PDA

View Full Version : The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski



nzreva
26th January 2014, 21:19
Brzezinski graduated with a PhD from Harvard University in 1953 and became Professor of American Foreign Policy at Johns Hopkins University before becoming the United States National Security Adviser during 1977-1981 under the administration of President Jimmy Carter.
The Grand Chessboard: A major work of Zbigniew Brzezinski.
I read his book a few years ago and was amazed at the accuracy of what has happened to keep the landmass of Eurasia as the center of global power, he writes, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger should emerge capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America's global pre-eminence.
If a power is 2nd an another is 3rd in power, the 2nd in power should be brought back to 3rd in power, thus keeping the U.S. #1. Reading the book explained to me why Russia then Japan's economy changed after the diameters they have experienced. China now rising to a 2nd power seems to be in alot of hot water, soon to be engaged in war of some kind.
What I really want to look at is the U.S. Are we #1? I think the question should be. Is the U.S. power moving to Paraguay, or other parts of the world? An ideology lives where ever the people hold to the ideology. I believe in the next 22 years the new U.S. will be where we the free thinking people have chosen to move to.
We will always be #1 just in a different part of the world.

Snookie
26th January 2014, 21:46
I tend to suspect that the US has actually really been ruled/controlled from the Vatican and perhaps to a lesser degree by the City of London.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
26th January 2014, 22:12
I tend to suspect that the US has actually really been ruled/controlled from the Vatican and perhaps to a lesser degree by the City of London.

Based on the media love affair with the royal family, I'd say you are nearly right but need to switch those powers around.
the Vatican seems to have clout but gets annihilated by the US MSM.
Whereas the Masons and Royals can't do wrong... even when they do wrong, it's part of the love story.

I think the USA hates the Vatican, it's a useful puppet in the big puppet show, a "Big Scary" that permits our own (UK/US) police state.

:(

based also on analysis of V for Vendetta.
the Pope might not be the biggest scary, just the most educated one.

nzreva
26th January 2014, 22:29
Religion never rules, the heart. Liberty leaves and moves where like minded people are. The Vatican can only control the ignorant and the fearful. India will have a lot of influence, I believe, over the next few years, but not in the far future, when oppression rules a people, it is time to leave. I believe after the fights to control Paraguay and the New World it will be the place to be for the free minded.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
26th January 2014, 22:37
Religion never rules, the heart. Liberty leaves and moves where like minded people are. The Vatican can only control the ignorant and the fearful. India will have a lot of influence, I believe, over the next few years, but not in the far future, when oppression rules a people, it is time to leave. I believe after the fights to control Paraguay and the New World it will be the place to be for the free minded.

I understand how you feel, but Plato might disagree.
What of the "spiritual forms"?

I don't believe in "manifest destiny" any more than I think the Pope should hold temporal power.

We do live in a sorry world -- but people can change the way they act based on what they believe.

Christianity wasn't supposed to be a machine to slave drive whole populations.
It was born in a time of horrific political upheaval where many people were left exposed by race or lack of wealth.
It provided a way of escape during a time of barbarity.

Now, it provides a cover for the barbarity, and has to be cleaned from the inside out.

Not sure why people like to bash Christians (or catholics!) more than other people.
it's only a group and 99 percent of them get robbed for 10% tithe with no say over where the money goes.
Kind of like taxes.

"I bring not peace but a sword" ~JC

nzreva
26th January 2014, 22:49
I am interrupting my commits to mention China and the buy out.. http://wallstreetsectorselector.com/2013/11/china-announces-going-stop-stockpiling-u-s-dollars/
ABOUT

China Announces That It Is Going To Stop Stockpiling U.S. Dollars
International Desk, Special Guest Quarters | Michael Snyder | November 22, 2013 9:44 am
China just dropped an absolute bombshell, but it was almost entirely ignored by the mainstream media in the United States.

nzreva
26th January 2014, 22:57
Tesla

Christianity was born at Antioch 37 years after the Nazoraion, the Way or the Disciples. Christianity was the new order to control and hold people in bondage. Yahoshua never taught what Christianity taught. He did not start Christianity, John 15:15 "No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.

He never called himself a lord, because he freed us. He was and is a savior to all and a friend.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
26th January 2014, 23:04
Tesla

Christianity was born at Antioch 37 years after the Nazoraion, the Way or the Disciples. Christianity was the new order to control and hold people in bondage. Yahoshua never taught what Christianity taught. He did not start Christianity, John 15:15 "No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.

He never called himself a lord, because he freed us. He was and is a savior to all and a friend.

