PDA

View Full Version : Does China Plan To Establish “China Cities” And “Special Economic Zones” All Over America?



Camilo
23rd January 2013, 17:10
Does China Plan To Establish “China Cities” And “Special Economic Zones” All Over America?

January 23, 2013

Source: Michael Snyder, Guest Post

What in the world is China up to? Over the past several years, the Chinese government and large Chinese corporations (which are often at least partially owned by the government) have been systematically buying up businesses, homes, farmland, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources all over America. In some cases, China appears to be attempting to purchase entire communities in one fell swoop. So why is this happening? Is this some form of “economic colonization” that is taking place? Some have speculated that China may be intending to establish “special economic zones” inside the United States modeled after the very successful Chinese city of Shenzhen. Back in the 1970s, Shenzhen was just a very small fishing village, but now it is a sprawling metropolis of over 14 million people. Initially, these “special economic zones” were only established within China, but now the Chinese government has been buying huge tracts of land in foreign countries such as Nigeria and establishing special economic zones in those nations. So could such a thing actually happen in America? Well, according to Dr. Jerome Corsi, a plan being pushed by the Chinese Central Bank would set up “development zones” in the United States that would allow China to “establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work.” Under the plan, some of the $1.17 trillionthat the U.S. owes China would be converted from debt to “equity”. As a result, “China would own U.S. businesses, U.S. infrastructure and U.S. high-value land, all with a U.S. government guarantee against loss.” Does all of this sound far-fetched? Well, it isn’t. In fact, the economic colonization of America is already far more advanced than most Americans would dare to imagine.

So how in the world did we get to this point? A few decades ago, the United States was the unchallenged economic powerhouse of the world and China was essentially a third world country.

So what happened?

Well, we entered into a whole bunch of extremely unfavorable “free trade” agreements, and countries such as China began to aggressively use “free trade” as an economic weapon against us.

Over the past decade, we have lost tens of thousands of businesses and millions of jobs to China. When the final numbers for 2012 come out, our trade deficit with China for the year will be well over 300 billion dollars, and that will be the largest trade deficit that one country has had with another country in the history of the world.

Overall, the U.S. has run a trade deficit with China over the past decade that comes to more than 2.3 trillion dollars. That 2.3 trillion dollars could have gone to U.S. businesses and U.S. workers, and in turn taxes would have been paid on all of that money. But instead, all of that money went to China.

Rather than just sitting on all of that money, China has been lending much of it back to us – at interest. We now owe China more than a trillion dollars, and our politicians are constantly pleading with China to lend more money to us so that we can finance our exploding debt.

Today, the U.S. government pays China approximately 100 million dollars a day in interest on the debt that we owe them. Those that say that the U.S. debt “does not matter” are being incredibly foolish.

So thanks to our massive trade deficit and our exploding national debt, China is systematically getting wealthier and the United States is systematically getting poorer.

And now China is starting to use a lot of that wealth to aggressively expand their power and influence around the globe.

But isn’t it more than a bit far-fetched to suggest that China may be planning to establish Chinese cities and special economic zones in America?

Not really.

Just look at what has already happened up in Canada. It is well-known that the Chinese population of Vancouver, Canada has absolutely exploded in recent years. In fact, the Vancouver suburb of Richmond is now approximately half Chinese. The following is an excerpt from a BBC article…

Richmond is North America’s most Asian city – 50% of residents here identify themselves as Chinese. But it’s not just here that the Chinese community in British Columbia (BC) – some 407,000 strong – has left its mark. All across Vancouver, Chinese-Canadians have helped shape the local landscape.

A similar thing is happening in many communities along the west coast of the United States. In fact, Chinese citizens purchased one out of every ten homes that were sold in the state of California in 2011.

But in other areas of the United States, the Chinese are approaching things much more systematically.

For example, as I have written about previously, a Chinese group identified as “Sino-Michigan Properties LLC” has purchased 200 acres of land near the town of Milan, Michigan. Their stated goal is to build a “China City” that has artificial lakes, a Chinese cultural center and hundreds of housing units for Chinese citizens.

