PDA

View Full Version : Brief Summery of mind control......Tavistock Ideology Explains False Flags and The Manufacture of Consent - Neil Sanders - Neil Sanders



Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 10:08
A series of mini interviews that explain mind manipulation....
Easy to understand especially for those turned off by
more deeper documentaries on MK ultra, false flags..
Neil goes into the basics of advertising etc...


Tavistock Ideology Explains False Flags - Neil Sanders

Posted by D.Icke...
Saturday, 04 May 2013 08:14

6knMvF9oBmc


Published on 3 May 2013


A very good education on an obviously powerful institution in our midst - influencing
events all around us.Apologies for the poor video quality.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

False Flags and The Manufacture of Consent - Neil Sanders


G7WcG8Bgg4o



https://davidickebooks.co.uk/images/uploads/Neil_Sanders_Book.jpg

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 10:30
Your Thoughts Are Not Your Own - Neil Sanders Part 1

mAqGRhZoi4E

Published on 22 Jan 2013


Mind Control is a documented fact. The control of the actions
and emotions of an unsuspecting victim has been a reality
since at least the 1950's. Neil shows the origins, objectives
and architects of mind control.
Neil's web site is at http://www.neilsandersmindcontrol.com
and he is also on Facebook - Neil Sanders


sR11VKoQaOs


From the Tribal instinct to Advertising to the reasons
why Neil was drawn to his type of work....
Mind Control is a documented fact. The control
of the actions and emotions of an unsuspecting
victim has been a reality since at least the 1950's.
Neil shows the origins, objectives and architects of mind control.

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 10:41
http://www.truthjuice.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/neil-sanders-pic-630-x-250-v3.jpg


OK this one is not so brief ...LOl...


4iyXSUbvY1k

Published on 10 Jan 2013


We would like to thank Andrew Johnson for allowing us to share with you this
fantastic talk filmed at "Not on the Six O Clock News" which he hosted in Derby on
30th September 2012.

Andrew has very kindly given us permission to upload this talk, however if you
would like to purchase it in DVD format, please go to Andrew's website
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk, where you will also find more of
Andrew's research and other interesting videos evidence/links.

Neil Sanders - Your Thoughts Are Not Your Own: Media Manipulation Of Perception -
Neil Sanders, BA, MA and a qualified Hypnotherapist, has spent years reading
about and researching the subject of secret government mind control projects. Neil
will be discussing how the media shape perceptions and use propaganda, and show
that the mainstream media should be regarded with great caution when covering
certain topics and stories. Just how much are our thoughts steered by the media?
TV, advertisements, films, newspapers all have more influence over us than we
realise. Neil's book - of the same title -is available from his website

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 10:59
There is an easy way to break away from this ' SEE THRU THE BS '


sgAwdixodjw

Uploaded on 30 Jun 2010


"A hit scene from the 1988 classic film "They Live." An economic crisis brings
unemployed Nada (Roddy Piper) to L.A. in search of work. His discovery comes
when he dons a pair of special sunglasses made by a resistance group and sees for
the first time reality unadorned. Billboards, store signs, magazine covers--all bear
subliminal messages to OBEY, CONSUME, NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY to have NO
INDEPENDENT THOUGHT. Money itself says THIS IS YOUR GOD. What he finds
instead is that the ruling elite of the world are aliens in disguise, their aim being to
keep humans in a state of mindless consumerism. But worst of all, with these
glasses you see which of us are really hideous, bug-eyed aliens. The conceptual
breakthrough is hilarious while keeping its roots in darker matters. Although some
fault the film for settling into its action plot, the ending has a great payoff. And the
direction by John Carpenter is handled with superb workmanlike aplomb."

ghostrider
4th May 2013, 12:54
A series of mini interviews that explain mind manipulation....
Easy to understand especially for those turned off by
more deeper documentaries on MK ultra, false flags..
Neil goes into the basics of advertising etc...


Tavistock Ideology Explains False Flags - Neil Sanders

Posted by D.Icke...
Saturday, 04 May 2013 08:14

6knMvF9oBmc


Published on 3 May 2013


A very good education on an obviously powerful institution in our midst - influencing
events all around us.Apologies for the poor video quality.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

False Flags and The Manufacture of Consent - Neil Sanders


G7WcG8Bgg4o



https://davidickebooks.co.uk/images/uploads/Neil_Sanders_Book.jpg
The first video is a must watch for all avalonians... lots of names and dates to the beginings of mind control...

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 13:34
Is Hollywood Programming Us - Neil Sanders

he comments on Zero Dark 30 & how it was a

intelligence psyop etc...


OK getting heavier...LOL...



XEOsaiFMtcM


----------------------------------------------------------
MKultra and Manchurian Candidate Explained - Neil Sanders

xCqv24oy6gE




---------------------------------------------------------

Roseanne Barr On MK ULTRA Mind Control In Hollywood

xlLVWnSfR38


--------------------------------------------------------


Roseanne Barr opens for Cathy O'Brien on MKULTRA Mind Control

Uh7SWnZMPng


Published on 15 May 2012


PLEASE READ THIS MESSAGE. I can show you information
that you may not know about, information that YOU WILL
NOT KNOW ABOUT from mainstream media. I have uploaded
these videos because I thought they contained INFORMATION
THAT YOU ARE NOT BEING TOLD ABOUT, AND it is this
information that YOU CANNOT MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS
WITHOUT, period.

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 13:38
I have posted this before weird s--- going on here....

The diagnosis ' A Puff of Madness '......More like some form of mind control !

