In this period the Rockefeller Foundation gave money to build quarters for Ernst Rudin, the man who later wrote Hitler's 1933 Sterilisation Law.(6) As co-founder with Alfred Ploetz of the German Eugenics Society, Rudin claimed credit as the inspiration for all Hitler's racial laws, including the Nuremberg laws which made Jews second class citizens in Germany.(7) In the early part of the century Mrs. E.H. Harriman, who inherited the fortune based on the Union Pacific railroad, created the Eugenics Record Office. Her endowment helped fund the work of Harry Laughlin, the director of the Eugenics Record Office. Laughlin wrote the Model Sterilisation Law which Nazi eugenicists used as a model for their 1933 Sterilisation Law. He accepted an award from Heidelberg University honouring him for his part in developing this law.(8) He was also an important witness at the Congressional hearings on the Johnson Act, the immigration Act which began the policy of national immigration quotas. Such initiatives became a terrible trap for the Jews in the late Thirties. The Johnson Act ultimately resulted in the exclusion from America of the Jews attempting to flee Nazi Germany and its racial laws - laws inspired by Laughlin, Rudin and other eugenicists….

Followed these Quota Acts which said to the world: America, still overwhelmingly Nordic, proposes so to remain! These acts began a gigantic eugenic experiment in population control."(9) After this came the genocide. That which we now call genocide was then called eugenics.(10) Auschwitz showed the world the true face of eugenics. Yet some among the wealthy continued to support it.(11) For example, we find the names Rockefeller and Harriman, supporting the introduction of abortion and contraception, the means of eugenics. John D. Rockefeller III gave Margaret Sanger money with which to develop a contraceptive. Mrs. E.H Harriman's son was Averill Harriman, Governor of New York in the Fifties. Harriman allowed Robert Moses to follow a policy of letting Harlem deteriorate. (See Robert Moses and the Fall of New York., Robert Caro) It was then possible for the next governor, Nelson Rockefeller, to speak of the dreadful conditions in Harlem and the need for contraception and abortion as a solution for the problems of the people trapped there. Hence, in the Sixties, abortion, a eugenic goal, came to be seen as "progressive" in New York State. In the early Seventies, Nelson Rockefeller signed one of the first state law allowing widespread abortion, and the Rockefeller family gave money for the first legal abortion facility in New York State.... http://www.eugenics-watch.com/roots/chap10.html (http://www.eugenics-watch.com/roots/chap10.html) John D. Rockefeller's leadership in the Population Council was not the first Rockefeller foray into eugenics. When Alexis Carrel wrote his book advocating euthanasia institutions with a suitable gas for exterminating various people, he was on the staff of the Rockefeller Institute. The Rockefellers financed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in the 1920s, and provided funds for Ernst Rudin for genetic research in the 1920s. ...

A feminist author, Germaine Greer, commented on the post-war movement, saying: "It now seems strange that men who had been conspicuous in the eugenics movement were able to move quite painlessly into the population establishment at the highest level, but if we reflect that the paymasters were the same -- Ford, Mellon, Du Pont, Standard Oil, Rockefeller and Shell -- are still the same, we can only assume that people like Kingsley Davis, Frank W. Notestein, C. C. Little, E. A. Ross, the Osborns Frederick and Fairfield, Philip M. Hauser, Alan Guttmacher and Sheldon Segal were being rewarded for past services." In other words, the population control movement was the same as the old eugenics movement -- the same money, the same leaders, the same activities -- but with a new excuse. …”


Eugenics and the Nazis -- the California connection
by Edwin Black (chronfeedback@sfchronicle.com) author of the award-winning IBM and the Holocaust and the recently released War Against the Weak http://illuminati-news.com/nazi-california.htm (http://illuminati-news.com/nazi-california.htm)


“In California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little-known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing….Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans….

Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.

Stanford President David Starr Jordan originated the notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle "Blood of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood.

In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation's social service agencies and associations.

The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject them to deportation, confinement or forced sterilization.

The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz….

The most commonly suggested method of eugenicide in the United States was a "lethal chamber" or public, locally operated gas chambers. In 1918, Popenoe, the Army venereal disease specialist during World War I, co-wrote the widely used textbook, "Applied Eugenics," which argued, "From an historical point of view, the first method which presents itself is execution . . . Its value in keeping up the standard of the race should not be underestimated." "Applied Eugenics" also devoted a chapter to "Lethal Selection," which operated "through the destruction of the individual by some adverse feature of the environment, such as excessive cold, or bacteria, or by bodily deficiency."

Taken from Sue Arrigo's Case 22A Were the US Troops Fed Poisonous Beverages on Purpose? at http://www.mediafire.com/?cex0oynxsj0 (http://www.mediafire.com/?cex0oynxsj0)

Maia Gabrial
20th May 2012, 13:53
All they have to do is change the name of their organizations and people somehow get fooled into believing they're different. The Eugenics program was changed to "Family Planning"....Isn't that special?

And as I've been sayingall along (sarcastically) how the Rockefellers are sooooooo special.... not.

toad
20th May 2012, 15:30
Ever read the book children of men? or I think there is a movie aswell. great lil story.

bluestflame
2nd September 2012, 10:27
never once was I or ANYONE I KNOW consulted about this not once i think that says a whole lot about what's really behind this "cover story" for what they are really up to

bill gates links to nanotech , eugenics and vaccinations are a little sus

truth4me
2nd September 2012, 11:04
Hey Bill,how bout some pie?

iK6SS8CXYZo

DeDukshyn
29th September 2012, 00:21
In a rude backhander to my friends, in order to present things differently so that maybe....just maybe... the message might get through, I phrase it differently, the odd time.

I say.."look at the fluoride, the fumes, the plastic chemicals, the toxic fertilizers, the toxic food ingredients, the radiation, the degradation of soils, the loss and pollution of the water table, the toxic air, the aspartame, the bisphenols, the vaccines, and the GM foods with toxins built in....think of it all as a silently delivered intelligence test."

