PDA

View Full Version : Very strange news article - NASA seeking volunteers for Mars mission?



AtlasFactor
29th October 2010, 06:55
This is outright peculiar, especially the part where they say you won't come back.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nasa-mars-mission-a-one-way-trip/story-fn5fsgyc-1225945124330

Malcolm Linus
29th October 2010, 07:06
This is the kind of article that makes me verify that it's not april the 1st or theonion.com. Apparently it's not...

frank samuel
29th October 2010, 09:49
Well is funny to me but quite understandable that the best way to keep an astronaut mouth shut is not bring them back home, makes you wonder just how many men and women are exploring other planets like Mars without public knowledge.

One peculiar detail that has been mention by whistle blowers is that Mars is already inhabited by humans and EBE's alike and that green is a common color like in vegetation. Now for one second imagine these people coming home and relating their experiences, how long can our governments keep calling whistle blowers wackos and discrediting every legitimate whistle blower who has dare to come forward.

Catch 22 for NASA and those trying to keep taps on the flow of information is that even if they wanted to it would be almost impossible to reveal all of the underhanded activities they have been involved with concerning the ET agendas so my guess is volunteers via a one way trip to space and other planets will be the norm killing two birds with one stone; new NASA lifetime recruits who will never set foot on planet Earth again therefore diminishing security risk via leaked whistle blower information.

AtlasFactor
29th October 2010, 09:56
If you want a totally unfounded conspiracy theory opinion this is a test of response to see how willing people are to get aboard craft on the proviso they never return.

Who or what may want people for such a purpose, if true, is an interesting thing to ponder. But this is pure speculation of course.

AtlasFactor
29th October 2010, 10:00
(Interesting especially if connected with a meme being pushed by certain new age guru George Kavassilas about allowing loved ones to board craft of known hostile ETs.)

scanner
29th October 2010, 10:10
Could it not be just what it is ? A one way trip because they cannot get back or do we see conspiracy in everything ?

AtlasFactor
29th October 2010, 10:13
Could it not be just what it is ? A one way trip because they cannot get back or do we see cosperacy in everything ?

According to Henry Deacon, he and many others have been there and back. If his story is credible, it makes that part of the article suspicious. And frankly I trust the word of a whistleblower over NASA any day.

Operator
29th October 2010, 10:15
Just to let us get used that there will be one-way trips soon. By asking for volunteers they can measure the readiness for this idea.

lightblue
29th October 2010, 10:51
According to Henry Deacon, he and many others have been there and back. If his story is credible, it makes that part of the article suspicious. And frankly I trust the word of a whistleblower over NASA any day.

yes, i think the article is suspicious too..or else they are running a parallel programmme to say the least...just how do they plan to take the volunteer astronauts over to mars - based on which to say "it's too costly to bring them beack"? if it's aaccording to henry deacon's account (who's been and come back) no space ships are required :no: to "ferry" the personnel as the "jump rooms" are used for such missions... :secret: l




.

bennycog
29th October 2010, 11:35
we need an avalonian to undertake the task.. at least on of us can then get news to the mars colony that we are here and know the truth..
:)
but getting there through NASA might mean whoever takes the journey becomes the next new false flag event from outerspace.... collateral damage as you might say..

jcocks
29th October 2010, 12:21
My gut feeling is that it's a cover to allow the disclosure of some of the propulsion technologies that they've been holding to their chests, among other things...the fact that DARPA is involved only makes my gut feeling stronger...

It may also be a cover for the "ark ships" that are supposedly being built to ferry the PTB off-world.....

Elandiel BernElve
29th October 2010, 12:37
I wanna go:p

jcocks
29th October 2010, 12:38
I wanna go:p

You have first dibs, I'll have second :P

Carmody
29th October 2010, 12:44
My promise to myself, as a kid, was to die in outer space or on the surface of another planet.

Luke
29th October 2010, 13:39
Could be cool .. until you consider being fried by solar wind in the process of transit .. not to mention landing .. and not to mention that you are not going to uninhabited place.

BUT if you will have real New Frontier.. hell, count me in.

Still, my guess is that cleaning mess here on third rock comes first. But after that, who knows :)

Operator
29th October 2010, 13:45
at least on of us can then get news to the mars colony that we are here and know the truth..