In other instances, large chunks of real estate in major U.S. cities that are down on their luck are being snapped up by Chinese investors. Just check out what a Fortune article from a while back says has been happening over in Toledo, Ohio…

In March 2011, Chinese investors paid $2.15 million cash for a restaurant complex on the Maumee River in Toledo, Ohio. Soon they put down another $3.8 million on 69 acres of newly decontaminated land in the city’s Marina District, promising to invest $200 million in a new residential-commercial development. That September, another Chinese firm spent $3 million for an aging hotel across a nearby bridge with a view of the minor league ballpark.

Toledo is being promoted to Chinese investors as a “5-star logistics region“. From Toledo it is very easy to get to Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Columbus and Indianapolis…

With a population of 287,000, Toledo is only the fourth largest city in Ohio, but it lies at the junction of two important highways — I-75 and I-80/90. “My vision is to make Toledo a true international city,” Toledo’s Mayor Mike Bell told the Toledo Blade.

But some of these deals appear to be about far more than just making “investments”. According to the Idaho Statesman, a Chinese company known as Sinomach (which is actually controlled by the Chinese government) was actually interested in developing a 50 square mile self-sustaining “technology zone” south of the Boise airport…

A Chinese national company is interested in developing a 10,000- to 30,000-acre technology zone for industry, retail centers and homes south of the Boise Airport.

Officials of the China National Machinery Industry Corp. have broached the idea — based on a concept popular in China today — to city and state leaders.

The article suggested that this “technology zone” would be modeled after similar projects that already exist in China, and that Chinese officials were conducting similar negotiations with other U.S. states as well…

Sinomach is not looking only at Idaho.

The company sent delegations to Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania this year to talk about setting up research and development bases and industrial parks. It has an interest in electric transmission projects and alternative energy as well.

The technology zone proposal follows a model of science, technology and industrial parks in China — often fully contained cities with all services included.

Thankfully the deal in Idaho appears to be stalled for now, but could we soon see China establish special economic zones in other communities all around America?

The Chinese certainly do seem to be laying the groundwork for something. They have been voraciously gobbling up important infrastructure all over the country. The following comes from a recentAmerican Free Press article…

In addition to already owning vital ports in Long Beach, Calif. and Boston, Mass., the China Ocean Shipping Company is eyeing major ports on the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico. China also owns access to ports at the entry and exit points of the Panama Canal.

And due to fiscal woes plaguing many American cities and states, U.S. legislators have been actively seeking out Chinese investors. In one of the worst cases, Baton Rouge, La., Mayor Kip Holden offered the Chinese government ownership and operating rights to a new toll way system if the Chinese would provide the funding to build it.

Does it make sense for the Chinese to own some of our most important ports?

Isn’t there a national security risk?

Sadly, there isn’t much of anything that our politicians won’t sell these days as long as someone is willing to flash a lot of cash.

The Chinese have also been busy buying up important real estate on the east coast as a recent Forbes article explained….

According to a recent report in the New York Times, investors from China are “snapping up luxury apartments” and are planning to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on commercial and residential projects like Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn. Chinese companies also have signed major leases at the Empire State Building and at 1 World Trade Center, the report said.

But it is not only just land and infrastructure that the Chinese have been buying up.

They have also been purchasing rights to vital oil and natural gas deposits all over the United States.

There have been two Chinese companies that have been primarily involved in this effort.

The first is the China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC). According to Wikipedia, CNOOC is 100 percent owned by the Chinese government…

CNOOC Group is a state-owned oil company, fully owned by the Government of the People’s Republic of China, and the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) performs the rights and obligations of shareholder on behalf of the government.

The second is Sinopec Corporation. Sinopec Group is the largest shareholder (approx. 75% ownership) in Sinopec Corporation. And asthe Sinopec website tells us, Sinopec Group is fully owned by the Chinese government…

Sinopec Group, the largest shareholder of Sinopec Corp., is a super-large petroleum and petrochemical group incorporated by the State in 1998 based on the former China Petrochemical Corporation. Funded by the State, it is a State authorized investment arm and State-owned controlling company.

So whenever you see CNOOC or Sinopec, you can replace those names with the Chinese government. The Chinese government essentially runs both of those companies.

And as you can see from the following list compiled by the Wall Street Journal, those two companies have been extremely aggressive in buying up rights to oil and natural gas all over the nation…

Colorado: Cnooc gained a one-third stake in 800,000 acres in northeast Colorado and southeast Wyoming in a $1.27 billion pact with Chesapeake Energy Corp.

