PDA

View Full Version : Private Prisons -- Off our radar



AutumnW
26th September 2013, 20:35
One of THE most important issues for Americans and other countries going down this road. The U.S. has 5% of the world's population and a stunning 25% of the world's incarcerated prisoners. At least part of this is due to the ballooning of the private prison industry.

Prisoners are out of sight and out of mind. Private prisons contract with govt. Govt operates the criminal justice system. Govt, upon awarding contract to private prisons gaurantees an incarceration rate of between 80% and 100% in 65% of it's contracts.

Wrap your head around that. There is a perverse incentive to keep people locked up to meet quotas!! Is that berserko, or what? The goal of the prison system, prior to privatization, with all it's former flaws, was to get people back on the street, asap--if for no other reason than it's very expensive to keep people locked up.

Crony capitalism at its very worst and the very definition of a police state tactic.

Sorry if this is depressing. But the darkest aspects of our society must have the most light shone on them!

From Article:

65 percent of the private prison contracts ITPI received and analyzed included occupancy guarantees in the form of quotas or required payments for empty prison cells (a “low-crime tax”). These quotas and low-crime taxes put taxpayers on the hook for guaranteeing profits for private prison corporations.
Occupancy guarantee clauses in private prison contracts range between 80% and 100%, with 90% as the most frequent occupancy guarantee requirement.
Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Virginia are locked in contracts with the highest occupancy guarantee requirements, with all quotas requiring between 95% and 100% occupancy.

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/09/23/a-deep-look-into-the-shady-world-of-the-private-prison-industry/

dianna
26th September 2013, 20:41
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bM3qR4Ytjls

AutumnW
26th September 2013, 20:55
Dianna, Thank you so much for this clip. I look forward to watching it! Will respond back when I am done.

bbj3n546pt
26th September 2013, 21:17
More information regarding this subject can be found by reviewing the web site of Geo Group, Inc. http://www.geogroup.com/

Quoting from the home page “The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is the world's leading provider of correctional, detention, and community reentry services with 96 facilities, approximately 73,000 beds, and 18,000 employees around the globe. GEO's facilities are located in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa.”

2012 total revenues were US$1,479,062. The 2012 Annual Report can be found at this link: https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/36159R/20130314/AR_159415/
Note that they operate, in part, as a real estate investment trust (REIT).

The Board of Directors can be found directly at this link: http://www.geogroup.com/Board_of_Directors

CD7
26th September 2013, 21:29
The U.S. has 5% of the world's population and a stunning 25% of the world's incarcerated prisoners. At least part of this is due to the ballooning of the private prison industry.



Yes but somehow they SUCCEED very well in perpetuating the ILLUSION of our "free" country

spiritguide
26th September 2013, 23:53
There have been a few posts on this subject here at Avalon in the last year. Few responses, guess it won't be a real issue until friend or family get caught up in the insanity of slavery.

Peace!

CD7
27th September 2013, 01:11
This is a good synopsis of it


https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/p480x480/563562_10151693049616275_1519868271_n.jpg

Lifebringer
27th September 2013, 01:33
Enslavement. How else can they compete with NAFTA low wage sweatshops?

They work them for long hours, make them pay a daily'rental fee/occupancy fee, and if they have long sentences because of 3 strikes, it can add up to quite a tab. Sometimes it is up to the family to raise the money or they keep the prisoner past time, threatening them with more time if they don't pay the rental.

These free work camps are not free, they are a prisoner and family "shakedown." They phone service and calling cards per minute are a disgrace.

Flash
27th September 2013, 03:24
When one think of it, it looks quite similar to the way people are treated in Chinese prisons. With also being sent in prison for very menial things, as in China. Human rights??? Where?? I have noticed that the US politicians are mentioning much less, if ever, human rights now, while they were always doing in even Under Bush II (in fact the third in the dynasty). They must have been told to shut up by China and other countries after Guantanamo human rights anihilation, etc.

sigma6
27th September 2013, 06:52
One of THE most important issues for Americans and other countries going down this road. The U.S. has 5% of the world's population and a stunning 25% of the world's incarcerated prisoners. At least part of this is due to the ballooning of the private prison industry.
Prisoners are out of sight and out of mind. Private prisons contract with govt. Govt operates the criminal justice system. Govt, upon awarding contract to private prisons gaurantees an incarceration rate of between 80% and 100% in 65% of it's contracts.
Wrap your head around that. There is a perverse incentive to keep people locked up to meet quotas!! Is that berserko, or what? The goal of the prison system, prior to privatization, with all it's former flaws, was to get people back on the street, asap--if for no other reason than it's very expensive to keep people locked up.
Crony capitalism at its very worst and the very definition of a police state tactic.
Sorry if this is depressing. But the darkest aspects of our society must have the most light shone on them!
From Article:
65 percent of the private prison contracts ITPI received and analyzed included occupancy guarantees in the form of quotas or required payments for empty prison cells (a “low-crime tax”). These quotas and low-crime taxes put taxpayers on the hook for guaranteeing profits for private prison corporations.
Occupancy guarantee clauses in private prison contracts range between 80% and 100%, with 90% as the most frequent occupancy guarantee requirement.
Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Virginia are locked in contracts with the highest occupancy guarantee requirements, with all quotas requiring between 95% and 100% occupancy.
http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/09/23/a-deep-look-into-the-shady-world-of-the-private-prison-industry/


BC = Birth Certificate
POA = Power of Attorney
KJV = King James Authorized Version
CW = Christian Walters - the original introducer of Trust interpretation to the "CR" movement
CR = "Commercial Redemption" (for lack of a more generic term...)