Do we ?

Now consider this ... if they seriously propose to send someone up and can convince us with a plan that the astronauts could stay there
in a sustainable way ... then what are they actually telling us ?

Shairia
29th October 2010, 14:04
I'd be interested to know how many people have actually applied.

Elandiel BernElve
29th October 2010, 14:16
If there's still a way to apply i just might.

Going undercover on Mars as an Avalonian to provide Earth with clandestine truths about that living planet.

jackovesk
29th October 2010, 14:26
This is outright peculiar, especially the part where they say you won't come back.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nasa-mars-mission-a-one-way-trip/story-fn5fsgyc-1225945124330

Here's another one from The Australian...

Star survey shortens odds on finding more planets like Earth

A new survey of 166 Sun-like stars in our cosmic neighbourhood has indicated that 23 per cent of them are likely to have a small rocky planet that is of about the same mass as the Earth.

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2010/10/29/1225945/214639-earth.jpg

The research team, led by Andrew Howard and Geoffrey Marcy, of the University of California Berkeley, did not find direct evidence of terrestrial worlds around any of the stars they observed, because these are too small to be seen with today's instruments.

Their discovery of other planets considerably bigger than Earth, however, suggest that planets become more abundant as their mass falls. If this trend holds, it would mean that Earth-like worlds orbit one Sun-like star in four.

"Of about 100 typical Sun-like stars, one or two have planets the size of Jupiter, roughly six have a planet the size of Neptune, and about 12 have 'super-Earths' between three and 10 Earth masses," Dr Howard said.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/star-survey-shortens-odds-on-finding-more-planets-like-earth/story-e6frg8y6-1225945219696

Disclosure is not too Far Away Now!

Malcolm Linus
29th October 2010, 14:32
If there's still a way to apply i just might.

Going undercover on Mars as an Avalonian to provide Earth with clandestine truths about that living planet.

Would make for a good movie, one that Hollywood would probably be happy to buy, if they get to spice it up a little. By spice, I mean disinformation.

Martin
29th October 2010, 14:50
Well let us assume that this news on its on would be totally truthful than we are probably right to conclude that for a mission like this one would need a considerable big crew. A crew who would be able to stay there and substain themselfs with only minium support from earth. So what they indeed are doing is preparing us that we gonna have a mars colony. What ever that means. One might wonder why we wouldn't want to have one on the moon first?

But after all we might already be present on both ... so anything NASA has to say to the public is probably without any real "newsness" anyway. :ranger:


MfG

Martin

truthseekerdan
29th October 2010, 14:58
I'm thinking that their agenda is to send all the unemployed folks to Mars, so they don't have to pay more benefits that are about to expire anyway...:confused:

Operator
29th October 2010, 14:59
A crew who would be able to stay there and substain themselfs with only minium support from earth.

That's what my question implied .... what are they telling us ?
They're telling us that apparently we ARE ready and CAPABLE of doing it or ....

(unfortunately) it reminds to one way trains during WWII ... nobody returned to tell what happened at the other end



One might wonder why we wouldn't want to have one on the moon first?


I'm no expert but I think that a moon is by far not equal to a planet (potential for terraforming it).

Martin
29th October 2010, 15:09
That might be true Operator, but one would think that the moon would be a good opportunity to get some experience first ... but as you said maybe they already have all they need. I did not read the article before, because quit frankly it comes from NASA.


Mr Worden suggested that new technologies, such as synthetic biology and alterations to the human genome, could be explored ahead of the mission


But thats interesting! So what do we want to send? Superhumans? EBEs? Humans that breath carbondioxid? :becky:

It is just fishy as a NASA news can get ... and thats a lot of fishyness.


MfG

Martin

conk
29th October 2010, 15:19
I'd have to see the female astronauts first. I'm not going on a 'don't ask, don't tell' journey to a distant planet unless they can convince me there are already Martian women waiting or my traveling companions are cuter than Buzz Aldren.

