PDA

View Full Version : What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government"



Cjay
31st October 2012, 01:00
While the title of this documentary refers to the Australian Government, it exposes issues that affect most of us, worldwide, in so many ways.

Our governments deceive us every day because we let them. It's about money, power and control.

umVj5XQYAi8

Cjay
31st October 2012, 04:37
Outside The Box special edition from Down Under on Freedom Reigns, discussing the documentary in the OP.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomreigns/2012/10/30/outside-the-box-special-edition-from-down-under

D-Day
31st October 2012, 04:55
Thank you Cjay for posting this very important and useful iinformation.

The documentary in the OP demonstrates very clearly just how screwed up our societies and systems have become.

And the worst part about it is that we have allowed it to happen right under our noses through our own ignorance and the fact that we are so easily distracted rrom what's really going on behind the scenes.

It is imperative that we start educating ourselves about the methods by which we are being manipulared and controlled [illegally] by our own "governments".

We need to wake up and start challenging this stuff before it's too late!

Now, if you'll excuse me I have some letters to draft ;)

apokalypse
31st October 2012, 05:02
Website aswell.. http://www.truth-now.net/index.html

excellent Documentary...it connect all the dots what many people have said about Government is an Corporate Elites and it separate into different branches.

Cjay
31st October 2012, 05:07
Onus rests on those claiming Government authority to prove it...

Only if YOU demand the evidence!


This information is very powerful when you understand what it means.

Are you dealing with the "de jure Government" or a foreign corporation masquerading as the Government (invalid).

Go ahead - ask your "Government", "Judiciary" and/or "Legislature":

WHO ARE YOU?
FROM WHERE DO YOU DERIVE YOUR AUTHORITY?


The following PDF outlines simply and clearly how to:

test the validity of the "Government"
test the validity of the "Judiciary"
test the validity of the "Legislature"


http://www.truth-now.net/diags/ValidationGA.pdf

Lots more very important information on the website:
http://www.truth-now.net/

Cjay
31st October 2012, 05:13
This thread (and the website http://www.truth-now.net) is not only relevant to Australia.


Verified Warnings From Former U.S. Presidents About the “Invisible Government” Running the U.S. With “No Allegiance To the People”

“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”- George Santayana

Past presidents of the United States and other high profile political leaders have repeatedly issued warnings over the last 214 years that the U.S. government is under the control of an “invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.”

According to a half-dozen of our former presidents, one vice-president, and a myriad of other high profile political leaders, an invisible government that is “incredibly evil in intent” has been in control of the U.S. government “ever since the days of Andrew Jackson” (since at least 1836). They “virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties… It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”

As a result, “we have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated, governments in the civilized world—no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”

The sources for the above quotes (and more) are listed below. All of the quotes listed in this article have been verified as authentic and have associated links to the source materials. Also included below are statements made by David Rockefeller, Sr, former director of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and Federal Reserve Chairman’s Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke that appear to confirm some of the warnings.

WARNINGS ABOUT THE INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT RUNNING THE U.S.

The warnings listed below, which appear in chronological order, began with our first president – George Washington. The last president to speak out was JFK, who was assassinated. Read what they and other political leaders have said about the invisible government.

Full story: http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/09/03/verified-warnings-from-former-u-s-presidents-about-the-invisible-government-running-the-u-s-with-no-allegiance-to-the-people/

PDF version: http://www.truth-now.net/docs/Invisible%20Government.pdf

apokalypse
31st October 2012, 06:18
yep, not only Australia but also few other countries as well. it's interesting that i found major Australia banks like Commonwealth Bank, ANZ bank and NAB registered on http://www.sec.gov/.


damn, my Thread posted this Documentary got deleted because they considered "Conspiracy Theory" in one of Australian forums. can't believe they call it conspiracy...

TargeT
31st October 2012, 07:02
I assume this is what most of the "freeman" movement is about, I just finished the documentary and applaud the founder of http://www.truth-now.net/index.html for his diligent work in tracking down and fighting through the BS legal scare tactics, he was more successful than I thought possible.