Sorry to say, the more I think about it, and based on what I have seen and heard... they have always controlled the populations of the prisons in this matter, none-the-less what you speak is heartening; because that means people are waking up. They do hide away these victims, a large percentage, essentially innocent are languishing, slowly rotting in a living hell. I know this from experience. When they release prisoners, the police are notified and they go out and round up new "victims” and try and "collect" on warrants... When no new prisoners are coming in, the word comes back that the Judges are all "hard a**es" and not releasing anyone, then I heard it was a "good Judge" but when I got the chance, it turned out to be the same judge that was supposed to be the "harda**" !!!??? (Apparently no one was keeping track of names duhhh....) In other words it's not the judge; it's totally based on their inventory system. How many are coming down the pipeline... It's like a hotel that always has 95 to 105% occupancy. The private jails may have just exposed this now that they are putting it in writing and dealing with private corporations.

And it may cost the country as a whole but it makes the courts and jails HUGE money. So yes, they are really nothing more then a metastasizing cancer and parasite on the system as a whole. Every prisoner in jail has had his NAME Estate accessed via bonds; bid bonds, performance bonds and payment bonds... the body is warehoused as surety. And all this because he(/she) didn't know to present the NAME Estate for proper settlement. This applies to all charges, including criminal, (as long as there is no damage to property or people) and if there is, and it is "cured" before trial, then it will still suffice, but the application may certainly be a few more 'steps'... (see Winston's Criminal Court video for interpretation on process)

i.e.
Matthew 5:25-27 KJV (was authorized for use in court... and still could be if you understood it)
25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.


The reason for treating this like a business? …Guess who the biggest investors, or I should say the parties with greatest "interest", in the corporations of the City of [fill in the name of your city here]? ...Why the Police Unions for that city themselves!... Quitel literally, the fox guarding the henhouse... surprise, surprise!!! A friend of mine checked in Dunn and Bradstreet and found the City's of Windsor, Hamilton, London and Mississauga (all cities in Southern Ontario) are setup such that the Police union was the "OWNER" of the corporation of the city!!!!!! I am not sure if they were the sole owner or part owner... he just said they were listed as the OWNER. (would like to follow that up more...) Remember avoid the word “owner” like the plague (unless your some kind of “legal” expert…


Welcome to the REAL MATRIX... talk about living in a prison for your mind...


EXPRESSING THE TRUST
– The Holy Grail of Control, or the Hidden System of Control.


ROMAN SYSTEM - Not necessarily bad, (or good for that matter, we must be more pragmatic, analytical to see what is going on...) it is a control system, and some one knows how to use it, and kept it secret from the rest of us... "Just-Is" "Just-us" But they are fighting to install this system all over the planet...

What no one is getting is the whole key to taking back our power is LEARNING the power of the remedy that was put in the hand of every man and woman who lives in a country that operates a fiat currency and registered the event of the parent "giving" their child a NAME. That event was registered, the documents held and reified (search "reification") into a security, the value derived from an actuarial value of the lifetime of labour of the corresponding living human being. Bonds were then issued and the money was "borrowed" from the banks, thus why all money is debt in this Bankruptcy Model of Economics. And this, in a nutshell is why and what makes us the Creditors, it our energy the corporations are borrowing, OUR "MONEY" (that's another VERY important story...) Anyhow, another aspect of this security is that it becomes part of an 'Estate', or Master Account, upon which all property and accounts are opened and attached to by chain of title. Two separate entities... the birth of a flesh and blood living soul, and the "birth" of a PERSON, sole corporation, Master account... Because it is a form of title (by definition) It is a property, a thing. In trust it is the "res".

The Birth Certificate should be read as DOE, JOHN, Estate.
Now... since they are holding the title to this property. But, it was INTENDED for you (since your mom INTENDED to give you that NAME...) (start getting in your head this NAME is a BIG deal. It's the Title (right to everything in that NAME man!) Drivers License - created from the BC, SSN - created from the BC... that is what I mean by chain of title... All title ultimately goes back to the Certificate (itself is only a token) that references the original signature document which evidences the Title. The BC has been specifically called a “valuable token” And they hold all the original signature documents (The Titles).

I should add for clarity, Title is right to something, if you have a whole complete Title to something, only God can take it away from you... literally, legally, equitably and morally. Conversely this is why cops and judges and government are crawling up your butt to scrape whatever they can find and steal it from you. They know you don't have the title to ANYTHING... So where is our remedy? We have to have a remedy, that is universal principle, especially if they want to be holding our title. That is the crucial understanding, that changes from "They are screwing us..." (and they are...) to "How do we get our power back? how did we lose control?..."