Louisiana: Sinopec has a one-third interest in 265,000 acres in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale after a broader $2.5-billion deal with Devon Energy.

Michigan: Sinopec gained a one-third interest in 350,000 acres in a larger $2.5 billion deal with Devon Energy.

Ohio: Sinopec acquired a one-third stake in Devon Energy’s 235,000 Utica Shale acres in a larger $2.5 billion deal.

Oklahoma: Sinopec has a one-third interest in 215,000 acres in a broader $2.5 billion deal with Devon Energy.

Texas: Cnooc acquired a one-third interest in Chesapeake Energy’s 600,000 acres in the Eagle Ford Shale in a $2.16-billion deal.

Wyoming: Cnooc has a one-third stake in 800,000 acres in northeast Colorado and southeast Wyoming after a $1.27 billion pact with Chesapeake Energy. Sinopec gained a one-third interest in Devon Energy’s 320,000 acres as part of a larger $2.5 billion deal.

Gulf of Mexico: Cnooc Ltd. separately acquired minority stakes in some of Statoil ASA’s leases as well as six of Nexen Inc.’s deep-water wells.

So why is the U.S. government allowing this?

That is a very good question.

For a nation that purports to be pursuing “energy independence”, we sure do have a funny way of going about things.

Unfortunately, the sad truth is that China is absolutely mopping the floor with the United States on the global economic stage. China is rising and America is in an advanced state of decline. Global economic power has shifted dramatically and most Americans still don’t understand what has happened.

The following are 44 more signs of how dominant the economy of China has become…

1. A Chinese firm recently made a $2.6 billion offer to buy movie theater chain AMC.

2. A different Chinese firm made a $1.8 billion offer to buy aircraft maker Hawker Beechcraft.

3. In December it was announced that a Chinese group would be purchasing AIG’s plane leasing unit for $4.23 billion.

4. It was recently announced that the Federal Reserve will now allow Chinese banks to buy up American banks.

5. A $190 million bridge project up in Alaska was awarded to a Chinese firm.

6. A $400 million contract to renovate the Alexander Hamilton bridge in New York was awarded to a Chinese firm.

7. A $7.2 billion contract to construct a new bridge between San Francisco and Oakland was awarded to a Chinese firm.

8. The uniforms for the U.S. Olympic team were made in China.

9. 85 percent of all artificial Christmas trees are made in China.

10. The new World Trade Center tower is going to include glass that has been imported from China.

11. The new Martin Luther King memorial on the National Mall was made in China.

12. In 2001, American consumers spent 102 billion dollars on products made in China. In 2011, American consumers spent 399 billion dollarson products made in China.

13. The United States spends about 4 dollars on goods and services from China for every one dollar that China spends on goods and services from the United States.

14. According to the New York Times, a Jeep Grand Cherokee that costs $27,490 in the United States costs about $85,000 in China thanks to all the tariffs.

15. The Chinese economy has grown 7 times faster than the U.S. economy has over the past decade.

16. The United States has lost a staggering 32 percent of its manufacturing jobs since the year 2000.

17. The United States has lost an average of 50,000 manufacturing jobs per month since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.

18. Overall, the United States has lost a total of more than 56,000manufacturing facilities since 2001.

19. According to the Economic Policy Institute, America is losing half a million jobs to China every single year.

20. Between December 2000 and December 2010, 38 percent of the manufacturing jobs in Ohio were lost, 42 percent of the manufacturing jobs in North Carolina were lost and 48 percent of the manufacturing jobs in Michigan were lost.

21. In 2010, China produced more than twice as many automobiles as the United States did.

22. Since the auto industry bailout, approximately 70 percent of all GM vehicles have been built outside the United States.

23. After being bailed out by U.S. taxpayers, General Motors is currently involved in 11 joint ventures with companies owned by the Chinese government. The price for entering into many of these “joint ventures” was a transfer of “state of the art technology” from General Motors to the communist Chinese.

24. Back in 1998, the United States had 25 percent of the world’s high-tech export market and China had just 10 percent. Ten years later, the United States had less than 15 percent and China’s share had soared to 20 percent.

