PDA

View Full Version : If you are still in any Doubt..? Pictures from the 'ROTHSCHILD' Party 1972..!



jackovesk
9th March 2013, 16:59
Pics from 1972 Rothschild Party (the elite were doing it before Gaga) - Surealistic ball - Château de Ferrières - 1972

Interesting article on a Rothschild Party written by attendee Baron Alexis de Redé. These elite figures truly enjoy walking around with serious faces wearing creepy costumes. You think Gaga is “original”? Nope, she’s making trendy what her masters have been doing for centuries.

“… On 12 December 1972, Marie-Hélène gave her Surrealist Ball at Ferriéres. This time the guests were asked to come in black tie and long dresses with Surrealist heads. The invitation was printed with reversed writing on a blue and cloudy sky, inspired by a painting by Magritte. To decipher the card, it had to be held to a mirror.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/roths5.jpg
Baroness Marie-Hélène de Rothschild and Baron Alexis de Redé.

For the evening the chateau was floodlit with moving orange lights to give the impression that it was on fire. The staircase inside was lined by footmen dressed as cats that appeared to have fallen asleep in a variety of staged poses.

Guests had to pass throught a kind of labyrinth of Hell, made of black ribbons to look like cobwebs. The occasional cat appeared to rescue the guests and lead them to the tapestry salon. Here they were greeted by Guy with a hat to resemble a still-life on a platter, and by Marie-Hélène wearing the head of a giant weeping tears made of diamonds.

http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/roth3.jpg
Hélène Rochas

Marie Hélène proved that she had the flare and imagination to create something unique and worthwhile. None of this was created by charm alone. It needed a degree of ruthless determination.


She attended to every minute detail of style in her life and also in her entertaining. She was a great hostess with all the qualities. She loved parties and people.

She was forever in quest of new talent and new figures to entertain from the world of the arts, literature, dance and haute couture. She mixed them with the more established set of Paris society. everyone was intrigued. Marie-Hélène’s parties took on such importance that one social figure threatened to commit suicide unless she was invited…

http://vigilantcitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/roth4.jpg
Baron Alexis de Redé in a Dalí designed Hat


It is not possible to repeat such things now for many reasons. But it is fascinanting to look back and to remember these occasions, which dominated our thoughts and plans to such an extent for so many months. I am happy that I took part in so many, and happy that I gave some myself.”

-Baron Alexis de Redé

Some other Pictures

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-k.jpg
The invitation was printed with reversed writing on a blue and cloudy sky, inspired by a painting by Magritte. To decipher the card, it had to be held to a mirror.

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-b.jpg
Château de Ferrières. For the evening the château was floodlit with moving orange lights to give the impression that it was on fire

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/baron-guy-de-rothschild-baroness-marie-he-le-ne-de-rothschild.jpg
Baron Guy de Rothschild, Baroness Marie-Hélène de Rothschild

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/helene.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-01.jpg
Other Guests

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg
Table of the swaying dolls

http://www.pedopolis.com/en/blog/pics-from-1972-rothschild-party-the-elite-were-doing-it-before-gaga.html

PS - See the so called 'Conspiracy Theorists' weren't kidding, were they..!

Hungry..? How's your appetite now..???

Even more photo's below...

jackovesk
9th March 2013, 17:02
More Horror here...

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-e.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-d.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-f.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-h.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-c.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-j.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-i.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-a.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/rothschild-ball-1972-l.jpg

http://www.pedopolis.com/en/blog/pics-from-1972-rothschild-party-the-elite-were-doing-it-before-gaga.html

PS - And to think, these (In-breds) - Rule the World..?

william r sanford72
9th March 2013, 17:15
strange vibe from these ...feel like i should go and wash it off.....creepy.

jackovesk
9th March 2013, 17:21
strange vibe from these ...feel like i should go and wash it off.....creepy.

To True...

...and that's an 'Understatement'...:bad:

Freed Fox
9th March 2013, 17:23
These are interesting, thanks for sharing.

For those who don't recognize him, the gentleman in the 7th picture of the 2nd post (third from bottom) is Salvador Dali.

Carmody
9th March 2013, 17:48
These are interesting, thanks for sharing.

For those who don't recognize him, the gentleman in the 7th picture of the 2nd post (third from bottom) is Salvador Dali.

"Johnny don't need no mask! Johnny don't need no mask!" - Mikey Rourke, in 'Johnny Handsome' (http://armchairc.blogspot.ca/2009/02/johnny-handsome.html)

It is important, possibly, to bring these sort of things, these gatherings... to notice. What one does with that information, is their own choice.