Think of the implications of this. If they are holding the titles to all the NAMEs, then by chain of title they are holding title to EVERYTHING!!! That it is also why you are listed as a tenant on your mortgage or "Deed of Transfer" for example (but that's another story...)

Therefore there is only ONE way to interpret this, it has to be a trust interpretation.


Maxim of Equity: "Equity looks to the intent rather than the form" Thus why we don't lose our superior interest just because another is holding property intended for us. This is why it is called equitable title. A trust means (in this example) Property is given to a "holder" (someone you "trust") and the Title is split in two parts by definition… (like a rental agreement for example, i.e it’s NOT a complete transferring over… ) One part is a legal title, the other is an equitable title. Again by definition equitable title is superior, thus equitable title IS superior interest. That is why we have superior interest to the legal title that the State is holding! Unlike the rental example, its not conveyed for their use but for its SAFEKEEPING. (Trust)



Thus this entire event, dynamic and incontrovertible legal, lawful and "roughed in" trust interpretation (waiting to be "manifested" or "realized") inevitably follow, are all 'baked into' that document (BC = valuable token) So powerful and important, it's the reason why they hold it... (among other reasons not just our benefit, (as will be explained below))

And if you don't think Equity trumps common law, there are many hints:

(Courts of Justice Act - R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER C.43)

COMMON LAW AND EQUITY
Rules of law and equity: (R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 96 (1); 1993, c. 27, Sched.)
96. (1) Courts shall administer concurrently all rules of equity and the common law.

Rules of equity to prevail:
96. (2) Where a rule of equity conflicts with a rule of the common law, the rule of equity prevails.


Thus they are holding something that belongs to you... Thus they hold legal title, and therefore are the "statutory legal" property owner. That's why they like to pretend Statutory is the be all end all (it AIN'T, not by a long shot...) Natural Law is, Trust is, Equity is... Anyhow, you are the principal. You are the party with superior interest by definition. These words are CRITICAL. Claiming ownership to the NAME is lethal on both counts... both legally and a breach of the trust (as we step into the world of trust...like Alice through the Looking Glass) you can only claim your "superior interest". They undoubtedly have a huge obligation in holding it, but none the less, you can't claim title to the property (or any property if you think about it!!) You can only claim interest. If you understand this, you have 51% of all the understanding required and should be highly excited and motivated to want to learn more (haha)

One more time...

When one party is holding something that belongs to another...
And there is indisputable, incontrovertible, unequivocal proof of this (and you have that... it’s called a "Birth Certificate" Think of it as "proof of receipt" (thus why they make such a big deal in getting it to you when you want one... because it's an absolute trustee requirement in order for them to justify HOLDING your property in the first place!) Now then, the party that is holding what is rightfully yours has a "trustee" obligation. BIG TIME.

Another way to look at this. “IF” you had ever considered setting up a trust. One of the requirements would be to give the "Title" to the party that you are going to designate as the "Trustee"!!! And in turn you would require some "paperwork" in order to prove this arrangement. After that though, the trustee is YOUR FIDUCIARY in ALL matters pertaining to what they are holding!

So the government actually laid it out exactly in this fashion, just didn't bother to tell or educate the "little people" Now if no one shows up to make claim of interest, (I prefer NOTICE of Interest) to this trust (which most nobody has) then they would be forced to step in to maintain the trust (principle of trust law - a trust can't fail for lack of a trustee) but when they step in, they have declared themselves as Guardians with POA over it... tadaa... (don't you feel safer already?... hmm....)



And well, well, well what do you know?!... Isn't this exactly what the government (the State or Province) has done in fact! Now here's another aspect (or trick) It isn't exactly a trust yet. It is only POTENTIALLY one, All the pieces are there. (it’s a property of trust interpretation...) I know it sounds waffly, but it is and it isn’t. It’s more like a potential. It isn't a trust yet, in one sense, because you have NOT stepped up to the plate and "manifested your intention" to make it so. Now if you try to "claim" without clarifying exactly what you clearly mean, it might be a mistake, because it sounds like you are trying to claim property! But you don't have Title remember?! Point is, if you don't clearly understand this, they have a hundred ways to trip you up... You must claim superior interest! You must "EXPRESS" the trust! (before they try to create a constructive or resulting trust... and if they do, then you are sunk!) That’s right. The act of manifesting your intention, via instructions, a will, or "recognizing" (a form of contracting) that they are holding something that was intended for you. (notice that is the NOT the same thing as saying it is your property... think on that one...)

Understand this incredible dynamic, Understand the nature of your relationship to the NAME and what it actually really is... One of the things you must learn very clearly is what the difference between an EXPRESSED trust is vs a RESULTING or CONSTRUCTIVE trust.