"With pretty hard 'black and white' pass-fail conditions."


While years too late for my comment to matter much ...

In secret, I humour this POV -- and I think many still didn't even notice the backhander. An easy choice is being presented. Ball is now in our court -- If I understand this post correctly ;) ;)

baddbob
4th December 2012, 22:51
Bill Gates unveils his vision for the world's energy future, describing the need for "miracles" to avoid planetary catastrophe and explaining why he's backing a dramatically different type of nuclear reactor. The necessary goal? Zero carbon emissions globally by 2050.
opjpZTzKIWs

Tesla_WTC_Solution
4th December 2012, 23:20
thank you for this!
three years ago when I ranted to my family and to prisonp about this topic, most people just laughed.

Then when AJ announced the Sulfate Aerosol geoengineering program was spearheaded by Gates,
no one was laughing. No one laughed when they dumped iron into the Canadian west coast waters and within the two weeks there was a 7.7m earthquake there.

Did you know Gates is funding boats that can steer hurricanes, too?
I wonder if they vote. Because hurricane Sandy sure seemed to know how to rock the polls...

Mr. Gates reminds me of a juggler -- except most of the pins are dog turds.
Didn't Michael Crichton warn us all about philanthropy gone wild?

:dizzy: :frusty: :blabla:

Paul
4th December 2012, 23:59
Bill Gates unveils his vision for the world's energy future, describing the need for "miracles" to avoid planetary catastrophe and explaining why he's backing a dramatically different type of nuclear reactor. The necessary goal? Zero carbon emissions globally by 2050.
This is the rather infamous TED Talk of Bill Gates from Feb 2010, in which he speaks of using medical advances such as vaccines to reduce population growth. See for example Bill Gates Talks ‘Vaccines to Reduce Population’ by F. William Engdahl (http://www.financialsensearchive.com/editorials/engdahl/2010/0304.html)

DeDukshyn
5th December 2012, 00:19
Bill Gates unveils his vision for the world's energy future, describing the need for "miracles" to avoid planetary catastrophe and explaining why he's backing a dramatically different type of nuclear reactor. The necessary goal? Zero carbon emissions globally by 2050.
This is the rather infamous TED Talk of Bill Gates from Feb 2010, in which he speaks of using medical advances such as vaccines to reduce population growth. See for example Bill Gates Talks ‘Vaccines to Reduce Population’ by F. William Engdahl (http://www.financialsensearchive.com/editorials/engdahl/2010/0304.html)

Beat me to it! thanks! ;)

The tech is available, the questions for the elite is "how can we implement the coming demend for better energy solutions while still retaining control over monetary, corporate, and political faculties?"

I see that Bill is being "guided" tohelp implement a problem-reaction-solution scenario that is "better" but not better then anywhere near it could be -- "thank you for selecting, the lesser of evils presented"

Although, things are changing so fast let's see where we are in year ;) I bet it will be 100% different, and in a better direction (cleaning the house sometimes makes a bigger mess - allow it).

Just some thoughts ;)

Tesla_WTC_Solution
5th December 2012, 00:52
I can't keep track of how many Honeypots that man's got his mitts in, sorry LOL

XD

P.S. I should not say this here, but google Horatio L Gates, the general who betrayed Arnold and Washington and countless unremembered others, and compare that picture you find to the portrait of Gates Sr who is still living. lol

spitting image

DeDukshyn
5th December 2012, 01:11
Just for fun ... ;) Not quite ... but almost ... could well be related though .. look at the ear .. that is interesting .. ;)


http://c7.valuewalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/billg4_web1.jpg

Tesla_WTC_Solution
5th December 2012, 04:45
LMAO where did you get that one??

Haha, I meant Gates' dad, the old one, not the spry one...
He looks JUST like Horatio.

Jr. on the other hand looks more like Hillary Clinton imo.

XD

one sec

HERE hahaha

http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/5707/gateslol.png

_______________________________

hm i swerved off topic.

Here are some social geo engineering links:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1926137

Framing the Social, Political, and Environmental Risks and Benefits of Geoengineering: Balancing the Hard-to-Imagine Against the Hard-to-Measure


Gareth T. Davies
Free University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law

May 26, 2011

Tulsa Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:
In recent decades a number of scientists and writers have suggested techniques which could be used to lower the temperature of the earth and thereby counteract man-made global warming. Such techniques are commonly called geoengineering: engineering the earth.

The proposals have attracted a range of reactions. Environmental groups have generally been hostile, seeing geoengineering as a dangerous distraction from the only real solution — reducing emissions. Scientific and academic writers have been less definite, with the most common standpoint, almost a consensus, being that geoengineering may be necessary as a last resort if dangerous climate tipping points approach, but that, because of its risks, everything should be done to avoid this situation. Emissions reduction, almost all writers agree, is far preferable. Insofar as there is any enthusiasm for geoengineering, it is largely based on pessimism that such reduction will actually occur and a perception that geoengineering is a lesser evil than unfettered warming.

This paper challenges that “lesser evil” consensus. It may be that geoengineering is undesirable, and only desirable as a last resort. But it may also be that it could make a useful contribution to an optimal welfare outcome for humanity. One cannot take a firm position on the basis of the current limited research. Thus it is not yet possible to argue that geoengineering is part of the solution to climate change, but the widespread assumption that it is relatively undesirable is without basis too.

This paper analyses and critiques that assumption, using the idea of risk-benefit analysis. It suggests that as well as scientific and environmental issues, established ways of thinking about nature, sustainability and social progress are implicated in attitudes to geoengineering, often implicitly. Until these attitudes are more openly examined and unpacked it will not be possible to reach a rational or sustainable consensus over the most preferable policy options.

http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/

About Us

The Oxford Geoengineering Programme was founded in 2010 as an initiative of the Oxford Martin School at the University of Oxford.

Geoengineering - the deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth's natural systems to counteract climate change - is a contentious subject and rightly so.