I give these gatherings no weight, for if I did, then they would. I give them no power. As ...I should not.

At best, it is the joker dancing before the throne.

DNA
9th March 2013, 18:20
I have no problem with acknowledging this "EYES WIDE SHUT" scene takes place within the confines of the elite. But, my question is so what? I'm just going to be honest here, other than lavish spending and perported sexual debauchary, I don't see how this fits into the realms of evil or scary.

Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.

Also, it reminds me of the Alice in Chains video where an "eyes wide shut" party is taking place for the purpose of luring people with sex into a den of cannabals who eat them.

Here is the Alice in Chains video.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D37POA11KY

Kraut
9th March 2013, 18:26
Let them party and enjoy their twisted ways of "fun" because one day it'll be:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTO3ecChOcM
(Hopefully no one will be annoyed by the posted video, just couldn't resist.)

Those in power, regardless of how high think they can control the world eternally, but that's not going to happen. The crashing fall always comes. I used to worry about the Rothschilds and Co. a lot, now I don't.

ulli
9th March 2013, 19:53
One has to remember that parties with a theme are the domain of the wives of these people...
expressing themselves as hostesses. Having unlimited funds to create fun.
I have been to such parties, not quite as extravagant as the Rothchilds here but flamboyant dress
codes like "wear red". The hostess of one of these balls was once heard screaming
"I'll never ever have that bitch under my roof ever again!!" while referring to actress Joan Collins,
who deliberately ignored the dress code and made her rather late appearance in a green dress.

Anyway, the 1972 Rothchild party had an artsy surrealist motto ...
here is more about it:
http://madamedepique.wordpress.com/category/history-eccentricity/

Apparently someone threatened to commit suicide unless they were invited....

Tesseract
9th March 2013, 22:13
I think it's magnificent.

Ellisa
9th March 2013, 23:51
I think you bring to such photographs what you want to see. The theme was 'surreal', a word heard about just about everything today but which actually, in the 70s, still described an art movement started in the 1920s that tried to transcend reality by the use of incongruous images. I think that these photos show that the guests have tried to do this, and many in fact have copied famous artworks of the genre. It looks like a night of decadent fun!

Whether it will lead to covert discussions of world domination in the butler's pantry or unbridled debauchery in the dining room I do not know- though I expect not. Those elaborate and beautiful outfits would have taken a lot of effort as well as money to design and put on and ages to remove!

That said though- should people waste money on such things whilst others starve to death? Of course they shouldn't, but they will and still do.

P.S. Ulli- that Wilde letter you posted on the useless nature of Art is brilliant! I have never read that point of view so cleverly written before, and it is certainly very apt in this case.

indigopete
10th March 2013, 00:00
Although I have an open mind about the "Eyes Wide Shut" type of stuff, I don't see what the particular malevolent significance is of rich people having fancy dress parties. Is there evil symbolism in the costumes depicted above ? If so, what is it ?

Is someone just making a random association between the name "Rothschild", dressed up hi society, Stanley Kubric and Alex Jones and calling it sinister ? That's what it looks like to me. If not then please spell out what malevolent symbolism is being expressed here exactly.

1972 was right on the tail end of the psychedelic decade. Everybody was doing mad stuff - just check out films like "Zabriskie Point", "Blow Up" and "Performance" and those pictures suddenly don't look the least bit strange.

Hazel
10th March 2013, 00:35
Good to see the last 2 posts have things harnessed into perspective..

The Da da movement was about decrying the banality of pre-prescribed societal perceptions, that freely explored the dominion of the subconscious mind and was a gate way to Modernism with all its bountiful plurality.
Lets not rush to fear what we do not yet understand and its folly to need to make conflicted connections betwixt things.. isn't this in part what 'waking up' means.

P.S.. participating in and enjoying Art for Arts sake is not a decadence, a 'sin' / crikey folks.. lets not choke one of our vital arteries to soul.

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 01:17
Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.


Yep, nothing to worry about here...:shocked:

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg

Oh, I forgot to mention the Satanic-Sacrifice of babies & children, and Child Prostitution & Pedeophilia the 'Elite' are into aswell...:yes4:

You must, especially like the part of the dinner-setting where the baby-dolls skull is caved-in...:faint:

Bon Appétit...:hungry:

Hazel
10th March 2013, 02:18
With respect Jackovesk... go look at some Art history on the Surrealist movement, perhaps that will relax your response to this imagery..

