Justplain
10th October 2016, 16:43
So here's an article on how the Ontario provincial government has removed the freedom of choice for municipalities to remove fluoride from their water supplies. The article claims that opposition to fluoridation is based on junk science:
http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/canada/canadian-politics/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/ontario-to-debate-banning-cities-from-being-allowed-to-remove-fluoride-from-their-drinking-water&google_editors_picks=true
Here's the email i sent to the 'junk' journalist:
Hi,
I know you are paid to be a fluoridation promoter. Any objective journalist, of which very few exist these days, would have done some research on the other side of this fluoridation issue. A simple google search on the topic reveals that there are multiple reasons why fluoridation of municipal water is wrong:
http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/
Morally it is wrong because it is forced medication without the subjects' consent. Secondly, there IS scientific evidence that fluoridation IS harmful. The list of objections goes on. Now, the corporately owned provincial government wont even give municipalities the freedom of choice on the matter.
You are likely one of those journalists who also supports the forcing of genetically modified food down the unsuspecting public's throat. The public agencies that approved these frankenfoods only looked at biased/fabricated/fraudulent/incomplete research conducted by the agri-businesses that invented these unnutritious and harmful organisms. Other, objective research done on these products shows alarming reaults, such as sterility.
I have come to the conclusion that mainstream journalism is just a hired hand to the big corporate, fascist group that owns our politicians. Your article calls the arguments against fluoridation as based on 'junk' science without providing any facts or research to back up your position.
If proper research had been done beforehand, western society wouldnt have had to suffer through diets of transfats, food coloring, excessive sugar, etc., etc. The same results will be found some years down the road on gmo, fluoridation, and whatever newfangled food invention the corporate fascists come up with. And bribed journalists like you will always be around to promote this crap.
If you really cared about the public, you would research your articles better and perhaps get a little closer to the truth.
Regards,
http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/canada/canadian-politics/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/ontario-to-debate-banning-cities-from-being-allowed-to-remove-fluoride-from-their-drinking-water&google_editors_picks=true
Here's the email i sent to the 'junk' journalist:
Hi,
I know you are paid to be a fluoridation promoter. Any objective journalist, of which very few exist these days, would have done some research on the other side of this fluoridation issue. A simple google search on the topic reveals that there are multiple reasons why fluoridation of municipal water is wrong:
http://fluoridealert.org/articles/50-reasons/
Morally it is wrong because it is forced medication without the subjects' consent. Secondly, there IS scientific evidence that fluoridation IS harmful. The list of objections goes on. Now, the corporately owned provincial government wont even give municipalities the freedom of choice on the matter.
You are likely one of those journalists who also supports the forcing of genetically modified food down the unsuspecting public's throat. The public agencies that approved these frankenfoods only looked at biased/fabricated/fraudulent/incomplete research conducted by the agri-businesses that invented these unnutritious and harmful organisms. Other, objective research done on these products shows alarming reaults, such as sterility.
I have come to the conclusion that mainstream journalism is just a hired hand to the big corporate, fascist group that owns our politicians. Your article calls the arguments against fluoridation as based on 'junk' science without providing any facts or research to back up your position.
If proper research had been done beforehand, western society wouldnt have had to suffer through diets of transfats, food coloring, excessive sugar, etc., etc. The same results will be found some years down the road on gmo, fluoridation, and whatever newfangled food invention the corporate fascists come up with. And bribed journalists like you will always be around to promote this crap.
If you really cared about the public, you would research your articles better and perhaps get a little closer to the truth.
Regards,