25. The United States has lost more than a quarter of all of its high-tech manufacturing jobs over the past ten years.

26. China’s number one export to the U.S. is computer equipment.

27. The number one U.S. export to China is “scrap and trash”.

28. The U.S. trade deficit with China is now more than 28 times largerthan it was back in 1990.

29. Back in 1985, the U.S. trade deficit with China was just 6 million dollars for the entire year. For the month of November 2012 alone, the U.S. trade deficit with China was 28.9 billion dollars.

30. China now consumes more energy than the United States does.

31. China is now the leading manufacturer of goods in the entire world.

32. China uses more cement than the rest of the world combined.

33. China is now the number one producer of wind and solar power on the entire globe.

34. Today, China produces nearly twice as much beer as the United States does.

35. Right now, China is producing more than three times as much coal as the United States does.

36. China now produces 11 times as much steel as the United States does.

37. China produces more than 90 percent of the global supply of rare earth elements.

38. China is now the number one supplier of components that are critical to the operation of U.S. defense systems.

39. A recent investigation by the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services found more than one million counterfeit Chinese parts in the Department of Defense supply chain.

40. 15 years ago, China was 14th in the world in published scientific research articles. But now, China is expected to pass the United States and become number one very shortly.

41. China now awards more doctoral degrees in engineering each year than the United States does.

42. According to one study, the Chinese economy already has roughly the same amount of purchasing power as the U.S. economy does.

43. According to the IMF, China will pass the United States and will become the largest economy in the world in 2016.

44. Nobel economist Robert W. Fogel of the University of Chicago is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three times larger than the U.S. economy by the year 2040 if current trends continue.

Without the “globalization” of the world economy, none of this would have ever happened. But instead of admitting our mistakes and fixing them, our politicians continue to press for even more “free trade” and even more integration with communist nations such as China.

In fact, according to Dr. Jerome Corsi, the U.S. government has already set up 257 “foreign trade zones” all over America. These “foreign trade zones” are apparently given “special U.S. customs treatment” and are used to promote “free trade”…

Corsi noted that the U.S. government has created 257 foreign trade zones, or FTZs, throughout the United States, designed to extend special U.S. customs treatment to U.S. plants engaged in international-trade-related activities.

The FTZs tend to be located near airports, with easy access into the continental NAFTA and WTO multi-modal transportation systems being created to move free-trade goods cheaply, quickly and efficiently throughout the continent of North America.

“There is nothing in the U.S. government’s description of FTZs that would prevent a foreign government, like China, from operating a shell U.S. company that is in reality owned and financed by the Chinese government and operated through a Chinese government-owned corporation,” Corsi wrote.

Sadly, we are probably going to see a whole lot more of this in the years ahead.

According to Corsi, a professor of economics at Tsighua University in Beijing named Yu Qiao has suggested the following plan as a way to transform the debt that the United States owes China into something more “tangible”…

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

China would negotiate with the U.S. government to create a “crisis relief facility,” or CRF. The CRF “would be used alongside U.S. federal efforts to stabilize the banking system and to invest in capital-intensive infrastructure projects such as high-speed railroad from Boston to Washington, D.C.
China would pool a portion of its holdings of Treasury bonds under the CFR umbrella to convert sovereign debt into equity. Any CFR funds that were designated for investment in U.S. corporations would still be owned and managed by U.S. equity holders, with the Asians holding minority equity shares “that would, like preferred stock, be convertible.”
The U.S. government would act as a guarantor, “providing a sovereign guarantee scheme to assure the investment principal of the CRF against possible default of targeted companies or projects”.
The Federal Reserve would set up a special account to supply the liquidity the CRF would require to swap sovereign debt into industrial investment in the United States.

Apparently the Bank of China really likes this plan and would like to see something like this implemented.

In the years ahead, perhaps many of you will end up working in a “special economic zone” for a Chinese company on a project that is being financially guaranteed by the U.S. government.

If that sounds like a form of slavery to you, the truth is that you are probably not too far off the mark.

The borrower is the servant of the lender, and we should have never allowed ourselves to get into so much debt.

Now we will pay the price.

To get an idea of how much the world has changed in recent years, just check out this incredible photo which contrasts the decline of Detroit over the years with the amazing rise of Shanghai, China.

Things did not have to turn out this way. Unfortunately, we made decades of incredibly foolish decisions and we wrecked the greatest economic machine that the world has ever seen.

Now the future for America looks really bleak.