This seems to go back to a common theme I've been seeing around lately. Blantant lies, as LONG as they are blantant are allowed to be continued because they have put the information out there & apparently if you are "stupid enough" to fall for their BS then you deserve what you get.

Cjay
1st November 2012, 07:34
yep, not only Australia but also few other countries as well. it's interesting that i found major Australia banks like Commonwealth Bank, ANZ bank and NAB registered on http://www.sec.gov/.

You left out WESTPAC Bank, Macquarie Bank, Bank of Queensland, Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, Bankwest, Suncorp-Metway, AMP Bank, St. George Bank, Bank of Western Australia and probably most of the smaller banks and, er, "banks" that don't call themselves banks. They will tell you they are registered in USA so they can access the USA markets yet they claim to be "Australian banks".

New South Wales Treasury Corp, Treasury Corp of Victoria and Queensland Treasury Corp - all are Australian state government treasuries and all are registed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

This is an interesting search showing which foreign (national/state/provincial/local) governments are registered in USA:
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&SIC=8888&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0

Nations including: Finland, Belize, New Zealand, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Hungary, Panama, Peru, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Korea, Portugal, South Africa, Philippines, Turkey, Sweden...

Canadian Provinces including: British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Saskatchewan

WTF? Eye opening, to say the least. Do you think our governments are telling us the truth?



damn, my Thread posted this Documentary got deleted because they considered "Conspiracy Theory" in one of Australian forums. can't believe they call it conspiracy...

What does that tell you about that forum?

apokalypse
1st November 2012, 10:04
this whole thing with Commonwealth of Australia and Government is corporations is mind blogging, this video clip really open my eyes of understanding and i will come back on this topic after my research with conclusion.

BMJ
1st November 2012, 12:59
this whole thing with Commonwealth of Australia and Government is corporations is mind blogging, this video clip really open my eyes of understanding and i will come back on this topic after my research with conclusion.

Dido, many of the bodies that we thought were serving the people, such as federal parliament, are actually serving the majority share holders in Ozzy incoporated, listed on the USA stock exchange.

Cjay
2nd November 2012, 12:01
I would love to know who the shareholders are and when and where they meet. I'm not happy with the way things are being run.

Mad Hatter
2nd November 2012, 14:51
I passed this onto a share trading mate of mine and this was his reaction...

I guess Australia is a corporation now ? and not a country ?

and I thought it was just a stupid conspiracy theory. Well, not according to the US Securities and Exchange (SEC) - it isn't a theory.

here's the link !!! it's funny, the "commonwealth bank of australia" is listed too !!!!!
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=COMMONWEALTH+OF+AUSTRALIA&match=contains&action=getcompany

here's what it says for "COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA" apparently the "common wealth" does not include it's own people !!!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (Corporation) registered in the
UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION as CIK (0000805157).
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
CIK (0000805157)
SIC: 8880 - American Depositary Receipts
State location: DC | Fiscal Year End: 0630
Business Address
1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW
C/O AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY
WASHINGTON DC 20036
----------------------------------------------------------------------


and someone has been keeping it up to date ! there are recent entries...
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000805157&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0


wow !

Look at the SIC, it's 8880, and NOT classified as a foreign government, it's classified as UNKNOWN !!!!!!
This is getting way more interesting than Obama's Fake Birth Certificate !

------------------------------------------------------------
partial listing of SIC CODES..........

8741 Services-Management Services
8742 Services-Management Consulting Services
8744 Services-Facilities Support Management Services
8800 Unknown SIC - 8800
8810 Unknown SIC - 8810
888 Unknown SIC - 888
8880 Unknown SIC - 8880
8888 Foreign Governments
8889 Unknown SIC - 8889
8900 Services-Services, NEC
9721 International Affairs

taken from
http://it-solutions.gsa.gov/it-sol/helpdocs.nsf/828a2af062213c688825691a007f660a/af4957e9a75f227d8825691b0077215a!OpenDocument
----------------------------------------------------

and next to the SIC it says "American Depositary Receipts"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_depositary_receipt


here's more reading about the formed "corporation" of AUSTRALIA
http://www.peoplesmandate.iinet.net.au/Government_as_Foreign_corporation.html

