CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Virus

CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Virus
http://worldtruth.tv/cdc-admits-98-m...-cancer-virus/

CDC Admits 98 Million Americans Received Polio Vaccine Contaminated With Cancer Virus



The CDC has quickly removed a page from their website, which is now cached here, admitting that more than 98 million Americans received one or more doses of polio vaccine within an 8-year span when a proportion of the vaccine was contaminated with a cancer causing polyomavirus called SV40. It has been estimated that 10-30 million Americans could have received an SV40 contaminated dose of the vaccine.

//
//
// ]]>

V40 is an abbreviation for Simian vacuolating virus 40 or Simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans. Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer.

SV40 is believed to suppress the properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation, leading to cancer.

Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, has recently isolated fragments of the SV-40 virus in human bone cancers and in a lethal form of lung cancer called mesothelioma. He found SV-40 in 33% of the osteosarcoma bone cancers studied, in 40% of other bone cancers, and in 60% of the mesotheliomas lung cancers, writes Geraldo Fuentes.

Dr. Michele Carbone openly acknowledged HIV/AIDS was spread by the hepatitis B vaccine produced by Merck & Co. during the early 1970s. It was the first time since the initial transmissions took place in 1972-74, that a leading expert in the field of vaccine manufacturing and testing has openly admitted the Merck & Co. liability for AIDS.

//
//
// ]]>

The matter-of-fact disclosure came during discussions of polio vaccines contaminated with SV40 virus which caused cancer in nearly every species infected by injection. Many authorities now admit much, possibly most, of the world’s cancers came from the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines, and hepatitis B vaccines, produced in monkeys and chimps.

It is said mesothelioma is a result of asbestos exposure, but research reveals that 50% of the current mesotheliomas being treated no longer occurs due to asbestos but rather the SV-40 virus contained in the polio vaccination. In addition, according to researchers from the Institute of Histology and General Embryology of the University of Ferrara, SV-40 has turned up in a variety other tumors. By the end of 1996, dozens of scientists reported finding SV40 in a variety of bone cancers and a wide range of brain cancers, which had risen 30 percent over the previous 20 years.

The SV-40 virus is now being detected in tumors removed from people never inoculated with the contaminated vaccine, leading some to conclude that those infected by the vaccine might be spreading SV40.

Soon after its discovery, SV40 was identified in the oral form of the polio vaccine produced between 1955 and 1961 produced by American Home Products (dba Lederle).

Both the oral, live virus and injectable inactive virus were affected. It was found later that the technique used to inactivate the polio virus in the injectable vaccine, by means of formaldehyde, did not reliably kill SV40.

Just two years ago, the U.S. government finally added formaldehyde to a list of known carcinogens and and admitted that the chemical styrene might cause cancer. Yet, the substance is still found in almost every vaccine.

According to the Australian National Research Council, fewer than 20% but perhaps more than 10% of the general population may be susceptible to formaldehyde and may react acutely at any exposure level. More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems, on at least 8 federal regulatory lists, it is ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health (Environmental Defense Fund).

In the body, formaldehyde can cause proteins to irreversibly bind to DNA. Laboratory animals exposed to doses of inhaled formaldehyde over their lifetimes have developed more cancers of the nose and throat than are usual.

Facts Listed on The CDC Website about SV40

-SV40 is a virus found in some species of monkey.

-SV40 was discovered in 1960. Soon afterward, the virus was found in polio vaccine.

-SV40 virus has been found in certain types of cancer in humans.


Additional Facts

-In the 1950s, rhesus monkey kidney cells, which contain SV40 if the animal is infected, were used in preparing polio vaccines.

-Not all doses of IPV were contaminated. It has been estimated that 10-30 million people actually received a vaccine that contained SV40.

-Some evidence suggests that receipt of SV40-contaminated polio vaccine may increase risk of cancer.


