Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy

Wow -another enormous huge let down here regarding a prominent figure in the disclosure of truth movement - the first being David wilcock. - Incredible!!!!

In regards to KC, I have great respect for her incredible body of work and the tremendous "gestalt" of information presented in those interviews - but have typically found her general " most of the time" interviewing style to be very difficult to listen to secondary to: too much interviewer interjection and continuous self -agrandizment.

Her credibility like DW's in now very much in question if not irreperable:

Knowing that KC and DW have the capacity to fabricate such incredible ( and at times ridiculous) stories regarding the life of Mark Richards, the SSP and related world events, for what I can only assume is for reasons of staying relavent and sustaining donational cash flow is both empowering and heartbreaking.

It is empowering because I am now am very clear that time is better spent in developing ones own intuition/discernment and in perfecting oneself than it is in following the machinations of unscrupulous, comprimised alternative media figures

And the Mark Richard interviews with Kerry goes to the 9th (hope this is the last inning)
Simon Parks is her go to guy for confirmations on Richard's 'data' on what's really happening around the universe these days. I caught a lot of misinformation in her talk but hey you guys know I'm a ............. if I disagree. I find it purely a coincidence (not) that she did another Mark interview this soon since the doc is gonna be coming out soon.


MARK RICHARDS INTERVIEW NINE

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xNinc9nUmXU

Quote:

---

ichingcarpenter, I caught a lot of misinformation in her talk but hey you guys know I'm a ............. if I disagree.

---

I can't believe she wants to claim "they" tried to stop her from visiting Mark Richards and it shortened her visiting time with him. She clearly violated the dress code and had to go to the "Friends Outside" trailer in the parking lot to borrow some clothes to be let in for her visit. I have been to that very same prison for visits at least 50 or even 100 times back in the 90s. The second time I visited I had to do the very same thing and borrow clothes from the "Friends Outside" trailer in the prison parking lot. I learned the dress code after that and I learned the name of the prison I was visiting the very first time I went. She did not have to get back on the bus and go back through processing because they would have never let her get through the visiting processing center first. I am very suspicious of exactly how many times Kerry has actually visited MR. They have a very strict dress code and they don't single out anyone unless they don't abide by it. They politely told me I could not visit wearing the pants I had on and told me the "Friends Outside" trailer in the parking lot would be more than happy to loan me some pants so I can visit. The whole process took about 10 minutes. The guards at the visiting processing center have always been very very kind and courteous to me the years I visited at that very same prison. I have never had any problems there. Sometimes the wait in line has taken a couple of hours but they have many hardened criminals housed at that prison and Mark Richards is no exception.

Furthermore and most importantly is the fact that you can take notes during the visit and the guards will even provide you with a pencil and paper. Under no circumstances will you be allowed to remove those notes with you and take them out of the prison when you have completed your visit. You will be arrested on the spot. We are searched when we go in and searched when we leave including taking off our shoes both times before walking through a metal detector. I'm not saying smuggling notes out cannot be done. If Kerry smuggled hand written notes out of the prison as she claims she can be arrested for a very serious crime and her visiting privileges for the inmate and convicted killer Mark Richards will be terminated. Mark Richards will also be up on more charges added to his life sentence without the possibility of parole. In his case they would remove some of his privileges he has earned in his 36 years of incarceration.

Update; After calling the prison a few hours ago they have informed me they changed their policy about taking notes out of the prison since I last visited there. I was told they can take notes out after their visit as long as they are reviewed by prison officials before leaving the prison.

It may be that because of Kerry's high profile and the fact that she's publishing info about her interviews, the prison is making her an exception to their usual rules.
But in any case, it's very sad to see Kerry going so far off the rails.
The Deep State must have some kind of technology that makes their targets quite daft.
I can't believe she was ever that clueless before.
And I think she may have spent too much time in Hollywood, which seems to be a more toxic environment than any sane person would want to be in for any longer than necessary.

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

It may be that because of Kerry's high profile and the fact that she's publishing info about her interviews, the prison is making her an exception to their usual rules.