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 02:25
With respect Jackovesk... go look at some Art history on the Surrealist movement, perhaps that will relax your response to this imagery..

With all due respect recap1...

Its not a matter of that, I am here to 'expose' these types for who they really are & what they represent..!

Get it - Got it - Good..!

http://philosophers-stone.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/unlawfulkilling-300x268.jpg

DNA
10th March 2013, 05:46
Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.


Yep, nothing to worry about here...:shocked:

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg

Oh, I forgot to mention the Satanic-Sacrifice of babies & children, and Child Prostitution & Pedeophilia the 'Elite' are into aswell...:yes4:

You must, especially like the part of the dinner-setting where the baby-dolls skull is caved-in...:faint:

Bon Appétit...:hungry:

Jack I've been to art shows with Robots wearing dolls heads and breaking pictures of world leaders. I met and talked to the artists and they were not pedophiles or anything of the like. You are reading a lot into very little here.

I offerred you the oppurtunity to expand on your oppinion as to why these parties are representing something sinister and monstrous. Your answer is nothing less than what I would expect from a senationalistic journalist from any number of the fake propaganda news agencies.

If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause.

Water33/6
10th March 2013, 06:27
With respect Jackovesk... go look at some Art history on the Surrealist movement, perhaps that will relax your response to this imagery..

I agree. I'm an artist and actually appreciate how creative some of these costumes were. Some quite magnificent. Would love to have been invited, it would've been quite the party of parties to remember. Dali was there. It's so easy to judge if you don't understand artistry. I believe they had more imagination back then. Look at all the art movements of that era. You may be reaching and projecting your paranoia.

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 06:30
Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.


Yep, nothing to worry about here...:shocked:

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg

Oh, I forgot to mention the Satanic-Sacrifice of babies & children, and Child Prostitution & Pedeophilia the 'Elite' are into aswell...:yes4:

You must, especially like the part of the dinner-setting where the baby-dolls skull is caved-in...:faint:

Bon Appétit...:hungry:

Jack I've been to art shows with Robots wearing dolls heads and breaking pictures of world leaders. I met and talked to the artists and they were not pedophiles or anything of the like. You are reading a lot into very little here.

I offerred you the oppurtunity to expand on your oppinion as to why these parties are representing something sinister and monstrous. Your answer is nothing less than what I would expect from a senationalistic journalist from any number of the fake propaganda news agencies.

If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause.

Psuedo rhetoric...DNA

In lieu of repeating myself - As I mentioned to recap1, I am here to 'expose' these types for who they really are & what they represent..!

PS - Read into it any which way you want...


If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause

I am not talking about Art here...:nono:

I am referring to the 'Elite' - PTB - Rothshilds - Rockefellers - Royalty - etc...

This entire Forum is full of exposed 'Truths' of these SCUM & their Satanic leanings, Lust for Power, Murder of Innocents, Pedeophile & Child Prostitution Rings, the 'List' is endless...

What part of that don't you understand..?

So what your actually telling me is this 'Ilk' are people who just like to have their parties and are friends of 'Humanity'..?

Get a Grip...My post had absolutely 'Nothing' to do with Art..!

You my friend - Need a 'History' lesson...:yes4:

PS - And that goes to (ALL of YOU) who tried to railroad this 'Thread' with the ART :bs:

You bunch of naive Fools..!!!

Water33/6
10th March 2013, 06:37
Yes but you've posted these photos of these elaborate art theme parties... What do you expect ? You need to do a better job at picking the right source material. I doubt anyone here disagrees that Rothschilds etc are negatively oriented.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

"Exposing" a fun creative art party is not cutting it. Sorry to say

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 06:48
Yes but you've posted these photos of these elaborate art theme parties... What do you expect ? You need to do a better job at picking the right source material. I doubt anyone here disagrees that Rothschilds etc are negatively oriented.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

"Exposing" a fun creative art party is not cutting it. Sorry to say

...and..?

:pound:........................

DNA
10th March 2013, 06:54
Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.


Yep, nothing to worry about here...:shocked:

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg

Oh, I forgot to mention the Satanic-Sacrifice of babies & children, and Child Prostitution & Pedeophilia the 'Elite' are into aswell...:yes4:

You must, especially like the part of the dinner-setting where the baby-dolls skull is caved-in...:faint:

Bon Appétit...:hungry:

Jack I've been to art shows with Robots wearing dolls heads and breaking pictures of world leaders. I met and talked to the artists and they were not pedophiles or anything of the like. You are reading a lot into very little here.

I offerred you the oppurtunity to expand on your oppinion as to why these parties are representing something sinister and monstrous. Your answer is nothing less than what I would expect from a senationalistic journalist from any number of the fake propaganda news agencies.

If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause.

Psuedo rhetoric...DNA

In lieu of repeating myself - As I mentioned to recap1, I am here to 'expose' these types for who they really are & what they represent..!

PS - Read into it any which way you want...


If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause

I am not talking about Art here...:nono:

I am referring to the 'Elite' - PTB - Rothshilds - Rockefellers - Royalty - etc...

This entire Forum is full of exposed 'Truths' of these SCUM & their Satanic leanings, Lust for Power, Murder of Innocents, Pedeophile & Child Prostitution Rings, the 'List' is endless...

What part of that don't you understand..?

So what your actually telling me is this 'Ilk' are people who just like to have their parties and are friends of 'Humanity'..?

Get a Grip...My post had absolutely 'Nothing' to do with Art..!

You my friend - Need a 'History' lesson...:yes4:

PS - And that goes to (ALL of YOU) who tried to railroad this 'Thread' with the ART :bs:

You bunch of naive Fools..!!!

More generalizations.
I could argue your point for you far better and also without the name calling.

Why don't you pick a source to cite and build an argument.

All you have shown me thus far is your ability to cut/paste and use the color highlighter to help emphasize someone else's point.

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 07:08
Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.


Yep, nothing to worry about here..!

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg

Oh, I forgot to mention the Satanic-Sacrifice of babies & children, and Child Prostitution & Pedeophilia the 'Elite' are into aswell...:yes4:

You must, especially like the part of the dinner-setting where the baby-dolls skull is caved-in...:faint:

Bon Appétit...:hungry:

Jack I've been to art shows with Robots wearing dolls heads and breaking pictures of world leaders. I met and talked to the artists and they were not pedophiles or anything of the like. You are reading a lot into very little here.

I offerred you the oppurtunity to expand on your oppinion as to why these parties are representing something sinister and monstrous. Your answer is nothing less than what I would expect from a senationalistic journalist from any number of the fake propaganda news agencies.

If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause.

Psuedo rhetoric...DNA

In lieu of repeating myself - As I mentioned to recap1, I am here to 'expose' these types for who they really are & what they represent..!

PS - Read into it any which way you want...


If you were going to answer my question,,,I expected better from you, and if you are going to give answers like this, I suggest you not answer and let someone else take up the cause

I am not talking about Art here...:nono:

I am referring to the 'Elite' - PTB - Rothshilds - Rockefellers - Royalty - etc...

This entire Forum is full of exposed 'Truths' of these SCUM & their Satanic leanings, Lust for Power, Murder of Innocents, Pedeophile & Child Prostitution Rings, the 'List' is endless...

What part of that don't you understand..?

So what your actually telling me is this 'Ilk' are people who just like to have their parties and are friends of 'Humanity'..?

Get a Grip...My post had absolutely 'Nothing' to do with Art..!

You my friend - Need a 'History' lesson...:yes4:

PS - And that goes to (ALL of YOU) who tried to railroad this 'Thread' with the ART :bs:

You bunch of naive Fools..!!!

More generalizations.
I could argue your point for you far better and also without the name calling.

Why don't you pick a source to cite and build an argument.

All you have shown me thus far is your ability to cut/paste and use the color highlighter to help emphasize someone else's point.

:shocked:...How about using Avalon's very own (Search Engine)

Rothschilds

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494249

Rockefellers

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494257

Pedeophile Rings

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494260

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?56173-List-of-Child-Sex-Offenders-Inside-the-British-Government..---

Satanism

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494264

Ritual Abuse

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494295

Royalty

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494265


In lieu of repeating myself again- As I mentioned to recap1, I am here to 'expose' these types for who they really are & what they represent..!

That Enough for you DNA...:faint:

DNA
10th March 2013, 07:23
It's a pretty good cut and paste job Jack. Again, I would like to hear your take on the matter. I think in the time it took you to cut and paste those threads, you could have put something together somewhat informative in your own voice. But it's cool.

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 07:36
It's a pretty good cut and paste job Jack. Again, I would like to hear your take on the matter. I think in the time it took you to cut and paste those threads, you could have put something together somewhat informative in your own voice. But it's cool.

Forgive me,

I have just posted approx. 10 other 'Threads' today to help keep this forum going...

