PDA

View Full Version : Is speed of light 300342215 m/s and not 299792458 m/s?



WhiteLove
20th September 2015, 14:44
432^2 = 186624 miles = 300342215 m/s

Could it be that the true value of speed of light is actually 432^2 miles/s?

Nick Matkin
20th September 2015, 15:06
Easily checked by comparing the wavelength of a radio signal with its frequency using a rubidium standard, accurate to +/- one or two parts x10 -11, running at 6834682610.904 Hz (Such equipment now costs only a couple hundred dollars and is some orders of magnitude more accurate than the speed of light as widely published.)

Last time I looked the speed of EM radiation was 299,792,458 metres per second.

A frequency of 100.000000 MHz still has a wavelength of 2.99792458 metres.

Don't forget that if we got this even slightly wrong, lots of modern stuff wouldn't work. GPS navigation of a start!

Where did the alternative speed come from?

(For non-critical engineering purposes, 300,000,000 m/s is quite close enough.)

Bill Ryan
20th September 2015, 15:22
.
Off-topic on this thread, but if you enter 29.9792458 (and 31.134658) into Google Earth, you end up within 50 meters of the capstone of the Great Pyramid.

This is not a hoax... try it. Here's the result:

http://google.com/maps/place/29%C2%B058'45.3%22N+31%C2%B008'04.8%22E/@29.9792458,31.134658,17z

http://projectavalon.net/Pyramid_location.gif

This is super-weird, but might be a coincidence. This page (https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-the-great-pyramid-of-giza-and-the-speed-of-light.t2154/) sets out to explain why it's just an oddity, and nothing more. (But it's still weird!)

ghostrider
20th September 2015, 15:57
I've read where the Plejaren say light speed is around 300,000 kilometers per second , for what it's worth ... the exact number is 299.792.548 ... my source is FIGU bulletin 002 , linked from the future of mankind website ...http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_Bulletin_002

Citizen No2
20th September 2015, 17:35
Can anyone tell me what the speed of thought is?






Regards.

WhiteLove
20th September 2015, 17:47
Where did the alternative speed come from?
(For non-critical engineering purposes, 300,000,000 m/s is quite close enough.)

Thanks Nick! I found the alternative speed of light as a question asked in this video (16:20):

SQRQEB67j2Y

It was posted by Shadowself in this thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?85331-The-A-432-Hz-Frequency-DNA-Tuning-and-the-Bastardization-of-Music&p=1000803#post1000803).

They questioned if maybe speed of light is actually 432^2 miles/sec since it is so close to 299792458 m/s and the number 432 seems to be quite an important number in creation, so the speed of light might be linked to it somehow they thought...

badmotorfinger
20th September 2015, 17:48
This is on my list to research, following my happening across this little nugget (from 27.43 - 32.33)

UPccMlgug8A

Certainly caught MY attention!
Anyone else come across this / have any more detail?

Nick Matkin
20th September 2015, 19:04
Where did the alternative speed come from?
(For non-critical engineering purposes, 300,000,000 m/s is quite close enough.)

Thanks Nick! I found the alternative speed of light as a question asked in this video (16:20):

SQRQEB67j2Y

It was posted by Shadowself in this thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?85331-The-A-432-Hz-Frequency-DNA-Tuning-and-the-Bastardization-of-Music&p=1000803#post1000803).

They questioned if maybe speed of light is actually 432^2 miles/sec since it is so close to 299792458 m/s and the number 432 seems to be quite an important number in creation, so the speed of light might be linked to it somehow they thought...

Thanks for the video info.

But if the makers of the video think the formula frequency = 1/time was really given to George Van Tassel by extra terrestrial beings in the 1950s, they are sadly mistaken. This formula has been known ever since we could measure audio frequencies, and probably well before. It doesn't take a mathematician to work out that the frequency of something happening can be calculated by the time it takes to do it!

The frequency of Christmas (f) is one in 365 days (t).
The frequency of Sunday (f) is 1/52 weeks (t) = one every 144 hours.

The more scientific interpretation of the formula was certainly known by the late 19th century and an important part of the development of radio around the same time.

When simple matters like this get muddled by writers, in my opinion it rather undermines everything else they have to say.

WhiteLove
20th September 2015, 19:34
Where did the alternative speed come from?
(For non-critical engineering purposes, 300,000,000 m/s is quite close enough.)

Thanks Nick! I found the alternative speed of light as a question asked in this video (16:20):

SQRQEB67j2Y

It was posted by Shadowself in this thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?85331-The-A-432-Hz-Frequency-DNA-Tuning-and-the-Bastardization-of-Music&p=1000803#post1000803).

They questioned if maybe speed of light is actually 432^2 miles/sec since it is so close to 299792458 m/s and the number 432 seems to be quite an important number in creation, so the speed of light might be linked to it somehow they thought...

Thanks for the video info.

But if the makers of the video think the formula frequency = 1/time was really given to George Van Tassel by extra terrestrial beings in the 1950s, they are sadly mistaken. This formula has been known ever since we could measure audio frequencies, and probably well before. It doesn't take a mathematician to work out that the frequency of something happening can be calculated by the time it takes to do it!

The frequency of Christmas (f) is one in 365 days (t).
The frequency of Sunday (f) is 1/52 weeks (t) = one every 144 hours.

The more scientific interpretation of the formula was certainly known by the late 19th century and an important part of the development of radio around the same time.

When simple matters like this get muddled by writers, in my opinion it rather undermines everything else they have to say.

Everything was building up really nicely and then came f = 1 / time being given by ETs. LOL

justntime2learn
21st September 2015, 03:42
I like this, but the logic seems off. Where would the number 31.134658 come from when it is correlated to 29.9792458 when 29.9792458 and 300342215 were the only numbers mentioned in correlation to one another at the beginning... I get this location, not quite next to the pyramids unless I'm missing something here. I get this with these coordinates: 29.9792455,30.0343091