The Oxford Geoengineering Programme seeks to engage with society about the issues associated with geoengineering and conduct research into some of the proposed techniques. The programme does not advocate implementing geoengineering, but it does advocate conducting research into the social, ethical and technical aspects of geoengineering. This research must be conducted in a transparent and socially informed manner.

The University of Oxford is involved in three major projects on geoengineering funded by the UK Research Councils.

They are: The Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals (IAGP) in partnership with The University of Leeds, Cardiff University, Lancaster University, University of Bristol, University of East Anglia, The Tyndall Centre and the UK Met Office; Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) in partnership with The University of Bristol and Cambridge University; and Climate Geoengineering Governance (CGG), a recently announced Oxford-led project in partnership with The University of Sussex and University College London which will examine the governance and ethics of geoengineering.

http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering.asp

The results of the NERC public dialogue on geoengineering have been published, and the full report can be downloaded below. A leaflet summarising the top-level findings in the report is also available.

Geoengineering dialogue final report (868KB)

Geoengineering dialogue leaflet (1·36MB)

The dialogue was also evaluated independently. The final evaluation report is available below.

Geoengineering evaluation report (1·28MB)

Background
NERC carried out a public dialogue on geoengineering to assess public opinion on how future research relating to the subject should be directed, conducted and communicated. We worked in partnership with Sciencewise-ERC, which supports public dialogue activities in government.

As the recent Royal Society report on geoengineering states, the best way to tackle climate change is by cutting emissions of greenhouse gases. However, the report notes that "Unless future efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are much more successful than they have been so far, additional action may be required should it become necessary to cool the Earth this century."

Therefore we need to research different potential geoengineering options and their environmental, social and regulatory implications.


If it's based in the UK you know it has to have something to do with a tax..
in this case, a carbon tax :heh:

p.s. for laughs, a comparison of the two most powerful females on earth (that we know of):

the merkelator vs. billary the conqueror

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3351/pussinboots.png

grannyfranny100
5th December 2012, 16:47
Paul
Thanks for reminding us of his eugenics inspired TED talk. Gates is beloved by many but IMO he is a real snake.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
6th December 2012, 17:19
Sadly he was invested in:

Abbott labs (baby formula); the ingredients are not safe for infants any longer. Too much corn syrup solids for the baby liver!
Also the DHA is made kind of dirty, and also yeast produce the vitamins, and vitamin A palmitate is not absorbed by damaged or young guts.

British Petroleum; Mr. Gates added about, 15 million shares to his portfolio, EXACTLY before macondo well exploded, oops.
Not sure what to think about that one.

Waste Management Inc; Gates put money into that last year or 2010, not sure. WMI was part of the Gulf oil spill coverup.
Rumor was they trucked the Corexit waste to private inland dumps while keeping journalists at bay by gunpoint.

Vaccine industry: Gates is the most visible proponent of vaccines I know of. He went on CNN after Jenny did a year back.
He said those of us who oppose forced vaccination of hyper sensitives "kill children".
He actually said, "WELL YOU KNOW, they kill children".
He can't even take ownership of his statements!!!!!!!!
Please read about African children vaccinated at gunpoint, I don't know how to about that rumor! could it be??

GOVERNMENT GATEWAY; world justice project portal spearheaded partly Sr. Gates.
Government gateway is a microsoft access point to records of gov't staff and medical records of plebes.
It's already taken over India, UK, and Saudi Arabia. Keep your eyes open for computerization of jobs,
Keep eyes open for denial of services. Security leaks.
I don't think BAE systems was willing to work with gov't gateway because their files are dirty.
It's the MOTB guys. lol @.@

GEO-ENGINEERING; gates is invested heavily in sulfate aerosols that kill plants and in hurricane directing boats so blacks die instead of whites, roughly.
I don't know what the point of steering a hurricane is unless you are invested in real estate. change is positive and FEMA is already building shelters very similar to the ones I myself designed: domes that can withstand stress. Hopefully not rape domes though.


I need to cut him a break though.
He was mistreated at the dinner table by his father and we cannot expect him to bring anything to ours.

RedSnow
9th January 2013, 03:31
Bill Gates unveils his vision for the world's energy future, describing the need for "miracles" to avoid planetary catastrophe and explaining why he's backing a dramatically different type of nuclear reactor. The necessary goal? Zero carbon emissions globally by 2050.
opjpZTzKIWs Okay, I hate to make this my first comment on PA, but I'm hearing an Oliver Twist twist: 'More Sir, may I pleaseeeee have more?' I think BGs is a huge mouth piece for a 'new technology' that will only kill most of us in the end because in the 'end' if his love for vaccines don't do the masses in, it will be this weird 'unexplained' energy endeavor of his that he actually can't explain...are people actually believing this? If anyone cares to take the time to look up the stats on CO2 emissions worldwide, you're going to be surprised if you do the math right! I really don't like that he is reading from a monitor, either. Essentially, he is disregarding any 'green' approach and I believe that is the only safe path. Peace Out. P.S. What's with the 'We'? DO NOT BUY IT! I wish monopolies would just go the hell away....I'm using candles and turning the lights off.

Positive Vibe Merchant
9th January 2013, 23:26
But isn't Bill Gates looking after our kids with the Bill Gates foundation, and having a hand in vaccinating the children? :P

The thing that we all need to also keep in mind, and the reason why things get so massive, is that the higher you climb, and the more wealth you create, the more you can outsource parts of your life. Specifically, I seriously doubt Gates has 100% control over what his money goes in to. I am sure he has financial people who steer and direct upon his 'I want to continue creating wealth, so get me the highest returns' approach. When he actually stands up and comments on things, and becomes a part of it, you know he is behind it.

not defending him in any way, but the picture is bigger.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
23rd January 2013, 16:12
I think Hip Hipnotist was following this shot stuff, but look at this horrible one, found it on prisonplanet but it's from natural news I think.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/at-least-50-african-children-paralyzed-after-receiving-bill-gates-backed-meningitis-vaccine.html


At least 50 African children paralyzed after receiving Bill Gates-backed meningitis vaccine


Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
Jan 23, 2013

Bill and Melinda Gates have been on a crusade for at least the past decade to vaccinate every single child on the planet. And one of their primary geographical targets has been the continent of Africa, where poor sanitations and lack of clean water have created conditions in which diseases like meningitis and malaria run rampant. But rather than try to meet these basic needs, the multi-billionaires and their many allies have instead thrust vaccines on indigenous populations as the solution, which has in turn sparked a wave of paralysis among Africa’s younger populations.

