PDA

View Full Version : Newspaper Blows Lid Off Vaccine Damages



Heyoka_11
9th June 2015, 02:58
G'day All,

Just received this from the Alternative News Project feed (alternativenewsproject.org):
.................................................. .................................................. .....................

UK's Independent Newspaper Blows Lid Off Vaccine Damages


Finally it’s happened! A member of the mainstream press has the intestinal fortitude to publish the carefully ‘kept secret’, secret about vaccines and vaccinations: They cause dramatic life-altering damage and more frequently than “evidence-based medicine” or “consensus science” owns up to or MDs, the medical profession, public health agencies and pro-vaccine acolytes acknowledge.

The UK’s Independent Newspaper published some extremely damning vaccine adverse drug reaction (ADR) information on May 31, 2015 that said:
In the 10 years to April this year the agency received almost 22,000 “spontaneous suspected” adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in 13 routine immunisation categories including flu, MMR, tetanus, diphtheria and polio, according to a Freedom of Information response released earlier this month. [1]
However, the vaccine ‘ante’ has just been upped on vaccines’ adverse events/damages according to the Freedom of Information (FOI) documentation dated May 14, 2015, according to the chart below.

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency FOI Response 14 May 2015

The vaccine with the most ADR reports was the Human papillomarivus (HPV) for which there are three vaccines: Gardasil®, Cervarix®, and recently licensed Gardasil 9® [2] with 8,228 ADRs. Next in line is the annual Influenza virus vaccine with 2,994 ADRs. The MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella) with 1,594 ADRs is third highest. Fourth highest ADR reporting count is Pneumococcal disease (PCV) with 1,560 ADRs. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and haemophilus influenza type B with 1,309 ADRs is fifth. Sixth highest ADR is for Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio with 1,190. Seventh is Tetanus, diphtheria and polio with 1,076 ADRs. Those ADRs represent health damage from what’s called “multi-valent” vaccines, meaning more than one disease active is contained in a vaccination or jab, as it’s called in the UK. Six other vaccines had ADRs reporting fewer than one thousand, which should not be regarded as insignificant.

The above information demonstrably demonstrates – and validates – what vaccine-safety-advocates (often referred to as anti-vaxxers) have been beating the drums about: Vaccines cause irreversible damage and, as the U.S. VAERS reporting system—similar to the UK’s ADR reporting system—even deaths and for which the U.S. Vaccine Court has settled claims.

So, it’s indisputable that vaccines cause adverse health problems, which undeniably increase healthcare costs for everyone involved, plus promote more Big Pharma patented ‘products’ to deal with those ADRs. Can that be one of the hidden ‘aspects’ for promoting vaccines as assiduously as government health agencies do?

The UK is not unique in ADRs from vaccines. Every country in the world that has any vaccine program reports serious ADRs. However, what is unique is that in the USA those ADRs are not permitted to be discussed in the mainstream press and media. The Independent’s report truly is refreshing insofar as the “cat is out of the bag” definitely, and let’s make certain it stays out; that journalists globally report vaccine damage, and especially in the supposed ‘free’ press of the United States of America.

Back in May of 2013, the U.K. revealed via FOI documents that there were 30 years of secret official documents showing that U.K. government vaccine/medical experts have: 1) known the vaccines don’t work; 2) known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent; 3) known they are a hazard to children; 4) colluded to lie to the public; and 5) worked to prevent safety studies! [5]

Can you imagine how many children worldwide would have been saved from lifelong health problems—or even premature deaths—caused by vaccines IF any one of the governments colluding on the above vaccine skullduggery would have had the integrity to tell the world the scientific facts about vaccines: that Big Pharma’s vaccines actually cause harm; do not prevent disease but cause the very diseases in vaccines? Vaccines preventing diseases probably is the BIGGEST lie ever told! Why? Because it’s been perpetuated for so long, that most gullible people believe it.

Please check out the Resources section below for additional information, which is only a fraction of what’s going on about vaccines that readers may not know about due to the controlled ‘free’ press in the USA. The press and media are beholden to Big Pharma, probably because of all the advertising dollars Pharma spends in their daily newspapers and especially on TV. All those erectile dysfunction ads add up to advertising profits! The U.S. FDA also is beholden to Big Pharma for all the funding [3, 4] and consensus science it gets from them.

One last word about vaccines: They are not safe; never have been tested for the ability to cause cancer, interfere with reproduction or fertility, or their ability to cause birth defects (teratogenic). It states that right there on every vaccine package insert.

Next time your MD, employer or school wants to vaccinate you or your child, ask to see the vaccine package insert section that documents in print that the vaccine has never been tested for what was just discussed in the above paragraph. Ask him/her if he/she knew that, plus why would he/she want to inject you with toxins that can harm, as it explicitly states in the rest of the vaccine package insert, especially when every MD is sworn to do no harm.

References:

[1] http://tinyurl.com/o8wgl3m
[2] http://tinyurl.com/owf9v9e
[3] http://tinyurl.com/k98kz6n
[4] http://tinyurl.com/l9atefk
[5] http://tinyurl.com/ctr4yxm

By Catherine J. Frompovich
(Source: naturalblaze.com; May 31, 2015; http://tinyurl.com/qba3fef)
Read More:



http://tinyurl.com/qba3fef

.................................................. ................................................


I was chatting with two work colleagues this morning on this subject, one of whom has two young children. He's a pretty "eyes open" fellow: with a healthy degree of skepticism of the medical profession and big pharma.


After voicing his initial objection to having his children vaccinated, his GP informed him that unless he consents, he would no longer treat his children. The same went for any specialists that they had dealt with. This is a widespread practice here in Australia: you know, "where we are young and free"



What happened to the Hippocratic Oath, and what a damned criminal state of affairs? :mad2:



OK, I shall now get off my soap box.

All the Best,

Tony.

mosquito
9th June 2015, 11:52
Good news, and as she said - this particular cat needs to be kept out of the bag for all to see.

Good to see you posting again Tony :sun:

Flash
9th June 2015, 13:16
In my stupidity, I had my daughter vaccinated for everything, except this one Human papillomarivus (HPV) for which there are three vaccines: Gardasil®, Cervarix®, because by then I knew about vaccines.

But, it is also the only vaccine for which I had zero resistance from the health care people (nurses and doctors) when I said I did not want it for my daughter. They asked me if she had been vaccinated for the others vaccine, I said yes, but I do not want this one. One doctor told me he had his daughters vaccinated and mine should, because being Learning disabled (but not mentally challenged) she could not defend herself and has a much greater potential of being raped (in fact, he told me those kids are always raped) and I should protect her health. I answered that she would defend herself and won't get raped (although I was flabberghasted at that pediatrician telling me the terrible faith our disabled children were submitted to).

I said no, it stopped there. Nobody insisted further. I think it is because THEY KNOW TOO.

conk
9th June 2015, 18:42
It is surprising to also finally learn that many doctors themselves refuse vaccines for their families. Yes, they know. Just like chemo for cancer. Over 75% of oncologists would not submit to chemo if they had cancer.