An expressed trust will rebut any resulting or constructive trust. Which is why one possible way to do this is to make sure, one way or another, that the Birth Certificate is entered into the record of any court proceeding, and definitely, preferably, before any trial even starts. A4Ved, (Accepted for Value, it's an offer of indemnification in fact...) Along with instruction for settlement. (known as a Trust “indenture”) I believe the BC can be "presented" in court, and know of occasions where it has been FORMALLY presented in court. But… there is a private aspect to all this. And the offer to settle (trust instructions = indenture) must be referred to, or delivered to the Judge as "private" or "in the private" (i.e. outside of the public statutory... two separate things... and equity (trust interpretation) trumps statutory law, hands down, if you can get past their gauntlet.

Thus why they say we shouldn't even be physically going into the courts because if you submit the paperwork properly, they know they are left holding the bag. Your arrival would only be one last attempt to attach liability to you and by definition it is considered a form of presumption of jurisdiction. (i.e. just showing up is deemed presumption of jurisdiction. You are agreeing to go to Johnny’s house to play "monopoly". Remember Presumptions are "designed" to be rebutted, it's exactly like an "automatic setting" in a computer system. So that is not the problem. The problem is IDENTIFYING what it is they are PRESUMING! In order to let them know you are rebutting it!!! They will try to attach surety to you. Most people will get sucked in, in 2 minutes... Whereas if the ONLY evidence is the BC, (possibly both the long form and the short form = 2 witnesses) And it can only have one interpretation in court. They will dismiss, discharge, withdraw, etc, etc. We have seen this... I have a report from someone who did go in and ignored them when they called "the" NAME out 3 times. And they dismissed it.

So I know this is fundamentally correct. Just how to fit it into their rules of civil procedure is another question. After all the trick here is you are trying to deliver what is a "private trust settlement" into a public statutory probate court. Thus all their shenanigans, and 'acting' like they don't know. Do not be fooled. The only thing that would make sense is to do what is known as “invoke a court of equity” or deliver these docs (BC and possibly the long form as well), the acceptance (A4V signed for: signature, in trust), and instructions (indenture) beforehand to the Judge in "private" (since he is the only actor that can go into the private)

Thus the concept that CW's group is still trying to suss out... all the methods of invoking equity. For example one way I was told was to motion for a court of competent jurisdiction. (like a court of equity for example?)

This is all in alignment with one of the most universal maxims (indisputable truths) that “Whoever creates the liability must provide the remedy…” (mind you I am still looking for the source, Book, or manual... that is how "hidden" it must be...)

Regardless, this applies especially to us because we are all operating in a bankruptcy. That means they took away our ability to pay with real money. Even V the "guerrilla economist" in one of these threads, acknowledges this... A bankruptcy involves "trustees" (which means there's a trust....) And they DID give us the remedy!!. It's in your drawer! (or desk!) I don't care how secretive, "complicated" or labyrinthine it is, This IS what WE ALL NEED to learn.



EVERY ISSUE is NOW ONLY ONE ISSUE.
Correcting their statutory presumption of LIABILITY. PERIOD!!!
(do NOT go into their jurisdiction, or abandon all hope...)

And then acting "honourably" by presenting the Certificate of your indisputable proof of equitable interest. Your full faith and Credit in essence. What they have borrowed against and created bonds against (Gee do you think they are OWING you anything?????) With instruction (permission) to allow them to settle THEIR LIABILITY in the public. Thus we are using our equitable interest, our Faith and Credit, for the BENEFIT of the public.

The BC NAME you are holding is now their property (by virtue of holding legal title to the "thing" "res" original ink paperwork recording the gifting/giving of the "given name" from your mother to you. The piece of paper you hold is evidence of a legal property, that although it is correlated with the given name it is not that itself, it's a certificate. It's a legal entity, a property in it's own right. And it is government public property. And they again are holding title to that as well. But none the less, it is derived from the given NAME. (so technically the trust interpretation may be more complicated then I think, although the fundamentals are still sound re: superior interest=equitable title. And of course the problem is it is hard to find a way to exercise that without understanding trust interpretation!!

(Note: at this stage I don't want to get too much more into the actual application, but there is some clear and definite indications that we may need to include the SSN/SIN... because they need it to process the "public side" while they are doing the private settlement... but this is still in the research stage and only one interpretation)

This IS the solution to taking back our control. If you understand the power of a trust and the obligation of a trustee. Then you would understand why, even if it takes a few months, or a year, or 5 years, or 10 years... This is the point where your life changes. Where we become freed from the “SLAVERY” of their “GUARDIANSHIP” (POA over the CHILD named on the BC) Did you let that stop you from learning how to use a computer? (ok I know that may hurt for some... lol) but that is what we are dealing with... a system...


http://www.irs.gov/irm/part21/irm_21-007-013r.html
see IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2

2nd bullet under section 2:
An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopici92.pdf (s6 - 130813)
IRC-7701 – General Discussion - 1992

definition of person: (pg. 2)
IRC 7701(a)(1) does not refer to "person" in the usual sense of a living human being. Rather, Reg. 301.7701-1(a) instructs that the term "person" includes an individual, corporation, partnership, trust or estate, joint-stock company, association, syndicate, group, pool, joint venture or other unincorporated organization or group, guardian, committee, trustee, executor, administrator, trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee for the benefit of creditors, conservator, or any person acting in a fiduciary capacity.