As covered by investigative journalist Christina England over at Vactruth.com, the small village of Gouro in northern Chad, for instance, recently fell victim to the dark side of this vaccine agenda after at least 50 youth in the area developed paralysis following vaccination with “MenAfriVac,” a new meningitis vaccine developed specifically for Africa. Touted as a preventive cure for meningitis, MenAfriVac reportedly caused each of the children, some of whom were as young as seven, to suffer hallucinations, convulsions, and ultimately paralysis.

According to a cousin of two of the vaccine-injured children, the horrific side effects of MenAfriVac began to appear within 24 hours of its administration. Many of the children affected by it immediately began to experience headaches and vomiting, which later progressed into “uncontrollable convulsions while bent over with saliva coming from their mouths.” But when parents and local authorities tried to call on higher-up government officials to take action and help the affected children, their petitions for relief were all but ignored.

Government of Chad attempts to bribe parents into silence
This same cousin, who is referred to by England as “Mr. M.,” added that when Chad’s Minister of Health and Minister of Social Security finally showed up to Gouro nearly a week after the series of paralyzations first took place, they decided to evacuate the 50 paralyzed children to a hospital more than 300 miles away, as there is only one available doctor in the entire region of Gouro.

But rather than try to get to the bottom of why MenAfriVac caused such a serious reaction in the first place, and immediately halt all further distribution of the vaccine until this could be determined, these same government officials actually tried to bribe suffering parents with money to keep quiet about it. According to Mr. M., these officials were more concerned with covering up the dangers of ManAfriVac than with protecting villagers from harm.

“[T]he government and the media have gone silent about the tragedy, while there are still facts requiring clarification,” stated Mr. M. in an email to England about the incident. At this point in time, virtually no media has picked up on this important story. “All this disturbs us and makes us fear the worst effects for the future. [I]t is very sad that (the) entire city is paralyzed.”

Gates Foundation, WHO lie about safety of MenAfriVac
Worse is the fact that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization (WHO), and The Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP), all of which heavily promote MenAfriVac, have openly lied about the safety of the vaccine by repeatedly claiming it can be transported without refrigeration. The vaccine’s package insert clearly states that it must be stored refrigerated and protected from light.

“Why have major organizations spent $571 million on a vaccination project, when wells to provide access to clean drinking water have been constructed for less than $3,000 by the International Committee of the Red Cross?” asks England in a series of important questions regarding this disastrous situation. “Why has this vaccination program not been suspended, (and) what are these organizations going to do about the atrocity that has happened in Gouro?”




Never again will I be sorry that I opposed that man!!!!! (Gates) on my website!

__________________________________________________ ______________
¤=[Post Update]=¤

Please also look at: http://www.prisonplanet.com/undervaccinated-children-have-better-health.html

also by naturalnews.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/undervaccinated-children-have-better-health.html

Undervaccinated children have better health

Eleni Roumeliotou MSc
Natural News
Jan 23, 2013
The controversy about the efficiency and necessity of vaccines is well known. While conventional medicine advocates the use of vaccines, it also ignores the variety of toxic substances that vaccines contain and compromise the immunological responses. At the same time that medical authorities push for compulsory vaccinations, new data proves that these artificial immunization strategies simply do not work as they are supposed to. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that undervaccinated children have better health, as it is indicated by the frequency of outpatient and emergency hospital visits.
The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of alternative immunization schedules, which promote “a spacing out, a delaying, or a forgoing of at least some vaccines” against all official guidelines from institutions, such as the American Academy of Family Physicians, The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Children, who followed such an alternative immunization schedule, were compared to children who received the approved vaccines in a timely manner. The groundbreaking study observed data (2004-2008) from more than 320,000 children, aged two to 24 months. Undervaccinated children were found to have significantly fewer outpatient and emergency visits to the hospital, in comparison to age-appropriately vaccinated children. Also, the authors found that despite the immense political, corporate and medical pressure for forcing vaccinations, the undervaccination trend is growing strong, with more and more parents opting out of the vaccination schemes for their kids.

http://www.fromoldbooks.org/Cassell-MagazineOfArt/pages/337-St.-George-and-the-Dragon/337-St.-George-and-the-Dragon-q75-961x1217.jpg

Tesla_WTC_Solution
23rd January 2013, 17:10
PLEASE read about the Ugandan antibody dependent dengue that was paraded as Ebola during the olympics last year,
and please please please PLEASE read about AFRICAN NODDING DISEASE, which is caused by vaccine reaction enabling worms to leave longer in the human host, leading to seizures, slow starvation, and death.

in almost all cases the african gov't know the truth but are paid off or too afraid to tell the world, they have to fight WHO and the UN and everyone in front of Gates before they get to Gates... :(

Did you know that Benedict Arnold, the famous turncoat, called Horatio L Gates "Granny Gates", and the family resemblance is very strong!? He said that Gates was a desk pilot who stood behind better men while other generals led the charge.

the modern gates is the same!! bahahah

Lifebringer
23rd January 2013, 17:49
In my book, I was unable to publish and was told to write, there was a Kenyan country where a young doctor working under a pharmaceutical clinic for "HIV immune booster shots" the shots were tainted with the AIDs virus of a very virulent strain, to get the resources and land, that they had already sold to a conglomerate group for a new golf course in African East Coast for Elites.