Martin
29th October 2010, 15:25
Yeah sure, 70 heated-up martian beauties are already excitedly awaiting your departure! Iinscribe now! :p


MfG

Martin

Chakra
29th October 2010, 17:47
I'd have to see the female astronauts first. I'm not going on a 'don't ask, don't tell' journey to a distant planet unless they can convince me there are already Martian women waiting or my traveling companions are cuter than Buzz Aldren.

Don't get too worked up - it might not be for another 20 years yet!
According to the article in question that is..

Centre director Pete Worden, who claimed humans could be living on Mars by 2030 despite the inhospitable conditions, said: "The human space program is now aimed at settling other worlds.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nasa-mars-mission-a-one-way-trip/story-fn5fsgyc-1225945124330#ixzz13lrXJTBY

shadowstalker
29th October 2010, 18:07
I just love how Never A Straight Answer always messes with a persons head.

Operator
29th October 2010, 18:09
I just love how Never A Straight Answer always messes with a persons head.

I'm afraid you're right ... more distraction again.

Zook
29th October 2010, 19:30
Hi AtlasFactor,


This is outright peculiar, especially the part where they say you won't come back.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nasa-mars-mission-a-one-way-trip/story-fn5fsgyc-1225945124330

If I can volunteer my opinion (and send you the bill later), there's at least two leading possibilities. TPTB have already colonized Mars and are preparing the public's imagination. (I seriously doubt that they'd consider anyone outside their own secret services for a real maiden voyage to Mars.)

Or two, they're keeping the sheeple entertained while their secret services face delays in the implementation of the final plan for full spectrum dominance (whatever that entails).

Me? I only volunteer for Moon missions ... and that only because the central button that holds my pants up has broken loose from its Jacobian chains. I'll have to get my Mummy to sew it back for me. And of course, opinions (which reminds, here's the invoice for ...)

:typing:

Martin
29th October 2010, 19:51
I just by now found out that a few days ago the news of "Silver on the moon" made the round and of course talk about a unmanned moon mission via a robot to dig into the moons surface came up. It was also confirmed that there seems to be water on the moon.

10/21/2010 LCROSS and LRO Science Science Results of Lunar Impact (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/oct_21_media_telecon.html)

LCROSS Impact Data Indicates Water on Moon (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/oct_21_media_telecon.html)

So zookumar you might want to bring your bathing things along! :p


MfG


Martin

Ba-ba-Ra
29th October 2010, 20:25
Hi AtlasFactor,


. TPTB have already colonized Mars and are preparing the public's imagination. (I seriously doubt that they'd consider anyone outside their own secret services for a real maiden voyage to Mars.)

Or two, they're keeping the sheeple entertained while their secret services face delays in the implementation of the final plan for full spectrum dominance (whatever that entails).


:typing:

Have to agree with all of the above. Or maybe this is just another way to solve the problem of our overly crowded prisons.

3optic
29th October 2010, 21:09
Could it not be just what it is ?

No it can't. ;)

Hummingbird
29th October 2010, 23:27
Possible intentions

If anyone has seen 2012( don't recommend for anyone who takes in the fear tactics, just for reading between the lines) in the movie all the elite have tickets to go on the arc's, but we all know they arnt going to go out and sit in the ocean the real arc's will ship them to a planet or planets they have probly been colonizing for years.
They can't tell us about the jump rooms, they arnt gunna fly you there on a big rocket or any ship, you are gunna get jumproomed, there for the reason why you can never return to tell your story
They need more bodies to work, increase the dna pool which is probly pretty close since the ptb family's are inbreeder's.
If they will kidnap people here on this planet run horrible experiments on them, force them to do there dirty work, what could happen to you when there's nobody but them watching. I would not recommend any of you great soul's to go under these conditions, we are here to make the earth a great place and keep it that way, not to help the illuminate collonize another planet for there pyramid power control system..

jcocks
30th October 2010, 09:49
Possible intentions

If anyone has seen 2012( don't recommend for anyone who takes in the fear tactics, just for reading between the lines) in the movie all the elite have tickets to go on the arc's, but we all know they arnt going to go out and sit in the ocean the real arc's will ship them to a planet or planets they have probly been colonizing for years.
They can't tell us about the jump rooms, they arnt gunna fly you there on a big rocket or any ship, you are gunna get jumproomed, there for the reason why you can never return to tell your story
They need more bodies to work, increase the dna pool which is probly pretty close since the ptb family's are inbreeder's.
If they will kidnap people here on this planet run horrible experiments on them, force them to do there dirty work, what could happen to you when there's nobody but them watching. I would not recommend any of you great soul's to go under these conditions, we are here to make the earth a great place and keep it that way, not to help the illuminate collonize another planet for there pyramid power control system..