BBC Madness In The Fast Lane, MKULTRA clones - full 49min

9-bIWm08eJc

music
4th May 2013, 13:56
Kurt Lewin, head of Tavistock Instute, 1932 “If terror can be introduced on a widespread basis into society, it will revert to a blank state, where control can be instituted from an exterior point”
Eric Trist, head of Tavistock Institute, 1965 “Thanks to the Tavistock Institute, the world is already in an irreversible state of social turbulence”

Nuff said.

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 14:16
Interesting take on the James Town Massacre......Very strange,
but he has certainly looked into it and who knows !!

Part of the CIA MK Ultra programme....



Jonestown Not A Mass Suicide Pt 1 - Neil Sanders

xvfwN3Ekjys


Published on 24 Feb 2013


Neil gives us the chronology of events that in no way
suggest any mass suicide took place. In part 2
Jonestown is considered along with other cults.

Jonestown Cults And Democracies Pt 2

Pz9K56AxAXc

Published on 25 Feb 2013


Our Democracies are a case of which psycopath
to choose from, and who chose those psycopaths.
This creates a lure to join the Cults. But they in
turn are manipulated by the Intel agencies and
their chiefs and members.

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 14:28
I'm not an expert on this either but another interesting take on
the events......


The Waco Massacre Part 1 - Neil Sanders

YY9QbuWbQz0

Published on 4 Mar 2013


Like Jonestown this was not a mass suicide, but a mass killing!
David Koresh (born Vernon Wayne Howell; August 17, 1959 --
April 19, 1993) was the leader of the Branch Davidians religious sect ...


The Waco Massacre Part 2 - Neil Sanders



I8d6H53CI6s

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Hicks Waco Bradley Tank Setting Fire To The Compound

wKlsThwd75w


ZmQWXkFfI6U

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basically these bas----'s have always committed false flags and 'set up' crimes !

music
4th May 2013, 14:40
Waco, this is why the West, Texas fertilizer factory explosion was originally reported as occuring in Waco. Since when does the media report an event based on the nearest hospital? Waco = Wacko = armed extremists in need of serious gun control = extreme relevance to current agenda = mind control = engineering of consent.

Hervé
4th May 2013, 14:41
A year ago, to the day, I posted the following; may be, now, it will catch on?


Anything that's diverting from, or not addressing, the following is distraction:

DIPLOMACY BY DECEPTION (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/diplomacy_deception/diplomacy_deception06.htm)

by Dr, J Coleman (1993)

6 - Tavistock and "Operation Research" - Undeclared War

The founder for the Tavistock Institute (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_tavistock.htm) for Human Relations, John Rawlings Reese, was to perfect a system that would subvert and then control the thinking of human beings so that they could be channeled in any direction so desired by the Committee of 300, also known as the Olympians. It must be said that to do this, one must introduce an automated mentality into the bulk of the targeted population. This is an objective with very far-reaching implications nationally and internationally.

The end result of Reese's objectives were and remain, control of all human life; its destruction when deemed desirable, whether it be through mass genocide or mass slavery. We are witnessing both today. One is the Global 2000 genocidal plan, which calls for the deaths of more of 500 million people by the year 2010; the other is slavery by an economic means. Both systems are fully operational and working side-by-side in today's America.

Reese began his Tavistock experiments in 1921; it soon became clear to him that his system could be applied both domestically and militarily. Reese said that the solution to the problems he foresaw needed a ruthless approach, without concern for religious or moral values. He later added another area to his list: that of nationalism.

Reese is known to have studied the work of the Nine Unkown Men, as referred to in 1860 by the French writer Jacolliot. Among Jacolliot's remarks were that the Nine Unknown Men knew about the liberation of energy, sterilization by radiation, propaganda and psychological warfare, all of which were absolutely unheard of in that century. Jacolliot said that the technique of psychological warfare was "the most dangerous of all sciences is that of moulding mass opinion, because it would enable anyone to govern the whole world."

When it became obvious that British politicians were bent on solving the country's economic problems by means of another war, Reese was given 80,000 British Army recruits to use as guinea pigs. Operation Research was the name given to his project, and basically, it was designed to develop a methodology (logistics) in military management that would make the best use of limited military resources sea, air and land defense systems against Britain's foreign enemies.

Thus, the original program was a military-management one, but by 1946, Reese had developed Operation Research to the point that it could be applied as a civilian management program. Reese had "arrived," insofar as social engineering was concerned, but his work is concealed in top secret files at Tavistock. Technically, the Reese Tavistock manual, of which I have a copy, is a full declaration of war against the civilian population of any targeted country. Reese said that it had to be understood that "whenever any government, groups, persons in positions of power" use his methods without the consent of the people, it is understood by these governments or groups of people that conquest is the motive, and that domestic warfare exists between them and the public.

Reese discovered that with social engineering comes the greater need for information that can be rapidly collected and correlated. One of the earlier statements attributed to Reese was the necessity to stay ahead of society and predict its moves by engineering situations. A big breakthrough for Reese and his social tinkerers came with the discovery of linear programming by George B. Danzig in 1947. This came at a time when Reese was engaged in a war with the American nation, a war which is still ongoing, and which was greatly facilitated by the invention of the transistor by Bardeen, Brittain and Shockley in 1948.

Enter the Rockefellers, who gave a huge grant to Tavistock to enable Reese to press ahead with a study of the American economy, using Operation Research methods. Simultaneously, the Rockefeller Foundation gave Harvard University a four-year grant to create its own American economy model. The year was 1949, and Harvard pressed ahead with its own economic model, based on Tavistock's.

The only stipulation Reese made as a condition of his cooperation with Harvard, was that Tavistock methods be followed throughout. These were based upon the Prudential Assurance Bombing Survey Study, which led to saturation bombing of German worker housing as a means of bringing about the capitulation of the German war machine. These methods were now ready to be applied in a civilian context.