Interesting that the same way this guy is getting busted connected to the "foundation/FIRM" of a secret society, the same way. In my book, the doctor gets caught by a US mistress working with problem pregnancy as a volunteer and funded by her friend in US she went to college on a VISA with. She has an affair with a British officer who came to their area because of rapes and to protect the tent city. She became pregnant and had to use the same clinic, I mean, why would she think there was something wrong. The British officer went home to explain that he's not staying in London when he's finished his term, but returning to help her and be with his child. She is in contact with him by phone, and since they aren't married yet, felt no need to explain this affair with the head doctor treating her during her pregnancy. She has the child, and he administers an immuno booster vaccine, supposedly to boost her iron levels and such. She immediately within 3 month comes down with 3 stage HIV. Thing is this doctor worked for the "firm" and was pushing the vaccine as a biological war weapon to depopulate various areas of interest to the firm. He draws a false conclusion that because she isn't more open with who this half white child's father was, and assumes she was a prostitute. Knowing that the symptoms were from the shot, he sends her to the lab in back to give a urine. He becomes very short with her when she describes the symptoms and says they began immediately with a fever when she returned home after the booster shot. He tells her to go home, enters the results and makes a phone call about this uppity jungle **** to have her silenced. As she comes out his office, she coughs and then touches the door knob, noticing his eyes get big when she does. She says nothing and goes to get a cup for the test. Struggling to carry her infant and weakened she almost passes out, and young doctor assists her and notices the bags under her eyes and runny nose, as a concern for her child. She tells him about the "immuno booster shot" to which, he himself who orders the medicines under the doctor, says he's never heard of. She tells them many of the women have come down with the same symptoms.

He then does some tests and finds a week later, that she has full blown HIV when she hadn't had relations with the father since she was 6 weeks pregnant. The story twists and spins and riles the blood with secrets of destruction unfolding and victory of justice by the public around the world, is done. The elites doing it connected to DC high ranks, planned on boarding "arc flyers and spending 7 years in space with supplies and probing other worlds for possible habitation. This doesn't happen. Live by the sword, die by the sword, is in Revelation.

Secrets unfold. My book is called "Season of the Witnesses" and this is just one of the many charecters, with suspenseful page turning events of what I was told to write almost 6 years ago.

I think it was to prepare me so i could prepare for my family. It's not so strange to hear this somehow, but welcome that these guys are finally getting caught. You know what they say, don't go to jail overseas. Their jails are the real hells without recourse.

PS Thanks mods for the censor, my bad, i got carried away as i always do just talking about it. Maybe that's why they had to break me in. To first hear it, would piss many women and fathers off, most rely on the strength of their offspring to help bring better economic times to the family.

Poor babies, may God send the cure for the damages and the fine of a lifetime on Gates who either didn't do his research(plenty of money to check on its effects" or was in on it all along using the charity for bigger conquest.

conk
23rd January 2013, 18:07
There are African villages where the women run and hide at the first sight of white medical doctors. As they flee they warn the rest, "the baby killers are coming". These plain, uneducated women KNOW that the vaccines will sterilize them AS DESIGNED!!!

Tesla_WTC_Solution
23rd January 2013, 18:45
There are African villages where the women run and hide at the first sight of white medical doctors. As they flee they warn the rest, "the baby killers are coming". These plain, uneducated women KNOW that the vaccines will sterilize them AS DESIGNED!!!
I believe it.

the problem is how can whites help an area where we don't live?
what is the best way to help africa become free of this scourge?

Tesla_WTC_Solution
23rd January 2013, 21:05
they are effectively practicing eugenics, horribly evil,
unrestrained in foreign countries where corrupt officials can be bribed into turning a blind eye to genocide of their own indigenous peoples....

Look:

http://wiki.dickinson.edu/images/e/ed/EugenicTree.jpg

http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4083/5209874855_03f3c65dc9_z.jpg

http://kimgraaemunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/pilgrim.jpg?w=331&h=274



Tell me dear God why do people think THIS (picture below) is threatening??

http://ionenewsone.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/pch6725.jpg

gripreaper
24th January 2013, 06:48
Wait a minute, wasn't it Bill Gates, who just a few days ago said he does not care about money and is going to give all of his 65 billion to helping the poor and downtrodden on the planet?

Tesla_WTC_Solution
24th January 2013, 14:32
Wait a minute, wasn't it Bill Gates, who just a few days ago said he does not care about money and is going to give all of his 65 billion to helping the poor and downtrodden on the planet?
I hadnt heard, where's my money? just kidding

p.s. gates stole my waterless crapper idea.
just kidding, his is clunkier.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
27th January 2013, 16:44
Surface proteins delivered by vaccines and other vectors, like a mosquito, can cause nematodes (worms!) to live much longer and avoid immune detection in tissues such as the liver and BRAIN!

It is simply UNSAFE to force parents to vaccinate their infants and young children. Vaccine reactions are not restricted to children, however.
There are plenty of adult victims, with vectors ranging from baby diapers to expired vaccines with dangerous adjuvants.

PROOF of Surface Proteins causing trouble genetically, including sterilization of host:

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/265/1413/2407.abstract
Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2817283/
Longicorn beetle that vectors pinewood nematode carries many Wolbachia genes on an autosome

http://big5.xiamenair.com/gate/big5/rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/278/1716/2293.full
A worm's best friend: recruitment of neutrophils by Wolbachia confounds eosinophil degranulation against the filarial nematode Onchocerca ochengi


Oxitec Experiments Backed by Gates et al, involved mosquitoes who deliver Wolbachia not only to each other but to species upon which they feed.
Common cat food contains enough antibiotic to allow mosquitoes to freely breed while at the same time transmitting disease*.

*Genetically engineered disease.

frozen alchemy
28th January 2013, 00:10
Is there any actual PROOF of these allegations (like pictures of the stricken children) or is it all hearsay and conspiracy? Not that I'm on board with any vaccines, but this is over the top and therefore rather suspect. More science, less emotion, please.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
28th January 2013, 00:51
Last year the Seattle Times newspaper admitted to having been bought off along with hundreds of other news outlets, and also admitted that one of the largest contributors/armtwisters was the Gates foundation.