I think at this point we are splitting hairs; there is and continues to be a division in the church,
and the fighting over these labels and doctrines is what Paul the apostle warned about,
which is why he diminished himself and praised the Christ instead.

nzreva
26th January 2014, 23:06
With China making this move, she will be #2 in power, watch what happens to China in the near future. If The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski is correct (I believe it is) China will be brought to her knees and moved back to # 3 or ? power.

nzreva
26th January 2014, 23:12
Tesla

Paul was a Nazoraion
Acts 24:5 "For we have found this man a real pest and a fellow who stirs up dissension among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the heresies of the Nazarenes (Greek Nazoraion).

nzreva
26th January 2014, 23:40
In his 1970 piece Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, Brzezinski argued that a coordinated policy among developed nations was necessary in order to counter global instability erupting from increasing economic inequality. (Not to do anything to repair gross economic inequality in a rigged global market system, just to contain the outrage.)
Out of this thesis, Brzezinski co-founded the Trilateral Commission (internal, 1999) with David Rockefeller, serving as director from 1973 to 1976. The Trilateral Commission (2008) is a group of prominent political and business leaders and academics primarily from the United States, Western Europe and Japan. Its purpose is to strengthen relations among the three most industrially advanced regions of the free world. Brzezinski selected Georgia governor Jimmy Carter as a member.http://www.takeoverworld.info/grandchessboard.html

Ya'll can download the book here on pdf.

nzreva
26th January 2014, 23:56
Page 154
• The Paracel and Spratly Islands in the South China Sea pose
the risk of a collision between China and several Southeast
Asian states over access to potentially valuable seabed energy
sources, with China imperially viewing the South China
Sea as its legitimate national patrimony.
• The Senkaku Islands are contested by both Japan and China
(with the rivals Taiwan and mainland China ferociously of a
single mind on this issue), and the historical rivalry for regional
preeminence between Japan and China infuses this
issue with symbolic significance as well.
" The division of Korea and the inherent instability of North
Korea—made all the more dangerous by North Korea's
quest for nuclear capability—pose the risk that a sudden explosion
could engulf the peninsula in warfare, which in turn
would engage the United States and indirectly involve Japan.
My comment
The problem has worsened, as China a wealthy and rising threat is now needing new territory, buying more and more of the U.S., will be problematic for the U. S. in the future.....

Aragorn
27th January 2014, 00:00
I tend to suspect that the US has actually really been ruled/controlled from the Vatican and perhaps to a lesser degree by the City of London.

Far less so by the Vatican than by the State of Israel, my friend. And the City of London is of course a very influential player in that regard, but don't forget that the USA has been sold out to its own corporations, which by now have for most part all become transnational. As an aside, you may want to keep an eye on the upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership and Trans-Atlantic Partnership agreements, which will effectively boost the US American hegonomy by providing a form of immunity against the laws of non-US nations for US-based transnational corporations.

Fact of the matter is that the USA are the primary socio-economic, political and military tool by which the Illuminati carry out their plans for humanity. Brzezinski himself is a Skull & Bones member, and if you've ever seen one or multiple interviews with the guy, then you'll know that he's most definitely a Machiavellian sociopath. Brzezinski was also the guy who (by his own admission) singlehandedly engineered the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, so as to "bring communism to its knees and give the Soviets their own Vietnam". Allegedly, it was a ploy to bring an end to the Cold War - which is what Brzezinski uses as the sole justification - but in the same vein, it also ensured that the United States of America would remain as the only nuclear superpower in the world.

This, in turn, has fed the already pre-existing American Exceptionalism philosophy, which is not only based upon a lie, but which is also gratuitously being wielded as an excuse - or perhaps even as the ultimate excuse - for the invasion of sovereign nations by the USA in its imperialist stride, as well as for the USA to become the global policeman - or bully, depending on how you look at it - of the entire world, all in the name of "spreading liberty and democracy".

The belief that the United States of America would be the propagator of democracy and liberty is of course in stark contrast with the fact that the Patriot Act - which has been secretly reaffirmed by Obama in spite of his vow to abolish it - deprives the USA's own citizens (and any detained foreigners) not only of their constitutional freedom, but also of their human rights as outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Even Obama has - still only a few days ago as I'm writing this - appealed onto American Exceptionalism as justification for the NSA's mass surveillance, by stating that "other nations are grateful to the USA for keeping them safe".

Another such contrasting but little known fact is that the USA as a nation does not recognize the authority of the International War Tribunal in De Hague, and that under the first George W. Bush administration, the USA effectively blocked all NATO decisions (by way of Donald Rumsfeld) until NATO had changed its internal laws so that a NATO member nation could no longer be prosecuted over war crimes.

Israel is definitely instrumental in US international politics as well, and assumes an incredible arrogance and defiance towards the Palestinians - as well as towards everyone else in the Arab world for that matter - because Israel knows that the USA will always have its back. In return, Israel itself provides the US government (as well as the British government) with "plausibly deniable" cronies for carrying out assassinations or false flag operations by way of the Mossad - think "9/11".


Note : If you want to know more about this, then look up on the name Annie Machon on YouTube. She's an ex-MI5 operative who was stabbed in the back by her own government and the British press for daring to expose some of their dirty work. She is currently residing in Canada and she is part of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Annie Machon also believes - albeit that she doesn't have concrete evidence - that the late Lady Diana Spencer was eliminated by MI5 (or possibly MI6) over the fact that she was planning to become an international spokesperson for the Palestinian cause, which would have gone right in against the official British policy.