Reese made a detailed study of America's entry into WWI, which he deemed to be the beginning of the 20th century. Reese realized that for America to be seduced away from so-called "isolationism," American thinking would have to be drastically changed. Woodrow Wilson had dragged America into European affairs in 1916 with corruption and corrupting policies. Wilson sent American forces to fight on Europe's battlefields, in spite of the warnings issued by the Founding Fathers, to stay out of foreign entanglements. The Committee of 300 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_committee300.htm), was determined to keep the United States entangled in European and indeed world affairs forever after.

Wilson did not change Europe, but Europe changed America. The banishing of power politics, which is what Wilson thought he could do, was not possible, because power is politics and politics is economic power. This has been so since the earliest recorded history of politics: those of the city-states of the Sumer and Akkad of 5,000 years ago, right down to Hitler and the USSR. Economics is only an extension of a natural energy system, but that system, the elitists have always said, belongs under their control.

In order for an economy to be under the control of elite body, it has to be an economy that is predictable and totally manipulatable. This is what the Harvard model set out to accomplish, backed by the social dynamics of the Reese Operation Research. Reese had discovered that to achieve total predictability in population groups, the elements of society had to be brought under control under a yoke of slavery, and dispossessed of the means of discovering their predicament, so that not knowing how to unite or a joint defense, they would not know where to turn to for help.

That Tavistock methodology is at work can be found everywhere in the United States. People, not knowing where to turn to understand the predicament they find themselves in, turn to the worst place of all for supposed help: the government. The Harvard Economic Research Project, which began in 1948, embodied all the Reese principles, which, in turn, came out of the Prudential Bombing Survey and Operations Research. By joining forces, the elite (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalelite.htm) felt that a means of controlling a nation's economy and the population was now available with the coming of the computer age — both a blessing and a terrible curse for mankind.

All science is only a means to an end, and man is knowledge (information), which ends in control. Who the beneficiaries of that control are was decided by the Committee of 300 and its antecedents 300 years ago. The war waged against the American people by Tavistock is now 47 years old and shows no signs of letting up. As energy is the key to all life on this planet, through diplomacy by deception and outright strong-arm methods, the Committee has gained control of most energy resources.

The Committee, by deception and dissembling, has also gained control of social energy, which is expressed in economic terms. Provided that the ordinary citizen could be kept ignorant of the real economic methods of bookkeeping, then the citizens would be doomed to lead a life of economic slavery. This is what has happened. We, the people, gave our consent to the economic controllers of our lives and became slaves of the elite. As Reese once said, people who will not use their intelligence have no better rights than dumb animals who have no intelligence at all. Economic slavery is essential if good order is to be maintained, and the ruling class may enjoy the fruits produced by slave labor.

Reese and his team of social scientists and social engineers went to work on the American public by learning first, then understanding, and then attacking, the social energy (economics) and the mental and physical weaknesses of the nation. Earlier, I said that the computer is both a blessing and a curse for mankind. On the positive side, there are many emerging economists who, through the use of computers, are starting to wake up to the fact that the Harvard model is a blueprint for economic slavery.

If this new breed of economic programmers can get its message out to the American people fast enough, the New World Order (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_nwo.htm) (of slavery) can still be stopped. This is where diplomacy by deception plays such a vast role in subverting through the media, education and influencing the way we think by distracting us with issues of absolutely no importance, while the truly important issues are glossed over. In a major policy study meeting ordered by the Committee of 300 in 1954, it was made clear to economic experts, high-ranking government officials, bankers, and leaders of commerce and industry, that the war against the American people was to be stepped up.

Robert McNamara was one of those who said that, because peace and good order was being threatened by an out-of-control population, the wealth of the nation had to be moved away from the undisciplined masses and into the control of the self-disciplined few.

McNamara savagely attacked overpopulation, which he said threatened to change the world in which we live and make it ungovernable:

"We can begin with the most critical problems of population growth. As I have pointed out elsewhere, short of nuclear war itself, it is the gravest issue that the world faces in the decades ahead. If current trends continue, the world as a whole will not reach replacement level fertility - in effect an average of two children per family - until about the year 2020. That means that the world's population would finally stabilize at about 10 billion, compared with today's 4.3 billion.

"We call it stabilized, but what kind of stability would be possible? Can we assume that the levels of poverty, hunger, stress, crowding and frustration that such a situation could cause in the developing nations which by then would contain 9 out of 10 human beings on earth would be likely to assure social stability? Or, for that matter, military stability?

"It is not a world that any of us would want to live in. Is such a world inevitable? It is not but there are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birthrate must come down more quickly, or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.

"There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm). In a thermonuclear age, war can accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are nature's ancient checks on population growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene."
In 1979 McNamara repeated his message to the leading bankers from around the world, and Thomas Enders, a high-ranking State Department official, made the following statement:

"There is a single theme behind all of our work. We must reduce population growth. Either they do it our way, through nice, clean methods, or they will get the kind of a mess that we have in El Salvador, or Iran, or Beirut. Once population growth is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it. Civil war can help things, but it would have to be greatly expanded. To reduce population quickly, you have to pull all males into the fighting and kill significant numbers of fertile, child-bearing-age females."


The solution to the problem of a world in which the elite would not want to live is mass genocide. The Club of Rome (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_clubrome.htm) was ordered to produce a blueprint that would wipe out 500 million of excess population. The plan was called Global 2000 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_depopu.htm#Global_2000_Program), and it was activated by spreading the AIDS virus throughout Africa and Brazil. Global 2000 was officially accepted as U.S. policy by President James Carter.


The conference members agreed that the,

"low-class element of society must be brought under total control, trained and assigned to duties at an early age, which can be accomplished by the quality of education, which must be the poorest of the poor. The lower-classes must be trained to accept their position, long before they have an opportunity to query it."