D: Trust (pg. 7)
A working definition of "trust" is provided in Reg. 301.7701-4. The term "trust" as used in the Code refers to an arrangement created either by a will or by an inter vivos declaration whereby trustees take title to property for the purpose of protecting or conserving it for the beneficiaries under the ordinary rules applied in chancery or probate courts.

I highlighted “person” and “trust” it actually makes reference to "chancery" OR "probate" courts....



And we are the operators (or should be)... And they are the "ghosts" in the machine. Our house servants know how to run and manage the house (Estate) better then we do, and now they have tied us to the bed in the cellar, and are living the life of Reilly… under the guise that it is all for our benefit.

The fact is, they are NOT necessarily holding it completely for our benefit, it can most definitely be interpreted and justly so that they are holding it FOR THEIR BENEFIT. When you release any claim to property (all you need is superior interest…) You can identify the NAME (which is really the public… as per the Criminal Code definition of “any one”, “person” and “owner” or similar expressions, include Her Majesty, and an organization; (Public Corporations)

I am telling you this system is there. And the only way to understand it is to start taking the first steps to learning the fundamental principles of trust. What it is, how it operates, why it operates (very philosophical in fact...) In one sense it is the melding of the principles of law and morality. Think about it... trust. duty. obligation. Rights.

Statutory law is on the surface, a mishmash of commerce, admiralty, trust criminal, whatever (all mumbo jumbo to me) All superimposed over a bedrock that is ultimately trust. The language of the elite...

Don't believe this? Find it hard to fathom? I can't blame you, that's because you have nothing to reference it against... But consider this article, right in the mainstream, right under everyone's noses. Here is an example I came across... just by luck I was listening to an audio on the subject and caught it…
In fact it may be a useful tool for us... a tool of delivery of things from private to the public.


REAL WORLD EXAMPLE

Nigella Lawson’s ex reportedly threatened to commit suicide in an attempt to win back celebrity chef
http://arts.nationalpost.com/2013/08/12/charles-saatchi-made-suicide-threats-in-an-attempt-to-win-back-tv-chef-nigella-lawson-u-k-paper-reports/

It makes reference to a “decree nisi”... (this is a clear reference to a trust interpretation and process)

091007 – MB&T.NTT – Debut NTT – 02.mp3
http://www.4shared.com/mp3/KxwzkQ3S/091107_-_MBTNTT_-_Debut_NTT_-_.html
In this Christian Walters audio, they start talking about it at around 60 minutes (I would start there at any rate)

In a nutshell what they are saying it is, is fascinating to say the least. It points up a couple of 'undeniables' Trust law is alive and well. And ‘rich’ people seem to know what it is... Consider, what kind of lawyer, (assuming he didn't represent himself) would have come up with this? (not a criminal lawyer...) Not that it helped him win, but it was incredibly odd that he was still able to remain in contact with her... and overcome the typical court orders... (that they automatically (by presumption) dump on us plebs...)

In a nutshell a decree nisi is described somewhat like this, but it is better you listen to the audio, to capture the spontaneity of the conversation
nisi decree: Start listening at approx 1:00:00 (is where it’s worth listening to)

interim decree from court (which is really you) not the judge
it’s purpose is to deliver something from the private side to the public side
and can be followed up with a notice of acceptance and default (or similar)

in this case it’s applied to a private settlement for example
- since it is interim, it doesn’t become absolute until the other party
fails to show why they shouldn’t have to follow it
- then it is absolute , unconditional, it stands so once this becomes absolute, you put in a show order against the decree the court (you) demanded

Now they have to follow AND they will automatically be in contempt as well...

Now the point of all this isn't to rush out and do a "decree nisi" or even to learn what it is exactly. (it essentially allowed him to continue contacting her is all... and brush aside their plebian presumptions like a gnat) this is rather advanced, but simply to show a real world example where trust law is what was operating, NOT statutory, because these people like savvy computer operators, knew where to go to find the default settings (automatic presumptions) and change them to their own preferences (expressed their own trust interpretation) That is all, it's just a real world example, mocking everyone who reads it... knowing it would go right over everyone's heads...


Believe me, like the computer, now that we know it is there... (has always been in fact, it is not going away... embrace it or deny it, both have their own consequences in terms of your empowerment, and your ultimate freedom


Legal, equity, trust references, definitions, plus...
http://www.4shared.com/office/fD-GhfAx/Summary_-_Title_Trust_Equity_R.html



4shared is notorious for aggressive advertising and some people
can't figure out how to download (the "price" of "free"...)