DeBron
23rd January 2013, 17:34
So is the aversion to Chinese people buying land and winning job contracts bad because they are Chinese?

Camilo
23rd January 2013, 17:44
So is the aversion to Chinese people buying land and winning job contracts bad because they are Chinese?

Not at all. The problem is that USA will be owned and ran by China.

RMorgan
23rd January 2013, 18:21
So is the aversion to Chinese people buying land and winning job contracts bad because they are Chinese?

Not at all. The problem is that USA will be owned and ran by China.

Hey Camilo,

Well, the USA owns and runs lots of countries around the world by force and most Americans don´t seem to care about it.

I don´t know if, in the long term global scenario, if it would be good or bad, but it would be extremely ironic if China ends up owning the US, which is very possible since the US economy is collapsing and China´s economy is becoming stronger.

It´s even more ironic if you realize that the US was a major player in the Chinese economic growth, when it decided to transfer its production lines to China, to take advantage of its very low labor costs.

Raf.

DeBron
23rd January 2013, 18:31
A Country ruled by immigrants is becoming influenced by other immigrants. Still do not see the problem.


Oh and thank you RMorgan for your reply

Lifebringer
23rd January 2013, 18:38
You know what I think? I think they sold this country a long time ago, and auctioned off regions. The Bush's are moving to Bolivia and own 200 acres of land with tunnels. Perhaps the elites sold it to China and are just gonna move without telling the public/dupes who voted for them to do it? I mean, I'm just saying about 16 yrs ago, PA citizens were complaining about them selling a public bridge because the cities couldn't toll it anymore. The bridge was paid for after years of tolls, then a private owner wanted to buy it and recharge the citizens at a steady rise, every time he needed another purchase.

spiritguide
23rd January 2013, 20:39
How nice of RED China to go from killing us to owning us. We are being sold out by the people elected to protect us. Most Chinese people are just peacefully trying to survive like the rest of the world population. It's their communist party/government who is part and parcel of the cabal we speak of. Similar to the Dem and Rep parties here. All control freaks. If you were in Nam you were definitely on the Red Chinese hit list and a lot of brothers and sons were hit. Jane Fonda is in their click don't you know. Oh! don't forget to lick their boots when you sell your kids and grandkids future to them.

Kimberley
23rd January 2013, 20:50
I have known about this happening for years however to see it all written out and listed is a confirmation that we sure are on are way to being owned by China. I have no problem with that or the Chinese.

For some reason this one in particular really intrigued me .


29. Back in 1985, the U.S. trade deficit with China was just 6 million dollars for the entire year. For the month of November 2012 alone, the U.S. trade deficit with China was 28.9 billion dollars.


and this:


In addition to already owning vital ports in Long Beach, Calif. and Boston, Mass., the China Ocean Shipping Company is eyeing major ports on the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico. China also owns access to ports at the entry and exit points of the Panama Canal.

Camilo thank you for posting but who is Michael Snyder, and what does Guest Post mean? Please give links to sources if you are able...thank you.

I think I found the original source and I see this article has been posted in many places:

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/does-china-plan-to-establish-chinese-cities-and-special-economic-zones-all-over-america

很多我們所有的愛與和平! Much love and peace to us all!

Arrowwind
23rd January 2013, 21:02
The answer to the question in the title of this thread is an absolute yes.

China To Build 50 Square Mile Self-Sustaining City Near Boise, Idaho (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/06/08/china-to-build-50-square-mile-self-sustaining-city-near-boise-idaho)

On 06.8.11, in Censorship (http://sadhillnews.com/category/censorship), Economy (http://sadhillnews.com/category/economy), New World Order (http://sadhillnews.com/category/government/new-world-order), Regime (http://sadhillnews.com/category/government/regime), Taxes (http://sadhillnews.com/category/taxes), by Sad Hill

http://sadhillnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/take-a-good-look-kids-this-will-all-belong-to-china-qe3-bailout-stimulus-budget-deficit-sad-hill-news1.jpg (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/06/08/china-to-build-50-square-mile-self-sustaining-city-near-boise-idaho/take-a-good-look-kids-this-will-all-belong-to-china-qe3-bailout-stimulus-budget-deficit-sad-hill-news-2)
Hey Sad! Didn’t you run the above illustration (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/06/03/50-things-americans-should-know-about-our-economic-loss) just 4 days ago?
Yup…
China To Construct Self-Sustaining City Near Boise, Idaho
(American Dream (http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/china-wants-to-construct-a-50-square-mile-self-sustaining-city-south-of-boise-idaho) and Idaho Statesman (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/12/31/1472023/chinese-company-eyes-boise.html)) Thanks to the trillions of dollars that the Chinese have made flooding our shores (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/03/11/obama-it-would-be-so-much-easier-to-be-the-president-of-china) with cheap products, China is now in a position of tremendous economic power (http://sadhillnews.com/2010/10/22/chinese-professor-in-2030-ad-explains-the-destruction-and-ownership-of-america). So what is China going to do with all of that money? Buy up pieces of the United States and set up “special economic zones” inside our country. One of these “special economic zones” would be just south of Boise, Idaho and the Idaho government is eager to give it to them.
China National Machinery Industry Corporation (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/01/20/obama-welcomes-our-new-chinese-overlords)(Sinomach for short) plans to construct a “technology zone” south of Boise Airport which would ultimately be up to 50 square miles in size. The Chinese Communist Party (http://sadhillnews.com/2010/10/03/one-nation-working-together-rally-list-of-sponsors) is the majority owner of Sinomach, so the 10,000 to 30,000 acre “self-sustaining city” that is being planned would essentially belong to the Chinese government (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/01/20/obama-welcomes-our-new-chinese-overlords). The planned “self-sustaining city” in Idaho would include manufacturing facilities, warehouses, retail centers and large numbers of homes for Chinese workers. Basically it would be a slice of communist China dropped right into the middle of the United States.
According to the Idaho Statesman, the idea would be to build a self-contained city with all services included. It would be modeled after the “special economic zones (http://sadhillnews.com/2011/06/07/taxpayer-funded-communist-supporting-gm-pushes-for-higher-gas-tax-%E2%80%93-1-per-gallon)” that currently exist in China.
~snip~
(Idaho Statesman (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/12/31/1472023/chinese-company-eyes-boise.html)) The state’s efforts have been critical to the discussions, said Pat Sullivan, a Boise lobbyist who works with Southeast Idaho Energy.
“One thing these Chinese see is we have a governor here who has a great big open-door policy, and I think that’s making a difference in this Sinomach project,” he said.

CdnSirian
23rd January 2013, 22:48
"Each and every one of our state governors has approved and allocated a certain amount of acres of their U.S. state land to be inhabited by Chinese communists --communists straight from China! They are to set up little towns and live here, supposedly for the purpose of producing Chinese products for sale in the U.S.A. The land the states are giving them for their little towns will be considered "foreign territory"!!! We are told that the laws of the state (in which these Chinese communists dwell) will apply to the communist Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ). Comment: If so, why are they allowed in here!??! Isn't the whole set up unlawful??? There are 257 of these little communist towns to be built all over the United States. Go to this website and see the list of the states, and how many FTZ's are to be erected in each and every state! Our nation is being peppered all over with these communist closed towns called "zones"! This insane brainstorm by Washington, D.C. officials was just recently discovered by alert citizens in the State of Idaho, where an FTZ is being built there, just south of Boise, Idaho, possibly 30,000 acres of Idaho is going to be used for that FTZ. " from:http://www.dailypaul.com/155091/257-foreign-trade-zones-across-america

I can't find the reference right now but I have also read that there is/will be a FTZ in Utah, completely Chinese and to bring over 30,000 Chinese employees. Both presidential candidates must have known this while they promised that jobs were #1 priority. Will try and find that article.

www.naftz.org/wp-content/uploads/.../2011-State-by-State-Study.pdf It's well spaced and blocked out better.