"Technically, children must be 'orphaned' in day care centers under government control. With such an initial handicap, the lower-classes will have little hope of upward mobility away from their assigned positions in life. The form of slavery we have in mind is essential for good social order, peace and tranquility.

"We have the resources to attack the vitality, options and mobility of the individuals in society by knowing through our social scientist, understanding and manipulating and attacking their sources of social energy (income), and therefore, their physical, mental and emotional strengths and weaknesses. The general public refuses to improve its own mentality. It has become a herd of proliferating barbarians, and a blight on the face of the earth.

"By measuring the economic habits by which the sheep try to run from their problems and escape from reality via the medium of 'entertainment', it is absolutely possible, applying Operation Research methods, to predict the probable combination shocks (created events) which are necessary to bring about complete control and subjugation of the population by subverting the economy. The strategy includes the use of amplifiers (advertising), and when we speak on television in the manner that a ten year old can relate to, then because of the suggestions made, that person will purchase that production impulse, the next time he comes across it in a store.

"The balance of power will provide the stability that the world of the 21st century is likely to achieve, rent as it will be, by passionate tribalism and by such seemingly insoluble issues like that posed by mass migration from the South to the North, and from farm to city. There may be mass transfers of population, such as those between Greece and Turkey in the aftermath of the First World War; really mass murders. It will be a time of troubles, in need of a unifier; an Alexander or Mohammed.

"A great change that will come about as a result of emerging conflicts between peoples who live side by side — and which will, by their intensity, take primacy over their other conflicts — is that political rivalry will be within regions, rather than between them. This will bring about a turning back from global politics. After a decade in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union dueled across oceans, the powers will focus on protecting themselves against forces on their frontiers — or within them.

"The American people do not know economic science and care little about it, hence, they are always ripe for war. They cannot avoid war, notwithstanding their religious morality, nor can they find in religion the solution to their earthly problems. They are knocked out of shape by economic experts who cause Shockwaves that wreck budgets and buying habits. The American public is yet to realize that we control their buying habits."
There we have it. Split up nations into tribal factions, keep the populace struggling to make a living and concerned with regional conflicts so that they will never have an opportunity to get a clear view of what is going on, let alone challenge it, and at the same time, bring about a drastic lowering of the world's population.


We see this happening in the former Yugoslavia, where the country is being forced into small, tribal entities, and we see it in America, where the average family has both parents working, and yet cannot make ends meet. These parents do not have time to pay careful attention to how they are being deceived and led into economic slavery. It is all a set-up.

Today, we observe — if we have the time— that the United States stand at the threshold of progressive dissolution as the result of Tavistock's silent "control" war against the American nation. The Bush presidency was a total disaster, and the Clinton presidency will be even more of a shock. This is the way the blueprint is drawn, and we, the people, are fast losing faith in our institutions and our ability to remake America into what it was intended to be — a very far cry from what it is now — overrun by foreign people who threaten to engulf the nation — a South-North invasion right here in our own country.

We have surrendered our real wealth for a promise of greater wealth, instead of compensation in real terms. We have fallen into the toils of the Babylonian system of "capitalism," which isn't capitalism at all, but an appearance of capital, as typified by currency which is in fact negative capital. This is deceptive and destructive. The U.S. dollar has the appearance of currency, but it is in fact a token of debt and indebtedness.

Currency as we know it will be balanced by war and genocide—which is what is happening in front of our very eyes. Total goods and services is real capital, and currency can be printed up to this level, but not beyond it. Once currency is printed beyond the level of goods and services, it becomes a destructive, subtractive force. War is the only way to "balance" the system by killing those creditors, which the people docilely gave up true value in exchange for inflated currency.

Energy (economics) is the key to all earthly activities. Hence the often repeated statement I have made that all wars are economic in origin. The thrust of the One World Government-New World Order must, of necessity, be to obtain a monopoly of all goods and services, raw materials, and control over the manner in which economics is taught. Only in this framework can the New World Order gain full control. In the United States, we are constantly helping the One World Government to obtain control of the world's natural resources by being tricked into giving part of our income for this purpose. It is called "foreign aid."


Tavistock's Operation Research project states as follows:

"Our research has established that the simplest mode of gaining control of people is to keep them undisciplined and in the dark of basic systems and principles while at the same time keeping them disorganized, confused and distracted by issues which are of relatively little import.

"In addition to our less direct long-range penetration methods, this can be accomplished by a disengagement of mental activities and providing low quality programs of public education in mathematics, logic, system designs and economics and by discouraging technical creativity.

"Our mode calls for emotional stimulus, increased use of amplifiers which induce self-indulgence, whether direct (television programs) or advertising. We at Tavistock have found that the best way to accomplish the goal is through an unremitting and unrelenting emotional affrontation and attack (mental rape) through a constant barrage of sex, violence, wars, racial strife both in the electronic and print media. This steady diet could be called 'mental junk food'.

"Of primary importance is the revision of history and law and subjecting the populace to the deviant creation, thus shifting thinking from personal needs to constructed, fabricated outside priorities. The general rule is that there is profit in confusion, the greater the confusion, the greater the profit. One of the ways in which this can be accomplished is to create problems and then offer solutions.

"It is essential to divide the people, keep the adults' attention away from real issues and overcome their thinking with matters of relatively little importance. The young must be kept ignorant of mathematics; the proper teaching of economics and history must never be made available. Keep all groups so occupied with an endless round of issues and problems that they have no time to think clearly, and here, we rely on entertainment which should not reach beyond the mental capacity of a child in the sixth grade.

"When government is able to seize private property without just compensation, it is certain that people are ripe for surrender and consenting to slavery and legal encroachment. Energy sources which support a primitive economy are a supply of raw materials, the consent of people to labor, and assume a certain place, position, level in the social structure viz., provide labor at various levels of the structure.