GENERIC DOWNLOAD INSTRUCTIONS FOR - 4SHARED:
(save these instructions - avoid a lot of 'headaches')

click 4shared link provided to start...
(1) folders/files will display – Click on the folder or file only...
- new tab / window opens displaying selection to play or download
- underneath are two buttons:
"Download" and "Share with friends"

(2) select "Download"
- new tab / window opens with two buttons:
"PRIORITY DOWNLOAD" and "FREE DOWNLOAD"
"pop up" window appears - it's advertising
(shut it down and continue..)

(3) select "FREE DOWNLOAD"
a sign in 'box' will appear, sign in with
4shared account option at bottom
- Sign Up (left) - or Login (right)
(NO NEED to download anything to sign up)

(4) login: username password,
"download, save as, save" appears





links for my own reference:

previous:
Adam Kokesh violently dragged from public protest by police, arrested for 'resisting arrest'
ALL CRIME IS COMMERCIAL - So PAY THEM (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?59291-Adam-Kokesh-violently-dragged-from-public-protest-by-police-arrested-for-resisting-arrest&p=685391&viewfull=1#post685391)

Adam Kokesh violently dragged from public protest by police
TAKING BACK MY CONTROL WITH RofPOA (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?56811-I--Bill--am-being-impersonated-on-Facebook.&p=647557&viewfull=1#post647557)

Adam Kokesh violently dragged from public protest by police
Jane Doe's Court Experience (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?59291-Adam-Kokesh-violently-dragged-from-public-protest-by-police-arrested-for-resisting-arrest&p=685431&viewfull=1#post685431)


following:
Nautural law Trumps Maritime Law Montana Courtroom
EQUITY in TRUST But Where To Find It... (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?65795-Nautural-law-Trumps-Maritime-Law-Montana-Courtroom&p=767074&viewfull=1#post767074)

Corncrake
27th September 2013, 08:18
This is George Monbiot's hard hitting article from 2009 on the prison system in the US and UK:

"The US and British governments have created a private prison industry which preys on human lives.

It’s a staggering case; more staggering still that it has scarcely been mentioned on this side of the ocean. Last week two judges in Pennsylvania were convicted of jailing some 2000 children in exchange for bribes from private prison companies.

Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan sent children to jail for offences so trivial that some of them weren’t even crimes. A 15 year-old called Hillary Transue got three months for creating a spoof web page ridiculing her school’s assistant principal. Mr Ciavarella sent Shane Bly, then 13, to boot camp for trespassing in a vacant building. He gave a 14 year-old, Jamie Quinn, 11 months in prison for slapping a friend during an argument, after the friend slapped her. The judges were paid $2.6 million by companies belonging to the Mid Atlantic Youth Services Corp for helping to fill its jails(1,2,3). This is what happens when public services are run for profit.

It’s an extreme example, but it hints at the wider consequences of the trade in human lives created by private prisons. In the US and the UK they have a powerful incentive to ensure that the number of prisoners keeps rising.

The United States is more corrupt than the UK, but it is also more transparent. There the lobbyists demanding and receiving changes to judicial policy might be exposed, and corrupt officials identified and prosecuted. The UK, with a strong tradition of official secrecy and a weak tradition of scrutiny and investigative journalism, has no such safeguards."

Full article: http://www.monbiot.com/2009/03/03/the-proceeds-of-crime/

Corncrake
27th September 2013, 08:51
This is such an important subject and sadly one no one really wants to examine - as spiritguide wrote above Few responses, guess it won't be a real issue until friend or family get caught up in the insanity of slavery.
I became interested about 10 years ago when I read about the controversial American company Wackenhut Correction Corporation (G4S) running UK prisons which seemed to me unblievable given their history.

Article by Greg Palast from 1999

Free Market In Human Misery

New Mexico's privately operated prisons are filled with America's impoverished, sometimes violent outcasts - and they are just the guards. That's the warning I took away from confidential documents and from guards who spoke nervously on condition of anonymity.

The prisons' owner operator, Wackenhut Corporation, has not had a very sunny summer. Three weeks ago, Texas terminated its contract to run a prison pending the expected criminal indictment of several members of staff for sexually abusing inmates. The company has also been yanked from operating a prison in its home state of Florida, and mass escapes in June, July and August threaten their Australian contracts.

And in New Mexico, Wackenhut's two prisons, open barely a year, have been the scene of riots, nine stabbings and five murders, including, two weeks ago, the killing of a guard. Wackenhut's share price plummeted. But there is a ray of hope. Last month, between the fourth and fifth murder in New Mexico, Jack Straw's office announced it would award new contracts to the company, including one to build and operate a prison at Marchington in Staffordshire.

http://www.gregpalast.com/free-market-in-human-misery/#more-896

In 1999 the UK government cancelled its contract with Wackenhut (G4S) not because of human rights abuses but because the Home Office alleged that they had shown 'a total disregard for fundamental tenets of government accounting and Prison Service financial policy'. But they continued to operate in the the UK until the much publicised Olympics security fiasco when they failed to provide enough guards and now finally it would appear that their contracts are not being renewed. They are all about cost cutting at any expense.