BMJ
9th November 2012, 12:49
Bump this stuff needs to be seen by more ozzy's

Living Food
17th November 2012, 18:50
Actually it's a corporation, registered with the Securites Exchange Commission in Washington DC! (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000805157&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)

See here: "Company Name: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/805157/999999999511002281/xslEFFECTX01/primary_doc.xml)"

Two governments (http://www.truth-now.net/vtable.htm)
Case studies (“http://truth-now.net/cases.htm”)

Watch this 52 minute documentary exposing the truth of the Australian "government", it will open your eyes to what's really going on. There's real laws and pretend laws, and most of the laws we blindly accept are in fact pretend laws created by a corporation acting as de facto government, rather then by the de jure government. Also keep in mind that almost every time you see names in CAPITAL LETTERS then it is the name of a corporation - that applies to your birth certificate too, but that's a whole other story. Now look at the names of just about every government agency on their seal...capital letters.That's not a government, it's a corporation! You've been conned!

umVj5XQYAi8

¤=[Post Update]=¤

The Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia - legitimate government:

http://www.truth-now.net/picts/uk_royal_coat_of_arms.png

The corporate logo of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA - corporation masquerading as government:

http://www.truth-now.net/picts/coatofarms%20au.png

Which seal are the government agencies and courts using, I wonder?

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b151/Marc_au/Ron1/Ron2/Ron%204/Ron%205/Ron%206/high-court-of-australia-logo.png

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b151/Marc_au/Ron1/Ron2/Ron%204/Ron%205/Ron%206/acs_logo.gif

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b151/Marc_au/Ron1/Ron2/Ron%204/Ron%205/Ron%206/ATOlogo_.gif

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b151/Marc_au/Ron1/Ron2/Ron%204/Ron%205/Ron%206/AustralianParliamentlogo.jpg

http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b151/Marc_au/Ron1/Ron2/Ron%204/Ron%205/Ron%206/AFP.png

They all use the corporate logo (kangaroo and emu), not the actual Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia (lion and unicorn). Therefore they're all subsidies of the parent corporation, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. And have no jurisdiction whatsoever to enforce any laws.

TigaHawk
17th November 2012, 23:16
I was issued a "fine" recently for "fare evasion" on the train last week.

If the gocard system they implimented wasnt intentionaly flawed so it doublecharges, and doesnt register when you swipe on, even tho it opens the gate to let you in, just so they can make money with fines.

I intend to fight this fine with the method below.

The only thing i am stuck on is finding the equivilant of Customs and Excise for the Dept of Transport within our Constitution.

I've found a few references to trans and transport but the are labeld just as that - transport, no department name like he's done for Customs (Current name of customs and referenced name of what customs was in our constitution)


Was going to have another read through, if i cant find it just reference chapter/page/line instead.

I will let you know how it goes.


and yes - the Queensland Government, even tho not listed in that US buisnes site, would be a sub-company of the Government of Australia, therefor, as with federal Government, all unlawfull and fradulent laws and bi-laws that were put in place are also nullified.

Living Food
18th November 2012, 00:03
So here we have the Australian government, and lots of other governments, filing form 18-Ks with the SEC. Definition of a form 18-K:


A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), more commonly known as the Annual Report for Foreign Governments and Political Subdivisions. It is used to update the SEC and investors regarding the status of a domestically traded foreign security and its issuer. The information required from a foreign issuer on this annual update includes anything that could materially affect the long-term solvency of the security or its issuer. [My emphasis]

From http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-18-k.asp#axzz2CWkqcenK.

So, the Australian government is a "domestically traded foreign security"? "Yeah, we just trade governments like stocks here in Washingon DC" :)


-----------
I'll continue to update this page with more "governments" registered as corporations with the SEC as I find them.