"Each class, therefore, guarantees its level of income and hence controls the class immediately below it, thereby preserving the class structure. One of the best examples of this was found in the caste system in India, in which rigid control was exercised, ensuring that upward mobility which could threaten the elite at the top, was constrained. In this method is security and stability attained, and also a government from the top.

"The sovereignty of the elite is threatened when the lower classes, through communications and education become informed and envious of the power and possessions of the class above them. As some of them become better educated, they seek to rise higher through a real knowledge of economics-energy. This presents a real threat to the sovereignty of the elite class.

"It follows that the rise of the lower classes must be postponed long enough for the elite class to achieve energy (economic) dominance, labor by consent becoming a lesser economic source. Until such economic dominance is achieved to the fullest extent possible, the consent of people to labor and let others handle their affairs has to be taken into account. Failure to achieve this goal would result in interference in the final transfer of energy sources (economic wealth) to the control of the elite.

"Until such times, it is essential to recognize that public consent is still the essential key to the release of energy in the process of economic amplification. A consent of energy release system is therefore vital. Artificial security must be provided in the absence of the mother's womb, which can take the form of withdrawal, protective devices and shelters. Such shells will provide a stable environment for stable and unstable activity, and provide a shelter for the evolutionary processes of growth, that is to say, survival in a shelter that gives defensive protection against offensive activities.

"It applies equally to the elite and the lower classes, but there is a definite difference in the manner in which both these classes approach the solution of the problem. Our social science scientists have made out a very compelling case that the reason why individuals create a political structure is because they have a subconscious desire to perpetuate their childhood-dependency relationship.

"In the simplest of terms, what the subconscious longing demands is an earthly god to eliminate risks from their lives, put food on the table and pat them on the back in a comforting way when things don't go well. The demand for an earthly problem-solver-risk-eliminator is insatiable, which has given rise to a substitute earthly god: the politician. The insatiable public demand for 'protection' is met by promises, but the politician actually delivers little or nothing on his promises.

"Ever present in humans is a desire to control or subdue others who disturb their daily existence. However, they are unable to cope with the moral and religious issues such actions would raise, so they give the task to professional 'hit men', which we collectively call politicians.

"The services of politicians are engaged for a number of reasons, which, in the main are listed in the following order:



1) To obtain the longed-for security without managing it.

2) To obtain action without the need to act, and without having to give the desired action thought.

3) To avoid responsibility for their intentions.

4) To obtain the benefits of reality without exerting the necessary discipline of learning.


"We can readily divide a nation into two sub-categories, the Political Sub Nation and the Docile Sub-Nation. The politicians hold quasi-military jobs, of which the lowest is the police force, next come attorneys. The presidential level is run by the international bankers. The docile sub-nation finances the political machine by consent, that is to say, through taxation. The sub nation remains attached to the political sub-nation, the latter feeding off it and growing stronger, until the day comes when it is strong enough to devour its creator, the people."

When read in conjunction with the systems outlined in my book, the "Committee of 300 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_sociopol_committee300.htm)", it is relatively easy to see just how far Tavistock's Operation Research project has succeeded, and nowhere more so than in the United States.


Recent statistics show that 75 percent of sixth grade school children were unable to pass what was called "the maths test." The maths test consisted of elementary simple arithmetic, which ought to tell us something. Mathematics did not come into the test at all. Cause for alarm?

You be the judge.

*******************************************************

The above is most probably derived from, but certainly corroborated by: Silent weapons for quiet wars (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?53442-Now-that-the-distractions-of-predicted-catastrophes-have-come-and-gone-what-s-left&p=605099&viewfull=1#post605099), which can also be found as an addendum in William Cooper's "Behold a Pale Horse (http://ephraiyim.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/william_cooper-behold_a_pale_horse1991_copy.pdf),"

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 14:48
I'm enjoying these snippets of what must have been a bigger interview....

Oklahoma City Multiple Bombs - Then he goes on to answer some
questions about 9/11 ...........Neil Sanders

uaVqNaB6Gqg


Published on 22 Apr 2013


The anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing was a
couple of days ago. And the MSM kept saying the
ingredients of the fertiliser plant in Waco that
exploded were the same ones that were used
in the Oklahoma City bombing.
Neil Sanders is a wizard at false flag events
(and many other things) and here he gives
us many anomalies of these bombings with
some background and interpretation.

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 15:03
Reese is known to have studied the work of the Nine Unkown Men, as referred to in 1860 by the French writer Jacolliot. Among Jacolliot's remarks were that the Nine Unknown Men knew about the liberation of energy, sterilization by radiation, propaganda and psychological warfare, all of which were absolutely unheard of in that century. Jacolliot said that the technique of psychological warfare was "the most dangerous of all sciences is that of moulding mass opinion, because it would enable anyone to govern the whole world."


Thanks Azmer it would be interesting to know who the nine were ?

music
4th May 2013, 15:19
Note the talking head, reminiscent of Templar lore

http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v308/__show_article/_a000308-000328.htm


Their numbers would be renewed by co-option, so as to preserve the secrecy of techniques handed down from ancient times. Examples of the Nine Unknown Men making contact with the outer world are rare.

There was, however, the extraordinary case of one of the most mysterious figures in Western history: the Pope Sylvester II, known also by the name of Gerbert d'Aurillac.

Born in the Auvergne in 920 (d. 1003) Gerbert was a Benedictine monk, professor at the University of Rheims, Archbishop of Ravenna and Pope by the grace of Ortho III.

He is supposed to have spent some time in Spain, after which a mysterious voyage brought him to India where he is reputed to have aquired various kinds of skills which stupified his entourage. For example, he possessed in his palace a bronze head which answered YES or NO to questions put to it on politics or the general position of Christianity.