Personal stories about vaccine adverse reaction:

http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/category/rooms/personal-stories-vaccine-injuries/
http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/children-paralyzed-and-106-extremely-sick-due-to-afrikan-meningitis-vaccine-2012/
http://vactruth.com/2013/01/25/paralyzed-symptoms-in-head/


African Children Still Paralyzed After Vaccines, Government Says “All in Their Head”

Jan 25th, 2013 | By Christina England | Category: Christina England, Top Stories

It has now been officially confirmed that in December 2012, 38 children were hospitalized after receiving the meningitis vaccine, MenAfriVac, during a vaccination campaign arranged by the Chadian government. News program France 24 stated that Saleh Ahmat Bodoumi, a former Member of Parliament in Chad, confirmed that seven of the most seriously affected children have since been evacuated from hospitals in the capital city of Ndjamena to the Republic of Tunisia in northern Africa to undergo further investigation and specialized treatment. [1]

This news was confirmed by the ‘Medical Xpress’ a health news service, which said Health Minister Mamouth Nahor N’Gawara made the following statement to the Agence France-Presse, the largest French news agency in the world (AFP):

“During the last phase of the vaccination campaign organized at Gouro (near the Libyan border) on December 11 to 15, 2012, unusual reactions were noted.”

N’Gawara added that “their state of health is not worrying.” [2]

FORCED VACCINATIONS

However, the Medical Xpress, along with other websites, followed this story the next day by backtracking and stating the following information:

“In a statement, the country’s health ministry said tests “failed to establish a causal link between the clinical manifestations observed in the patients and the MenAfriVac vaccine.”

According to the statement, one child who never received the meningitis shot ‘complained of suffering from the same symptoms’ found in the other children.” [3]

However, a contact in Chad gave VacTruth an extremely different version of events. He said:

“The government and the World Health Organization have made up these facts.

The government banned journalists from visiting the hospital since the children brought in. (sic) All the children from Gouro received the vaccine.

Firstly, they (Government/WHO) collaborated with the school’s headmaster who locked the school’s main door before vaccinating all the children. The school headmaster told the children that anyone who refused the vaccine would be banned from school and be arrested.

Secondly, they went door to door and injected the babies over one year.”

If you find this event difficult to believe, then cast your mind back to 2007 when the news broke that children in Maryland had been forcibly vaccinated at gunpoint under orders from the state Attorney General, various state judges and the local school board director, all of whom illegally conspired to threaten parents with imprisonment if they did not submit their children to vaccinations. [4]

Another example of these bully boy tactics was seen in Malawi last year, where 131 children were vaccinated at gunpoint after their parents had refused the measles vaccine. [5] [6]

A TRAGIC TIMELINE

Interestingly, the health minister ended his official statement by saying that the state of the paralyzed children’s health is not worrisome. If that is true, then why did the Chadian government move them to another hospital and why was this move done in secret?

Our Chadian contact informed me that the parents were not even allowed to know where the children were being evacuated to prior to evacuation. He confirmed that on the day that the children were evacuated, the N’Djamena International Airport had been closed to visitors!

VacTruth reported on the Chadian tragedy on January 6, 2013. [7] However, a team of experts in Chad did not begin to investigate the situation fully until January 9. The Prime Minister of Chad did not visit the sick children in hospital until a few days later. On January 13, VacTruth released a film of the TV footage of this visit that had been copied and forwarded to us. [8]

So, why did the Chadian government take so long to act on this appalling situation? According to France 24, the Health Minister did not make his announcement until January 9, five weeks after the incident occurred.

Another false representation of the facts being portrayed to the public is the following information which has been reported by several websites:

“In total, more than 100 million people in ten African countries have been vaccinated against the disease.”

It is a possibility that tens of millions of people were vaccinated with MenAfriVac, although highly unlikely. However, it is a total impossibility, by the WHOS’s own admission, that this number was vaccinated using the controlled temperature chain (CTC) implementations. In November 2012, WHO stated:

“Evidence of the heat stability of MenAfriVac® was validated by a team of experts from WHO, PATH, SIIL, and Health Canada. In collaboration with the government of Benin, the Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP), Optimize, and the WHO regional office for Africa, a pilot use of the MenAfrivac® vaccine in a CTC will be conducted during the upcoming MenAfriVac® campaign in the northern part of the country, from November 15 through 25. Benin is the 10th country to introduce the vaccine, as well as the first country to work with the new CTC implementation guidelines, developed through WHO’s Immunization Practices Advisory Committee”. [9] (emphasis added)

BREAKING THE RULES, AT LEAST TWICE

So, what has been going on behind the scenes?

MenAfriVac was a pre-licensed vaccine still in the testing stages. It had been advertised by all the major organizations involved in the campaign, including UNICEF, FDA, CDC, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, Meningitis Vaccine Project and WHO, as a vaccine that could be kept in a controlled temperature chain (CTC) at temperatures of up to 40 degrees Celsius for up to four days. However, according to the manufacturer, this information was not strictly true because they state:

“MenAfriVac should be stored and transported between 2-8ºC. Protect from light. The diluent should be stored at 25°C. It is recommended to protect the reconstituted vaccine from direct sunlight.” [10]

According to a report of a meeting which took place in October 2012 between the World Health Organization’s Immunizations, Vaccines and Biologicals group and the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (IPAC), the MenAfriVac vaccine had not been fully licensed and would not be due to be fully endorsed until 2013, at the earliest. [11]

The children of Gouro were vaccinated in December 2012, apparently with a vaccine that was still being tested which had not yet gained approval to be used outside of a cold temperature chain. According to sources, Dr. Diego Buriot read this message in French on Chad TV, a local television station:

“We have done all analyses, we believe that the vaccine was not the cause of the paralysis and the children are not in danger. It is clear that the vaccine is not the cause. All seems to show that the vaccine, which already has been largely used on the whole of the chain, does not produce vaccinal complications.