A Greater Perspective on Aerial Spraying and SV40

The Defense Sciences Office of the Pathogen Countermeasures Program, in September 23, 1998 funded the University of Michigan’s principal investigator, Dr. James Baker, Jr. Dr. Baker, Director of Michigan Nanotechnology Institute for Medicine and Biological Sciences under several DARPA grants. Dr. Baker developed and focused on preventing pathogens from entering the human body, which is a major goal in the development of counter measures to Biological Warfare. This research project sought to develop a composite material that will serve as a pathogen avoidance barrier and post-exposure therapeutic agent to be applied in a topical manner to the skin and mucous membranes. The composite is modeled after the immune system in that it involves redundant, non-specific and specific forms of pathogen defense and inactivation. This composite material is now utilized in many nasal vaccines and vector control through the use of hydro-gel, nanosilicon gels and actuator materials in vaccines.

Through Dr. Baker’s research at the University of Michigan; he developed dendritic polymers and their application to medical and biological science. He co-developed a new vector system for gene transfer using synthetic polymers. These studies have produced striking results and have the potential to change the basis of gene transfer therapy. Dendrimers are nanometer-sized water soluble polymers that can conjugate to peptides or arbohydrates to act as decoy molecules to inhibit the binding of toxins and viruses to cells. They can act also as complex and stabilize genetic material for prolonged periods of time, as in a “time released or delayed gene transfer”. Through Dr. Baker’s ground breaking research many pharmaceutical and biological pesticide manufacturers can use these principles in DNA vaccines specific applications that incorporate the Simian Monkey Virus SV40.

WEST NILE VIRUS SPRAYING

In 2006 Michael Greenwood wrote an article for the Yale School of Public Health entitled, “Aerial Spraying Effectively Reduces Incidence of West Nile Virus (WNV) in Humans.” The article stated that the incidence of human West Nile virus cases can be significantly reduced through large scale aerial spraying that targets adult mosquitoes, according to research by the Yale School of Public Health and the California Department of Public Health.

Under the mandate for aerial spraying for specific vectors that pose a threat to human health, aerial vaccines known as DNA Vaccine Enhancements and Recombinant Vaccine against WNV may be tested or used to “protect” the people from vector infection exposures. DNA vaccine enhancements specifically use Epstein-Barr viral capside’s with multi human complement class II activators to neutralize antibodies. The recombinant vaccines against WNV use Rabbit Beta-globulin or the poly (A) signal of the SV40 virus. In early studies of DNA vaccines it was found that the negative result studies would go into the category of future developmental research projects in gene therapy. During the studies of poly (A) signaling of the SV40 for WNV vaccines, it was observed that WNV will lie dormant in individuals who were exposed to chicken pox, thus upon exposure to WNV aerial vaccines the potential for the release of chicken pox virus would cause a greater risk to having adult onset Shingles.

CALIFORNIA AERIAL SPRAYING for WNV and SV40

In February 2009 to present date, aerial spraying for the WNV occurred in major cities within the State of California. During spraying of Anaheim, CA a Caucasian female (age 50) was exposed to heavy spraying, while doing her daily exercise of walking several miles. Heavy helicopter activity occurred for several days in this area. After spraying, she experienced light headedness, nausea, muscle aches and increased low back pain. She was evaluated for toxicological mechanisms that were associated with pesticide exposure due to aerial spraying utilizing advanced biological monitoring testing. The test results which included protein band testing utilizing Protein Coupled Response (PCR) methods were positive for KD-45. KD-45 is the protein band for SV-40 Simian Green Monkey virus. Additional tests were performed for Epstein-Barr virus capside and Cytomeglia virus which are used in bio-engineering for gene delivery systems through viral protein envelope and adenoviral protein envelope technology. The individual was positive for both; indicating a highly probable exposure to a DNA vaccination delivery system through nasal inhalation.

The question of the century is how many other viruses and toxins are within current day vaccines that we’ll only find out about in a few decades?

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.
http://www.naturalnews.com/041411_SV..._vaccines.html

It appears that even the webcache page has been removed already.

I googled it and found that natural news reported it yesterday and Mike Adams' link is no good either.

Going to keep searching, hopefully someone at least saved a screen shot..... which of course isn't real proof of anything.

These lizards are truly despicable.

This yt video is the best I can find so far... it contains a screenshot of the CDC page.... let's see how long this stays up there....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mu8BLK-xP5M

WOW! I saw that posted somewhere recently and went looking for it to see if there were other links or sources.... and found this (http://preventdisease.com/news/13/07...er-Virus.shtml) which just is a copy/paste of the OP.

As souce links there, it gives the google cache link which gives a 404 Error now;

It also links to http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/vacc...Report2012.pdf

Also, http://rense.com/general88/dwqs.htm

and to http://preventdisease.com/news/12/01...-Systems.shtml

and http://www.infowars.com/mandatory-h1...-in-the-works/

then http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40


I'll be looking for more.

I started a thread earlier in July on the same subject here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...-Polio-Vaccine
You might want to request a merge.

Thank you MorningSong... that web cache page is so valuable. I saved one on my computer and I hope many others are doing the same. I also posted it to every social site I have an account with.

HA! This is from 1999- pay attention to the conclusion section:

Quote:

---

Anticancer Res. 1999 May-Jun;19(3B):2173-80.
Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine.
Fisher SG, Weber L, Carbone M.
Source

Cancer Cause and Prevention Program, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

The presence of SV40 in monkey cell cultures used in the preparation of the polio vaccine from 1955 through 1961 is well documented. Investigations have consistently demonstrated the oncogenic behavior of SV40 in animal models. Early epidemiologic studies were inadequate in demonstrating an increase in cancer incidence associated with contaminated vaccine. Recently, investigators have provided persuasive evidence that SV40 is present in human ependymomas, choroid plexus tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas, however, the etiologic role of the virus in tumorigenesis has not been established.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Using data from SEER, we analyzed the incidence of brain tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas from 1973-1993 and the possible relationship of these tumors with the administration of the SV40 contaminated vaccine.
RESULTS:

Our analysis indicates increased rates of ependymomas (37%), osteogenic sarcomas (26%), other bone tumors (34%) and mesothelioma (90%) among those in the exposed as compared to the unexposed birth cohort.
CONCLUSIONS:

These data suggest that there may be an increased incidence of certain cancers among the 98 million persons exposed to contaminated polio vaccine in the U.S.; further investigations are clearly justified.

---

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10472327

If you look at the link, on the right is a menu with related research articles (summaries)...some from earlier dates.

I found this site interesting.... this is not truely new news at all, it appears. (But it is the first time I've heard of it and I am PQued off! )

http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.html

http://vactruth.com/2013/06/13/trick...te-your-child/
These Tricks Are Played to Get You to Vaccinate Your Child

Parents are often mislead to believe vaccines are safe and effective.
Countries around the world are coming up with more and more elaborate tricks to pressure parents into fully vaccinating their children. Recently we have seen them telling barefaced lies, denying unvaccinated children access to daycare facilities and excluding students from attending their graduation ceremony over a chicken pox scare. To learn more, please continue reading.

Scare Tactics Used in Australia

Over the last few weeks, newspapers in Australia have reported that due to the changes being made to the Public Health Act, parents will be forced to produce an up-to-date vaccine certificate, or a conscientious exemption form countersigned by their doctor, if they want to use day care facilities for their children. Any day care facility failing to comply with these new regulations is likely to incur a fine.

According to The Sydney Morning Herald, the President of the NSW branch of the Australian Medical Association, Brian Owler, has declared this “a sensible move.” He believes that making parents supply mandatory documentation about their children’s vaccination status will boost vaccination rates. [1]

Jillian Skinner, the NSW Health Minister, told reporters:

“Anyone who has seen a baby with whooping cough or a toddler with measles or has spoken to a parent who has lost a child knows the devastating consequences of failure to vaccinate.”

She is absolutely correct, of course; seeing a child with whooping cough is extremely disturbing. However, is vaccination a cast-iron guarantee that your child will be protected? No, it isn’t, and I can say this with one hundred percent certainty because my own child contracted whooping cough, despite being fully vaccinated at the time.

Currently, in Australia, vaccination is not mandatory. This is explained very clearly in full in a research paper written by Dr. Viera Scheibner, which we will discuss in just a moment. She says that “Parents have a constitutional and legal right to opt for natural immunity, which is achieved by contracting the natural infectious diseases of childhood.”

She states that this right is defined in the New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act of 1999, which stipulates that a child is considered immunized if they were administered a vaccine, developed natural immunity by contracting the alleged ‘vaccine-preventable’ diseases, or if the parents have declared in writing a conscientious objection to the child being vaccinated.

In 2012, Reuters published an article stating that infectious disease specialist David Witt, from the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California, reported that his research revealed that the effects of the whooping cough vaccine can wear off over time. He stated, “We have a real belief that the durability (of the vaccine) is not what was imagined.” [2]

In other words, there has never ever been any real evidence that the vaccine was effective long term. Worrying, isn’t it?

Witt’s study can be found at Clinical Infectious Diseases. [3]

While the Australian government has decided that the best way to boost vaccination uptake is to deny unvaccinated children the right to childcare, the UK government has used other dirty tactics to get parents to vaccinate their children.




Scare Tactics Used in the United Kingdom

I am sure that many of you are aware that the UK media recently published a frenzy of reports, highlighting a so-called measles epidemic in Wales. According to newspapers, this epidemic was threatening the lives of two million children residing in the UK. [4]

However, there was never a massive measles epidemic in Wales. The British media had ‘accidentally on purpose’ reported the SUSPECTED cases of measles, as ACTUAL cases of measles and, in fact, the numbers of confirmed cases were negligible. [5]

Mind you, this latest so-called measles epidemic in Wales is nothing new. Here in the UK, we have heard it all before. In fact, there have been regular so-called outbreaks of measles occurring in Wales for several years.

In 2011, the headlines in Wales stated: Parents Urged to Get Children Vaccinated as Measles Spreads. [6]

In 2009, the headlines in Wales stated: More Parents Choosing MMR Jab for Kids During Welsh Measles Outbreak. [7]

In 2008, headlines in Wales read: Measles Outbreak in Wales Worsens. [8]

In 2007, the headlines in Wales stated: Alert Over Measles as Cases on the Increase. [9]

Strangely, however, not one of these reports states whether or not the sick children were vaccinated against measles. The reason that this important factor has been left out of reports is because the public is educated to automatically assume that the children most at risk from contracting measles are in fact those who have not yet been vaccinated.

This is untrue, however, because it has been documented for many years that if your child has been vaccinated against measles, there are no guarantees that they are protected.

The Truth About the Measles Vaccine

A paper written by Peter Aaby et al. for The Journal of Infectious Diseases in 1986, titled Vaccinated Children get Milder Measles Infection: A Community Study from Guinea-Bissau, states that vaccinated children who contracted measles developed a milder form of the disease. In fact, Aaby’s paper states very clearly that vaccinated children are no more protected from the measles than their unvaccinated peers.

In his opening paragraph, Aaby states:

“When vaccinated children develop measles it is usually assumed that seroconversion did not occur because maternal antibodies neutralized the vaccine, because immunoglobulins were administered simultaneously, or because improper handling of the vaccine inactivated it. Numerous cases of ‘vaccine failures’ have been noted in reports from developing countries. It is often claimed that such failures create a lack of confidence in the immunization program. Some investigators have therefore suggested that the age of the child at vaccination be raised to get a higher rate of seroconversion.” [10]

In other words, when a vaccinated child contracts the measles, instead of realizing that the vaccine is ineffective, scientists look for external reasons as to why the vaccination failed. For example, they may look for any environmental factors, which may have contributed.

In this instance, they blame maternal antibodies for seroconversion not occurring and the poor handling of the vaccines. (Seroconversion is the development of detectable specific antibodies specific to, and in response of a particular antigen, such as a virus or a vaccine.) [11]

Aaby continued by stating:

“In an urban area of Guinea-Bissau, where measles has been a major source of child mortality, an immuization program was introduced to control the disease. Nonetheless, measles has continued to cause many deaths, and many children are reported to catch measles after vaccination.”

Dr. Viera Scheibner’s detailed and valuable research supports Aaby’s findings. In her paper A Critique of the 16-Page Australian Pro-Vaccination Booklet Entitled ‘The Science of Immunisation: Questions and Answers,’ in the section titled Effectiveness of Vaccination, [12] she writes:

“Outbreaks in the fully vaccinated American children continued with increasing frequency and severity. Without disclosing the vaccination status of children in measles epidemics, claiming victory over measles is just empty jabbering.

Moreover, vaccinated children started developing an especially vicious form of atypical measles. Fulginiti described the occurrence of atypical measles in children given formaldehyde treated, aluminium precipitated measles vaccine, also referred to as “killed” measles.

He explained the problem as due to the altered immunological host response caused by vaccination.”

Up to this point atypical measles had only occurred in children who had received the ‘killed measles’ vaccine. However, Dr. Scheibner continued by adding:

“Later on, when live attenuated measles vaccine was introduced, the recipients starting developing atypical measles from it, as well.”

Dr. Scheibner continues by quoting a study, written by Rath and Schmidt, who studied 386 children who had received three doses of the killed measles vaccine. They discovered that when 125 of these children were later exposed to the measles virus, 54 of them developed measles. The authors concluded:

“It is obvious that three injections of killed vaccine had not protected a large percentage of children against measles when exposed within a period of two and a half years after immunization.”

Dr. Scheibner later explains how diseases such as whooping cough and measles can occur in ever-younger children not because the unvaccinated are spreading them, but because babies are born to vaccinated mothers who lack transplacentally transmitted immunity, which normally protects small babies against contracting any infectious disease.

She continues by adding that breastfed babies of vaccinated mothers are three times more likely to catch measles than baby’s breastfed by naturally immune mothers.

Various studies support this. A study titled Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage by Sandra Waaijenborg et al. published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases agrees. [13] Waajjenborg’s study researches whether using the MMR vaccine “successfully” for twenty years has adversely affected the maternal antibodies passed to infants by their mothers who were vaccinated as children. Her team concluded that:

“Children of mothers vaccinated against measles and possibly rubella have lower concentrations of maternal antibodies and lose protection by maternal antibodies at an earlier age than children of mothers in communities that oppose vaccination. This increases the risk of disease transmission in highly vaccinated populations.”

These studies and papers strongly support that vaccinated children still catch the diseases that they are vaccinated against and that vaccines are not only unsafe, but they are also totally ineffective.

Scare Tactics Used in the US

The US government has become so paranoid that unvaccinated children are a danger to the public that they have gone all-out to segregate them. The most outrageous vaccine segregation that I have ever heard of took place in at a school in Norwin, Pennsylvania, recently.

Nine students who had not received the chicken pox vaccination were informed that they would not be allowed to attend their prom unless they either received the chicken pox vaccination or had a blood test proving their immunity.

The panic came after a fellow student caught the disease. However, the students were later informed that they could attend the prom after all because the event didn’t fall within the time frame specified to avoid contagion and the school had miscalculated the dates. The health department recommended that students should be excluded eight to 21 days post-exposure to a person with chicken pox.

Pupils were informed that it was unclear whether or not they would be allowed to attend their graduation ceremony, which fell within the period spelled out by the health department.

Sadly, there has been no update on this story, so we do not know if they were allowed to attend their graduation or not. [14]

Conclusion

Despite the fact that study after study confirms that vaccinated children are no more protected than their unvaccinated peers, governments from around the world, hand-in-hand with Big Pharma and the medical professionals, keep coming up with more elaborate ways to force parents into vaccinating their children.

I find it very sad that governments are so keen to boost vaccination targets that they are denying parents the ability to earn a livelihood by denying their children’s admittance into day care. This seems to me to be over the top and completely unnecessary. How do governments expect parents to be able to support their family if their children are denied access to day care provisions?

Social play is an essential part of a child’s development and to deny children the right to play with their peers in a safe play environment purely because they are not vaccinated, in my opinion, amounts to little more than child abuse.