Government of Panama, aka REPUBLIC OF PANAMA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000076027&type=&dateb=&owner=include&start=40&count=40)
REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Republic+of+Uruguay&match=contains&action=getcompany)
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Republic+of+Venezuela&match=contains&action=getcompany)

Now this is interesting; we've got two companies listed as South Africa - REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000932419&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0) and GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRCA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001254425&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)...and the second one only has one filing, which looks like a merger agreement between GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA and TELKOM SA LTD. The latter is a communications company that is partly owned by the state, which is probably what that document is about. I wonder why it was filed by a different company then the main REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, though? Curious.

For the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, the mailing address is the NATIONAL TREASURY, whereas for the GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA it is the MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS. Makes me think that the former created the latter solely for the purpose of buying shares in the communications company, or maybe the the latter was created as a sort of joint company between the communications company and the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA? I'm sure there's a reason buried somewhere in the statues and acts (note, not laws) that govern how companies operate.

Living Food
18th November 2012, 00:56
Yeah, we just trade governments like stocks here in Washingon DC

Though to be fair, as far as I can tell (with the little research I've done so far), the "foreign governments" only offer debt securities, not stocks.

Leon
18th November 2012, 11:02
Scott is opening a can of worms here that people have been warning about for the last 20+ years....

If you can invisage the Aust Government as the Mafia then you start seeing the picture...

I moved, best choice ever.. I loved Australia but Australian Government changed this...

modwiz
18th November 2012, 12:11
So here we have the Australian government, and lots of other governments, filing form 18-Ks with the SEC. Definition of a form 18-K:


A filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), more commonly known as the Annual Report for Foreign Governments and Political Subdivisions. It is used to update the SEC and investors regarding the status of a domestically traded foreign security and its issuer. The information required from a foreign issuer on this annual update includes anything that could materially affect the long-term solvency of the security or its issuer. [My emphasis]

From http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-18-k.asp#axzz2CWkqcenK.

So, the Australian government is a "domestically traded foreign security"? "Yeah, we just trade governments like stocks here in Washingon DC" :)


-----------
I'll continue to update this page with more "governments" registered as corporations with the SEC as I find them.

Government of Panama, aka PANAMA REPUBLIC (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000076027&type=&dateb=&owner=include&start=40&count=40)
URUGUAY REPUBLIC (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Republic+of+Uruguay&match=contains&action=getcompany)
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Republic+of+Venezuela&match=contains&action=getcompany)

Now this is interesting; we've got two companies listed as South Africa - REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000932419&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0) and GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRCA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001254425&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)...and the second one only has one filing, which looks like a merger agreement between GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA and TELKOM SA LTD. The latter is a communications company that is partly owned by the state, which is probably what that document is about. I wonder why it was filed by a different company then the main REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, though? Curious.

For the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, the mailing address is the NATIONAL TREASURY, whereas for the GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA it is the MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS. Makes me think that the former created the latter solely for the purpose of buying shares in the communications company, or maybe the the latter was created as a sort of joint company between the communications company and the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA? I'm sure there's a reason buried somewhere in the statues and acts (note, not laws) that govern how companies operate.

It is interesting to note that the business addresses for Uruguay and Panama are both in Wash. DC. At least Venezuela has its' office in Caracas.

Tony
18th November 2012, 12:23
Thank you for this post!
It is truly amazing, criminal and evil.

Let's look at other countries!!!

modwiz
18th November 2012, 12:27
Thank you for this post!
It is truly amazing, criminal and evil.

Let's look at other countries!!!

If this came into awareness for enough people, it could change things. I am sure these corporations are not comfortable with this knowledge becoming well known. Patriotism and jingoism are not as easily inspired for corporate entities who have only a parasitic purpose for their existence.

Mike Gorman
18th November 2012, 12:47
Actually, The British Govt is listed in Dunn & Bradstreet as a corporate body, these listing were pointed out in the 'Lawful Rebellion' movement,
all the courts and instruments of government operate as a profit making business, hence the proliferation of Fines over the the past 20 years,
noticed you tend to get Fined for trivial transgressions these days...?
It is all very murky, and disturbing-The City Of London (not London itself) is the ruling center seemingly.

Tony
18th November 2012, 13:48
It is all becoming clearer! We have mistakenly been lead to believe that 'their' game is real.