We have retested the vaccine, both at the level of the producer, as well as at the level of random checks, which are undecided. These will give their results within several weeks, but actually we are sure that the vaccine is not the cause.

What we are sure of is first of all that there is no danger whatsoever for the children, that is very important to say. All the clinical trials that we have done are completely normal other than this agitation, which is real, it translates the fear of the children.” [translated from French]

This is the first public acknowledgement admitting that the children had became ill and paralyzed after they had received the vaccination, as well as the first of likely many denials that the vaccine is not to blame.

So, who is Dr. Diego Buriot and who does he represent?

IT’S ALL IN THEIR HEAD

Dr. Diego Buriot is the Director of the WHO Office in Lyon, France. He is in charge of the Department of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response and with impressive credentials and “considerable experience in the public health problems of developing countries.” [12]

Of course he would say that the vaccines did not cause the children’s injuries, even though he has admitted that all the test results have not yet been received and won’t be for several weeks. Remember his words?

“We have retested the vaccine, both at the level of the producer, as well as at the level of random checks, which are undecided. These will give their results within several weeks, but actually we are sure that the vaccine is not the cause.”

On January 20, 2013, the human rights organization ECOTERRA International and I wrote a letter to the resident representative of WHO in Chad, Dr. Saïdou Pathé Barry. We have checked the WHO website [13] regularly since submitting our inquiry, but we have not found any report or update. For this reason, we have been forced to make a public appeal to WHO and ask them to answer our fourteen questions regarding the MenAfriVac vaccination tragedy at their earliest convenience.

On January 22, we were given a copy of the original press release signed by The Minister of Public Health, Dr. Mamouth Nahor N’gawara. It makes interesting but predictable reading:

The findings were the same old same, although the release did admit to the inadequate hospital conditions, the lack of medical follow-up — especially on the psychological level — and the dialogue between the community and the health personnel as being insufficient.

No cause for the illness of the children appears to have been found. Interestingly, the Experts’ Recommendations stated:

• Make sure of a progressive yet fast return of the children to their families, and a medical follow up

• Maintain the dialogue with the families, the actors and the partners of the vaccination

• Reinforce the medical structure at the local level by adding a doctor and a state registered nurse for a better tracking of the health of the population and the routine activities

• Reinforce the health personnel capacity in crisis communication and rumor control

The experts want to stress that the analysis of the epidemiological, medical, clinical and paraclinical data do not permit us to establish a causal link between the clinical manifestations observed in the patients, and the MenAfriVac™ vaccine.

The symptoms observed in the patients resemble those, which have been described in the literature under several names:

• collective hysteria
• collective obsessive behavior
• mass psychogenic phenomenon

In other words, the “experts” are trying to say that the children’s condition is psychological. This move is growing in popularity governments and the medical profession uses the ‘its all in their heads’ phenomenon to minimize vaccine damage, thus shifting the blame to the parents or the victim.

They finish by stating, translated from French:

“The independent experts thank the population and the Chadian authorities for the confidence placed in them. They appeal to the diligence of the authorities to put quickly into action the recommendations, which will facilitate the return to a calmed down situation, beneficial to the correct proceeding of the vaccination programs.”

The press release also says that a final report will be completed by the health services in Tunisia.

What the press release fails to say is the following: out of the 500 children vaccinated, a total of 106 became ill. Only 38 of the sick children were hospitalized, leaving 62 sick children in Gouro to be cared for by relatives. [13]

HOW ARE THE CHILDREN DOING?

When I asked my contact if the conditions of the hospitalized children were improving, he replied:

“The children in hospital are still paralyzed. Most of the children still can’t stand up. Some have convulsions so badly that they need four people to attend. Those who have convulsions end with their up arms straight and their eyes are fixed and open without reaction.

We are not receiving enough information about the children the government and WHO took to Tunisia.

There are sick children left in Gouro who may be evacuated to Libya.”

CONCLUSION

We have yet to see the full outcome of the MenAfriVac vaccine tragedy. There is little doubt that these children are very sick and may need lifelong care and attention. They will likely be returned home, if they recover sufficiently, without adequate care and attention and their parents left without help or support to care for their children’s disabilities alone. Unfortunately, many third world countries do not have access to basic equipment such as wheelchairs that we in the Western world take for granted.

Surely it is now time for the Chadian government and the organizations involved to stop trying to cover up this tragedy and instead, look after all of the sick children properly. I believe that the real tragedy of this whole situation is in a few months, these children like thousands of others, will be forgotten and it will be ‘business as usual’ for all of the organizations involved.

The MenAfriVac vaccination will likely be given to millions more third world children across Africa. The vaccination of children with pre-licensed and unlicensed vaccines, which may be life-threatening, needs to cease. This is not health care, but a total disregard for human life in the name of profit.

Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Namaste UK Publishing and ECOTERRA International; Desiree Rover for translations; and my Chadian contacts.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _________

I hope you are not a shill Frozen Alchemy.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
28th January 2013, 20:29
Meh, sorry, I bet you're not a shill.

But gosh I hate that foundation.

They spend money on permethrin tainted mosquito nets and dirty vaccines/malaria drugs.
Dumped into the veins of the Negro.

It should be illegal to hurt the blacks in africa just as it is illegal to hurt a spotted owl or salamander or some damned thing like that....

Tesla_WTC_Solution
29th January 2013, 17:35
BTW everyone here should know how to use Google, at least the front page.
That is how I find almost everything!! Yes they censor, but not fast enough.

Neither I nor anyone else can provide just everything everyone needs,
so if you see something Google something.