According to Sylvester II this was a perfectly simple operation corresponding to a two-figure calculation, and was performed by an automaton similar to our modern binary machines.

This "magic" head was destroyed when Sylvester died, and all the information it imparted carefully concealed. No doubt an authorized research worker would come across some interesting things in the Vatican Library.

In the cybernetics journal, Computers and Automation of October 1954, the following comment appeared:

"We must suppose that he (Sylvester) was possessed of extraordinary knowledge and the most remarkable mechanical skill and inventiveness.

"This speaking head must have been fashioned 'under a certain conjunction of stars occuring at the exact moment when all the planets were starting on their courses.'

"Neither the past, nor the present nor the future entered into it, since this invention apparently far exceeded in its scope its rival, the perverse 'mirror on the wall' of the Queen, the precursor of our modern electronic brain.

"Naturally it was widely asserted that Gerbert was only able to produce such a machine head because he was in league with the Devil and had sworn eternal allegiance to him."

Had other Europeans any contact with the society of the Nine Unknown Men? It was not until the nineteenth century that this mystery was referred to again in the works of the French writer Jacolliot.

Jacolliot was French Consul at Calcutta under the Second Empire. He wrote some quite important prophetic works, comparable, if not superior to those of Jules Verne.

He also left several books dealing with the great secrets of the human race. A great many occult writers, prophets and miracle-workers have borrowed from his writings which, completely neglected in France, are well known in Russia.

Jacolliot states catagorically that the Soceity of Nine did actually exist. And, to make it all the more intriguing, he refers in the this connection to certain techniques, unimaginable in 1860, such as, for example, the liberation of energy, sterilization by radiation and psychological warfare.

Yersin, one of Pasteur and de Roux's closest collaborators, was entrusted, it seems, with certain biological secrets when he visited Madras in 1890, and following the instructions he received was able to prepare a serum against cholera and the plague.

The story of the Nine Unknown Men was popularized for the first time in 1927 in a book by Talbot Mundy who for twenty-five years was a member of the British police force in India. His book is half-fiction, half scientific inquiry.

The Nine apparently employed a synthetic language, and each of them was in possession of a book that was constantly being rewritten and containing a detailed account of some science.

The first of these books is said to have been devoted to the technique of propaganda and psychological warfare.

"The most dangerous of all sciences," wrote Mundy, "is that of moulding mass opinion, because it would enable anyone to govern the whole world."

It must be remembered that Korzybski's "General Semantics" did not appear until 1937 and that it was not until the West had the experience of the last World War that the techniques of psychology of language, i.e., propaganda, could be formulated.

The first American college of semantics only came into being in 1950. In France almost the only book that at all well known is Serge Tchocotine's "Le Viol des Foules" which has had a considerable influence in intellectual polical circles, although it deals only superficially with the subject.

The second book was on physiology. It explained, among other things, how it is possible to kill a man by touching him, death being caused by a reversal of the nerve-impulse.

It is said that Judo is a result of "leakages" from this book.

The third volume was a study on microbiology, and dealt especially with protective colloids. The fourth was concerned with the transmutation of metals. There is a legend that in times of drought temples and religious relief organizations received large quanities of fine gold from a secret source.

The fifth volume contains a study of all means of communication, terrestial and extra-terrestial.

The sixth expounds the secrets of gravitation. The seventh contains the most exhaustive cosmogony known to humanity. The eighth deals with light.

The ninth volume, on sociology, gives the rules for the evolution of societies, and means of foretelling their decline. Connected with the Nine Unknown Men is the mystery of the waters of the Ganges.

Multitudes of pilgrims, suffering from the most appalling diseases, bathe in them without harming the healthy ones. The sacred waters purify everything.

Their strange properties have been attributed to the fact that they contain bacteriophages. But why should these not be formed in the Bramaputra, the Amazon or the Seine?

Jacolliot in his book advances the theory of sterilization by radiation, a hundred years before such a thing was thought to be possible. These radiations, he says, probably come from a secret temple hollowed out in the bed of the Ganges.

Avoiding all forms of religious, social or political agitations, deliberately and perfectly concealed from the public eye, the Nine were the incarnation of the ideal man of science, serenely aloof, but conscious of his moral obligations.

Having the power to mold the destiny of the human race, but refraining from its exercise, this secret society is the finest tribute imaginable to freedom of the most exalted kind.

Looking down from the watch-tower of their hidden glory, these Nine Unknown Men watched civilizations being born, destroyed and re-born again, tolerant rather than indifferent, and ready to come to the rescue -- but always observing that rule of silence that is the mark of human greatness.

Myth or reality?

A magnificent myth, in any case, and one that has issued from the depths of time -- a harbinger, maybe, of the future? Talbot Mundy wrote a book called "The Nine Unknown" based on the legend, here is a review of it:

"Perhaps the perfect balance between pulp high adventure and mystical novel was achieved in The Nine Unknown. (1923/1924), written and published right before the Tibetan opus Om.

"The novel is based on a persistant legend brought back to the west from the East, about the existence of nine unknown perfected men who watched over India, and guarded its secrets.

"In Mundy's novel there turns out to be nine unknown men who work for the good of mankind, and a dark shadowy nine who worship Kali and work to destroy the work of the others.

"JimGrim and his crew must try to sort out which is which if they are to survive. The novel was a favorite of Pauwels and Bergier, whose discussion of "the nine" was a prototype "open conspiracy" for planetary change in their influencial Morning of the Magicians.

"The use of Mundy's ideas in Pauwels and Bergier's book was probably was one of the prime reasons for the Mundy revival in the 1960s.

"The Nine Unknown remains my favorite of the JimGrim novels, and ranks at the very top of my picks of Mundy's works. It is truely unfortunate that the novel has remained out of print since the late 1960s."

Cidersomerset
4th May 2013, 16:45
Thanks music, the fun part of all this is if I go into Bob Nevritts info, his shows are
twice a week now Tue & thurs and they can be up to six hours long. He is 91 years
old and worked for intelligence for decades. He and James Martinez and others
have discussed 100's of subjects over thousands of hours. He has talked a lot about
how the elites channel the otherside and have always done so and he has
channelled many times thru the 'Evergreens' 'Abrahams' 'Cosmic Awareness' Seth
and now Ion which is the electric environment not a channel.They go into great
detail into all this and it explains a lot of what is going on.But unless you have
followed them its hard to explain.

But what it has done is made me open to all sorts of things in this world and all the
parallel ones and inter dimensional portals. Which are actually in all of our cells and
much more....LOL...

music
6th May 2013, 09:22
Bump, this is important!

music
23rd May 2013, 18:57
"Your thoughts are not your own"? Who'ld've thought, eh?

Mark (Star Mariner)
25th May 2013, 13:34
Bump again.

This material is important and must be seen by all Avalonians if they want to actually understand how things work in our world, and everything that's going on, and has gone on for perhaps the last 50 years.

Also anyone that is able to receive the channel called Showcase (I think UK cable and satellite only), check out Neil Sanders on Richplanet TV who often appears as a guest speaker. His interviews can also be viewed at the Richplanet website (www.richplanet.net).

Example clips of Richplanet TV and Neil Sanders:

Neil Sanders on the manipulation of the Music industry (http://blip.tv/richplanetnet/richplanet-tv-neil-sanders-music-manipulation-6088274)

Neil Sanders on Psychotronics (http://blip.tv/richplanetnet/richplanet-tv-neil-sanders-psychotronics-6073440)

Neil Sanders on Media mind control and Manchurian candidates (http://blip.tv/richplanetnet/the-richplanet-starship-neil-sanders-part-1-3951268)

Neil Sanders on Mind control, MKULTRA, psychotronics, implants, hypnosis (http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.php?ref=16&part=1&gen=4)

Neil Sanders talks about CIA media infiltration & mainstream propaganda (http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.php?ref=136&part=1&gen=4)

InCiDeR
25th May 2013, 14:06
The Delphi Technique — What Is It?

FFfKOSTftcs

The Delphi Technique was originally conceived as a way to obtain the opinion of experts without necessarily bringing them together face to face. In recent times, however, it has taken on an all new meaning and purpose. In Educating for the New World Order by B. Eakman, the reader finds reference upon reference for the need to preserve the illusion that there is "…lay, or community, participation (in the decision-making process), while lay citizens were, in fact, being squeezed out." The Delphi Technique is the method being used to squeeze citizens out of the process, effecting a left-wing take over of the schools.

A specialized use of this technique was developed for teachers, the "Alinsky Method" (ibid, p.123). The setting or group is, however, immaterial; the point is that people in groups tend to share a certain knowledge base and display certain identifiable characteristics (known as group dynamics). This allows for a special application of a basic technique.

The change agent or facilitator goes through the motions of acting as an organizer, getting each person in the target group to elicit expression of their concerns about a program, project, or policy in question. The facilitator listens attentively, forms "task forces," "urges everyone to make lists," and so on. While s/he is doing this, the facilitator learns something about each member of the target group. S/He identifies the "leaders," the "loud mouths," as well as those who frequently turn sides during the argument — the "weak or noncommittal".

Suddenly, the amiable facilitator becomes "devil's advocate." S/He dons his professional agitator hat. Using the "divide and conquer" technique, s/he manipulates one group opinion against the other. This is accomplished by manipulating those who are out of step to appear "ridiculous, unknowledgeable, inarticulate, or dogmatic." S/He wants certain members of the group to become angry, thereby forcing tensions to accelerate. The facilitator is well trained in psychological manipulation. S/He is able to predict the reactions of each group member. Individuals in opposition to the policy or program will be shut out of the group.

The method works. It is very effective with parents, teachers, school children, and any community group. The "targets" rarely, if ever, know that they are being manipulated. Or, if they suspect this is happening, do not know how to end the process.

The desired result is for group polarization, and for the facilitator to become accepted as a member of the group and group process. S/He will then throw the desired idea on the table and ask for opinions during discussion. Very soon his/her associates from the divided group begin to adopt the idea as if it were their own, and pressure the entire group to accept the proposition.

This technique is a very unethical method of achieving consensus on a controversial topic in group settings. It requires well-trained professionals who deliberately escalate tension among group members, pitting one faction against the other, so as to make one viewpoint appear ridiculous so the other becomes "sensible" whether such is warranted or not.

The Delphi Technique is based on the Hegelian Principle of achieving Oneness of Mind through a three step process of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. In thesis and antithesis, all present their opinion or views on a given subject, establishing views and opposing views. In synthesis, opposites are brought together to form the new thesis. All participants are then to accept ownership of the new thesis and support it, changing their own views to align with the new thesis. Through a continual process of evolution, Oneness of Mind will supposedly occur.

The theory of the Delphi and the reality of the Delphi are, obviously, quite different — the reality being that Oneness of Mind does not occur but only the illusion of Oneness of Mind with those who refuse to be Delphi'd being alienated from participating in the process.

While proponents of education reform feel they are quite justified in this, the effect of this unethical manipulation of people is to create polarized camps. In an effort to maintain the process, advocates have marketed a plethora of publications (such as What's Left After the Right, No Right Turn and If You Don't, They Will) intended to label, castigate, and alienate anyone who does not go along with them. As a result, parents come to understand that their role in education reform is merely perfunctory; that the outcome is preset, that they are not but the rah-rah team so when opposition does arise, advocates of education reform can say, "we had community input."

To make sure that the situation is controlled, only those parents who agree with the process are allowed on the restructuring teams. New participants are carefully screened to ensure that education reform goes forward unquestioned.

If measurable opposition persists, advocates are told, get the local ministers on board. Take steps to neutralize, by whatever means necessary, the opposition. In some places, opponents have been harassed, both at home and on the job, personal property has been damaged and vandalized, people have lost their jobs. Anyone who does not go along with the restructuring of our society is susceptible to the totalitarian tactics of those promoting education reform – whether it be parents, teachers, principals, superintendents or board members. The need exists for advocates to maintain an iron grip on the process. They cannot, for instance, withstand open public debate of the issues. Therefore, they do not partake in public forums. They cannot withstand the criticism, so they close every avenue for parents to address the issues. They are rapidly creating, through their divisive tactics, a volatile situation. America is being torn apart.

Parents, citizens, teachers, principals, superintendents who are opposed to the new purpose being given our American education system need tools to withstand the process being used to bring it in — against the Delphi Technique and consensus which, through their basis in the Hegelian Principle, have Marxist connections and purposes.

First, no opportunity must be left untaken to expose this unethical, divisive process. Second, when this process is used, it can be disrupted. To do so, however, one must be able to recognize when the Delphi Technique is being used, and how to disrupt it.

Source (http://www.learn-usa.com/transformation_process/acf001.htm)


http://www.techcast.org/Upload/OtherImages/TC-method2.gif



Agenda 21 Uses Delphi Technique-Fredinburg Interviews Heather Gass
W1JhnFG82FQ


The Delphi Technique: Let’s Stop Being Manipulated!

More and more, we are seeing citizens being invited to “participate” in various forms of meetings, councils, or boards to “help determine” public policy in one field or another. They are supposedly being included to get ”input” from the public to help officials make final decisions on taxes, education, community growth or whatever the particular subject matter might be.

Sounds great, doesn’t it? Unfortunately, surface appearances are often deceiving.

You, Mr. or Mrs. Citizen, decide to take part in one of these meetings.

Generally, you will find that there is already someone designated to lead or “facilitate” the meeting. Supposedly, the job of the facilitator is to be a neutral, non-directing helper to see that the meeting flows smoothly.

Actually, he or she is there for exactly the opposite reason: to see that the conclusions reached during the meeting are in accord with a plan already decided upon by those who called the meeting.

The process used to “facilitate” the meeting is called the Delphi Technique. This Delphi Technique was developed by the RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Defense back in the 1950s. It was originally intended for use as a psychological weapon during the cold war.

However, it was soon recognized that the steps of Delphi could be very valuable in manipulating ANY meeting toward a predetermined end.

How does the process take place? The techniques are well developed and well defined.

First, the person who will be leading the meeting, the facilitator or Change Agent must be a likable person with whom those participating in the meeting can agree or sympathize.

It is, therefore, the job of the facilitator to find a way to cause a split in the audience, to establish one or a few of the people as “bad guys” while the facilitator is perceived as the “good guy.”

Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc. Once this is done, the facilitator establishes himself or herself as the “friend” of the rest of the audience.

The stage is now set for the rest of the agenda to take place.

At this point, the audience is generally broken up into “discussion—or ‘breakout’—groups” of seven or eight people each. Each of these groups is to be led by a subordinate facilitator.

Within each group, discussion takes place of issues, already decided upon by the leadership of the meeting. Here, too, the facilitator manipulates the discussion in the desired direction, isolating and demeaning opposing viewpoints.

Generally, participants are asked to write down their ideas and disagreements with the papers to be turned in and “compiled” for general discussion after the general meeting is reconvened.

This is the weak link in the chain, which you are not supposed to recognize. Who compiles the various notes into the final agenda for discussion? Ahhhh! Well, it is those who are running the meeting.

How do you know that the ideas on your notes were included in the final result? You Don’t! You may realize that your idea was not included and come to the conclusion that you were probably in the minority. Recognize that every other citizen member of this meeting has written his or her likes or dislikes on a similar sheet of paper and they, too, have no idea whether their ideas were “compiled” into the final result! You don’t even know if anyone’s ideas are part of the final “conclusions” presented to the reassembled group as the “consensus” of public opinion.

Rarely does anyone challenge the process, since each concludes that he or she was in the minority and different from all the others (...)
Continue (http://www.vlrc.org/articles/110.html)

Delight
17th September 2013, 17:33
I am bumping the thread with the latest Redice interview. I was able to use the Vinny Eastwood interview below even more.

Neil Sanders - Hour 1 - The Dark Art of Mind Control
September 16, 2013


http://rediceradio.net/radio/2013/RIR-130916-neilsanders-hr1.mp3


Neil Sanders holds an MA in Film Studies, studied Psychology and Media Production and is a qualified hypnotherapist. Neil is considered an expert on the subject of mind control and has been studying the history of this dark art and its application by military and government intelligence agencies across the globe for many years. He is the author of Your Thoughts Are Not Your Own Volumes one and two. In the first hour, we'll discuss mind control in its various forms, prevalent today. Neil explains how Brain-washing in Red China, a book by Edward Hunter laid the foundation for the Manchurian candidate. We'll talk about mind control used in politics to form public opinion. Neil also talks about cultivation theory, a social theory which examines the long-term effects of television and how the more time people spend "living" in the television world, the more likely they are to believe social reality portrayed on television. Then, we'll discuss B.F. Skinner's box, cognitive dissonance and how are thoughts are not our own.

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2013/09/RIR-130916.php

Another recent interview.

R3q-0OIxc48[/YOUTUBE]

http://www.neilsandersmindcontrol.com/