Kn5DMRd7Qjs

Living Food
18th November 2012, 14:24
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=216105)
HUNGARY (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Republic+of+Hungary&match=contains&action=getcompany)
GOVERNMENT OF JAMAICA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Government+of+Jamaica&match=contains&action=getcompany)
JAPAN (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000837056&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF ITALY (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000052782&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000205317&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
STATE OF ISRAEL (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Israel+state&match=contains&action=getcompany)
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000836136&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
PROVINCE OF MANITOBA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000826926&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
UNITED MEXICAN STATES (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=United+Mexican+states&match=contains&action=getcompany) - composed of these states/countries:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101368/000119312512437075/g429436exd_pg06.jpg

Paul
18th November 2012, 14:34
While the title of this documentary refers to the Australian Government, it exposes issues that affect most of us, worldwide, in so many ways.

Our governments deceive us every day because we let them. It's about money, power and control.


Proof the Australian government is unlawful

Actually it's a corporation

Good thread, Living Food, though it is a duplicate of another thread on the same topic and video that Cjay started three weeks ago.

I merged the two threads.

modwiz
18th November 2012, 14:36
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=216105)
HUNGARY (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Republic+of+Hungary&match=contains&action=getcompany)
JAMAICA GOVERNMENT (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Government+of+Jamaica&match=contains&action=getcompany)
PROVINCE OF MANITOBA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000826926&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
UNITED MEXICAN STATES (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=United+Mexican+states&match=contains&action=getcompany) - composed of these states/countries:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/101368/000119312512437075/g429436exd_pg06.jpg

Hungary, Mexican States and Manitoba all have their mailing addresses in Manhattan, NY. The plot sickens.

Living Food
18th November 2012, 14:40
Sorry Paul, I didn't know - so much activity on this forum that it's hard to tell if you're duplicating a pre-existing thread or not.


I merged the two threads.

Thanks.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


The plot sickens

LOL. Cheesy, but you made me laugh there :becky:

More "governments" coming.

Living Food
18th November 2012, 14:58
Crap. I just got logged out and lost over 2 dozen "governments" registered with the SEC. I'll post it again later.

Paul
18th November 2012, 15:01
Crap. I just got logged out and lost over 2 dozen "governments" registered with the SEC. I'll post it again later.

Be sure to click the "Remember Me" box (just below where you enter your login name) when you login. That will keep you from being logged out.

(But don't click that box when using a public computer such as at a library or Internet cafe.)

OZ.
18th November 2012, 15:41
private Corporation everywhere:

Have a look for those too on Dun & Bradstreet (http://www.dnb.com/) (hard to link DnB)

1) Federal Reserve (http:http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=federal%20reserve&state=US&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop)
2) FBI (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=fbi&state=US&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop)
3) FEMA (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=fema&state=US&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop)
4) CIA (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=cia&state=US&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop)

ETC


David icke in his book "Human Race Get Off Your Knees" (p 508) talk shortly about that and put light on all these private corporations:

- Portugal, Ethiopia, Egypt, Eritrea, Iran, Iraq, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon & East Africa.

Have a look to this one too: UNITED KINGDOM COMMERCIAL CORPORATION (Spain) LIMITED



pByZmACuIAk

bwH0wYYk9k4

I'm so slow in english you've probably said all of this ^^

OZ.
18th November 2012, 16:00
Freeman-on-the-Land Forum Gateway (http://www.fmotl.com/)

Living Food
18th November 2012, 21:04
Have a look for those too on Dun & Bradstreet (hard to link DnB)

1) Federal Reserve
2) FBI
3) FEMA
4) CIA

ETC

Great job! I'm going to have a field day with that website, I think ;)

It even says on some of those entries, like for FEMA, "also traded as...". What more evidence could you possibly want?

OZ.
18th November 2012, 22:41
Indeed we want to have a deep understanding for the people:

This is a massive scam, our parents sold us ^^
How to be under the "Common law" witch is the law of the people, not only in US, UK & Australia.
They apply the same pattern because it WORKS, we accept to be "slaves".