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494318

...and to be honest if you can't gleen anything from what I've said from the OP onwards, so be it...:faint:

DNA
10th March 2013, 08:28
Rothschilds[/B]

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494249

Rockefellers

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494257

Pedeophile Rings

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494260

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?56173-List-of-Child-Sex-Offenders-Inside-the-British-Government..---

Satanism

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494264

Ritual Abuse

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494295

Royalty

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494265


In lieu of repeating myself again- As I mentioned to recap1, I am here to 'expose' these types for who they really are & what they represent..!

That Enough for you DNA...:faint:



It's a pretty good cut and paste job Jack. Again, I would like to hear your take on the matter. I think in the time it took you to cut and paste those threads, you could have put something together somewhat informative in your own voice. But it's cool.

Forgive me,

I have just posted approx. 10 other 'Threads' today to help keep this forum going...

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/search.php?searchid=6494318

...and to be honest if you can't gleen anything from what I've said from the OP onwards, so be it...:faint:

You need to redo those hyperlinks only one out of the eight you just posted works.

ThePythonicCow
10th March 2013, 08:48
...How about using Avalon's very own (Search Engine)
You can't post useful search links that way. The link you get from a search request is only valid for the user who issued the search.

The best you can do is to tell the reader what words/phrases to search for, and let them reissue the search themselves.

ThePythonicCow
10th March 2013, 09:07
I deleted your last post, Jackovesk.

There was useful content to it ... that the search terms for your search links (unusable by others) were the bold terms just before the links. It is those terms, such as Rothschilds, Rockefellers, ... on which others can search the forum, though just what you expect them to find you leave unstated.

But there was rudeness as well ... too much so.

DNA
10th March 2013, 10:05
Thanks Paul for mentioning you deleted my post as well. Oh sorry that was sarcasm. All I did was point out how disrespectfull Jack has been to everyone who has commented negatively to his thread ascertation that people at a stylish well dressed party equate satanism and/or pedophilia.

I don't think you should have deleted Jack's post either, it shows folks who he really is.

Jack stated earlier he didn't have time to enter into a dialogue on the subject because he is to busy trying to save this forum.
Maybe Jack is correct, maybe he is keeping this forum together.

Maybe you guys have lost so many prolific posters you're willing to cater to one as flawed as Jack in order to keep him around.
Better yet, manicure his threads so as to keep folks from finding out who the person is behind the cut and pasting.

I work 60 hours a week Paul, I have a newborn baby at home. So when I spend this much time in an effort to generate positive dialogue on a subject, and what I get in return is a self agrandizing person who considers my questions patronizing and unworthy, I go ahead and do my duty to point it out.

I'm a little mad Paul, you tell me in private you agree with what I said, and then you erase what I said and without so much as a mention.

And what about this.


[I am not talking about Art here...:nono:

I am referring to the 'Elite' - PTB - Rothshilds - Rockefellers - Royalty - etc...

This entire Forum is full of exposed 'Truths' of these SCUM & their Satanic leanings, Lust for Power, Murder of Innocents, Pedeophile & Child Prostitution Rings, the 'List' is endless...

What part of that don't you understand..?

So what your actually telling me is this 'Ilk' are people who just like to have their parties and are friends of 'Humanity'..?

Get a Grip...My post had absolutely 'Nothing' to do with Art..!

You my friend - Need a 'History' lesson...:yes4:

PS - And that goes to (ALL of YOU) who tried to railroad this 'Thread' with the ART :bs:

You bunch of naive Fools..!!!

Jack calls forum members naive fools? This is acceptable? You haven't erased this have you?
Just so we are on the same page, it's cool to refer to fellow forum members as naive fools when in disagreement? Right?
Not to mention all the sarcasm and belittlement that is communicated with his icon choices and over use of color and bold type.
That last part I'm pretty sure is in the forum guide lines as a no no. I saw you chastize him for this over a year ago, and here he is doing it like he always has.


9. OVER USE OF TEXT FORMATTING
Excessive use of over the top attention grabbing formats such as ALL CAPS, large text, alarmist and panicky URGENT headlines are not permitted and may be edited by moderators

Okay, I'm done.

ThePythonicCow
10th March 2013, 10:41
Thanks Paul for mentioning you deleted my post as well.
I had already deleted Jackovesk's post, and posted on this thread that I had done so, when you subsequently posted it as a quote (that I presume you had started responding to before my deletion.)

When I deleted Jackovesk's post, I told him so publicly, above, so that others could see what I was up to and that I had problems with the post for being rude.

When I subsequently deleted your post, it was mostly because it happened that you ended up quoting a post I had just decided minutes earlier to delete. I felt no need to make a public issue of your (now deleted) post, because I didn't have serious problems with what you said.

