sjkted
6th November 2010, 06:09
When we are born, we may not be a totally empty slate , but we do not know language nor do we have any social conditioning. We learn these by looking up to the grown ups in our life -- mainly our parents but also teachers, older siblings, family members, neighbors, etc. Every once in a while one finds an adult who acts as a mentor and one looks up to this person.
All of these people are represented in the conscious and subconscious mind as archetypes or templates. This is kind of like a computer template -- you get the structure and you fill in some small details yourself.
When we are young, we form conclusions based on the experiences we have prior to having a rational mind to fully understand what is going on.
For example, if dad cheats on mom frequently, one might come to the subconscious conclusion that women do not have any value.
If mom and dad both do drugs regularly, one might come to the conclusion that this is normal and natural. Likewise with any type of abuse.
We form these types of conclusions for everything: we store a database of experiences for truth, valor, bravery, cowardice, strength, instability, etc.
TPTB know that people are born with diverse interests, skills, and potential. Therefore, they created a template for each of us.
All of the people we see in the media are representative of some archetype. Some of them are bloodline elite, but many of them are chosen because they represent a group of people: stupid/smart, black/white/asian/hispanic, serious/silly, athletic/non-athletic, strong/weak, tall/short, etc.
In other words, whoever you are and whatever your trip is in life, there's someone for you to watch and identify with.
And this brings the problem: all of them are meant to induce a particular state of consciousness that leads us back into supporting the system and avoiding the big topics. As any good marketer knows, celebrity endorsements are extremely valuable. When Oprah loses 80 pounds, the people who identify with her archetype want to know what she did so they can do it. When Paris Hilton buys a new purse, her followers want to know what it is so they can buy it.
These media personalities also "teach" us what the boundaries are. They tell us what is a deviance from the social norm, so we know not to be deviants. And, when someone publicly displays behavior they deem deviant, they come up with a moniker to ostricize the deviant: conspiracy theorist, kooks, crazies, nerd, geek, airhead, fatso, white trash, etc.
For most people, the fear of being mocked is enough to get them to abondon the deviant behavior and bring them back to "normal" social behavior.
TPTB use media in two major ways: (1) to bring us to a group consensus view of reality, (2) to induce particular types of behaviors.
Foreshadowing is a method that is used to induce behavior. For example, all of the doom and gloom in movies, television, and the news is meant to induce apathy and depersonalization. After playing a very real-looking video game with killing, blood and guts, when people see the real thing in real life, it is seen as depersonalized and the human event is lacking.
One example would be the introduction of homosexuality as the new cool behavior. Ever since Britney and Madonna kissed on stage, girls and every day folk see this behavior as normal and natural. And girls who are not homosexual-inclined begin to be pressured into this type of behavior.
Another example is the sexualization of anything and everything, especially little boys and girls. This includes the media messages to them, the portrayal of young girls in revealing clothes such as bikinis, and the fallacy that they are young adults, instead of pre-teens.
Both of these induced behaviors cause the obvious destruction of the family unit, as the family unit can't be stable if mom and dad are exhibiting homosexual and promiscuous behavior.
It goes even further than this. Our thought leaders are leading us into a one world religion by discrediting the existing world religions while promoting new age spirituality. A good example of this would be Oprah's interviews with Eckhart Tolle.
They cause us to focus on trivial issues such as whether a mosque should be built at the WTC site, rather than who is really reponsible for the 9/11 attacks and what really happened.
Foreshadowing has another effect, which is blatently obvious when analyzing any MSM music. It bypasses the conscious mind and accesses the subconscious mind. It does this by quickly running through phrases and words that aren't completely comprehensible to the conscious mind, but when carefully read on paper and put into context with details on the artist and the music video are apparent. This is their goal -- to send us programming that we cannot detect consciously, yet we still act it out subconsciously.
The foreshadowing of the doom and gloom was to prepare us to do nothing in the event of 9/11 and future false flag attacks. Had they not done this, people might have behaved unpredictably -- there may have been chaos and riots and other unpredictable behavior. And once this was broadcast on live media, it would inspire other people to act this way in the event of a false flag attack.