---

No they never violate their own rules. Especially with an ordinary person visiting an inmate. If Kerry was an actual confirmed press with press credentials and went through the proper screening process the prison has a different set of rules. Kerry has no such credentials nor is she high profile other than in this community of ufology. Ufology, like it or not is a very small community in the world and prison officials at CSP Solano have no idea who she is other than a person on inmate Mark Richards's visiting list. There are many reasons notes cannot be removed from the prison bypassing prison security. All letters mailed to and from prisoners are opened and screened before being forwarded. They check for contraband and other things i.e. escape attempts or other crimes being planned and orchestrated from inside the prison by inmates. Kerry Cassidy is no Charlie Rose or Diane Sawyer.

You may well be right, of course.
I think of Kerry as having a high profile in conspiracy theory circles as a whistleblower, which prison officials may not consider important, but Deep State officials certainly may, and as puppet masters, they are known for pulling strings. ( This is just speculation on my part, obviously.
Perhaps I'm just reluctant to entertain the thought that Kerry might have actually arrived at the low point where she is out and out lying, though I have no problem believing that Richards is an out and out liar. )

Quote:

---

Posted by onawah

It may be that because of Kerry's high profile and the fact that she's publishing info about her interviews, the prison is making her an exception to their usual rules.

---

Quote:

---

Posted by geofffxdwg

No they never violate their own rules. Especially with an ordinary person visiting an inmate. If Kerry was an actual confirmed press with press credentials and went through the proper screening process the prison has a different set of rules. Kerry has no such credentials nor is she high ...

---

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation - Writing, Telephoning and Visiting an Inmate

...All inmates are allowed visits with approved visitors. If a media representative wishes to visit an inmate, write to the inmate and ask him/her to send you a CDC Form 106, Visiting Questionnaire. Your completed questionnaire must be submitted and approved by the institution before your visit. The application process takes about 30 working days. All approved visitors - friend, relative, attorney, or member of the media - may visit; however, they may not bring in cameras or recording devices. The institution will provide, upon request, pencil and paper to an adult visitor as needed. For more information about visiting, call the toll-free CDCR Visitation Information number at 1-800-374-8474 or the Visitation page.

[full section here]

I just got off the phone with the prison and they have changed their policy regarding taking notes out of the prison after visiting. They allow it after they review them.

Quote:

---

Posted by geofffxdwg

I just got off the phone with the prison and they have changed their policy regarding taking notes out of the prison after visiting. They allow it after they review them.

---

We can surmise that the rule was in effect before January 1, 2017. California Code of Regulations: Title 15 (2017) Rules and Regulations of Adult Institutions, Programs, and Parole — Updated through January 1, 2017.

page 129:
(2) During an interview conducted pursuant to subsection 3261.5(b), news media and non-news media representatives shall be allowed to bring up to three (3) pens, three (3) pencils and one (1) pad of paper into the facility. These items shall be searched to protect against an immediate and direct threat to the security of the institution.

https://i.imgur.com/F5VZkI8.gif

Re-listening to the beginning of this 1st Mark Richards interview, I see how naive I was five years ago.
............http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/belly-laugh.gif

TOTAL RECALL MY INTERVIEW WITH MARK RICHARDS - INTERVIEW I

This is an interview with Captain Mark Richards conducted at Vacaville Prison on November 2, 2013. This is the first time in the over 30 years of his incarceration, that any journalist has interviewed him. I was not allowed to document this face-to-face interview with camera or any recording devices or to take notes during the interview. Everything you are about to see has been recalled from memory immediately after my meeting with him.

@ 4:09 Kerry explains how there’s no tech allowed in the prison and @ 8:51 Kerry has just come out to begin video portion.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5bPhG3WP2xM

Project Camelot

Published on Nov 8, 2013

I just listened to the beginning of Kerry's report on her interview with Mark Richard and she speaks right away about the British interviewers taking the side of the murderer who commited the murder for which Mark Richard is paying bla bla bla..

Right from the start, Kerry is showing us that she does not understands much of true in depth journalism, my gosh!.

A journalist does not take side, the British guys do not, a journalist does the inquest to find the truth and for this, they look at all sides.

