I've been reading these letters over the last day ... awesome material, and quite relevant to the current events discussed in the above interview of Dr. Francis Boyle by Alex Jones.Quote:
Posted by DreamsInDigital
Printable View
I've been reading these letters over the last day ... awesome material, and quite relevant to the current events discussed in the above interview of Dr. Francis Boyle by Alex Jones.Quote:
Posted by DreamsInDigital
Sorry forgot to post other parts. Here they are.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8LMc8...ture=endscreen
https://youtube.com/watch?v=8LMc8...ture=endscreen
https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=i2SwP_82hv8
https://youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=i2SwP_82hv8
https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=dq-6e0VRo4A
https://youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=dq-6e0VRo4A
Hi Steve Ecnal61 and myself were talking about that this morning, can we some how stop it through our positive thought conciousness etc. its worth a try.If we really are the creators maybe this can be avoided...The other parts are defo worth a watch now ive remembered to post them lol.Quote:
Posted by Cidersomerset
I don't think I should have watched the rest of this before I went to bed...LOL..
Kissenger' blood thirsty jeckal' I didn't like him before this and I can believe
he called the troops 'dumb animals'....
God knows what he thinks of us ...LOL..
probably dream about him now...'nightmare'...lol.. Steve
"A possible assassination threat on Barack Obama if he doesn't play ball"
LOL
Obama doesn't possess the ball, never had and never will. The 47 layers above him are in possession of it. So how can he play ball if he doesn't posses it? Hope I cleared the air.
There is still one missing, from what I've heard. Nothing I've heard since, has changed that from missing -to found.Quote:
rogue nukes being flown across the US by some authority in the US
That missing nuke might play a part of any given false flag scenario.
jfk wanted no part of vietnam yet, they killed him in broad daylight in front of citizens with his wife right next to him, and got away with it. one man with a five round clip, and a bolt action rifle scored three or four headshots at a moving target right under the noses of the secret service ?? yeah right. I guess if the public likes you that's to much power. put nothing past the ptb, people with no humanity.
Some kid, with specia gift ofprediction, once said, he will be assassinated, or die in the following years.
However, i understand he is pushed by other layers above him. But because peple usually dont know that.. The staged thing can be a trigger to a major reason to go war. Because we need war anyway (in some sort of way)
It is supposedly in the Chicago area from 'things' I have heard. Silverstein bought the Sears Tower with the money he got from his insurance on the Twin Towers. Probably all disconnected facts. :jester:Quote:
Posted by Carmody
Snippet from Article: (link at bottom of post)
Here five things that prove to me that your "hope and change" was a fraud, and that you're a stooge for the elite:
1 - Continuing The Iraq & Afghanistan Debacles
You knew that our invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan went against every moral compass you claim to possess.
You knew the Iraq thing was all about lies and disinformation. You knew we had no legal or moral justification to bomb the hell out of that country and then invade and occupy it. You could have told Congress and the American people that funding such a disgrace would bankrupt us financially and spiritually… as it has.
As president, you could have and should have used the bully pulpit to alter the conversation and push for a withdrawal of forces and funds immediately.
Yes, you would have gotten slack from it, yet with folks like Republicans Ron Paul and Walter Jones, and Democrats like Dennis Kucinich and many others, the case would have been one of a bipartisan nature.
The fact is, Barack, that most Americans would have agreed with you, despite the bought-and-paid for mainstream media with its phony left-and-right slants. As far as Afghanistan, this whole ‘get those who did 9/11’ (if they were even the real culprits) action should have been part of a United Nations policing effort… not a vendetta or revenge act of imperialism.
By now you should realize that it really had very little, if at all, to do with Bin Laden or Al Qaeda. It was about extending our power to that region. History should have taught you, the scholar, that no foreigners have ever successfully colonized or occupied Afghanistan.
How many of our own former military officers and CIA analysts do you need to tell you that?
2 - Increasing Funding For This Military Empire
You have turned out to be the same as that jackass who you followed into the Oval Office.
Instead of drawing down our 800+ bases worldwide and cutting this outrageous military spending, you give us halfhearted political stunts. The military spending last year was over 560 billion dollars… and that does not include the black budget that even you probably know very little about (so much for who runs things Barack).
Ten years ago, the military spending was almost half of what it is now! We now spend, and you know this, Mr. President, 56 cents of every federal tax dollar on it… and you say we need economic stimulus!?
Now, you are being forced, along with Congress, to cut spending. The plan you are selling us is a joke Barack, and you know it! It comes out to less than 8 % a year over 10 years. Ron Paul says all the cuts should be completed in one year!