I sometimes post in public when I delete, and sometimes send a PM. It depends on the circumstances.

===

I would suggest, however, that it's better to Report problematic posts of others than to try to "educate" them on the open forum if they aren't willing students. When one tries to present unwanted advice, no matter how politely one tries to choose one's words, one is likely to end up derailing a thread in conflict and resolution efforts ... as has happened to this thread now.

If this happened to have been a thread I personally cared about, I'd probably have split it already, several posts back, in an effort to salvage the good part.

Fred Steeves
10th March 2013, 11:39
Hey Paul. I'm glad you didn't split this one up, because through all the back and forth(and the bs), I learned some things about high society and art. Not generally interested in either, seldom would I click on a thread described as either, and I certainly wouldn't have followed the thread split. But as it turned out I got an unexpected education.

Having visited Jekyll Island 2 years ago, and snooping all around the grand hotel that still operates today, I've got an idea now about how their night life might have looked.

Just my 2 cents. :)

P.S. Jacko, you need to chill brother.(LOL) It's all good, you can learn a lot from the vast diversity of members here. Keep those ears open, cause nothin's simple as it seems.

jackovesk
10th March 2013, 13:31
But as it turned out I got an unexpected education.

Just my 2 cents. :)

P.S. Jacko, you need to chill brother.(LOL) It's all good, you can learn a lot from the vast diversity of members here. Keep those ears open, cause nothin's simple as it seems.

G'day Fred,

I really wish that was the case on this 'Thread'...:faint:

Perhaps you could point out some of the invaluable education-points I seemed to have overlooked...:)

write4change
10th March 2013, 13:51
What the exposure does for me -- is keep it in my face what the purpose of amassing money is for. Throughout time the top of the pyramid has always been decadent as a whole. When the world is under such stress -- this is where they spend their time and money.

The cost of this party could have produced the movie Thrive. It is why Jasper Gamble is an outcast to his "birth right." Celebrating the right of the super rich to extravagantly and decadently use their wealth for no purpose leaves me needing a bath. I am glad I got to be reminded of this but I am done and will not return to this thread. Once is enough.

Eyes Wide Shut was more true than not and what that film says is that those people take their "fun" very seriously.

RMorgan
10th March 2013, 15:21
These are interesting, thanks for sharing.

For those who don't recognize him, the gentleman in the 7th picture of the 2nd post (third from bottom) is Salvador Dali.

Yes, and this picture is not from that party; It´s a famous Dali´s picture and was shot elsewhere.

Yvonne
10th March 2013, 15:39
strange vibe from these ...feel like i should go and wash it off.....creepy.

I was thinking the same thing!!!! The baby doll with no legs reminded me of the Opening Ceremony of the Olympics.

HaveBlue
11th March 2013, 09:06
Some of those pics look like paintings and/or mixtures of both photos and retouched photos.
The 1972 version of photoshop.

However, I agree Jack, having that kind of thing on my dinner table is going to put me off eating.
Maybe they are so scroogy it is a way to keep expenses down!

Unless it is a battered women and childrens expose' it is hardly sets the mood of my idea of a party either. Everyone hiding their identity and having 'those' props. Is that their idea of a 'Halloween' party?

Those broken baby dolls are very sinister looking indeed. - And I am an iron maiden fan, familiar with the artwork on the 2002 Dance of Death album. (which is way more tasteful)

Where did these pics come from? How did they make it onto the web?

Nanoo Nanoo
17th March 2013, 01:06
Clue me in if you understand why, but as far as these photos are concerned, these parties and the artistic intention don't look scary, they look pretty cool.


Yep, nothing to worry about here...:shocked:

http://www.pedopolis.com/medias/images/table-of-the-swaying-dolls.jpg

Oh, I forgot to mention the Satanic-Sacrifice of babies & children, and Child Prostitution & Pedeophilia the 'Elite' are into aswell...:yes4:

You must, especially like the part of the dinner-setting where the baby-dolls skull is caved-in...:faint:

Bon Appétit...:hungry:

You do know the Beatles released an album called " Butchered Babies " with the four of them on the cover donning dismembered baby parts...

Having said that ive been to parties similar to this .. not quite as extravagant but so much fun none the less. I held a part one too as a dress up , it was hillarious !

No butchered baby parts but it wasnt the 70's and im sure we didnt have access to the class A's they did.

they make you do strange things... being so wealthy makes life seem booring unless you spice it up with the unusual.

N