Nanoo Nanoo
27th January 2014, 01:47
British Aristocracy is from German blood. British Occupation was ousted in the US. Germany was allied by the US but then deceived and turned upon.

the demise of the US is retribution on behalf of Germany by infiltration.

In the EU Germany is the one country holding up.

note , these are not countries that do this , these are factions.

N

Tesla_WTC_Solution
27th January 2014, 02:05
British Aristocracy is from German blood. British Occupation was ousted in the US. Germany was allied by the US but then deceived and turned upon.

the demise of the US is retribution on behalf of Germany by infiltration.

In the EU Germany is the one country holding up.

note , these are not countries that do this , these are factions.

N

This is true and supported by research, actually!

TY for adding this.

p.s. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c0/Viking-Norman_descent_of_the_British_royal_family.png

It's true!

(if you have a wheel on the mouse, use CTRL + wheel to zoom in and out)

also interesting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestry_charts_of_the_current_British_Royal_Famil y#Questionable_connections


...However, the lineage proposed by Reitwiesner is easily verifiable....

Aragorn
27th January 2014, 04:01
British Aristocracy is from German blood.

That is correct. The British royal family has changed their names, but they are in essence Saxe-Coburgs, and as such, they are directly related to the Belgian royal family.

When Belgium was first formed as an independent nation and the provisional Belgian government wanted to make Belgium into a constitutional monarchy, these government officials had their mind set on selecting a descendant of the French royal family - called Charles - as the new Belgian king. At that point in time, the British royal family intervened - and it was at that point in history the first time ever that Great-Britain came to actually intervene in the internal affairs of Belgium - and insisted that the Belgian king would be Leopold von Saxe-Coburg Gotha, a German and direct relative of the British royal family.

The Belgian constitution was recently changed - i.e. a few years ago - to allow for Belgium to now also officially have a queen, just as e.g. in the UK and in the Netherlands - as opposed to the title of queen meaning "the wife of the king". This was done because the eldest child of the current ruling monarch - Philippe, as of 2013 - is a girl. Her name is Elisabeth and she's now about 13 years old. When she in turn takes over the throne from her father, the name of the royal family will of course change once her own time will have arrived to abdicate in favor of one of her future children. However, up until and including Philippe, the last name of the Belgian royal family has always been Saxe-Coburg Gotha. There was a point in the past when the then-ruling monarch (Leopold II) didn't have a son of his own, and at that stage, the rule of succession designated the son (Albert I) of his younger brother as the successor to the throne.

There is a republican movement in Belgium - or otherwise put: there are people who feel that the monarchy should be abolished - but in all fairness, it doesn't stand a chance, given that Belgium is politically ruled primarily by three "political families" who are all royalist and pro-monarchy. The term "political families" in the afore sentence is to be interpreted as "distinct political parties who share the same political ideology and who at one point in the past were united across the language border, but who have since then been segregated by this language border and who are thus now considered to be independent parties".

These three political "families" are the socialists, the Christian-democrats and the liberals, and all of them are completely controlled by Freemasons. Although their methods and their propaganda differ, they are known to collaborate behind the scenes and to conspire together against new and alternative parties, with whom they don't want to share their power. They've even created an electoral threshold - meaning that a political party must at least gather 5% of the votes in order for it to be allowed into parliament - so as to make sure that the three of them will always come out as the three biggest parties of any regional or federal election. By consequence, so long as this unholy trinity continues to persist, Belgium will remain a constitutional monarchy.

Nanoo Nanoo
27th January 2014, 05:45
The British Colonisers were turfed out by the US and declared indipendant.

I can tell you first hand these types DO NOT FORGIVE or FORGET , they will retreat and then come back,. it is in their nature..

So what they are doing is instead of colonising they are de valuing the land and buying it through their central banks with digital credits.

Then when they own it the good old USA will be declared a British Colony just like Australia.

These two land owner factions have been head butting for ever.

Its gonna be reall funny in mid 2015 when the real owners show up .. ha ;)

N

Aragorn
27th January 2014, 05:59
The British Colonisers were turfed out by the US and declared indipendant.

I can tell you first hand these types DO NOT FORGIVE or FORGET , they will retreat and then come back,. it is in their nature..

So what they are doing is instead of colonising they are de valuing the land and buying it through their central banks with digital credits.

Then when they own it the good old USA will be declared a British Colony just like Australia.

These two land owner factions have been head butting for ever.


I'm afraid I do not agree with that assessment. The USA may be (in part) controlled from within the City of London, but in the spirit of globalization and the plan to abolish individual nation states, it would be very foolish of the Illuminati to first declare the US a British colony again, and especially so because of the USA's military potential.



Its gonna be reall funny in mid 2015 when the real owners show up .. ha ;)


I'm not sure as to what you're alluding to with regard to 2015, but for me, "the real owners" (of the landmass comprising the United States of America) are the indigenous peoples whom Columbus mistakenly referred to as "Indians" (because he thought he had arrived in India).

Nanoo Nanoo
27th January 2014, 06:56
I dont think it will be a public declaration.

but can you imagine if Columbus was looking for Turkey ?

ha

N