How many more foreclosures, lost jobs, homeless, hungry, medically untreated and underwater Americans need you see before you 'Get it'?
Five Reasons Why Obama is a Proven Stooge of The Global Elite ~ Full Article Here.
Fooled me once, shame on him.
Fooled me twice, shame on me!
:yo:
Someone sent me this email. I am thankful to whomever researched it. Sorry if it has already been posted.
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American' when the term wasn't even used at that time?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known then as the " British East Africa Protectorate".
3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
Resources: http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-c...s/default.aspx Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Kenya
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?????
Please send this to everyone you know with the hope that we can force the media as well OUR NATION to address this CORRUPTION.
I think the underlying real reason he would be killed is to bring in Full-scale Marshal law or have vice president as a constitutional Dictator.Quote:
Posted by WhiteFeather
I hate to say it, but all of this is about the President getting re-elected. Blame it on the right-wing extremists " that never wanted a black man to be President", blame it on the Muslims "that want to kill us", but deflect, deflect, deflect. If it's a referendum on him, then he loses.
KISSENGER thinks of US as GOYM/CHATTLE
Bad spelling will not improve his opinion, LOL.Quote:
Posted by Lifebringer
¤=[Post Update]=¤
We have to spell right if we are to dispel such notions about us.Quote:
Posted by Cidersomerset
¤=[Post Update]=¤
We seem to be on a mission to allow certain ones to question our ability to spell. Never helpful when they are calling you dumb.Quote:
Posted by WhiteFeather
What does it matter if the said appears to "play ball" or not, for these words imply the said has authority, power and control. For has not the said been doing what "they" wish; is it not so, that when one of his kind stops... they simply cease to be without warning!?Quote:
Posted by winston smith1971
FYI:
"US President Barack Obama has told Congress that the sanctions his administration imposed on Libya last year will be extended for another year, White House officials said.
Obama informed Congress on Thursday that the national emergency order allowing sanctions against Libya will continue, noting that Washington was concerned by ongoing threats posed to US interests by the family of Libya's slain dictator Muammar Gaddafi.
“The situation in Libya continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” Obama said in a letter to congressional leaders.
“We need to protect against this threat and the diversion of assets or other abuse by certain members of Gaddafi’s family and other former regime officials," he said.
"Therefore, I have determined that it is necessary to continue the national emergency with respect to Libya," he wrote.
Obama declared the national emergency over Libya on February 25, 2011, citing threats to US national security and foreign policy posed by Gaddafi and his government in their "extreme measures" against the people of Libya.
National emergency regulations authorize the US president to impose sanctions on foreign countries.
Sanctions imposed on overseas Libyan assets by the United Nations, the United States, and other nations have unwound slowly since Gaddafi’s death last year. However, releasing the assets is both politically and legally complicated, because the frozen funds include investments and property owned by private individuals. "
source
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/228305.html
Update on lawsuit:
Why I'm Suing Obama, by Chris Hedges
Attorneys Carl J. Mayer and Bruce I. Afran filed a complaint Friday in the Southern U.S. District Court in New York City on my behalf as a plaintiff against Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to challenge the legality of the Authorization for Use of Military Force as embedded in the latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act, signed by the president Dec. 31.
The act authorizes the military in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled “Counter-Terrorism,” for the first time in more than 200 years, to carry out domestic policing. With this bill, which will take effect March 3, the military can indefinitely detain without trial any U.S. citizen deemed to be a terrorist or an accessory to terrorism. And suspects can be shipped by the military to our offshore penal colony in Guantanamo Bay and kept there until “the end of hostilities.” It is a catastrophic blow to civil liberties.
I spent many years in countries where the military had the power to arrest and detain citizens without charge. I have been in some of these jails. I have friends and colleagues who have “disappeared” into military gulags. I know the consequences of granting sweeping and unrestricted policing power to the armed forces of any nation. And while my battle may be quixotic, it is one that has to be fought if we are to have any hope of pulling this country back from corporate fascism.
Section 1031 of the bill defines a “covered person”—one subject to detention—as “a person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.”
The bill, however, does not define the terms “substantially supported,” “directly supported” or “associated forces.”