"National Association
o f Fo r e i g n - Tr a d e Z o n e s
20 12
The im p a c t o f
Fo r e i g n - T r a d e Z o n e s
o n t he 5 0 s t a t e s & P u e r t o R ic o
A bout T h is R epor t
Welcome to the 2012 edition of the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones annual
report on “The Impact of Foreign-Trade Zones on the 50 States and Puerto Rico.” This study
provides an analysis of foreign-trade zone activity by state, individual zone, and subzone, based
on information submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board staff at the U.S. Department of
Commerce. It provides a detailed survey of activity and trends, including merchandise received,
exports, number of companies active in zones, and employment connected to zone activity. It
also describes the array of activities in zones, including manufacturing, wholesale and retail
distribution, storage and other activities. The data is extracted from the annual reports each zone
grantee is required to submit to the FTZ Board on activities within that zone. The data covers
Fiscal Year 2010.*
By publishing this study, the NAFTZ hopes to promote public understanding and appreciation
of the important role the FTZ program plays in national, state and local economic development.
As this report will demonstrate, the overall scale of activity in the program is impressive. Behind
the numbers, the activities in FTZs touch virtually every area of the daily lives of Americans.
Products that move through zones or are processed there include cosmetics, footwear, and
furniture to automobiles, wind energy products and robotics, among other things.
The content of our report begins with a short article on the “The Big Picture 2010: Leading the
Recovery,” which describes overall trends in zone activity in 2010, followed by an article on the
automotive sector, the Top 15 State Rankings, and then individual reports for each of the 50
states and Puerto Rico.
The four main metrics used throughout the report are: (1) Merchandise Received; (2) Exports;
(3) Employment; and (4) Active Firms. Merchandise received describes the dollar value of
merchandise admitted to a foreign-trade zone, both domestic and foreign as well as zone-
to-zone transfers. Exports are the dollar value of all goods that leave the foreign-trade zone
directly without entering U.S. commerce, regardless of their origin before admission to the
zone. Employment includes all persons engaged in business activities under zone procedures,
including contract and part-time employees as reported by zone grantees. " And this goes on, a very long report.

I remember reading about the Mercedes plant in Georgia, about 10 years ago, the author stating that the workers were Polish, the local unionized US autoworkers all lost their jobs, and then the factor of those workers being paid in Poland and not spending/taxed in the local economy, housed in dorms. A chunk of Poland. (No labor laws, no W Comp, no minimum wages? Not sure. But no taxes. Nor for Mercedes? Not sure).

A chief complaint I've read about this situation is that there are no customs requirements. In other words a foreign power could land troops, tanks etc into their warehouses - and no one would know. Just roll 'em out.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/01/25/jb-campbell-foreign-trade-zones-2/

http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1107/110725losangeles.htm FTZ crime

Would welcome some good news about this topic!

spiritguide
24th January 2013, 01:34
@ Kimberly... Investigate Red Chinas role in the Viet Nam conflict along with them capturing a U.S. Navy P-3 off their coast a few years back. The Communist Party is not the people as you think. Our jobs went there to slave labor, what is your definition of slave? Beware of the stranger handing out candy my mom always said.

Airwooz
24th January 2013, 02:21
Remind me of the old time where American fear Japan to took over, and then Japanese economy collapsed till today .

American owed by bunch of space lizard, no one can change that for now.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/08/Rising_sun_movie_poster_1993.jpg/220px-Rising_sun_movie_poster_1993.jpg

Airwooz
24th January 2013, 02:42
@ Kimberly... Investigate Red Chinas role in the Viet Nam conflict along with them capturing a U.S. Navy P-3 off their coast a few years back. The Communist Party is not the people as you think. Our jobs went there to slave labor, what is your definition of slave? Beware of the stranger handing out candy my mom always said.

It's American government first to made a deal with Chinese Communism Party back in 70's, China broadcasted its first TV commercial after Deng xiao ping's America trip, China invaded vietnam right after America's retreat in order to filled the blank where Soviet Union wanted to step in.

We don't want to be a World factory or steal American's jobs, it's the government between US and China, they have this long term agenda in the very beginning.

mosquito
24th January 2013, 03:04
So is the aversion to Chinese people buying land and winning job contracts bad because they are Chinese?

Not at all. The problem is that USA will be owned and ran by China.

Unlike the many other countries, the Philippines being one example, owned, pillaged, and run by US corporations.

Watch the videos on this thread .....

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?54547-John-Perkins-Confessions-of-an-Economic-Hitman-Full-Interview-2008&p=619321&viewfull=1#post619321http://

to find out how the USA has waged economic warfare on the world.

spiritguide
24th January 2013, 03:40
For those who want to know what the Constitution says about the Subject of the OP is, here is the info.

Article I sec. 10 ; - No State shall, without Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing inspection Laws, and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any Stateon Imposts or Exports, shall be forthe Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State or with a foreign Power, or engagein War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Seems to me the freelancing by states with foreign powers, ie. Chinese government, is contrary to this section of article I of the constitution.