I personally don't see any reason not to go if that's what you want to do... Not everything has to be conspiracy. Personally, the more people they send up there, the less likely they will be able to get away with nefarious practices on those who go. Why? Beause these people are going of their own volition... It may even be the thing that liberates and illuminates the martian colonies - having free men and women up there....

I'm starting to think they are telling us these things as a form of gradual disclosure, as the secret is becoming too big to keep, and with the public commercialisation of space becoming closer to being a reality, it's only a matter of time before the truth comes out anyway. Much better to tell the truth themeselves in a way they can control than to have it come out in a way they can't. Put simply, I beleive the burden of secrecy is becoming greater than the burden on them of having the truth come out.

And much much better to start letting free men and women go up.... this way it doesn't look to the general populace as tho they have anything to hide...

Operator
30th October 2010, 11:55
I personally don't see any reason not to go if that's what you want to do... Not everything has to be conspiracy. Personally, the more people they send up there, the less likely they will be able to get away with nefarious practices on those who go. Why? Beause these people are going of their own volition... It may even be the thing that liberates and illuminates the martian colonies - having free men and women up there....

I'm starting to think they are telling us these things as a form of gradual disclosure, as the secret is becoming too big to keep, and with the public commercialisation of space becoming closer to being a reality, it's only a matter of time before the truth comes out anyway. Much better to tell the truth themeselves in a way they can control than to have it come out in a way they can't. Put simply, I beleive the burden of secrecy is becoming greater than the burden on them of having the truth come out.

And much much better to start letting free men and women go up.... this way it doesn't look to the general populace as tho they have anything to hide...

I think this topic is far more complicated ... we are no way near the 'thinking' behind this program.

Astronauts that have supposedly been to the moon behave strange when they are asked about their experiences. We 'know' (do we really since we have only been
told this by others ?) that their memories are messed with by hypnotists etc. I asked Richard Hoagland recently what his thoughts were on the video clip where we
see astronauts faking that they are half way to the moon and how we did cross the van Allen belts while space shuttles at 300 miles up had to be lowered in orbit
because of radiation illness symptoms of the astronauts ... no answer.

My current conclusion is that whatever happened ON the moon (if at all) was not by Apollo technology. We also learned about the statements like "we have been helped".
Some how several nations popped up announcing that they are going to the moon and I hear dates that are a couple of years after 2012 ... ?!? (2015 ... 2017)
The space shuttle program is halted this year ... could it be that something is happening in our area of space the coming years which lifts the limitations so we are
enabled to leave this planet on a conventional base ? ( I am not talking about ET's but a natural phenomena).

Hummingbird
1st November 2010, 04:09
nasa is part of the military complex, if you join you must go threw the process they have designed for you to go threw, in other words you don't call the shot's. So your not free men or woman, you are subject to like operater said, mind control tactics and memory wipes.

Zook
1st November 2010, 13:04
I just by now found out that a few days ago the news of "Silver on the moon" made the round and of course talk about a unmanned moon mission via a robot to dig into the moons surface came up. It was also confirmed that there seems to be water on the moon.

10/21/2010 LCROSS and LRO Science Science Results of Lunar Impact (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/oct_21_media_telecon.html)

LCROSS Impact Data Indicates Water on Moon (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/main/oct_21_media_telecon.html)

So zookumar you might want to bring your bathing things along! :p

MfG
Martin

Dunno, Martin. Bathing in the Earthlight doesn't have the same atmosphere as bathing in the Moonlight (not even an atmosphere, if truth be told). 'Course, I`d have plenty of peace and quiet to compose my reply to Ludwig van (e.g. quasi-lunar fantasia, Earthlight Sonata, Keyboard Sonata No. 15 in C Sharp Minor... let`s see ... the high notes are on the right side, right?)

:jester: