View Full Version : Paris Climate Accord

4th June 2017, 05:12
The Paris Climate Accord is GENOCIDE Against Plants, Forests and All Life on Our Planet (http://humansarefree.com/2017/06/the-paris-climate-accord-is-genocide.html)

"The primary goal of the Paris Climate Accord — the reduction of atmospheric carbon dioxide — is nothing less than genocide against all plant life across our planet.

That’s because all plants depend on CO2 for their very survival.

It’s the “oxygen” for plants, and right now trees, grasses and food crops are starving for CO2 because it sits at nearly the lowest level it has ever been in the history of the Earth (barely above 400 ppm now, when it used to be over 7,000 ppm in the past).

Humans attempting to eliminate CO2 from the atmosphere is equivalent to some evil, fictional “plant demon” attempting to eliminate oxygen from the atmosphere, causing the mass asphyxiation of the entire human race. Just as eliminating oxygen is genocide against humans, eliminating carbon dioxide is genocide against plants."

175 countries ruled by,I don't say illiterate but blind,"politicians" signed that treaty. (http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2016/04/parisagreementsingatures/)
And they need "17 goals to transform our planet".So they need goals for their planet in particular and not for the planet in general.And they made a logo for this and also a ceremony.
The logo:

and ceremony:

And all came from here:
UN (https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-d&chapter=27&lang=en)

My advice,not being an environmentalist,but a simple human who enjoy nature,please plant flowers/trees/shrubs any kind of plants where ever you can (own gardens,pots,road sides,outside of the cities).
It will help and you will give life to an organism.

A Voice from the Mountains
4th June 2017, 13:48
Anybody looking for the actual raw data and academic literature related to it will find something completely different than what the MSM and politicians always say.

People who keep parroting the climate change line verbatim over and over have no other explanation than pure and unadultered brainwashing.

Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis

It is becoming clear that not only do many scientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical scientists may indeed form a scientific consensus.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

The survey results show geoscientists (also known as earth scientists) and engineers hold similar views as meteorologists. Two recent surveys of meteorologists (summarized here and here) revealed similar skepticism of alarmist global warming claims.

According to the newly published survey of geoscientists and engineers, merely 36 percent of respondents fit the “Comply with Kyoto” model. The scientists in this group “express the strong belief that climate change is happening, that it is not a normal cycle of nature, and humans are the main or central cause.”

The authors of the survey report, however, note that the overwhelming majority of scientists fall within four other models, each of which is skeptical of alarmist global warming claims.


But then of course there's also this other problem with academia:

DELINGPOLE: ‘Penises Cause Climate Change’; Progressives Fooled by Peer-Reviewed Hoax Study

Gender studies is a fake academic industry populated by charlatans, deranged activists and gullible idiots.

Now, a pair of enterprising hoaxers has proved it scientifically by persuading an academic journal to peer-review and publish their paper claiming that the penis is not really a male genital organ but a social construct.

The paper, published by Cogent Social Sciences – “a multidisciplinary open access journal offering high quality peer review across the social sciences” – also claims that penises are responsible for causing climate change.

The two hoaxers are Peter Boghossian, a full-time faculty member in the Philosophy department at Portland State University, and James Lindsay, who has a doctorate in math and a background in physics.

They were hoping to emulate probably the most famous academic hoax in recent years: the Sokal Hoax – named after NYU and UCL physics professor Alan Sokal – who in 1996 persuaded an academic journal called Social Text to accept a paper titled “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity”.

Sokal’s paper – comprising pages of impressive-sounding but meaningless pseudo-academic jargon – was written in part to demonstrate that humanities journals will publish pretty much anything so long as it sounds like “proper leftist thought;” and partly in order to send up the absurdity of so much post-modernist social science.


5th June 2017, 01:04
Research shows that global warming is primarily linked to wobbles in the earth's orbit and also cfc's. The carbon dioxide ruse is a means to tax us. Here's the research that shows that cfc's are heavily linked to global warming and not carbon dioxide:

"WATERLOO, Ont. (Thursday, May 30, 2013) - Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are to blame for global warming since the 1970s and not carbon dioxide, according to new research from the University of Waterloo published in the International Journal of Modern Physics B this week.

"CFCs are already known to deplete ozone, but in-depth statistical analysis now shows that CFCs are also the key driver in global climate change, rather than carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

"Conventional thinking says that the emission of human-made non-CFC gases such as carbon dioxide has mainly contributed to global warming. But we have observed data going back to the Industrial Revolution that convincingly shows that conventional understanding is wrong,” said Qing-Bin Lu, a professor of physics and astronomy, biology and chemistry in Waterloo’s Faculty of Science. “In fact, the data shows that CFCs conspiring with cosmic rays caused both the polar ozone hole and global warming.” "


5th June 2017, 13:24
Here's a slightly different take (http://wp.me/p8BOpJ-102) on why not to sign the Paris Agreement. It has everything to do with Wall St.

5th June 2017, 14:46
Here's a slightly different take (http://wp.me/p8BOpJ-102) on why not to sign the Paris Agreement. It has everything to do with Wall St.

This article really begins to speak to the problem. Climate change is not about the climate at all, it is really about the money. It is sad on two fronts, it has firmly entrenched science in the first row of a nasty political play and it has given people a sense that only government can look after the environment (nothing could be further from the truth).

5th June 2017, 15:14
It's all about the money AND they want to drain the U S of all the funds they can, who are they? The NWO gang.

5th June 2017, 15:54
We are rapidly heading towards global cooling and it has nothing to do with human activity and everything to do with the solar minimum.

However, some people and politicians have found out a really good way to con people of out their money with this climate hoax.

5th June 2017, 18:16
Here's a slightly different take (http://wp.me/p8BOpJ-102) on why not to sign the Paris Agreement. It has everything to do with Wall St.

I think you hit the nail on the head with your article. Control and taxation, at the end of the day seem to be what makes the world go round.

5th June 2017, 18:29
The liberal perspective is interesting....


So pretty much the opposite of that video is the truth; according to my "do the opposite of anything on MSM" theory.