So, the point is, they have already prepared us to act calm and predictably in the event of a false flag, so there's no real need for any build-up any more to prepare for another false flag. They may introduce imagery and broadcast it among themselves, but other than that it will not be 10+ years of build-up.
--sjkted
All of these people are represented in the conscious and subconscious mind as archetypes or templates. This is kind of like a computer template -- you get the structure and you fill in some small details yourself.
When we are young, we form conclusions based on the experiences we have prior to having a rational mind to fully understand what is going on.
For example, if dad cheats on mom frequently, one might come to the subconscious conclusion that women do not have any value.
If mom and dad both do drugs regularly, one might come to the conclusion that this is normal and natural. Likewise with any type of abuse.
We form these types of conclusions for everything: we store a database of experiences for truth, valor, bravery, cowardice, strength, instability, etc.
TPTB know that people are born with diverse interests, skills, and potential. Therefore, they created a template for each of us.
All of the people we see in the media are representative of some archetype. Some of them are bloodline elite, but many of them are chosen because they represent a group of people: stupid/smart, black/white/asian/hispanic, serious/silly, athletic/non-athletic, strong/weak, tall/short, etc.
In other words, whoever you are and whatever your trip is in life, there's someone for you to watch and identify with.
And this brings the problem: all of them are meant to induce a particular state of consciousness that leads us back into supporting the system and avoiding the big topics. As any good marketer knows, celebrity endorsements are extremely valuable. When Oprah loses 80 pounds, the people who identify with her archetype want to know what she did so they can do it. When Paris Hilton buys a new purse, her followers want to know what it is so they can buy it.
These media personalities also "teach" us what the boundaries are. They tell us what is a deviance from the social norm, so we know not to be deviants. And, when someone publicly displays behavior they deem deviant, they come up with a moniker to ostricize the deviant: conspiracy theorist, kooks, crazies, nerd, geek, airhead, fatso, white trash, etc.
For most people, the fear of being mocked is enough to get them to abondon the deviant behavior and bring them back to "normal" social behavior.
TPTB use media in two major ways: (1) to bring us to a group consensus view of reality, (2) to induce particular types of behaviors.
Foreshadowing is a method that is used to induce behavior. For example, all of the doom and gloom in movies, television, and the news is meant to induce apathy and depersonalization. After playing a very real-looking video game with killing, blood and guts, when people see the real thing in real life, it is seen as depersonalized and the human event is lacking.
One example would be the introduction of homosexuality as the new cool behavior. Ever since Britney and Madonna kissed on stage, girls and every day folk see this behavior as normal and natural. And girls who are not homosexual-inclined begin to be pressured into this type of behavior.
Another example is the sexualization of anything and everything, especially little boys and girls. This includes the media messages to them, the portrayal of young girls in revealing clothes such as bikinis, and the fallacy that they are young adults, instead of pre-teens.
Both of these induced behaviors cause the obvious destruction of the family unit, as the family unit can't be stable if mom and dad are exhibiting homosexual and promiscuous behavior.
It goes even further than this. Our thought leaders are leading us into a one world religion by discrediting the existing world religions while promoting new age spirituality. A good example of this would be Oprah's interviews with Eckhart Tolle.
They cause us to focus on trivial issues such as whether a mosque should be built at the WTC site, rather than who is really reponsible for the 9/11 attacks and what really happened.
Foreshadowing has another effect, which is blatently obvious when analyzing any MSM music. It bypasses the conscious mind and accesses the subconscious mind. It does this by quickly running through phrases and words that aren't completely comprehensible to the conscious mind, but when carefully read on paper and put into context with details on the artist and the music video are apparent. This is their goal -- to send us programming that we cannot detect consciously, yet we still act it out subconsciously.
The foreshadowing of the doom and gloom was to prepare us to do nothing in the event of 9/11 and future false flag attacks. Had they not done this, people might have behaved unpredictably -- there may have been chaos and riots and other unpredictable behavior. And once this was broadcast on live media, it would inspire other people to act this way in the event of a false flag attack.
So, the point is, they have already prepared us to act calm and predictably in the event of a false flag, so there's no real need for any build-up any more to prepare for another false flag. They may introduce imagery and broadcast it among themselves, but other than that it will not be 10+ years of build-up.
--sjkted