Open for dialog....

:peace:

Referee
24th January 2013, 06:39
Here is pink!

96Kl59wwuxE

Arrowwind
24th January 2013, 14:01
I wrote to my governor this morning and here is what I said. I suggest that if you are an American Citizen you write to Governor Otter of Idaho. You do not need to be a citizen of Idaho to do so. you can do so here:
http://gov.idaho.gov/ourgov/contact.html

This is what I wrote to him.



Governor Otter,

I am shocked and appalled at your decision to bring communist Chinese people to the State of Idaho and that you have participated in allocating them 50 square miles near Boise for them to build their city on.
What are you thinking? Communist China has perpetuated the murder of millions of its civilians for merely political differences. They incarcerate people for religious reasons, they sell their human organs on the black market, they forcefully control the reproduction of their women, they have stood silently as families slaughter girl babies in favor of boys, they have sent toxic and dangerous products to our shores, they have not particpated in free and equal trade by limiting our products into their market. I will not accept and I will not welcome these people. Your association with this endeavor aligns you with their economic and political agendas by supporting their mission, that is to take over our United States of America one inch at a time. I cannot not help but assume that you have done this for money and vested interests in economic development that ultimately will undercut the citizens of Idaho. And perhaps you feel that we owe them something regarding their purchase of US debt over the years and that somehow we are endebited to them and that we must pay with our land? Though this action you merely support our illegal banking system, and are endeavoring to pay out to the Chinese by providing them even more economic opportunity to control us. What you have done is not representative of the vast majority of Idaho citizens. Your behavior is not only immoral it is treasonous. I will now spend my time screaming from the highest mountain tops in our fair state to have you ousted.

Sincerely,
XXX XXX

spiritguide
24th January 2013, 14:44
@ Airwooz,

Your comments are correct for the 70's but the Chinese gov role was different in the 60's. The main point is that the powers above the governments and parties (world elitists) Cabal, manipulated and orchestrated the far east theater for control and oppression. We are talking about world conquest by greedy above government powers. Even the U.N. is a puppet to them. Control is the issue and it is driven by greed.

Arrowwind
24th January 2013, 17:02
I have known about this happening for years however to see it all written out and listed is a confirmation that we sure are on are way to being owned by China. I have no problem with that or the Chinese.

!

I have to ask...
you have no problem that this movement onto American soil is not just Chinese individuals but by the Chinese government who has murdered millions, forced birth control, harvest organs from prisoners for sale on black market, sells us toxic and poisonous products, thinks its ok that the trade deficit is in the billions, incarcerates people for their religious and political views, and has a long long history of this... I consider them to be fascist.


You have no problem that we are to be owned by the Chinese?


and its ok that these chinese governement colonies are coming to US soil?


and that all of this should be guaranteed by the tax money of the US citizens?

I would really like some clarifications on your position.

Arrowwind
24th January 2013, 17:06
So is the aversion to Chinese people buying land and winning job contracts bad because they are Chinese?

my aversion is based on the Governmental Chinese history in their human rights violations that continues today. Race has nothing to do with it.
I am also adverse to foreign governments, not foreign citizens, but foreign governments, owning American soil

DeBron
24th January 2013, 19:46
What I find interesting is how things are presented to us from multiple resources. A movie came out last year called the Campaign had a subplot about this very issue. The movie itself was about an entrenched congressmen who was not doing what the film's version of the Koch brothers wanted him to do. So they got some nobody to run. They wanted him to vote to allow China to buy large tracts of land in North Carolina so they could move their workers here and have our products built in the US for Chinese wages to increase profit.

Funny movie, unless you are greatly offended by a CGI baby being punched in the face and later a cute CGI puppy getting punched in the face.

I have noticed that Will Farrell has had a couple of movies that are hilarious and stupid but with a message about the things our governments and large corporations do including The Other Guys.


So this weekends homework is to watch The Campaign and The other Guys. You might learn something.

spiritguide
28th January 2013, 15:24
@ Kimberly,

Have you no response to the postulate presented to you? Is there a justification for the type of occupationism now on the march in this country on behalf of corrupt international governments, corporations and banks? Your perception might help us see clearer. Thank you!