I may be wrong but here this:

Who came to the people to say; "Listen dummy" here is a piece of paper, you put a cross in it, you can't read that's your problem, too late you accepted to be a slave ?

The bloodlines = see illuminazi 666

The pattern is always the same, before we had only tribes, when the educated rich white man came you have a centralization of power.

From tribes under the common law to Countries

It's up to us to centralize the information to make not only a good thread but a comprehensive job, make it real.

The video of Michael Tsarion is a masterpiece for me. Too late, spotted :photo:

Living Food
18th November 2012, 23:06
Back to Australia for a moment - I can prove that the kangaroo + emu symbol is a corporate logo and not the original Great Seal of The Commonwealth of Australia, because it is patented (http://www.trademarkia.com/australia-89000535.html) by the company COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Actually there are around a half-dozen different kangaroo + emu logos patented by the COMMONWEALTH, each with slight variations.

Very clever using similar names and counting on the people to automatically assume they're dealing with the legitimate government, but a little research and their house of cards starts to collapse. I'm going to show this to lots of people, it's time the word got out.

Living Food
18th November 2012, 23:15
The CITY OF NAPLES (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001016472&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0) is listed as a separate company then the REPUBLIC OF ITALY. Maybe it's a separate city-state like DC, the Inner City of London and the Vatican?

The plot sickens, indeed.

OZ.
18th November 2012, 23:42
the original Great Seal of The Commonwealth of Australia, because it is patented (http://www.trademarkia.com/australia-89000535.html) by the company COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.

Silly

yeah if people want to keep the "Australian Government" line in this thread we could create another one.

Living Food
18th November 2012, 23:55
REPUBLIC OF FINLAND (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000035946&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001179453&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
HELLENIC REPUBLIC (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000931106&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000074615&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF PERU (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000077694&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000862406&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
PROVINCE OF NOVA SCOTIA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000842639&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
QUEBEC (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000722803&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REGION OF LOMBARDY (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001191980&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000914021&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF CHILE (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000019957&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000917142&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF KOREA (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000873465&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF PORTUGAL (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000911076&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001030717&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000869687&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000203098&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)
KINGDOM OF SWEDEN (http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0000203098&owner=include&count=40&hidefilings=0)

From D&B:

BRITISH GOVERNMENT (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearc h&searchType=NSF&state=US&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&fromView=&hiddenSessionId=2141959597&skipIPValidation=YES&searchPerform=true&busName=British+government&address=&city=&zipCode=&country=US#goTop)
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearc h&searchType=NSF&state=US&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&fromView=&hiddenSessionId=2141959597&skipIPValidation=YES&searchPerform=true&busName=Federal+republic+of+Germany&address=&city=&zipCode=&country=US#goTop)
REPUBLIC OF CHINA (+ TAIWAN) (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearc h&searchType=NSF&state=US&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&fromView=&hiddenSessionId=-1785347240&skipIPValidation=YES&searchPerform=true&busName=Republic+of+china&address=&city=&zipCode=&country=US#goTop)
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?dynaString=GWHCQP&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&hiddenSessionId=-450457852&searchType=NSF&service=&busName=Canadian+government&country=US&address=&dunsNumber=&state=US&zip=&city=&lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearch&SecurityWord=GWHCQP#goTop)

Living Food
19th November 2012, 00:09
yeah if people want to keep the "Australian Government" line in this thread we could create another one.

Nah, I think it's better to have all of the corruption in one place - for easy access :)

D-Day
19th November 2012, 00:29
yeah if people want to keep the "Australian Government" line in this thread we could create another one.

Nah, I think it's better to have all of the corruption in one place - for easy access :)

I agree that this information should be stored in one place/thread for the sake of convenience.

However, if we continue down the current path then the existing tread title is somewhat inappropriate and misleading.

Could we perhaps look at changing the tread title in some way so that it less specific to Australia??

Some members may bybass the thread thinking the information does not relate to or affect them becuse they don't live in Austalia.

Just a thought.... EVERYBODY here needs to know about this stuff as it affects us all!

Living Food
19th November 2012, 11:54
Good point. We'd probably have to ask one of the mods?