How is the Australian government planning to get around parents’ right to opt for natural immunity for their children? Are they planning on changing the law to make vaccination mandatory or will they just make it mandatory for parents who use day care facilities?

Furthermore, to deny students the opportunity of attending their graduation ceremony just because they are not vaccinated with the chicken pox vaccine is totally ridiculous. Graduating from high school is one of the biggest days in a student’s life. It is a once in lifetime occurrence. Once it is gone, it is gone.

It is about time that the governments wised up to the fact the unvaccinated children are the most protected children on the planet and that it is the vaccinated that are most at risk of disease and disability. They need to read the work of Dr. Scheibner and the many other researchers who have spent years studying the subject of vaccination and allow children to develop their own natural immunity.


- See more at: http://vactruth.com/2013/06/13/trick....akoRPQP2.dpuf

Hi op. Some doctors in Rome, Italy, linked sv40 to gliomas found in post mortem samples of autistic brains.

Sv40 could be causing tuberous sclerosis.

It's obvious that the CDC, like the FDA and other government entities have been hijacked by the large pharmaceutical corporations. In this story been mentioned and 98 million Americans had being vaccinated for polio during a specified period of time, but then they immediately tried to gloss over the effects of the contaminated vaccine by trying to postulate that only 20 to 30% of those vaccinated, had been exposed a contaminated sample. This is so irresponsible of them that it should be obvious they're trying to cover up their catastrophe. Unfortunately, most Americans have become so lazy and apathetic, as well as blindly trusting of the medical establishment, that only a few will ask how they could possibly know that such a small percentage of the vaccine were contaminated? Especially considering these vaccines were given almost 50 years ago.

Quote:

---

Posted by Irishquad

It's obvious that the CDC, like the FDA and other government entities have been hijacked by the large pharmaceutical corporations. In this story been mentioned and 98 million Americans had being vaccinated for polio during a specified period of time, but then they immediately tried to gloss over the effects of the contaminated vaccine by trying to postulate that only 20 to 30% of those vaccinated, had been exposed a contaminated sample. This is so irresponsible of them that it should be obvious they're trying to cover up their catastrophe. Unfortunately, most Americans have become so lazy and apathetic, as well as blindly trusting of the medical establishment, that only a few will ask how they could possibly know that such a small percentage of the vaccine were contaminated? Especially considering these vaccines were given almost 50 years ago.

---

This is no accident. Those Nazi scientists we brought over in Paperclip went right to work on this cancer time-bomb. The Rockef**kers & Co. didn't want to pay social security to the baby boomers,,,, so they said, come up with something that's going to kill them in their 50's and early 60's, after they have contributed their whole lives to the social security system. And as if killing us isn't enough (painfully and horribly, I might add).... those of us who manage stay healthy will have to face what George Carlin predicted was going to happen (bless his soul) : "They're coming for your social security, and they'll get it... it's a big f....kin club, and you ain't in it."

I just read two books that spell it all out and lots more.

Lee and Me by Judyth Vary Baker and Dr mary's Monkey by Ed Haslam.

Lots of documentation; mind blowing stuff.

We've been had ladies and gentlemen....

there's no such thing as a cancer virus but by saying this they (or rather the people who believe it) will create a lot of cancers. it's a self-fulfilling prophecy, very deviously done because most people don't know how cancer or other diseases are really created and will believe that they've been "infected". you have to give them credit for their ingenuity. creating new hidden ways to kill people by appearing remorseful.

Sorry if this has already been posted above. Read book, Dr. Mary's Monkey for a more in depth and monumentally strange investigation into this story.

Quote:

---

TheTruthIsInThere: there's no such thing as a cancer virus but by saying this they (or rather the people who believe it) will create a lot of cancers. it's a self-fulfilling prophecy, very deviously done because most people don't know how cancer or other diseases are really created and will believe that they've been "infected". you have to give them credit for their ingenuity. creating new hidden ways to kill people by appearing remorseful.

---

I was on the 'spiritual student' circuit for a very l-o-o-o-n-g time and I'm familiar with this belief which you are sharing with us all. There is truth in it for sure... BUT.. not the WHOLE truth. Things are way too mysterious for this to be the entire truth.

I always have noticed that what I believe or think is not wisdom... it is my direct experience which results in wisdom. I would like to share my direct experience here. It has been one of my great gifts to know some amazing 'healers' who work with technology outside of the Medical Model. One of these is a man who traverses continents to offer his services in communities who await his return a couple of times yearly. He is paid well, because what he does really works. He uses radionics (which detects and projects frequencies) to help people heal themselves.

There are lots of radionics practitioners out there who have machines with modest effectiveness. In this case Stefan uses special custom made quartz crystals with carbon fibre connections from the client to the radionics machine. His treatments are VERY effective. And... his cure rates very high. And all his method does is... analyze the frequencies in the body of the client for signatures from viruses and other pathogens. Then... a counter frequency is sent back to the body which eliminates the dis-ease frequencies. Within moments all symptoms of the disease vanish.

I was very surprised that he found several types of frequencies that he said belonged to 'onco- viruses' in my body 2 years ago. After a harrowing divorce and a somewhat traumatic transition in my life the previous year I was having a 'general check-up' from Stefan. Onco-viruses are known to create cancer. Stefan has found that about 7 of them plus a fungus or 2 are needed to actually create a cancerous tumor. Some of these cause pain throughout the body and this is what he discovered in my body. Within moments of finding about 4 of these viruses, and 'treating' each one, my entire body relaxed and I experienced a sudden cessation of pain throughout every cell. The pain and tension had crept up so slowly within my body that I had been unaware it was there until it let go.

So, it is all fine and well to speak of how we 'create' these things. However, perhaps consciousness creates them once they are thought up. And, we are not alone here. We are, in fact... ALL ONE.. which means that those (who appear to be our enemies and separate from us) can create things to punish or kill us if they choose. This is all part of the drama and trauma of appearing separate in this reality. If there is a 'me' and there is a 'you' and... there are 'them' ...then we can all play at creating war between ourselves. And this is what is done here on this planet, where everything eats everything else in order to remain alive. (plants might be the exceptions... but under time photography they appear to fight viciously among themselves to survive too)

We live in an energetic soup together. We are all influenced, not only by our OWN thoughts, but by all thoughts everywhere and everywhen. At this current time we are not conscious of most of them. For example, who says we ever need to eat? And who says we need to actually use our mouths and speak in order to communicate? Who decided that our bodies get old and eventually die? And who designed a world where everything must kill in order to live? We are in a strange reality for sure... and your statement does not take into account that there are 2 sides to the coin of existance. On one side all is emptiness and beingness (I AM), and the other side is separateness so that we can experience ourself (I AM ME)

When looking at this question Zen has some simple parable stories to tell. In one a master asks a Zen student if he has figured out the question 'Who Am I?'. The student responds I am everything... I am formless and I am infinate. The master raises his Zen stick and hits the student across his shoulders HARD! 'OUCH!', cries the student, 'What did you do that for?' 'Perhaps you do not have the entire answer', answers the master, 'If you are formless and eternal then what just happened?'

Your response here has triggered one of my pet peeves. It is a response from 'half way up the mountain'. Somehow you are using the idea that we are 'the creators' and combining it with the idea that there are 'devious' people out there who are separate from 'us'. This understanding is not complete.

How do you change something like this? By looking at if fully so that it is not sneaking around without your knowledge. Then by not giving it any energy. Being angry is energy as much as feeling like a victim is. Eventually, if you are successful, you just accept that this is life here in this reality.

I love the serenity poem, but I removed the parts of it I don't agree with. For example I no longer pray to a God who is separate from me...

..........Grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace.

So.. here is my question to you... What are you creating with your statement????

Quote:

---

TheTruthIsInThere: there's no such thing as a cancer virus but by saying this they (or rather the people who believe it) will create a lot of cancers. it's a self-fulfilling prophecy, very deviously done because most people don't know how cancer or other diseases are really created and will believe that they've been "infected". you have to give them credit for their ingenuity. creating new hidden ways to kill people by appearing remorseful.

---