I met regularly with leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. I used to visit Palestine Liberation Organization leaders, including Yasser Arafat and Abu Jihad, in Tunis when they were branded international terrorists. I have spent time with the Revolutionary Guard in Iran and was in northern Iraq and southeastern Turkey with fighters from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party. All these entities were or are labeled as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government. What would this bill have meant if it had been in place when I and other Americans traveled in the 1980s with armed units of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua or the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front guerrillas in El Salvador? What would it have meant for those of us who were with the southern insurgents during the civil war in Yemen or the rebels in the southern Sudan? I have had dinner more times than I can count with people whom this country brands as terrorists. But that does not make me one.
Once a group is deemed to be a terrorist organization, whether it is a Palestinian charity or an element of the Uighur independence movement, the military can under this bill pick up a U.S. citizen who supported charities associated with the group or unwittingly sent money or medical supplies to front groups. We have already seen the persecution and closure of Islamic charity organizations in the United States that supported the Palestinians. Now the members of these organizations can be treated like card-carrying “terrorists” and sent to Guantanamo.
But I suspect the real purpose of this bill is to thwart internal, domestic movements that threaten the corporate state. The definition of a terrorist is already so amorphous under the Patriot Act that there are probably a few million Americans who qualify to be investigated if not locked up. Consider the arcane criteria that can make you a suspect in our new military-corporate state. The Department of Justice considers you worth investigating if you are missing a few fingers, if you have weatherproof ammunition, if you own guns or if you have hoarded more than seven days of food in your house. Adding a few of the obstructionist tactics of the Occupy movement to this list would be a seamless process. On the whim of the military, a suspected “terrorist” who also happens to be a U.S. citizen can suffer extraordinary rendition—being kidnapped and then left to rot in one of our black sites “until the end of hostilities.” Since this is an endless war that will be a very long stay.
This demented “war on terror” is as undefined and vague as such a conflict is in any totalitarian state. Dissent is increasingly equated in this country with treason. Enemies supposedly lurk in every organization that does not chant the patriotic mantras provided to it by the state. And this bill feeds a mounting state paranoia. It expands our permanent war to every spot on the globe. It erases fundamental constitutional liberties. It means we can no longer use the word “democracy” to describe our political system.
The supine and gutless Democratic Party, which would have feigned outrage if George W. Bush had put this into law, appears willing, once again, to grant Obama a pass. But I won’t. What he has done is unforgivable, unconstitutional and exceedingly dangerous. The threat and reach of al-Qaida—which I spent a year covering for The New York Times in Europe and the Middle East—are marginal, despite the attacks of 9/11. The terrorist group poses no existential threat to the nation. It has been so disrupted and broken that it can barely function. Osama bin Laden was gunned down by commandos and his body dumped into the sea. Even the Pentagon says the organization is crippled. So why, a decade after the start of the so-called war on terror, do these draconian measures need to be implemented? Why do U.S. citizens now need to be specifically singled out for military detention and denial of due process when under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force the president can apparently find the legal cover to serve as judge, jury and executioner to assassinate U.S. citizens, as he did in the killing of the cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen? Why is this bill necessary when the government routinely ignores our Fifth Amendment rights—“No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law”—as well as our First Amendment right of free speech? How much more power do they need to fight “terrorism”?
Fear is the psychological weapon of choice for totalitarian systems of power. Make the people afraid. Get them to surrender their rights in the name of national security. And then finish off the few who aren’t afraid enough. If this law is not revoked we will be no different from any sordid military dictatorship. Its implementation will be a huge leap forward for the corporate oligarchs who plan to continue to plunder the nation and use state and military security to cow the population into submission.
The oddest part of this legislation is that the FBI, the CIA, the director of national intelligence, the Pentagon and the attorney general didn’t support it. FBI Director Robert Mueller said he feared the bill would actually impede the bureau’s ability to investigate terrorism because it would be harder to win cooperation from suspects held by the military. “The possibility looms that we will lose opportunities to obtain cooperation from the persons in the past that we’ve been fairly successful in gaining,” he told Congress.
But it passed anyway. And I suspect it passed because the corporations, seeing the unrest in the streets, knowing that things are about to get much worse, worrying that the Occupy movement will expand, do not trust the police to protect them. They want to be able to call in the Army. And now they can.
Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Truthdig.com
From the Heart,
Wormhole
****
I think there was supposed to be news of this today? Anybody hear?
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/media-fin...o-eligibility/
--- Watch these videos below - A LOT OF EVIDENCE ACTUALLY --- amazing really!
https://youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=ID_KfcmG9gs
https://youtube.com/watch?v=S40WK...layer_embedded
https://youtube.com/watch?v=-qDzM...layer_embedded
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WQUGw...layer_embedded
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jgTZU...ayer_embedded#!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=CHAM3...layer_embedded