Living Food
19th November 2012, 16:38
Now isn't this interesting: The GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&searchType=BSF&busName=australian%20taxation%20office&state=US&country=US&cm_mmc=dnb-_-home-_-retail-_-lookup_-topbar#goTop), "Also Traded as the OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE". Now you know what their real purpose is, don't you?

The IRS (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearc h&searchType=NSF&state=US&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&fromView=&hiddenSessionId=-1757193839&skipIPValidation=YES&searchPerform=true&busName=Internal+Revenue+Service&address=&city=&zipCode=&country=US#goTop)

All the tax collection agencies and offices are corporations that ultimately report to the IMF, and all you have to do is search them on the D&B website to see that.

UNITED STATES SENATE (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearc h&searchType=NSF&state=US&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&fromView=&hiddenSessionId=1010084603&skipIPValidation=YES&searchPerform=true&busName=United+states+senate&address=&city=&zipCode=&country=US#goTop)
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearc h&searchType=NSF&state=US&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&fromView=&hiddenSessionId=547181218&skipIPValidation=YES&searchPerform=true&busName=uNITED+STATES+HOUSE+OF+REPRESENTATIVES&address=&city=&zipCode=&country=US#goTop)

See, it's corporate officers making the "laws" here, we only have to follow them because our birth certificates prove us to be members of their corporation. But if you research well you can get around that and be immune to all of these silly acts and statues. The corporate police can't do anything against a sovereign flesh-and-blood entity, they only have power over those who are members of the corporation. Opt out and you will be FREE.

Living Food
19th November 2012, 18:43
Also the US military is a private mercenary army under the corporation USA:

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?dynaString=VAPRSM&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&hiddenSessionId=-515691136&searchType=NSF&service=&busName=DEPARTMENT+OF+THE+AIR+FORCE%2C+UNITED+STAT ES&country=US&address=&dunsNumber=&state=DC&zip=&city=&lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearch&SecurityWord=VAPRSM#goTop)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, UNITED STATES (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?dynaString=WCJZCZ&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&hiddenSessionId=-991378050&searchType=NSF&service=&busName=DEPARTMENT+OF+THE+ARMY+UNITED+STATES&country=US&address=&dunsNumber=&state=DC&zip=&city=&lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearch&SecurityWord=WCJZCZ#goTop)
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?dynaString=EIVYSC&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&hiddenSessionId=-1263010017&searchType=NSF&service=&busName=UNITED+STATES+COAST+GUARD&country=US&address=&dunsNumber=&state=US&zip=&city=&lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearch&SecurityWord=EIVYSC#goTop)
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?dynaString=RHQWXK&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&hiddenSessionId=-1227791147&searchType=NSF&service=&busName=UNITED+STATES+MARINE+CORPS&country=US&address=&dunsNumber=&state=DC&zip=&city=&lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearch&SecurityWord=RHQWXK#goTop)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, UNITED STATES (http://creditreports.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationCmd?dynaString=GBSBYG&storeId=11154&catalogId=71154&productId=0&manPartNumber=0&hiddenSessionId=-885633671&searchType=NSF&service=&busName=United+states+air+force&country=US&address=&dunsNumber=&state=US&zip=&city=&lookupType=AdvancedCompanySearch&SecurityWord=GBSBYG#goTop)

No doubt this applies to the militaries of the other corporation-countries too.

OZ.
19th November 2012, 19:28
A lot of work to uncover the whole Web!

Living Food
14th February 2013, 18:07
So far in this thread I've used the SEC for foreign corporations posing as governments, and Dun & Bradstreet for domestic corporations posing as the US government. But I'm even more fond of the website manta.com, because it flat-out states that our alleged government is really a corporation. Ladies and gentleman, all the proof you should need:

https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/?ui=2&ik=61ec7fe628&view=att&th=13c9bf4197474728&attid=0.0.1.7&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1



https://mail.google.com/mail/ca/?ui=2&ik=61ec7fe628&view=att&th=13c9bf4197474728&attid=0.0.1.6&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1

*Our current Secretary of State is actually John Kerry, that image is a little old.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

The Organic Act of 1871 was the Act that sold us down the river and replaced our de jure government with a corporation. What nobody ever bothered to tell you was that the "Federal government" ONLY has jurisdiction in DC.