If Richard does not want to give them an interview, not much they can do to give his side on one hand, on the other hand, they are doing the job Kerry should have done to start with. The fault is hers, not theirs. She is the one taking a side without any regard for any other side, doesn't she sees it? Surprising

To me, she is compromised at least for keeping her membership going, if not more. Or she lost some critical thinking abilities.

Also, she has never been truly played before by psychopaths and won't admit she does not understands what she is dealing with.

We are all fighting manipulations and lies and the psychopaths of this world, and she falls face first in it, not even aware she is. So disconcerting truly.

Even her being targeted for the dress code, please, high heels can be used to kill, baggy pants and tops can be used to hide weapons (high heel for example), etc. You would not believe what a criminal can hide in his clothes, so as I understand it, this is not personal targeting.

Follow the evidence. Geoff will show his evidence in his and Kevin’s documentary. Until then we patiently wait and thankfully the criminal remains in custody either way. The legal case has already been decided (past tense).

What is apparently happening here is an effort to rightfully correct the narrative so that a murder victim’s name and memory are appropriately remembered and not forgotten.

Hopefully also to help Kerry to wake up and understand how badly she's been had...

Quote:

---

Posted by Joe from the Carolinas

What is apparently happening here is an effort to rightfully correct the narrative so that a murder victim’s name and memory are appropriately remembered and not forgotten.

---

If I remember correctly Kerry once spoke about "triangulating" information. According to her a technique used by the cia to determine whether information is possibly true or not. The difference being that the cia does not openly speak about this on a youtube channel though.

I guess it means when 3 seemingly or in reality unconnected sources tell the same story it is likely to be true.

In Kerry's case it means when 3 people (for instance Mark Richards, Eddie Page and Simon Parkes) tell her the same BS it has to be true in Kerry's world.
That's not really a good way to do truth finding is it ? In fact, that's BS journalism. Good luck with that !

If you don't follow the journalistic principals then don't call yourself a journalist. And if you don't do a proper investigation then don't call yourself an investigative journalist.
Camelot has become utter garbage by now. No wonder "whistleblowers" are backing out.

I'm quite sure most of her info can be easily debunked by someone who really does some proper investigation. It's not really worth the trouble in most cases I think, but still.

Anyway, it's more preaching to the choir here isn't it ?

At the 12:38 minute mark of this 2009 interview with Dr. Stephen Greer, Kerry Cassidy says that a "secret witness" told her that the world would run out of food in 10 months and that we had 4 years of air left in the world.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hzqDVOjtNhg

I bet it was 'captain' Mark Ridiculous who told her that.

I'm getting a red, red wine vibe from her

Quote:

---

Posted by ichingcarpenter

At the 12:38 minute mark of this 2009 interview with Dr. Stephen Greer, Kerry Cassidy says that a "secret witness" told her that the world would run out of food in 10 months and that we had 4 years of air left in the world.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hzqDVOjtNhg

I bet it was 'captain' Mark Ridiculous who told her that.

I'm getting a red, red wine vibe from her

---

Is the term whistle blower so corrupted that we now use the term "secret witness"??? Would one brain cell of common sense tell you that there is something amiss with a "secret witness" telling you we have 4 months left of oxygen and 10 months left of food on this planet and something is off here. She interrupts him with this statement like it's a big deal. When the time is up and nothing happens will she discredit this person??? Absolutely not, nothing more will be said and those that "follow" her won't bat an eye. And of course, the person that provided the "intel" is a "secret witness" so his/her reputation doesn't need to take a hit. I actually feel embarrassed for her watching her child like enthusiasm over it.

I'd like to know how the air gives out in 4 months? Does all the vegetation die off in 2 months??? What about the food...Absolutely no crops next year and all the animals die?????Does the 10 months mean all preserved food is gone??? Here's the big elephant in the roomA little common sense goes a long way and this woman seems to have lost whatever she had.

This video has over 500 thousand watches, I wonder how many even gave this a second thought.. we will never know because the comments are conveniently disabled.Are we living in the age where common sense and reason are just plain gone????

Quote:

---

Posted by ichingcarpenter

At the 12:38 minute mark of this 2009 interview with Dr. Stephen Greer, Kerry Cassidy says that a "secret witness" told her that the world would run out of food in 10 months and that we had 4 years of air left in the world.

I bet it was 'captain' Mark Ridiculous who told her that.

I'm getting a red, red wine vibe from her

---

I remember that (the Greer interview was in 2009, btw), and as best I recall her source was someone who had e-mailed her several times and who we'd actually both spoken to; I'd never given it any credence. He always called himself 'Waterman', or 'Dr. Waterman', and we have his real name. He was a medical doctor. He's referenced several times in this list of old Camelot audio interviews.

• http://projectcamelot.org/audio_interviews.html

Quote:

---

peterpam; Here's the big elephant in the room. If we run out of oxygen in 4 months, who is going to give a crap about running out of food in 10 months?A little common sense goes a long way and this woman seems to have lost whatever she had.

This video has over 500 thousand watches, I wonder how many even gave this a second thought.. we will never know because the comments are conveniently disabled.Are we living in the age where common sense and reason are just plain gone????

---

I cannot agree more. Thank you peterpam. She constantly does this now. As far as the Mark Richards material goes that she has been releasing, every shred of it is a complete falsehood and she knows it. There is simply no way she couldn't know it.

This is part of an email exchange Kerry has posted on her website between her and Eddie Page
Attachment 39293

I just can't believe the level of dishonesty and lies Kerry will stoop to. Kevin Moore has no power to get Crossan Hoover paroled from a state prison in the United States of America. No more so than any of us here commenting or reading this thread have. Crossan Hoover has spent 37 years of his 25 years to life sentence in prison. He has had numerous parole hearings and been denied. We are still interviewing him to this day. His hearing was on the 25th of last month. To insinuate he got a release date because he has been talking to us and continues to talk to us this very day is a perfect example of what a fraud Kerry Cassidy has become. At this point I'm not sure who is the bigger liar. Mark Richards or Kerry Cassidy? The level or ignorance of anyone supporting and believing these lies is staggering. Almost biblical.......

Quote:

---

Posted by peterpam

Quote:

---

Posted by ichingcarpenter

At the 12:38 minute mark of this 2009 interview with Dr. Stephen Greer, Kerry Cassidy says that a "secret witness" told her that the world would run out of food in 10 months and that we had 4 years of air left in the world.

---

Is the term whistle blower so corrupted that we now use the term "secret witness"??? Would one brain cell of common sense tell you that there is something amiss with a "secret witness" telling you we have 4 months left of oxygen and 10 months left of food on this planet and something is off here. She interrupts him with this statement like it's a big deal. When the time is up and nothing happens will she discredit this person??? Absolutely not, nothing more will be said and those that "follow" her won't bat an eye. And of course, the person that provided the "intel" is a "secret witness" so his/her reputation doesn't need to take a hit. I actually feel embarrassed for her watching her child like enthusiasm over it.

I'd like to know how the air gives out in 4 months? Does all the vegetation die off in 2 months??? What about the food...Absolutely no crops next year and all the animals die?????Does the 10 months mean all preserved food is gone??? Here's the big elephant in the room. If we run out of oxygen in 4 months, who is going to give a crap about running out of food in 10 months?A little common sense goes a long way and this woman seems to have lost whatever she had.

This video has over 500 thousand watches, I wonder how many even gave this a second thought.. we will never know because the comments are conveniently disabled.Are we living in the age where common sense and reason are just plain gone????

---

Peterpam, you are mixing up years and months.

Well, not that it matters. It’s crazy anyway.

Attachment 39295

Mark Richards's wife at the time he conspired and committed the murder of Richard A. Baldwin. This is a very compelling interview and she is such a nice honest person. A lovely lady to say the least. BTW her name is Caryn Bacon.

Quote:

---

Posted by geofffxdwg

Attachment 39295

Mark Richards's wife at the time he conspired and committed the murder of Richard A. Baldwin. This is a very compelling interview and she is such a nice honest person. A lovely lady to say the least.

---

I look forward to the interview, geoff. http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/smilies/hi-five.gif