I don't believe prison should be a picnic but at the moment they don't work - at least half released prisoners re-offend within two years. In Norway re-offending is at 20% and even less at the controversial new prison discussed here:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1384308/Norways-controversial-cushy-prison-experiment--catch-UK.html

Rollo
27th September 2013, 21:27
BC= Birth Certificate
POA = Power of Attorney
KJV = King James Authorized Version
CW = Christian Walters - the original introducer of Trust interpretation to the "CR" movement
CR = "Commercial Redemption" (for lack of a more generic term...)


Sorry to say, the more I think about it, and based on what I have seen and heard...

Hi Sigma,

I think you can start its own thread about the trust. This subject is very interesting.

sigma6
28th September 2013, 00:14
Yes it is very interesting, absolutely, I'm considering it, I find I suffer from writers block, and find it's the reading of other's certain pages that causes these 'outbursts of creative response' (which is why I write at each individual point...) So I am including a series of "before and after links" for those who want to bother following it, at the bottom of each page for my own personal reference as I examine my own continuing thought process, thanks for kind acknowledgement... it's quite the labour of love.

Actually what I may do is copy and past all the links into a cohesive thread at some point... will have to go through my own 'slog' of responses, as I may have even left a few off the before/after links... ;(


Some quotes from Mary Croft's Book: whom I occasionally correspond with... and have to admit this definitely resonates...
HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN ... a Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/

"Needless to say, suggesting we have been conned into playing an insidious game which is destroying our lives, our futures, our fellowship, our spirituality, and our true natures, will meet with non-receptive minds. Consequently, in exasperation one night I resolved that my book would be futile – a waste of my time and energy. I declared I would put my efforts back into developing my Energy Psychology practice.

In the middle of the night I was awakened by a voice saying, “Secret Oral Teachings”. I thought, “I’ll remember” and went back to sleep. Later I heard it again, and then again upon awakening I heard, “Secret Oral Teachings” at which point I leapt out of bed and went to my books and put my hand on a small brown book which I’d owned for 20 years and never read, entitled, Secret Oral Teachings in Tibetan Buddhist Sects by Alexandra David-Néel and Lama Yongden (1967). Within the first eight pages I read about the hesitation of the Buddha, before beginning His Mission:

“I have discovered a profound truth, difficult to perceive, difficult to understand, accessible only to the wise. “Human beings busy themselves in the vortex of the world and find their pleasure. It will be difficult for men to understand the law of the concatenation of causes and effects, the suppression of the samskaras (ideas that one forms which depend upon ignorance).

“Of what use to reveal to men that which I have discovered at the price of laborious efforts? Why should I do so? – This doctrine cannot be understood by those filled by desire and hatred .. it is mysterious, deep; hidden from the vulgar mind. If I proclaim it and men are unable to understand it, the only result will be fatigue and annoyance for me.”


and this other one...

“Do not believe on the strength of traditions even if they have been held in honour for many generations and in many places; do not believe anything because many people speak of it; do not believe on the strength of sages of old times; do not believe that which you have yourselves imagined, thinking that a god has inspired you. Believe nothing which depends only on the authority of your masters or of
priests. After investigation, believe that which you have yourselves tested and found reasonable, and which is for your good and that of others.”

“Doubt is an incitement to research, and research is the path to true knowledge.”
“Why are these teachings secret? Does that mean I can’t write and tell about them?” “No, Alexandra, these teachings are not called ‘secret’ because it is forbidden to talk about them. They are ‘secret’ because so few who hear them understand.”

sigma6
28th September 2013, 01:09
More information regarding this subject can be found by reviewing the web site of Geo Group, Inc. http://www.geogroup.com/

Quoting from the home page “The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is the world's leading provider of correctional, detention, and community reentry services with 96 facilities, approximately 73,000 beds, and 18,000 employees around the globe. GEO's facilities are located in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa.”

2012 total revenues were US$1,479,062. The 2012 Annual Report can be found at this link: https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/36159R/20130314/AR_159415/
Note that they operate, in part, as a real estate investment trust (REIT).

The Board of Directors can be found directly at this link: http://www.geogroup.com/Board_of_Directors


Stop accepting the public "benefits and privileges" because rest assured that is exactly how these are defined in the statutory jurisdiction.
Waive all benefits and privileges in the public. Do not consent to any contracting.
Without Prejudice . I am authorized and bonded to use the NAME John Doe for Her Majesty in right of Canada

if you look to the Criminal Code section 336 A trustee (such as the State/Province) recognizes two ways to hold property:
for the benefit and use of a PERSON or
for the a PUBLIC or charitable use (notice there is no "of a PERSON) ... it's the PUBLIC...

Now combine that with the definition of PERSON in the Criminal Code:
"any one", "person", or "owner" and similar expressions, include Her Majesty and an organization; (WTF!!!)

This is getting to the issue of them trying to pin "beneficial owner" status on us. Like when you signed the Mortage, that is what you actually signed something akin to "an aquistion of beneficial ownership" contract (Congratulations, you just agreed to be liable for the taxes on the State's property in exchange for pretending you are the Title holder (which of course you are NOT!!!) And NO you did NOT put signature to the Mortgage document or the Deed of Trust... (guess who... Her Majesty's representatives (a lawyer!) did on her behalf of course... and all this happens because you willingly (by your own "consent") claim the NAME and try to use it as if you were holding title to it...

(and yes I know how fantastical that sounds, but welcome to the Alice and Wonderland Looking Glass world (the Matrix) Remember the title to the property (or "res") regarding the NAME, if you follow the chain of Certificate nos, Registration no, Photostatic Print of the record to show you the ORIGINAL ink signature document that IS the locus of Trust (absolute right to use and control) And note that Title (especially legal title) doesn't transfer with a certificate or copy (just part of the 'game' they play...) The control mechanism here is that it has to be presented within the correct jurisdiction (most likely an equity jurisdiction for a private settlement) in order to properly express the trust while you identify yourself and your intention....

Thus I might say "Do you understand (i.e. do you stand under my jurisdiction) that I have been bonded and authorized to use the NAME "DOE, JOHN" (and any and all derivatives thereof) for her Majesty (I am not claiming ownership but use it on behalf of the corporation that is HER MAJESTY and an organization) in right of Canada (the public) and I am presenting the necessary Registered Certificate of proof of my right to operate thus... for the purpose of helping you settle your liability in the public,

If they refuse this honourable offer to settle, it would be a HUGE egregious breach of trust and dishonour... (which is why they are slimy hypocritical scumbags, when they refuse this.

note: goes without saying you must do this with true understanding, you may have to answer a few questions, and that is where they will try and sneak control back... and trip you up... you can't just be a parrot...

You are in essence cutting off their ability to "double dip" the system. They want to charge you in the public statutory, while they still continue to process your NAME Estate (which is what the courts (banks) are designed and have access to do. Look at all the levels of control, qualifications, and membership in secret societies they use to hide what the court system really is... and with the police union as owner of the corporation of the city, all the parasites are being happily fed...

Yet if you can step into another jurisdiction... where "equity" is properly invoked and recognized, for example when you excercise YOUR RIGHTS (remember those?... haaha)
Guess who is the liable party....
Guess who is the beneficial 'owner'...
Guess who is now clearly the trustee with fiduciary obligation (and if they are not clear give specific instruction, do not say please or use the word request...) that is NOT trust language, another hoop against you)

ok, cutting myself off here...

sdv
11th November 2013, 01:54
More information regarding this subject can be found by reviewing the web site of Geo Group, Inc. http://www.geogroup.com/

Quoting from the home page “The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is the world's leading provider of correctional, detention, and community reentry services with 96 facilities, approximately 73,000 beds, and 18,000 employees around the globe. GEO's facilities are located in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa.”

2012 total revenues were US$1,479,062. The 2012 Annual Report can be found at this link: https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/36159R/20130314/AR_159415/
Note that they operate, in part, as a real estate investment trust (REIT).

The Board of Directors can be found directly at this link: http://www.geogroup.com/Board_of_Directors

The G4S Group (British) runs a high-security prison in South Africa. Major problems there recently - riots, guards taken hostage. The government stepped in and took over the prison and now there is an enquiry about torture .. forcefully giving inmates anti-psychotic medication, repeatedly shocking them with a taser-type weapon, and so on. Here's just one news article on it, but I have seen men from G4S being interviewed and they are arrogant with this attitude 'we have done nothing wrong'. http://mg.co.za/article/2013-11-05-probe-into-mangaung-prison-torture-nearly-complete

This is what G4S say about their work at Maungaung:


Care and Justice ServicesAdd this
Mangaung Correctional Centre (MCC) in South Africa balances the safe and secure accommodation of nearly 3,000 maximum security inmates by providing care, rehabilitation and community outreach involvement.
The project was the first Private Finance Initiative (PFI)/Public Private Partnership (PPP) to be developed in South Africa, leveraging the know-how of both public and private sectors. G4S was part of the consortium responsible for the design, construction and financing of the project and signed a 25-year contract to operate the facility as sub-contractor to the consortium. Mangaung is the second largest private prison in the world and, having played a part in its design and construction, G4S is proud to have opened it in 2001.

The purpose built prison ensures that even though facilities are extensive and provide a range of opportunities for inmates to learn and develop new skills, security is tight and controlled at all times, especially with nearly 3,000 inmates.

At Mangaung, inmates spend 40 hours per week on a broad range of activities, a figure nearly double the number set for prisons in the UK. There is a clear focus on each inmate gaining the right skills in order to enhance the chance of employment upon their release. In fact, Mangaung’s educational centre for adults “Liberty” is renowned in South Africa for its successes.

In addition to education, Mangaung plays an enormous part in introducing corporate responsibility; the inmates grow and donate produce to local charities, make clothes for local children and make furniture to donate to local schools.

These are just some of the reasons why for two years running G4S has been presented with an award for local community development by the Premier of the province. http://www.g4s.co.za/en-ZA/What%20we%20do/Services/Care%20and%20justice/