Some notes I took from the Organic Act:

"Nor shall the legislative assembly have power to establish any bank of circulation, nor to authorize any company or individual to issue notes for circulation as money and currency" [end of section 17] - *cough cough* Federal Reserve Act, anyone?

"That the legislative power of the District shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District" [section 18 beginning] - in other words, the government only has jurisdiction within DC.

"That the said legislative assembly shall not have the power...to tax the property of the United States" [section 20] - implies that DC and the United States are separate entities? Also only gives power to tax property within DC.

"That the property of that portion of the District not included in the corporations of Washington and Georgetown..." [section 21 beginning] 'Nuff said.

Section 22 calls both Georgetown and Washington "corporations", multiple times. I'm too lazy to type out the whole section though.

Section 25 implies DC courts can only enforce DC laws.

Section 28 is so mindblowing, I'm going to type the whole thing out here: "That the said legislative assembly shall have power to create by general law, modify, repeal, or amend, within said District, corporations aggregate for religious, charitable, educational, industrial, or commercial purposes, and to define their powers and liabilities; Provided, That the powers of corporations so created shall be limited to the District of Columbia." THIS is the evidence proving that our "government" only has jurisdiction in DC.

Section 40 again calls Washington and Georgetown corporations (in the beginning) .

"And upon the repeal of the charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown, the District of Columbia be, and is hereby declared, the successor of said corporations" [section 41]

Sure, some people might argue that by "corporation" they mean "municipal corporation", ie "An incorporated political subdivision of a state that is composed of the citizens of a designated geographic area and which performs certain state functions on a local level and possesses such powers as are conferred upon it by the state." (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...al+Corporation), but I don't buy that. With legal terms being as precise as they are, there's no way they would make such a huge "mistake". Oops, looks like we accidentally made a corporation that rules the nation instead of a capital for the US government...oh well. NO, it was intentional.

The Organic Act of 1871, for anyone interested in reading it: http://www.dcvote.org/trellis/strugg...ation_1871.pdf

More on how the Organic Act of 1871 created a corporation called THE UNITED STATES: http://byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf

¤=[Post Update]=¤



JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS

District of Columbia


In the revision of the Statutes relating to the District,
the clause of the Act of 1871, declaring the District of Columbia
(Rev. Stat. D.C. p. 2, Sec. 2) to be a body corporate for
municipal purposes, with power to contract, etc. was retained.
By the Act of June 20, 1874, for the government of the District
and for other purposes. (18 Stat. 116, Chap. 337), previous
statutes providing for the District a governor, secretary,
legislative assembly, board of public works and a delegate to
Congress were repealed, and all the power and authority then
vested in the governor and board of public works, except as
limited by that Act, were vested in a commission, composed of
three persons, to be appointed by the President, with the consent
of the Senate. But by the Act of June 11, 1878 (20 Stat. chap.
180), a permanent form of government for the District was
established. It provided that "the District of Columbia shall
remain and continue a municipal corporation, as provided in
section two of the Revised Statutes relating to said District,"
and that the commissioners therein provided for should "be deemed
and taken as officers of such corporation.

[The District of Columbia v. Henry E. Woodbury, 136 U.S. 472]
[(1890)]
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/woodbury.htm

Living Food
14th February 2013, 18:21
Nobody ever notices when they go to court that the flag in the corner is NOT the US flag. C'mon, people, it's right there in front of you. See:

ACTUAL US FLAG

http://www.vfwpost2391.com/American%20Flag%20on%20Pole.JPG



THE FLAG FOUND IN COURTROOMS



http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR_YiHsWfv5Xrq1r8D6fmWVUfkujpQ2e Z9NQxVII5eULTzhMDFGmfZGjoI



See the difference? Even the CEO of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA always stands in front of the second (fake) flag:

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR588n6dwoURPQZmL6CGtk8U-tDbyLcXtSrL_nvGgyZwr7o5LOLtA