Arrowwind
29th January 2013, 18:23
It really behoves parents and parents to be to be well aware of their state regulations. Some states may require that you actually join a church that says no to vaccinaitons, like Religious Science. Don't wait till the school deadline to do this. You need to have a history of church affiliation. You may need to swallow some pride or ego to do this to protect your children if you live in one of the offending states.
Every single state provides a state exemption for religous beliefs. Use it if you must. You must also make sure that you have clearly obtained documents that you have gone through an exeptiom process. In my state that requried that I go to the Department of Health and listen to their pathetic lecture for 10 minutes and take their propaganda paperwork home with me. They wrote an exemption document for my son which stated that I had been notified of the potential consequences to health if not vaccinated.
In this current poltitical climate you must force yourself to jump throught the correct hoops for exemption to protect your child. Understand what exemption requrirements in your state are and do it or be ready to pay the consequences.

12 states provide philosophical exemptions. All states provide medical or religious exemptions.
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx


Meanwhile if your state is overly oppressive consider working on a statewide organization to reverse the law. Texas not to long ago managed to reverse the law so philisophical reasons are now valid for exemption.

I see many reports that 40 and upwards number of vaccinations are required for school admission. So I looked at my state and clearly this is not so. You may want to look at the requirements of your state to get a reality check. Of course this does not mean that some clinic or some doctor may try to give you others that the state does not promote or reccommend.
http://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements/california.aspx

For all those poor folks in Africa exposed to such atrocities, I cant say what the remedy is for their situation. WHO has them controlled.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
29th January 2013, 19:02
Thank you, arrowind.

The state of WA doesn't hammer us too hard.
they were at least on the surface extremely understanding about paul's level of disability and me not wanting vaccines and risperidol forhim....

omg

jackovesk
11th June 2013, 17:20
Published on Jun 10, 2013


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-4moX1waOk&list=PLSn1F05iE4gYl5DswTkQP953IFiEtv1tD
Welcome back to Truthstream's "Letters to the New World Order". Letter #2 goes out to our ever-watching friends at the National Security Administration (although they already know that).

Two down, only 8,741 left to go.

Once upon a time I fell asleep, and when I woke up, even one of the co-authors of the Patriot Act was shocked at how much illegal spying the National Security Administration was engaged in against the American people. I'm wondering if I can even go to the bathroom by myself at this point. Oh well, I guess it's not like that $2 billion dollar data hub they built out in the Utah desert on the taxpayers' dime was going to be used to store excess lawn gnomes. At least the 65 megawatt electricity required to run the place will only cost us $40 million dollars a year. And with over a million square feet, I sure hope they've left some extra room out there for all the political dissidents! (


Published on Jun 4, 2013


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UR6cWjCiHMw&list=PLSn1F05iE4gYl5DswTkQP953IFiEtv1tD&feature=player_detailpage
Pilot of a fun new series "Letters to the New World Order". Letter #1 goes out to everyone's favorite eugenicist billionaire, Mr. Bill Gates.

Whew. One down, only 8,742 left to go.

Once upon a time I fell asleep, and when I woke up, a billionaire bought a bunch of scientists from all over the world the way some people might collect antique cars. Then, while the mainstream media was busy making jokes about him paying $100,000 to have someone design a modern condom like it was just the cutest thing ever, he was also paying some guy in Arizona to test contraceptive vaccines in the form of an oral bait that sterilizes rats (check out a project called 'Rodent Biocontrol and Crop Protection' on the Gates Foundation Grand Challenges in Global Health website).

Also, if something can sterilize a rat (mammal) then it can sterilize a human (also a mammal). Is that why scientists do research on rats in the first place? Pretty crazy, amirite? So is an operating system designed to suck and continually require owners to buy upgrades. I think they call that 'planned obsolescence'. But gosh, it sure does pay the contraceptive vaccine research bills.

http://truthstreammedia.com/are-political-dissidents-the-real-target-of-nsas-prism/

Tesla_WTC_Solution
11th June 2013, 18:33
Incredible topic. Those "people" need to hear from the rest of us, and they need to hear it loudly.

Thanks for the heads up on the rat sterilization. @@

I really am aghast at what that pansy Gates is willing to do to other people.

Toss him into a football field, though, and not so much will happen to them, lol!

bogeyman
11th June 2013, 20:09
It is known during apartheid, BOSS released diseases in areas which were naturally effected, but BOSS done so to make the matter worse, to make their enemies weaker. This was in fact admitted to by those in power after the fact if course.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
11th June 2013, 22:25
Have you guys kept up with the Oxitec mosquitoes and the Gates plot to sterilize people with Wolbachia bacteria?

Wolbachia changes the sex ratio of the species it infects, and also contributes to the worsening of parasitic diseases like African Nodding Disease.

It's the factor that is supposed to keep GMO mosquitoes from having sex, but the truth is, they are attracted to cat food -- and cat food contains enough antibiotic waste to kill Wolbachia, allowing the Oxitec mosquitoes to breed.

this whole thing sounds just like Jurassic Park -- "life finds a way"!


these dip****s are going to kill us all, either on accident or on purpose.
we are NOT lab rats to be disposed of and judged at their whim and fancy.

we are sentient human beings.

Sidney
11th June 2013, 22:33
Have you guys kept up with the Oxitec mosquitoes and the Gates plot to sterilize people with Wolbachia bacteria?

Wolbachia changes the sex ratio of the species it infects, and also contributes to the worsening of parasitic diseases like African Nodding Disease.

It's the factor that is supposed to keep GMO mosquitoes from having sex, but the truth is, they are attracted to cat food -- and cat food contains enough antibiotic waste to kill Wolbachia, allowing the Oxitec mosquitoes to breed.

this whole thing sounds just like Jurassic Park -- "life finds a way"!


these dip****s are going to kill us all, either on accident or on purpose.
we are NOT lab rats to be disposed of and judged at their whim and fancy.

we are sentient human beings.

I'm pretty sure no accidents are involved.:boom:

ghostrider
11th June 2013, 23:22
if population control is so important Mr. Gates, off yourself and lead the way...you know lead by example ... ha

Tesla_WTC_Solution
12th June 2013, 00:46
Think of the ecological footprint left by his whole entourage @@

lol

Especially those huge bodyguards.